Acta Neuropathologica

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 259–271

Identification of novel pathways involved in the pathogenesis of human adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma

  • Cynthia L. Andoniadou
  • Carles Gaston-Massuet
  • Rukmini Reddy
  • Ralph P. Schneider
  • Maria A. Blasco
  • Paul Le Tissier
  • Thomas S. Jacques
  • Larysa H. Pevny
  • Mehul T. Dattani
  • Juan Pedro Martinez-Barbera
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

Activating mutations in the gene encoding β-catenin have been identified in the paediatric form of human craniopharyngioma (adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, ACP), a histologically benign but aggressive pituitary tumour accounting for up to 10% of paediatric intracranial tumours. Recently, we generated an ACP mouse model and revealed that, as in human ACP, nucleocytoplasmic accumulation of β-catenin (β-catnc) and over-activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway occurs only in a very small proportion of cells, which form clusters. Here, combining mouse genetics, fluorescence labelling and flow-sorting techniques, we have isolated these cells from tumorigenic mouse pituitaries and shown that the β-catnc cells are enriched for colony-forming cells when cultured in stem cell-promoting media, and have longer telomeres, indicating shared properties with normal pituitary progenitors/stem cells (PSCs). Global gene profiling analysis has revealed that these β-catnc cells express high levels of secreted mitogenic signals, such as members of the SHH, BMP and FGF family, in addition to several chemokines and their receptors, suggesting an important autocrine/paracrine role of these cells in the pathogenesis of ACP and a reciprocal communication with their environment. Finally, we highlight the clinical relevance of these findings by showing that these pathways are also up-regulated in the β-catnc cell clusters identified in human ACP. As well as providing further support to the concept that pituitary stem cells may play an important role in the oncogenesis of human ACP, our data reveal novel disease biomarkers and potential pharmacological targets for the treatment of these devastating childhood tumours.

Keywords

Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma β-Catenin Mouse Pituitary tumour Stem cells 

Introduction

Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is the most common non-neuro-epithelial brain tumour in children [31, 43, 47]. Although not metastatic and histologically benign, ACP is invasive and prone to recurrence after surgery, the conventional mode of treatment. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma often behaves aggressively with invasion of the hypothalamus and visual pathways. Therefore, total resection of the tumour without damage to vital surrounding structures such as the hypothalamus and optic chiasm is not always possible. In these children, radical excision is associated with unacceptable morbidity and mortality whilst subtotal resection without adjuvant radiotherapy predisposes to a high (>60%) 3-year recurrence risk and further hypothalamic and visual compromise [34, 38, 44]. Although a conservative surgical approach with adjuvant radiotherapy for residual tumour has been recently adopted, both tumour recurrence and treatment-associated morbidity are still high. Consequences of the tumour and its treatment include obesity with associated Type 2 diabetes mellitus, learning difficulties, visual impairment and panhypopituitarism, which can be life-threatening. This poses a heavy burden to parents and carers as well as a heavy cost for health services.

A crucial role for Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the aetiology of ACP has been firmly established. Activating mutations in the gene encoding β-catenin (CTNNB1) have been identified in the majority of samples of human ACP [9, 51]. Recently, phenotypic analysis of a mouse model (Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+) expressing a mutant form of β-catenin that cannot be degraded, leading to over-activation of the pathway, has confirmed that these mutations, rather than a second hit, are causative of the tumours [18]. A characteristic histological finding in both human and mouse ACP is the restricted nucleocytoplasmic accumulation of β-catenin and over-activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in very few cells that form clusters (β-catnc clusters). Despite harbouring the tumorigenic mutation in the β-catenin gene, all other cells only show the normal β-catenin staining in the cytoplasmic membrane without any nucleocytoplasmic accumulation (non-cluster β-catm cellular component of ACP) [18, 25, 26, 32]. Beyond the relevant diagnostic value of this unique histological feature to distinguish ACP from other pituitary tumours, little is known about the reason for this specificity or the relevance of the cluster cells in the disease. Recent evidence points towards a role in tumour progression and invasiveness into the brain [8, 27, 28, 29]. A deeper analysis of these cellular structures may provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of ACP resulting in the identification of new disease biomarkers and pharmacological targets.

An open question is the contribution of pituitary progenitors/stem cells (PSCs) in the aetiology and pathogenesis of ACP. Previously, we have demonstrated that one of the initial effects of mutated β-catenin is the increase of PSCs in the ACP murine model compared with control pituitaries. At late gestation and early postnatal stages, a proportion of β-catenin-accumulating cells within the clusters express the stemness marker SOX2 in the murine pre-tumoral pituitary [14, 18]. However, SOX2 is not expressed in the β-catenin accumulating clusters in human ACP, but rather in sporadic cells within the tumour [17]. This raises the question of what the connection is between the human and mouse β-catenin-accumulating clusters.

In this study, we have used the ACP mouse model to investigate the pathogenesis and the possible involvement of PSCs in the aetiology of human ACP. We demonstrate that β-catenin-accumulating cluster cells have functional and molecular characteristics of pituitary progenitors/stem cells. We present their global gene expression profile and reveal novel genes and signalling pathways expressed in both mouse and human ACP. This molecular analysis highlights interplay between clusters and surrounding cells through the secretion of signals involved in proliferation, survival, stem cell maintenance, cell migration and tumorigenesis.

Materials and methods

Mice

The Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+, Hesx1-Cre and BAT-gal mice have been previously described [2, 24, 41].

X-gal staining, in situ hybridisation and immunostaining

Wholemount X-gal staining, immunostaining and in situ hybridisation on 8 μm paraffin sections were performed as previously described [2, 18]. Samples of human ACP were obtained from the Department of Histopathology at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. At least three pituitaries or tumours and between two and six slides were analysed. As negative controls, sections were hybridized with sense riboprobes for in situ hybridisation or secondary antibody alone for immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence.

Immuno-FISH

Paraffin tissue slides were deparaffinised and underwent citrate antigen retrieval, before a fluorescent is situ hybridisation was performed as previously described [49], After washing, the slides were incubated overnight with an anti β-catenin antibody (Sigma, dilution 1:100). The primary antibody was detected with an Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody before DNA counterstaining with DAPI in a 4 μg/ml solution in PBS. The slides were mounted using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories).

The β-catenin/telomere immuno-FISH 8-bit pictures were acquired with a Leica TCS-SP5 (AOBS) high-resolution confocal microscope. A 63×-Leica immersion objective was used with an additional magnification of 2.5×. Stacks of seven pictures were taken with a step size of 0.8 μm. Those were further maximum projected by the LAS AF software (Leica) for analysis. Fluorescence analysis of intensities was performed with Definiens Developer XD1.8 software (Definiens). The β-catnc cluster and the β-catm surrounding cells used for the telomere analysis were selected by hand according to the β-catenin immunofluorescence staining.

