Glial nuclear aggregates of superoxide dismutase-1 are regularly present in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Forsberg, K., Andersen, P.M., Marklund, S.L. et al. Acta Neuropathol (2011) 121: 623. doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0805-3
- 639 Downloads
The most common cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is mutations in superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1). Since there is evidence for the involvement of non-neuronal cells in ALS, we searched for signs of SOD1 abnormalities focusing on glia. Spinal cords from nine ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations, 51 patients with sporadic or familial ALS who lacked such mutations, and 46 controls were examined by immunohistochemistry. A set of anti-peptide antibodies with specificity for misfolded SOD1 species was used. Misfolded SOD1 in the form of granular aggregates was regularly detected in the nuclei of ventral horn astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes in ALS patients carrying or lacking SOD1 mutations. There was negligible staining in neurodegenerative and non-neurological controls. Misfolded SOD1 appeared occasionally also in nuclei of motoneurons of ALS patients. The results suggest that misfolded SOD1 present in glial and motoneuron nuclei may generally be involved in ALS pathogenesis.
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis Superoxide dismutase Motoneurons Intranuclear Glia
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease mainly characterized by progressive loss of upper and lower motoneurons and death usually ensues within 3–5 years after diagnosis. More than 150 mutations in the ubiquitously expressed enzyme superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) have been associated with familial ALS (FALS) and such mutations are found in about 6% of all ALS patients [35, 45] (http://alsod.iop.kcl.ac.uk). The mutations confer a cytotoxic property on the enzyme that is poorly understood . Nine of the mutations cause long C-terminal truncations. These mutant SOD1s lack the stabilizing C57-C146 intrasubunit disulfide bond and also strand 8 in the β-barrel core of the protein, and thus cannot adopt native folding. The most extensively studied truncation mutant, Gly127insTGGG (G127X), has been found to be rapidly degraded and to be present only in minute amounts in the human spinal cord . The mutant SOD1s associated with ALS should most likely cause ALS by essentially the same mechanism. This implies that any common cytotoxic conformational species of SOD1 should be misfolded and present in minute amounts in the tissue.
The wild-type human SOD1 can also have neurotoxic effects. Transgenic overexpression in mice leads to axonal abnormalities and a late moderate loss of ventral horn neurons [19, 24], and it exacerbates disease caused by mutant SOD1s [11, 19]. Compared to D90A, the most common of the ALS-associated mutant SOD1s, wild-type human SOD1 is between half and equally neurotoxic in mice . Damage to this long-lived protein causes destabilization and results in interaction properties and toxicity similar to those found for mutant SOD1s [5, 34].
There is considerable evidence for the involvement of non-neuronal cells in the pathogenesis of ALS. In murine SOD1 models, down-regulation of SOD1 expression in astrocytes  and microglia  slows progression after disease onset, whereas down-regulation in motoneurons delays onset [4, 47]. In chimeric mice, motoneurons expressing mutant SOD1s are spared if surrounded by non-transgenic glial cells . Neuron-restricted synthesis of G93A mutant SOD1 in mice is, however, sufficient to cause motoneuron pathology and a late ALS-like disease [20, 43]. Mutant SOD1 expression in oligodendrocytes might protect against loss of motoneurons . The exact role of non-neuronal cells in the pathogenesis of human ALS is unknown, but all cells implicated in the transgenic models show signs of activation or alterations.
We have developed a set of antibodies which allow specific detection of misfolded SOD1 against the abundant background of native enzyme in the human CNS. Using these antibodies, we have previously shown that inclusions containing misfolded SOD1 are regularly present in motoneuron somas of ALS patients, both with and without SOD1 mutations . The finding of misfolded SOD1 in sporadic ALS (SALS) was recently confirmed by Bosco et al. , and they also found that wild-type SOD1 immunopurified from SALS tissues inhibited fast axonal transport in a manner similar to H46R mSOD1 indicating a pathological mechanism common to SALS and SOD1 FALS. In this study, we searched for signs of SOD1 involvement in ALS focusing on non-neuronal cells. The major novel finding is that misfolded SOD1 is regularly present in the nuclei of ventral horn astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes in ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations as well as in sporadic and familial patients lacking such mutations. Only negligible staining was seen in control patients with neurodegenerative and non-neurological disease.