Flow sorting

The β-catenin-accumulating cellular fraction (β-catnc cluster cells) was purified from surrounding (β-catm) cells of Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal pituitaries by flow sorting taking advantage of their activation of the BAT-gal reporter. The BAT-gal transgene expresses lacZ (encoding β-galactosidase) under the regulation of TCF/LEF binding sites in cells with activated Wnt/β-catenin signalling [41]. For the assessment of the colony-forming potential of β-catnc cluster cells, three independent flow-sorting experiments were performed using a total of 17 Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal pituitaries at 18.5 dpc. In brief, cells were dissociated by incubation for 4 h at 37°C in an enzyme mix containing collagenase type II (Sigma), trypsin (Gibco) and DNase I (Worthington) in HBSS (Gibco). After washing in HBSS, the cells were manually dissociated and then treated using the CMFDG kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s recommendations, to yield a fluorescent product when the CMFDG substrate is cleaved by β-galactosidase. The cells were flow-sorted immediately in PBS containing 1% fetal calf serum and 25 mM HEPES using a MoFlo XDP (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California, USA). GFP fluorescence was detected using a 530/40 filter, and dead and auto-fluorescent cells were excluded using propidium iodide (Invitrogen) using a 613/20 filter. The analysis for cell sorting was carried out on Summit software (Dako). Flow sorting of cells from Sox2eGFP/+ pituitaries was carried out as above, without CMFDG treatment or addition of propidium iodide. The data presented were obtained from three independent experiments using a total of 19 Sox2eGFP/+ mice of 6–8 weeks of age. For subsequent culture, the cells were collected in culture medium and for RNA isolation, in RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen), flash frozen and stored at −80°C until processed.

Cell culture

Single cells were cultured as adherent colonies using methods described by Gleiberman et al. [20] and plated at a clonal density of 20 cells per well of a 96-well plate (roughly 60 cells per cm2), or graded densities (1,000–4,000 cells per well) in six-well plates. The colonies were fixed after 1 week and stained with haematoxylin as previously described [18].

RNA extraction, microarray methods and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA isolation from pituitaries and flow-sorted cells was performed as described using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) [3]. Approximately 3,000 β-catnc cluster cells were obtained from seven independent flow-sorting experiments of dissociated and CMFDG treated Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal pituitaries (n = 15 mice). Linear amplification of purified RNA was carried out using the Ovation Pico WTA System (NuGEN), following manufacturer’s recommendations, yielding approximately 5.5 μg of polyadenylated RNA. From this, 3.0 μg were used for microarray analysis, using standard Affymetrix labelling and hybridization protocols for hybridization on GeneChip Mouse 430_2 arrays. The remaining 2.5 μg were reverse transcribed to cRNA with Omniscript RT (Qiagen) and random hexamers (Promega) and used for qRT-PCR. RNA from Sox2eGFP/+ flow-sorted pituitaries was isolated and processed as described and used only for qRT-PCR analyses. Reactions were run in triplicate on an ABI 7500 Fast cycler using MESA Blue reagent (Eurogentec) and repeated for a minimum of four independent samples for each cell type. Primer sequences are available on request. Results were analysed using the ΔΔCt method.

Results

β-Catenin-accumulating cells from tumorigenic murine pituitaries share properties with normal pituitary progenitors/stem cells

We have previously shown that tumorigenic pituitaries from Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ mice contain higher numbers of cells with clonogenic potential, this being the ability to form colonies comprised of undifferentiated progenitors when cultured in stem-cell-promoting media [18]. However, it is not known whether these clonogenic cells correspond to the population accumulating β-catenin in the nucleus and cytoplasm (β-catnc clusters) or those showing only the normal membranous or sub-membranous β-catenin localization (β-catm) without any nucleocytoplasmic accumulation. This is clinically relevant since these two cell populations exist in human ACP and indeed, the presence of β-catnc clusters is used as a diagnostic histopathological feature that differentiates human ACP from other brain tumours of the sellar and suprasellar areas of the brain [26]. To provide insights into the cellular nature of β-catnc clusters, we carried out detailed molecular and cell culture analyses in the mouse model.

As activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, as assessed by the expression of Wnt/β-catenin target genes, is restricted to the β-catnc clusters in both mouse and human ACP [29, 52], we used a genetic tool in mouse to enable their purification. Specifically, we employed the BAT-gal mouse strain, a reporter line of active Wnt/β-catenin signalling, which expresses lacZ, encoding β-galactosidase, under the control of TCF/LEF binding sites [41]. In Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal triple heterozygous pituitaries, β-galactosidase activity is present in clusters of cells (Fig. 1a), which corresponds to the cells that accumulate nucleocytoplasmic β-catenin and, a proportion of which, also express SOX2 (Fig. 1b) [18]. This enzymatic activity was used to generate a luminous product after treatment and fluorescent cells from dissociated pituitaries were sorted by flow cytometry resulting in the purification of two cell fractions: (1) BAT-gal+ve that correspond to β-catnc cluster cells and (2) BAT-gal−ve containing all the remaining cells from the intermediate and anterior pituitary lobes (β-catm cells) (Fig. 1c). The efficiency of the purification was demonstrated by the higher expression of Wnt/β-catenin targets (Axin2, Lef1 and CyclinD1) as well as lacZ from the BAT-gal reporter specifically in the β-catnc fraction relative to surrounding β-catm cells (Fig. 1d) [18]. In addition, expression of genes associated with embryonic and adult pituitary progenitors/stem cells, such as Sox2 and Nestin, were also elevated in the β-catnc fraction [14, 20]. In contrast, expression of specific pituitary cell lineage commitment and terminal differentiation markers (Pit1, Pomc and Gh) was significantly lower in the β-catnc fraction. These data confirm our previous findings suggesting that the β-catenin-accumulating cells may correspond to undifferentiated pituitary progenitors/stem cells (PSC).
Fig. 1

Purification of β-catenin-accumulating cells from Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal pituitaries. a X-gal staining of a Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+;BAT-gal mutant pituitary showing the activation of the BAT-gal reporter and expression of β-galactosidase in clusters within the anterior lobe. The posterior lobe is highly stained and was surgically removed prior to the purification procedure. b Double immunofluorescence staining against β-catenin (green) and SOX2 (red) in wild-type and Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ (mouse ACP) pituitaries. Note the nucleocytoplasmic accumulation of β-catenin in very few cells that form clusters in the Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ pituitary (arrows), whilst the majority of the cells show normal cytoplasmic staining as in the control pituitary. SOX2 is expressed in cells of the marginal zone around the lumen in the control but in Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ pituitaries, some cells within the clusters also express SOX2 (arrows). Note a cluster that is negative for SOX2 expression (arrowhead). c Scheme of the strategy to purify the β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters. Triple heterozygous pituitaries (only anterior and intermediate lobes) are dissociated into single cell suspension, treated with CMFDG (a fluorogenic substrate for β-galactosidase) and subjected to flow-sorting. The two fractions are used for qRT-PCR analysis, gene profiling and stem cell culture. d qRT-PCR comparing BAT-gal+ve (clusters) versus BAT-gal−ve (non-clusters) cell fractions confirming the efficiency of the purification. Fold-changes in expression indicated on the y-axis, where >0 means higher expression in BAT-gal+ve and <0 higher in BAT-gal−ve. Cluster cells fit an undifferentiated profile (high Sox2 and low Pit1, Pomc1 and Gh) and show activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (high lacZ, Axin2, Lef1 and CyclinD1). e, f The BAT-gal+ve fraction contains 8.48 times more cells with clonogenic potential (progenitors/stem cells, PSCs) (e) able to form single cell-derived colonies when cultured in stem cell-promoting media (f). pl posterior lobe, il intermediate lobe, al anterior lobe, mz marginal zone. Scale barsb 50 μm, f 100 μm

Next, we sought to explore this possibility more definitively using an in vitro approach. When cultured in stem-cell-promoting media, normal PSC form adherent colonies arising from single cells, and fitting an undifferentiated profile [20]. To explore if β-catnc clusters contain colony-forming progenitor/stem cells, flow-sorted β-catnc (BAT-gal+ve fraction) and β-catm cells (BAT-gal−ve fraction) were cultured for 1 week and assessed for colony formation. It was clear that total numbers of colony-forming cells were significantly increased in the fraction containing the β-catnc clusters (8.48-fold increase; Fig. 1e, f). However, only around 5% of the β-catenin-accumulating cells were capable of expanding to give rise to a colony under these conditions, suggesting that stemness is likely associated with a different factor, such as Sox2 expression, rather than nucleocytoplasmic β-catenin accumulation.

To test this idea, we used a Sox2-eGFP mouse model, in which Sox2-expressing cells are marked by eGFP expression [12]. Flow-sorting purification of eGFP-expressing cells followed by culture in stem-cell-promoting media showed that only cells within the Sox2-expressing fraction were capable of generating colonies (Fig. 2a–d). Cells not expressing eGFP did not form colonies, strongly suggesting that PSCs are contained within the Sox2-expressing population (Fig. 2e).
Fig. 2

Pituitary progenitors/stem cells (PSCs) are contained in the SOX2-expressing population. a Scheme of cell purification strategy: Sox2eGFP/+ postnatal pituitaries (P14) are dissociated into single cell suspensions and flow sorted to separate the eGFP+ve and eGFP−ve fractions. b Scatter plots showing the isolation of the two fractions. The gates used are indicated on the plot. c Clonal culture of cell preparations from unpurified Sox2eGFP/+ pituitaries in stem cell-promoting media gives rise to eGFP+ve colonies demonstrating the activation of the SOX2 promoter in PSCs. d Photograph of a tissue culture plate containing fixed and hematoxylin-stained colonies demonstrate the presence of colonies only in the flow sorted purified eGFP+ve fraction. e Approximately 2.4% of the eGFP (Sox2)-expressing cells are able to form colonies. Scale bar 50 μm

We have previously shown that in vivo β-catnc clusters in mouse and human ACP contain slow-dividing/quiescent cells, a feature often associated with stem cells [18]. Another feature linked to stemness is increased telomere length, as this gradually decreases with each cell cycle due to incomplete replication of telomeric DNA, but remains long in slow-dividing stem cells [15, 16]. Quantification of telomere length on histological sections of Hesx1Cre/+; Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ pituitaries at 18.5 dpc, showed that β-catnc cluster cells have significantly longer telomeres than the surrounding β-catm cells (Fig. 3a, c). However, a similar analysis on human ACP samples revealed longer telomeres in surrounding β-catm cells rather than β-catnc clusters (Fig. 3b, d). Together these data suggest that: (1) β-catenin-accumulating clusters in the murine ACP model exhibit a molecular profile and cellular behaviour characteristic of undifferentiated pituitary progenitors/stem cells; (2) β-catenin-accumulating clusters in human ACP, although slow-dividing and undifferentiated (i.e. lacking expression of terminal differentiation pituitary markers), do not express SOX2 or have longer telomeres and (3) mouse and human β-catenin-accumulating clusters may correspond to cells that are ontogenetically related but temporally distant; mouse cluster cells at 18.5 dpc relate to an early stage of tumour formation (pre-tumoral stage) whilst human cluster cells are present in clinically relevant and advanced tumours.
Fig. 3

Analysis of telomere length in β-catenin accumulating clusters and surrounding cells in mouse and human ACP. (a, b) Telomere PNA FISH (Cy3 conjugate) and β-catenin immunofluorescence on mouse pre-tumoral lesions at 18.5 dpc (a) and human ACP samples (b) allows visualisation of telomeres specifically in β-catenin accumulating cluster cells or non-cluster surrounding cells. c, d Quantification of telomere length as sum spot intensity reveals significantly longer telomeres in β-catenin accumulating cluster cells in the mouse (c) whereas these are significantly shorter in the advanced human ACP sample (d). The pictures shown (a, b) are representative examples corresponding to single optical confocal sections of 0.001 μm thickness. Indicated statistics prepared using a Students t-test, n = 50 clusters for mouse, n = 25 clusters for human. Scale bar 50 μm

Global gene expression analysis of β-catnc cluster cells from murine tumorigenic pituitaries reveals novel pathways involved in ACP

Having purified the β-catnc cluster cells from tumorigenic mouse pituitaries, we decided to carry out a global gene profiling study to reveal new genes/signalling pathways involved in human ACP.

Microarray analysis of flow-purified β-catnc cells in comparison with β-catm cells confirmed previously characterised gene expression changes [18]. As mentioned above, activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway targets Axin2 and Lef1 is restricted to cells within the β-catnc clusters in the Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+) mouse model as well as in human ACP, assessed by in situ hybridisation. In the array data, levels were 16.77-fold higher for Axin2, 9.51-fold higher for Lef1, and Sp5, another universal Wnt/β-catenin target [56, 61] was found to be 12.69-fold higher in β-catnc clusters relative to the β-catm fraction (Supplementary Table 1). Likewise, expression of SOX2 is up-regulated in a proportion of β-catnc cells within the clusters, and in the array, Sox2 levels were 1.62-fold higher in the cluster fraction. Conversely, the expression of terminal differentiation markers, such as Pomc (pro-opiomelanocortin-alpha) and Gh (growth hormone), both undetectable within β-catnc clusters by immunohistochemistry and with higher expression in surrounding β-catm cells by qRT-PCR, was specifically lower in the β-catnc cluster fraction by microarray comparison (9.01-fold lower for Pomc and 3.4-fold lower for Gh) (Supplementary Table 2). Changes in gene expression were further validated by quantitative real-time PCR (Supplementary Figure 1), demonstrating the efficiency of the cell purification and the robustness of the microarray data.