Materials and methods
Material was collected at autopsy from patients enrolled at the Department of Neurology, Umeå University Hospital. The group consisted of 43 patients with SALS [mean age 68 ± 12 (17–88) years] and 8 patients with FALS without SOD1 mutations [mean age 59 ± 11 (39–71) years]. The non-SOD1 FALS patients were subjected to genetic screening for mutations in the following genes; transactivation-responsive DNA-binding protein of molecular weight 43 kDa (TDP-43), fused in sarcoma (FUS), vesicle associated membrane protein B (VAPB), angiogenin and optineurin, and none were found. Moreover, nine ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations were included in the study: six patients homozygous for the D90A mutation, two patients heterozygous for the G127X mutation, and one patient heterozygous for the D101G mutation [mean age 62 ± 11 (43–75) years]. ALS patients were diagnosed in accordance with the revised criteria of El Escorial . In addition, two patients with spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) (aged 52 and 76 years, respectively) were included in the study.
Tissues were also collected from 26 control patients with other neurodegenerative diseases [mean age 74 ± 19 (2–92) years; 12 with Alzheimer’s disease; six with Parkinson’s disease; three with multiple sclerosis, one with tuberous sclerosis, one with Huntington’s disease, one with spinocerebellar ataxia 7, one with autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia, and one with argyrophilic grain disease]. Tissues from 20 control patients without neurological disease [mean age 69 ± 17 (37–91) years; all patients died from heart conditions or pneumonia) were also examined. The post-mortem time for all patients was estimated to be between 0 and 3 days, and there was no difference in postmortem time between the groups. The study adhered to the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Umeå University. For detailed information on subject collection, see Electronic Supplementary Material.
For detection of misfolded SOD1, a set of polyclonal rabbit (Ra) antibodies (ab) raised against keyhole limpet hemocyanin-coupled peptides corresponding to amino acids 4–20 (Ra 4–20 ab), 57–72 (Ra 57–72 ab), and 131–153 (Ra 131–153 ab) in the human SOD1 sequence were used. A set of polyclonal chicken (Chi) antibodies corresponding to the same set of peptides was also used (Chi 4–20 ab, Chi 57–72 ab, Chi 131–153 ab, respectively). The antisera were affinity purified in two steps as described in previous papers [12, 23]. G127X mutant SOD1 has following Gly-127 a 5 amino acid long neopeptide before the C-terminal truncation. CNS material from G127X mutant SOD1-carriers was also stained with a mutant-specific Ra SOD1 peptide antibody directed against amino acids 123–132 in the mutant: CADDLGGQRWK, (neopeptide shown in bold). This antibody shows no reaction with wild-type human SOD1 . Other commercially available antibodies used in the study are presented in Online Resource, Table S1.
MisSOD1 immunohistochemical results
Number of patients with nuclear misSOD1 staining in glial cells
Cervical spinal cord
Thoracic spinal cord
Lumbar spinal cord
Proportion of glial cells with nuclear misSOD1 staining
Cervical spinal cord
Thoracic spinal cord
Lumbar spinal cord
We have developed a set of rabbit and chicken antibodies against peptides in the human SOD1 sequence. The antibodies show high specificities for SOD1 in western immunoblots of human ventral horn extracts and they react only with misfolded SOD1 species in immunocapture experiments  (see also Online Resource, Fig. S1a, b). To further ascertain their specificities for misfolded SOD1 in immunohistochemical applications, the Ra 57–72 and the Ra 131–153 antibodies, and the Chi 57–72 and 131–153 antibodies, respectively, were subjected to preincubations. When pre-incubated with the appropriate immunizing peptide or with denatured SOD1, complete blocking of the signal was seen (Online Resource, Fig. S2b, d). Native SOD1 had no blocking effect (Online Resource, Fig. S2c). Exclusion of the primary antibodies resulted in the disappearance of all immunostaining. These studies show that the antibodies can be used for the specific detection of misfolded SOD1 species against the abundant background of natively folded SOD1 in tissues. In the following, positive immunohistochemical staining with these antibodies will be referred to as misSOD1 staining.