We interrogated the array data aiming to identify differentially expressed genes in the β-catnc cluster cells. This analysis revealed increased expression of signalling molecules involved in multiple cellular processes and physiological functions including normal development or stem cell maintenance and pathogenic conditions in humans such as tumorigenesis and cancer. These datasets have been deposited in ArrayExpress (Accession E-MEXP-3492) and are accessible to the scientific community. Here, we focus on a handful of genes and signalling pathways important for normal pituitary development or stem cell function, revealing an involvement of these in ACP.

The Hedgehog (HH) pathway participates in multiple developmental events and has been implicated in the maintenance of adult stem cell niches [7, 23, 39]. In addition, over-activation of the pathway has been identified in several human cancers as an important factor leading to tumour growth and metastasis [33, 40, 54]. When this pathway is down-regulated in the embryonic pituitary gland, progenitors of the Rathke’s pouch, the anterior pituitary primordium, fail to proliferate, resulting in a hypoplastic anterior pituitary but normal terminal differentiation of hormone-producing cells [59, 60]. Shh (sonic hedgehog) expression was found to be expressed 10.07-fold higher in β-catnc cluster cells (Supplementary Table 3).

The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family and transforming growth factor (TGF) superfamily of secreted signalling molecules, including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), are key regulators of several biological processes and together with their receptors, they affect the development of many human cancers [11, 21, 22, 62, 63]. In the pituitary gland, secreted FGFs and BMPs are required for normal specification and cell proliferation of pituitary progenitors during early pituitary development [10, 13, 36]. By microarray, members of the FGF family, such as Fgf3, Fgf4 and Fgf20 among others were expressed at higher levels in the β-catnc clusters relative to the surrounding β-catm cells (6.99-, 20.73- and 15.77-fold higher, respectively) (Supplementary Table 4). Likewise, expression of Bmp2, Bmp4 and Bmp7, was also enhanced (3.72, 9.47, and 5.67-fold in the β-catnc clusters, respectively) (Suppl. Table 5). Other members of the TGFβ family were also expressed at much higher levels in these cluster cells: Tgfa, 5.25; Tgfb1, 5.75; Tgfb2, 3.54. Genes encoding subunits of activin dimers were also found to be up-regulated in β-catnc cells: Inhba, 7.27; Inhbb, 9.74 (Supplementary Table 6). Collectively, these molecular data strongly suggest that the β-catnc cells within the clusters play a non-cell autonomous role (i.e. autocrine and paracrine signalling), which may be relevant in the pathogenesis of ACP.

In addition, the pattern of expression of several chemokines not only confirmed a non-cell autonomous function, but also revealed a reciprocal signalling interaction between the β-catnc clusters and surrounding β-catm cells. Several members of the CXC and CC families of chemokines and their receptors were highly expressed in β-catnc cluster relative to the β-catm cells (Supplementary Table 7). Of relevance to this study, CXCR4, a seven-transmembrane span G-protein-coupled receptor expressed in multiple normal and cancer stem cells was expressed 2.63-fold higher in the cluster cells [42, 46]. Conversely, CXCL12 (also known as stromal-derived factor 1, SDF-1), which primarily binds to CXCR4 was expressed 4.92-fold higher in β-catm cells surrounding the β-catnc clusters. Likewise, some of the CC chemokine and CSF (colony-stimulating factor) receptors showed higher expression in the β-catnc cluster cells. In summary, the gene profiling analysis of β-catnc has revealed a specific molecular signature characterised by a great increase in the expression of multiple signalling molecules and, in addition, illustrates a complex reciprocal interaction between β-catenin-accumulating cluster cells and their surrounding cells in ACP tumorigenesis.

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation studies demonstrate conserved novel pathways between mouse and human ACP

Several of the genes identified through array gene profiling of mouse ACP have not been previously implicated in the pathogenesis of human ACP. Therefore, we sought to validate the mouse array data described here with expression analysis for selected relevant genes on histological sections from both mouse and human ACP.

Hedgehog-secreted signals (e.g. SHH) bind to the receptor Patched 1 (Ptch1), leading to the de-repression of the transducer Smoothened (Smo). Activated SMO initiates the intracellular signalling cascade and the nuclear translocation of GLI, ultimately causing the transcriptional activation of target genes, including Gli1 and Ptch1 [30]. In Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ tumorigenic pituitaries, the Shh expression pattern was very similar to that observed for β-catenin, i.e. in distinct foci within the anterior and intermediate lobes, suggesting the likely co-expression of these genes in the β-catnc cell clusters (Fig. 4c). Immunohistochemistry with SHH antibodies revealed specific staining in the cytoplasmic membrane of the vast majority of pituitary cells, as expected for a secreted molecule of lipophilic nature. Within the clusters, SHH protein was detected only on the basal surface of the cells, i.e. the surface limiting the clusters and surrounding cells, indicating polarized secretion outside the clusters (Fig. 4a). To identify the responding cells where the HH pathway was activated, we analysed expression of Ptch1, the SHH receptor and a target of the pathway. In Hesx1Cre/+; Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ pituitaries, strong signal was broadly detected throughout the anterior lobe with some regions of stronger expression (Fig. 4e). Together, these data indicate autocrine as well as paracrine SHH signalling activation in the β-catnc cluster and β-catm cells, respectively.
Fig. 4

SHH signalling is active in mouse and human ACP. a Double immunofluorescence using antibodies against β-catenin (green) and SHH (red) showing the localisation of SHH in cells within the clusters of pituitaries from the ACP murine model at 18.5 dpc. Note the SHH protein on the cell membrane facing the stromal cells (arrows). b Immunohistochemistry reveals the presence of several β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters on a human ACP sample (arrows). c, d In situ hybridisation on the ACP mouse model (c) and human ACP (d) with Shh antisense riboprobes showing the up-regulation of Shh/SHH in some of the β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters (arrows). e, f In situ hybridisation on the ACP mouse model (e) and human ACP (f) with Ptch1 antisense riboprobes. Ptch1, a target of SHH signalling, is expressed throughout the pituitary of the mouse model and in both the palisading cells (arrowheads) and the β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters (arrows) in the human ACP sample. Scale barsa, b, d, f, 50 μm; c, e 150 μm

Next, we investigated whether the expression pattern of relevant HH signalling pathway components may be conserved in human ACP. A tentative role for this pathway in human ACP was proposed in a familial case of Gorlin syndrome showing the typical phenotype (basal cell carcinoma and craniofacial and bone malformations) in association with ACP and harbouring a mutation in PTCH1, but neither SHH nor PTCH1 expression could be identified in this study [45]. In situ hybridisation on human ACP sections (n = 5) showed a pattern of SHH expression characterised by the presence of cell clusters analogous to the typical β-catnc cell clusters observed in these human tumours (Fig. 4d). Analysis on consecutive sections with SHH riboprobes and α-β-Catenin antibody revealed the co-expression of these two genes, as observed in the mouse model (Fig. 4b, d). Finally, expression of PTCH1 was identified in cluster cells as well as in the palisading cells surrounding these typical lesions (Fig. 4f). These findings not only further validate our mouse model for the study of human ACP, but also demonstrate that the HH pathway is also active in human ACP in both the β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters, which secrete the SHH ligand, as well as in some surrounding β-catm cells.

Data from the array study showed elevated expression of Bmp2, Bmp4 and Bmp7 in the β-catnc clusters compared with non-cluster β-catm cells. This was confirmed by in situ hybridization analysis on Hesx1Cre/+;Ctnnb1lox(ex3)/+ tumorigenic pituitaries, which revealed a pattern of expression of these genes in restricted focal points reminiscent of the β-catenin accumulating clusters (Fig. 5a, c, e). In human ACP, BMP4 has previously been shown to have increased expression within the β-catnc clusters [29]. We confirmed this finding and revealed a comparable expression pattern for BMP2 and BMP7 in human ACP samples (Fig. 5b, d, f). Expression of Fgf3 and Fgf4 was observed in the mouse β-catnc clusters, and we were able to confirm FGF3 expression also in the human clusters (Fig. 5g–j).
Fig. 5

Expression analysis by in situ hybridisation of mouse and human ACP. Mouse pituitaries at 18.5 dpc. af Expression of Bmp/BMP members 4, 2 and 7 is up-regulated in pre-tumoral mouse pituitaries at 18.5 dpc and human ACP (arrows). In the ACP mouse model pituitary, expression is mainly restricted to cell clusters. In human ACP, expression is up-regulated in cell clusters, but other tumour cells express BMP2 and BMP7. g, hCtnnb1 and Fgf4 expression in the ACP mouse model pre-tumoral pituitary is up-regulated in cluster cells (arrows). i, j Fgf3/FGF3 expression is also up-regulated in cluster cells in both mouse and human ACP (arrows). k, lCxcr4 expression is detected in clusters in the ACP mouse model pituitary (arrows), but it is more widely expressed in human ACP. Scale barsa, c, e, g, h, i, k, 150 μm; b, d, f, j, l 50 μm

Finally, we analysed the expression pattern of Cxcr4 because of its known expression in numerous normal as well as cancer stem cell populations and its proposed role in cell migration and metastatic infiltration [6, 42, 46]. An activated CXCL12/CXCR4 axis has also been associated with proliferation of pituitary adenomas [4, 5]. In situ hybridization showed strong Cxcr4 expression in restricted foci resembling the β-catnc cell clusters in mouse tumorigenic pituitaries (Fig. 5k). In human ACP samples, CXCR4 expression was not very abundant and broadly expressed throughout the tumour with weak up-regulation in some clusters (Fig. 5l). Overall, this expression analysis confirmed the array data and supports the concept that β-catenin-accumulating cells in mouse and human ACP function as signalling centres from where multiple secreted signals emanate to act on themselves and neighbouring cells.

Discussion

In this paper, we have utilised a recently generated mouse model for ACP and carried out an unbiased molecular screen demonstrating the de-regulation of numerous genes and signalling pathways with tumorigenic potential in both mouse and human ACP. We provide molecular and expression data indicating that β-catnc cluster cells act as a source of mitogenic and pro-survival signals for themselves and surrounding β-catm tumour cells. Our global gene profiling analysis has revealed that members of the SHH, FGF and BMP family of morphogens, which are critical during normal pituitary development [23, 30, 39], show higher expression levels in the β-catnc cluster cells in both mouse and human ACP. As well as providing novel insights into the pathogenesis of human ACP, this research has identified potential therapeutic targets for these tumours.

SHH is required during the normal development of several organs and in adulthood this pathway plays an important role in the maintenance of stem-cell niches [1, 30, 53]. Over-active HH signalling occurs in numerous human cancers and can be caused by either a mutation-driven (ligand-independent) mechanism or ligand-dependent signalling (i.e. autocrine/paracrine signalling). Inactivating mutations in PTCH1 or more rarely, activating mutations in SMO have been identified in most sporadic medulloblastomas [19, 48, 64]. Loss-of-function mutations in PTCH1 underlie the molecular cause of Gorlin syndrome (also known as nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome), a rare condition characterised by an increased risk of developing various tumours, commonly medulloblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and basal cell carcinoma [58]. In contrast, many epithelial cancers, including small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic, prostate and gastrointestinal malignancies, also exhibit over-active HH pathway, but this is caused by increased expression of SHH ligand without known mutations in pathway components. In these tumours, SHH is released to the stroma (paracrine action) where it promotes tumour growth, infiltration and angiogenesis. In addition, activation of the SHH pathway in stromal cells is proposed to feedback signals to induce a more suitable environment for the SHH-expressing cells [58]. SHH autocrine signalling within the epithelial cells also appears to be important for cell renewal of cancer stem cells in breast cancer, multiple myeloma and chronic myelogenous leukaemia stem cells [64]. Our expression data strongly support a key role for HH signalling in the pathogenesis of mouse and human ACP, whereby SHH expression in the β-catnc cell clusters activates the pathway in both β-catnc (autocrine action) and β-catm cells (paracrine signalling). Whether over-activating mutations in the HH pathway components may underlie ACP tumorigenesis requires further research.

Over-activating mutations in FGF receptors have been identified in several human cancers, including breast, bladder, prostate, endometrial and lung cancers as well as haematological malignancies [62]. Expression levels of the FGF receptors 1–4 remained essentially unchanged between β-catnc clusters and surrounding β-catm cells. We noticed, however, that expression of Fgfrl1 (FGF receptor like-1), a recently identified receptor lacking the critical intracellular domain responsible for signal transduction and thought to act as a decoy receptor able to inhibit FGF signalling in the expressing cells [55], was expressed 8.99-fold higher in the cluster cells. Although bestowed with several functional activities, FGFs are potent mitogenic signals in a variety of cell contexts, including the pituitary gland. It is tempting to speculate that β-catnc cell clusters may act as a source of FGFs inducing surrounding β-catm cells to actively divide, while protecting themselves by expressing higher levels of Fgfrl1. This could explain the paradoxical observation that cluster cells in both mouse and human ACP remain quiescent (e.g. Ki67 negative), but cells in the immediate vicinity are mitotically active [18]. Related to this notion, β-catnc cells express high levels of anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl2/Bcl-xL family.