Misfolded SOD1 is found in the nuclei of glial cells in ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations
Both patients with the G127X mutation showed nuclear staining of glial cells, but they differed in the proportion of cells that stained. Using the G127X-specific Ra 123–132 ab, misSOD1 staining was seen in <25% of the glial cell nuclei in both patients. One of the two patients also had some nuclear staining in motoneurons. Interestingly, the Chi 131–153 ab, raised against a peptide sequence that is absent in the G127X mutant SOD1, gave rise to misSOD1 staining in glial cell nuclei in both G127X patients, and in one of them it was seen in more than 75% of the glial cell nuclei. Double staining with the Chi 131–153 ab and the G127X mutant-specific ab mostly showed separate aggregates of misSOD1 staining, without co-localization (Online Resource, Fig. S3a–c). Performing double-staining with an antibody that detect both misfolded wildtype and G127X mutant SOD1 protein, the Chi 53–72 ab, with the mutant-specific G127X ab yielded sometimes co-localization as in large aggregates in motoneurons (Online Resource, Fig. S3d–f) but also single staining with the Chi 57–72 ab as in the arrow-head marked glial nucleus. This indicates that some of the misSOD1 staining within the glial cell nuclei of G127X patients has originated from wild-type SOD1.
To establish that the misSOD1 staining observed was present inside neuronal and glial nuclei, double immunofluorescence staining with an antibody to the structural nucleoporin protein NUP 62, which localizes to the nucleoplasmic region of the nuclear envelope, was performed . Double staining with the NUP 62 antibody revealed the nuclear envelope, and inside it misSOD1 staining was seen (Online Resource, Fig. S4). MisSOD1 staining can thus be intranuclear in motoneurons and is principally intranuclear in glial cells.
Misfolded SOD1 is regularly found in the nuclei of glial cells and occasionally in motoneuron nuclei of ALS patients lacking SOD1 mutations
Small and numerous aggregates of misfolded SOD1 were seen in the cytoplasm of motoneurons from ALS patients lacking mutations in the SOD1 gene, as we have previously reported . These misfolded SOD1 aggregates were often scattered throughout the cytoplasm and were particularly abundant in the perinuclear area, but did not penetrate the nuclear envelope (Figs. 1f, 2b, e, 4d) . However, occasionally motoneurons also showed nuclear misSOD1 staining. The staining then appeared as nuclear aggregates approximately 0.5–3 μm in size, often in association with the nucleolus (Figs. 1e, g, 2d and Online Resource, Fig. S4a). In motoneurons with nuclear staining, the cytoplasm often appeared to contain fewer aggregates of misfolded SOD1 (Fig. 1e). The motoneurons thus showed two types of misSOD1 staining: either intranuclear staining in motoneurons or a perinuclear misSOD1 staining with numerous aggregates of misfolded SOD1 in the soma but no sign of intranuclear staining (Fig. 2e). In the latter case, the nucleus appeared to be spared, leaving the impression that the nuclear envelope was acting as a barrier. The two types of motoneuron staining appeared to co-exist in the ventral horns and they could be seen in the same section, although somal and perinuclear staining was more common and was seen in all ALS patients investigated. On the other hand, the intranuclear staining in motoneurons was seen in 30 of 43 SALS patients and in six of eight FALS patients, all of whom lacked SOD1 mutations. Four out of the six patients homozygous for the D90A mutation and one of the two SBMA patients showed inclusions of misfolded SOD1 in the nuclei of motoneurons. The nuclear staining was only seen in a few motoneurons per section, and not in all sections investigated.
Nuclear staining of SOD1 in glial cells was specific for tissues affected by ALS and was not seen in controls with non-neurological or other neurodegenerative diseases
Spinal cord sections from 20 patients who died of non-neurological diseases were stained with the anti-SOD1 peptide antibodies. Only one patient showed misSOD1 staining in the nucleus of glial cells and motoneurons (Fig. 1h). The proportion of staining was <25% in that patient, and staining was not seen in all sections investigated (Table 1). Twenty-six controls with other neurodegenerative diseases were also examined. Twenty-three of these controls did not stain for misfolded SOD1 in ventral horn glial cell nuclei; nor was misfolded SOD1 detected in the nuclei of motoneurons (Figs. 1i, 2f). As the spinal cord is not the primary site of pathology in other neurodegenerative diseases, we also examined the brain areas mainly affected in Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. We could not detect any misfolded SOD1 immunoreactivity in areas of the hippocampus, temporal, and frontal cortex, putamen, striatum, and substantia nigra (data not shown). The 4 of 46 controls that stained positive for misSOD1 showed increased GFAP staining in the spinal cord. All four also showed cytoplasmic inclusions in motoneurons when stained with ubiquitin, and in one neurodegenerative control, a patient with Alzheimer’s disease, a few skein inclusions could be seen in the motoneuronal cytoplasm as well.