An interesting concept that can be inferred from our data relates to the origin of the β-catenin accumulating (β-catnc) cluster cells. In mouse, these cells have an embryonic origin in Rathke’s pouch undifferentiated precursors (i.e. HESX1 and SOX2 expressing cells) [18]. However, SOX2 is not uniformly expressed in all clusters or every cell within the clusters in the mouse pre-tumoral pituitary at late gestation or early postnatal life (Fig. 1b) [18]. Subsequently, in advanced mouse tumours, SOX2 expression is rarely observed, although at this stage, β-catnc clusters are not identifiable and most of the tumour cells exhibit accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus, cytoplasm or both [18]. Similarly, although SOX2 positive cells have been identified in human ACP [17] (our unpublished observations), they are not present in the β-catnc cluster cells. This suggests that β-catnc cluster cells in human ACP and β-catenin-accumulating cells in advanced mouse ACP may derive from undifferentiated precursors/stem cells present in the embryonic or postnatal pituitary, but have lost cell stemness and down-regulated SOX2 expression.

Our data on telomere length on mouse and human β-catnc cluster cells are compatible with the idea that this similar cellular component of the tumours may correspond to different temporal stages of ACP development. Mouse β-catnc cluster cells in the pre-tumoral pituitaries exhibit longer telomeres than surrounding β-catm cells, suggesting the presence of stem cells in these structures. In contrast, β-catnc cluster cells in fully established human ACP have shorter telomeres than the rest of the non-cluster β-catm cells, suggesting that they do not contain stem cells. This could indicate the cellular ontogenesis of the β-catnc clusters in ACP, whereby SOX2+ve stem cells with long telomeres are initially present but differentiate at later stages of tumour development losing SOX2 expression and shortening their telomeres. Unfortunately, species differences in ACP prevents us from testing this idea experimentally as fully established tumours in our mouse model do not contain β-catnc clusters and early stages of human ACP are not available.

Regardless, it is tempting to speculate that human ACP may be a tumour of stem cell origin, in which pituitary progenitors/stem cells played a role solely at an early stage of tumorigenesis. Advanced and clinically relevant human ACP would be devoid of such cells. This is different from the general dogma for cancer stem cells, where they self-renew and give rise to progeny that populate the tumour bulk. Instead, the contribution of the stem cell could be to initiate a cascade of signalling events leading to the perpetuation of a pathogenic unit (β-catnc cluster cells and microenvironment), without further need for the original stem cells. Therefore, the tumour-initiating mutation may occur in a progenitor/stem cell but the propagation of the tumour may require a different cell type. This is in agreement with findings in other tumours such as glioma and medulloblastoma [37, 50]. The data presented here strongly suggest an important autocrine/paracrine function of the cluster cells as signalling centres within the tumour and the interplay with the stromal cells, which is maintained after loss of SOX2 expression.

Current treatments for human ACP are far from ideal and associated with high morbidity and significant mortality [31, 43]. Our data highlight several genes and pathways likely to play essential roles in the pathogenesis of human ACP, as they do in several other human cancers. For some of these pathways, specific small-molecule inhibitors have been designed and their efficacy is currently being tested in a variety of clinical trials [35, 57]. The research presented here is expected to promote the development of chemical-based therapies leading to more efficient and safer treatments for these childhood tumours.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of the UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital Flow Cytometry Core facility, UCL Genomics, the ICH Embryonic Stem Cell/Chimera Production facility and UCL Biological Services Unit. The authors thank S. Neda Mousavy Gharavy, Lee Langer, Nicoletta Charolidi and Massimo Signore for help with genotyping mice and embryos and Alison John for help with histopathology. C.G.-M. is a recipient of a NIHR GOSH/UCL-ICH BRC fellowship. The authors thank the DSHB (University of Iowa) and the NHPP (Harbor-UCLA Medical Centre) for providing some of the antibodies used in this study. This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust (Grants 084361, 078432, 086545).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Supplementary material