Misfolded SOD1 is also found motoneurons and glial cells in brainstem and motor cortex
Mid-olivary sections from the brainstem from 12 neurodegenerative control patients, from 11 SALS patients, 2 non-SOD1 FALS patients and 8 SOD1 mutated patients were investigated for misfolded SOD1 by immunohistochemistry. In brain stem motor nuclei, we found intranuclear misSOD1 staining in glial cells in all ALS patients, although the number varied between patients. Staining was generally found in fewer glial cells than seen in the spinal cord. The staining was mainly found in motor nuclei and in the inferior olivary nucleus. We also found a primarily cytoplasmic staining in brain stem motoneurons in all ALS patients, while nuclear staining was only occasionally observed. We found no staining in the control patients investigated.
Sections from motor cortex were investigated in eight SALS patients. All patients had misSOD1 staining in glial cell nuclei and some cytoplasmic staining in neurons. The staining was less than found in brainstem and spinal cord.
Identification of glial cell types with nuclear staining of misfolded SOD1
Next, we wanted to identify the glial cell types carrying nuclei that were positive for misfolded SOD1. We used double-labeling immunofluorescence with the anti-SOD1 peptide antibodies and antibody markers for astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy, we could show that most of the nuclei carrying misSOD1 staining were present in cells positive for the astrocytic marker GFAP (Fig. 3a–c). Double-labeled astrocytes were seen both in white and grey matter, and they were seen in all cases where positive staining for misfolded SOD1 was seen. We also found that some of the nuclei that were positive for misfolded SOD1 were present in cells that expressed the microglial marker Iba1 (Fig. 3d–f), although not all microglia had misfolded SOD1 in the nucleus. In addition, a few of the glial cell nuclei that stained for misfolded SOD1 expressed the olig 2 marker (Fig. 3g–i). These double-labeled oligodendroglia nuclei were much smaller and occurred less frequently than the astrocyte nuclei in the sections investigated.
SOD1-positive inclusions in glial cell nuclei occasionally co-localized with ubiquitin, but not with TDP-43 or p62
In the samples from SALS and FALS patients lacking SOD1 mutations stained with an antibody directed against TDP-43, cytoplasmic inclusions in motoneurons were seen in all sections investigated, as skein-like and/or fine granular punctuate inclusions, in accordance with the previous reports [1, 31]. For a more detailed description, see Electronic Supplementary Material. When ALS patients lacking SOD1 mutations were double-stained with the anti-SOD1 peptide antibodies, TDP-43 was not found to co-localize with the misfolded SOD1 aggregates seen in the somas of motoneurons. Occasionally, misfolded SOD1 and TDP-43 were located in the same glial or motoneuron nucleus but no co-localization could be demonstrated (Fig. 4d–f). Interestingly, two control patients, one with Alzheimer’s disease and another with cardiovascular disease, had TDP-43 positive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the shape of skein inclusions in the cytoplasm of spinal cord motoneurons (data not shown). The staining was not different from that seen in SALS patients. Both of these controls were negative when staining for misfolded SOD1. The two SBMA patients also showed cytosolic TDP-43 staining typical of SALS patients (data not shown).
Since misfolded proteins present in the nuclei are degraded through the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, we performed double immunofluorescence staining for misfolded SOD1 and ubiquitin. Occasionally, misfolded SOD1 co-localized with ubiquitin in glial cell nuclei, although most misSOD1 staining in glial cell nuclei was ubiquitin-negative (Fig. 4a–c).
The polyubiquitin-binding protein p62 (sequestosome 1) has been proposed to act as a factor for shuttling of polyubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome for degradation , and it has also been reported to interact with mutant SOD1 in cultured cells . Using two anti-p62 antibodies, staining of sections from ALS patients and controls failed to show any nuclear immunoreactivity in glial cells and motoneurons (data not shown). However, all ALS patients and 8 of the 47 controls had p62 staining in the cytoplasm, in the shape of punctuate and skein-like inclusions, as has been described before . The cytoplasmic p62 aggregates showed co-localization when double-labeling was performed with ubiquitin, but no co-localization of misfolded SOD1 and p62 was seen (Online Resource, Fig. S5).