401_2012_957_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)
401_2012_957_MOESM2_ESM.docx (32 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 31 kb)
401_2012_957_MOESM3_ESM.eps (19.5 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (EPS 20013 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez-Medina R, Le Dreau G, Ros M, Marti E (2009) Hedgehog activation is required upstream of Wnt signalling to control neural progenitor proliferation. Development 136(19):3301–3309. doi:10.1242/dev.041772 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Sajedi E, Gaston-Massuet C, Kelberman D, Burns AJ, Itasaki N, Dattani M, Martinez-Barbera JP (2007) Lack of the murine homeobox gene Hesx1 leads to a posterior transformation of the anterior forebrain. Development 134(8):1499–1508. doi:10.1242/dev.02829 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Young RM, Gaston-Massuet C, Wilson SW, Fuchs E, Martinez-Barbera JP (2011) HESX1- and TCF3-mediated repression of Wnt/beta-catenin targets is required for normal development of the anterior forebrain. Development 138(22):4931–4942. doi:10.1242/dev.066597 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbieri F, Bajetto A, Porcile C, Pattarozzi A, Schettini G, Florio T (2007) Role of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1/CXCL12) in regulating anterior pituitary function. J Mol Endocrinol 38(3):383–389. doi:10.1677/jme-06-0014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbieri F, Bajetto A, Stumm R, Pattarozzi A, Porcile C, Zona G, Dorcaratto A, Ravetti JL, Minuto F, Spaziante R, Schettini G, Ferone D, Florio T (2008) Overexpression of stromal cell-derived factor 1 and its receptor CXCR4 induces autocrine/paracrine cell proliferation in human pituitary adenomas. Clin Cancer Res 14(16):5022–5032. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4717 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Baruch A (2006) The multifaceted roles of chemokines in malignancy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25(3):357–371. doi:10.1007/s10555-006-9003-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brownell I, Guevara E, Bai CB, Loomis CA, Joyner AL (2011) Nerve-derived sonic hedgehog defines a niche for hair follicle stem cells capable of becoming epidermal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8(5):552–565. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.02.021 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burghaus S, Holsken A, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Riederer BM, Hans V, Blumcke I, Buslei R (2010) A tumor-specific cellular environment at the brain invasion border of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Virchows Arch 456(3):287–300. doi:10.1007/s00428-009-0873-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buslei R, Nolde M, Hofmann B, Meissner S, Eyupoglu IY, Siebzehnrubl F, Hahnen E, Kreutzer J, Fahlbusch R (2005) Common mutations of beta-catenin in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas but not in other tumours originating from the sellar region. Acta Neuropathol 109(6):589–597. doi:10.1007/s00401-005-1004-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis SW, Castinetti F, Carvalho LR, Ellsworth BS, Potok MA, Lyons RH, Brinkmeier ML, Raetzman LT, Carninci P, Mortensen AH, Hayashizaki Y, Arnhold IJ, Mendonca BB, Brue T, Camper SA (2010) Molecular mechanisms of pituitary organogenesis: in search of novel regulatory genes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 323(1):4–19. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.12.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dorey K, Amaya E (2010) FGF signalling: diverse roles during early vertebrate embryogenesis. Development 137(22):3731–3742. doi:10.1242/dev.037689 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellis P, Fagan BM, Magness ST, Hutton S, Taranova O, Hayashi S, McMahon A, Rao M, Pevny L (2004) SOX2, a persistent marker for multipotential neural stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells, the embryo or the adult. Dev Neurosci 26(2–4):148–165. doi:10.1159/000082134 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ericson J, Norlin S, Jessell TM, Edlund T (1998) Integrated FGF and BMP signaling controls the progression of progenitor cell differentiation and the emergence of pattern in the embryonic anterior pituitary. Development 125(6):1005–1015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fauquier T, Rizzoti K, Dattani M, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson IC (2008) SOX2-expressing progenitor cells generate all of the major cell types in the adult mouse pituitary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(8):2907–2912. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707886105 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flores I, Benetti R, Blasco MA (2006) Telomerase regulation and stem cell behaviour. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18(3):254–260. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.03.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flores I, Canela A, Vera E, Tejera A, Cotsarelis G, Blasco MA (2008) The longest telomeres: a general signature of adult stem cell compartments. Genes Dev 22(5):654–667. doi:10.1101/gad.451008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia-Lavandeira M, Saez C, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Perez-Romero S, Senra A, Dieguez C, Japon MA, Alvarez CV (2011) Craniopharyngiomas express embryonic stem cell markers (SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and SOX9) as pituitary stem cells but do not coexpress RET/GFRA3 receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2187 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaston-Massuet C, Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Jayakody SA, Charolidi N, Kyeyune R, Vernay B, Jacques TS, Taketo MM, Le Tissier P, Dattani MT, Martinez-Barbera JP (2011) Increased Wingless (Wnt) signaling in pituitary progenitor/stem cells gives rise to pituitary tumors in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(28):11482–11487. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101553108 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gibson P, Tong Y, Robinson G, Thompson MC, Currle DS, Eden C, Kranenburg TA, Hogg T, Poppleton H, Martin J, Finkelstein D, Pounds S, Weiss A, Patay Z, Scoggins M, Ogg R, Pei Y, Yang ZJ, Brun S, Lee Y, Zindy F, Lindsey JC, Taketo MM, Boop FA, Sanford RA, Gajjar A, Clifford SC, Roussel MF, McKinnon PJ, Gutmann DH, Ellison DW, Wechsler-Reya R, Gilbertson RJ (2010) Subtypes of medulloblastoma have distinct developmental origins. Nature 468(7327):1095–1099. doi:10.1038/nature09587 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gleiberman AS, Michurina T, Encinas JM, Roig JL, Krasnov P, Balordi F, Fishell G, Rosenfeld MG, Enikolopov G (2008) Genetic approaches identify adult pituitary stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(17):6332–6337. doi:10.1073/pnas.0801644105 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gordon KJ, Blobe GC (2008) Role of transforming growth factor-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1782(4):197–228. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.01.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gotoh N (2009) Control of stemness by fibroblast growth factor signaling in stem cells and cancer stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 4(1):9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han YG, Spassky N, Romaguera-Ros M, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Aguilar A, Schneider-Maunoury S, Alvarez-Buylla A (2008) Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia are required for the formation of adult neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci 11(3):277–284. doi:10.1038/nn2059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harada N, Tamai Y, Ishikawa T, Sauer B, Takaku K, Oshima M, Taketo MM (1999) Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J 18(21):5931–5942. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hassanein AM, Glanz SM, Kessler HP, Eskin TA, Liu C (2003) beta-Catenin is expressed aberrantly in tumors expressing shadow cells. Pilomatricoma, craniopharyngioma, and calcifying odontogenic cyst. Am J Clin Pathol 120(5):732–736. doi:10.1309/EALE-G7LD-6W71-67PX PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hofmann BM, Kreutzer J, Saeger W, Buchfelder M, Blumcke I, Fahlbusch R, Buslei R (2006) Nuclear beta-catenin accumulation as reliable marker for the differentiation between cystic craniopharyngiomas and rathke cleft cysts: a clinico-pathologic approach. Am J Surg Pathol 30(12):1595–1603. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213328.64121.12 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holsken A, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Blumcke I, Buslei R (2010) Tumour cell migration in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas is promoted by activated Wnt-signalling. Acta Neuropathol 119(5):631–639. doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0642-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holsken A, Gebhardt M, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Blumcke I, Buslei R (2011) EGFR signaling regulates tumor cell migration in craniopharyngiomas. Clin Cancer Res 17(13):4367–4377. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2811 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holsken A, Kreutzer J, Hofmann BM, Hans V, Oppel F, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Blumcke I, Buslei R (2009) Target gene activation of the Wnt signaling pathway in nuclear beta-catenin accumulating cells of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Brain Pathol 19(3):357–364. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00180.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ingham PW, Placzek M (2006) Orchestrating ontogenesis: variations on a theme by sonic hedgehog. Nat Rev Genet 7(11):841–850. doi:10.1038/nrg1969 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karavitaki N, Brufani C, Warner JT, Adams CB, Richards P, Ansorge O, Shine B, Turner HE, Wass JA (2005) Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 62(4):397–409. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02231.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kato K, Nakatani Y, Kanno H, Inayama Y, Ijiri R, Nagahara N, Miyake T, Tanaka M, Ito Y, Aida N, Tachibana K, Sekido K, Tanaka Y (2004) Possible linkage between specific histological structures and aberrant reactivation of the Wnt pathway in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. J Pathol 203(3):814–821. doi:10.1002/path.1562 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katoh Y, Katoh M (2009) Hedgehog target genes: mechanisms of carcinogenesis induced by aberrant hedgehog signaling activation. Curr Mol Med 9(7):873–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kiehna EN, Merchant TE (2010) Radiation therapy for pediatric craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus 28(4):E10. doi:10.3171/2010.1.focus09297 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim JM, Lee YH, Ku CR, Lee EJ (2011) The cyclic pentapeptide d-Arg3FC131, a CXCR4 antagonist, induces apoptosis of somatotrope tumor and inhibits tumor growth in nude mice. Endocrinology 152(2):536–544. doi:10.1210/en.2010-0642 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Labeur M, Paez-Pereda M, Haedo M, Arzt E, Stalla GK (2010) Pituitary tumors: cell type-specific roles for BMP-4. Mol Cell Endocrinol 326(1–2):85–88. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu C, Sage JC, Miller MR, Verhaak RG, Hippenmeyer S, Vogel H, Foreman O, Bronson RT, Nishiyama A, Luo L, Zong H (2011) Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals tumor cell of origin in glioma. Cell 146(2):209–221. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liubinas SV, Munshey AS, Kaye AH (2011) Management of recurrent craniopharyngioma. J Clin Neurosci 18(4):451–457. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Madison BB, Braunstein K, Kuizon E, Portman K, Qiao XT, Gumucio DL (2005) Epithelial hedgehog signals pattern the intestinal crypt-villus axis. Development 132(2):279–289. doi:10.1242/dev.01576 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mao L, Xia YP, Zhou YN, Dai RL, Yang X, Duan SJ, Qiao X, Mei YW, Hu B, Cui H (2009) A critical role of Sonic Hedgehog signaling in maintaining the tumorigenicity of neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Sci 100(10):1848–1855. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01262.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maretto S, Cordenonsi M, Dupont S, Braghetta P, Broccoli V, Hassan AB, Volpin D, Bressan GM, Piccolo S (2003) Mapping Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during mouse development and in colorectal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(6):3299–3304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miller RJ, Banisadr G, Bhattacharyya BJ (2008) CXCR4 signaling in the regulation of stem cell migration and development. J Neuroimmunol 198(1–2):31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Muller HL (2010) Childhood craniopharyngioma: current concepts in diagnosis, therapy and follow-up. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6(11):609–618. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.168 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Muller HL (2011) Consequences of craniopharyngioma surgery in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(7):1981–1991. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0174 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Musani V, Gorry P, Basta-Juzbasic A, Stipic T, Miklic P, Levanat S (2006) Mutation in exon 7 of PTCH deregulates SHH/PTCH/SMO signaling: possible linkage to WNT. Int J Mol Med 17(5):755–759PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ratajczak MZ, Zuba-Surma E, Kucia M, Reca R, Wojakowski W, Ratajczak J (2006) The pleiotropic effects of the SDF-1-CXCR4 axis in organogenesis, regeneration and tumorigenesis. Leukemia 20(11):1915–1924. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404357 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Roderick E, Karavitaki N, Wass JA (2008) Craniopharyngiomas. Historical aspects of their management Hormones (Athens) 7(3):271–274Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Romer JT, Kimura H, Magdaleno S, Sasai K, Fuller C, Baines H, Connelly M, Stewart CF, Gould S, Rubin LL, Curran T (2004) Suppression of the Shh pathway using a small molecule inhibitor eliminates medulloblastoma in Ptc1(±)p53(−/−) mice. Cancer Cell 6(3):229–240. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Samper E, Flores JM, Blasco MA (2001) Restoration of telomerase activity rescues chromosomal instability and premature aging in Terc−/− mice with short telomeres. EMBO Rep 2(9):800–807. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve174 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schuller U, Heine VM, Mao J, Kho AT, Dillon AK, Han YG, Huillard E, Sun T, Ligon AH, Qian Y, Ma Q, Alvarez-Buylla A, McMahon AP, Rowitch DH, Ligon KL (2008) Acquisition of granule neuron precursor identity is a critical determinant of progenitor cell competence to form Shh-induced medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 14(2):123–134. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.07.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sekine S, Shibata T, Kokubu A, Morishita Y, Noguchi M, Nakanishi Y, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S (2002) Craniopharyngiomas of adamantinomatous type harbor beta-catenin gene mutations. Am J Pathol 161(6):1997–2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sekine S, Takata T, Shibata T, Mori M, Morishita Y, Noguchi M, Uchida T, Kanai Y, Hirohashi S (2004) Expression of enamel proteins and LEF1 in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: evidence for its odontogenic epithelial differentiation. Histopathology 45(6):573–579. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02029.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shin K, Lee J, Guo N, Kim J, Lim A, Qu L, Mysorekar IU, Beachy PA (2011) Hedgehog/Wnt feedback supports regenerative proliferation of epithelial stem cells in bladder. Nature 472(7341):110–114. doi:10.1038/nature09851 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Song Z, Yue W, Wei B, Wang N, Li T, Guan L, Shi S, Zeng Q, Pei X, Chen L (2011) Sonic hedgehog pathway is essential for maintenance of cancer stem-like cells in human gastric cancer. PLoS One 6(3):e17687. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017687 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Steinberg F, Zhuang L, Beyeler M, Kalin RE, Mullis PE, Brandli AW, Trueb B (2010) The FGFRL1 receptor is shed from cell membranes, binds fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and antagonizes FGF signaling in Xenopus embryos. J Biol Chem 285(3):2193–2202. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.058248 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Takahashi M, Nakamura Y, Obama K, Furukawa Y (2005) Identification of SP5 as a downstream gene of the beta-catenin/Tcf pathway and its enhanced expression in human colon cancer. Int J Oncol 27(6):1483–1487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Takebe N, Harris PJ, Warren RQ, Ivy SP (2011) Targeting cancer stem cells by inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(2):97–106. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.196 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Theunissen JW, de Sauvage FJ (2009) Paracrine Hedgehog signaling in cancer. Cancer Res 69(15):6007–6010. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0756 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Treier M, O’Connell S, Gleiberman A, Price J, Szeto DP, Burgess R, Chuang PT, McMahon AP, Rosenfeld MG (2001) Hedgehog signaling is required for pituitary gland development. Development 128(3):377–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wang Y, Martin JF, Bai CB (2010) Direct and indirect requirements of Shh/Gli signaling in early pituitary development. Dev Biol 348(2):199–209. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.09.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Weidinger G, Thorpe CJ, Wuennenberg-Stapleton K, Ngai J, Moon RT (2005) The Sp1-related transcription factors sp5 and sp5-like act downstream of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesoderm and neuroectoderm patterning. Curr Biol 15(6):489–500. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.041 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wesche J, Haglund K, Haugsten EM (2011) Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in cancer. Biochem J 437(2):199–213. doi:10.1042/bj20101603 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wu MY, Hill CS (2009) Tgf-beta superfamily signaling in embryonic development and homeostasis. Dev Cell 16(3):329–343. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yauch RL, Gould SE, Scales SJ, Tang T, Tian H, Ahn CP, Marshall D, Fu L, Januario T, Kallop D, Nannini-Pepe M, Kotkow K, Marsters JC, Rubin LL, de Sauvage FJ (2008) A paracrine requirement for hedgehog signalling in cancer. Nature 455(7211):406–410. doi:10.1038/nature07275 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia L. Andoniadou
    • 1
  • Carles Gaston-Massuet
    • 1
  • Rukmini Reddy
    • 1
  • Ralph P. Schneider
    • 2
  • Maria A. Blasco
    • 2
  • Paul Le Tissier
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Jacques
    • 1
    • 3
  • Larysa H. Pevny
    • 4
  • Mehul T. Dattani
    • 5
  • Juan Pedro Martinez-Barbera
    • 1
  1. 1.Neural Development UnitUCL Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
  2. 2.Telomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology ProgramSpanish National Cancer Research CentreMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of HistopathologyGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Cell and Developmental BiologyNeuroscience Center, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Developmental Endocrinology Research GroupUCL Institute of Child HealthLondonUK

Personalised recommendations