The main new finding in this study is that misfolded SOD1 is present as small aggregates in the nuclei of glial cells of spinal cord tissue from ALS patients. These aggregates were found in ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations as well as in sporadic and familial ALS patients lacking such mutations. Nuclear staining of misfolded SOD1 in glial cells was found in 59 of 60 ALS patients investigated. Only 4 of the 46 non-neurological and neurodegenerative controls had misSOD1 staining, but it was sparse and not seen at all levels of the spinal cord (Table 1). Since the vast majority of control cases lacked staining, the misSOD1 staining seen in ALS cases is unlikely to represent post-mortem changes, which strongly suggests that the finding was related to ALS pathology. The glial cells containing misfolded SOD1 in the nucleus were mostly astrocytes but some microglial and oligodendroglial nuclei also stained positive for misfolded SOD1 (Fig. 3). Misfolded SOD1 was occasionally found in the nuclei of motoneurons.
Many histopathological studies which included staining for SOD1, have been carried out before on ventral horns from ALS patients with and without SOD1 mutations. It could appear curious that the glial nuclear staining not has been observed before. The likely explanation is that in most cases antibodies raised against whole human SOD1 have been used. Such antibodies react avidly with both native and denatured SOD1 , and the minute amounts of misfolded SOD1 will thus be masked by the staining of the abundant native SOD1 in the cells. Other studies using monoclonal conformation-specific antibodies directed towards peptides in the SOD1dimer interface or in the unfolded beta-barrel have failed to show misSOD1 staining in patients with sporadic disease or non-SOD1 mediated FALS [28, 30]. A possible explanation for this could be that SOD1 in sporadic disease might have different misfolded conformation/-s compared to SOD1-mediated disease. Monoclonal peptide antibodies with only one specific antigen determinant might fail to detect other misfolded conformations, whereas polyclonal antibodies with several specific antigenic determinants could detect different misfolded confirmations. Finally, the antigen retrieval could have differed. If it is too strongly denaturing, extensive misfolding of the background native SOD1 might occur, hampering detection of the misfolded SOD1 present in the tissue.
Our finding that misfolded SOD1 is present in glial cell nuclei of FALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations as well as in ALS patients lacking such mutations support the notion of a pathological interplay between neurons and glial cells. It raises the question of how these non-motoneuron abnormalities might contribute to motoneuron degeneration and disease progression. Studies using transgenic ALS mice have shown aggregates of mutant SOD1 in astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes [7, 17, 20]. Regarding studies on human post-mortem tissue, cytosolic inclusions in spinal cord astrocytes, intensely stained with an antibody to SOD1, have been observed in two long-term surviving FALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations . In the present study, all nine FALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations had staining of mutant SOD1 in glial cells, although the staining of misfolded SOD1 was primarily seen in the nuclei.
When using the mutant-specific G127X Ra 123–132 SOD1 ab, approximately 25% of the glial cell nuclei in both FALS patients with the G127X SOD1 mutant were stained, whereas using the Chi 131–153 ab, (raised to a peptide sequence that is absent in the G127X-mutated SOD1 protein) also gave staining of misfolded SOD1 in glial cell nuclei in the G127X patients. Performing double-staining with the two antibodies yielded mostly separate aggregates of misSOD1 staining and no co-localization was seen (Online Resource, Fig. S3a–c). This indicates that misfolded wild-type SOD1 protein may participate in the disease process even in patients carrying mutations.
Wild-type native SOD1 is normally located in the cytosol, the intermembrane space of mitochondria, and in the nucleus . Bidirectional movement of small proteins occurs via passive diffusion through the nuclear pore complex, whereas proteins larger than about 40 kDa generally require specific transportation . The size of the native SOD1 dimer is 32 kDa, and it should, therefore, be able to move freely between the nucleus and the cytosol. Accordingly, Chang et al.  found the native SOD1 concentration in the nucleus to be at least half that in the cytoplasm. In transgenic ALS models carrying mutant human SOD1s, misfolded SOD1 lacking the stabilizing intrasubunit C57-C146 disulfide bond is enriched in the susceptible spinal cord . Such disulfide-reduced SOD1 readily forms aggregates in vitro [9, 13] and is the major component of SOD1 aggregates present in symptomatic transgenic mice [3, 26]. Misfolded disulfide-reduced SOD1 is consequently a likely source of the aggregates/inclusions of SOD1 observed in the present study. In glial cells, the aggregation mainly appears to take place in the nuclei whereas in neurons it is more prominent in the soma. Unlike dimeric and monomeric SOD1, aggregated SOD1 will be trapped and potentially accumulated in the nuclei. It is possible that both the nucleus and the cytoplasm contain targets that are vulnerable to misfolded SOD1, but that the cytoplasm of glial cells may be better equipped to neutralize or degrade the proteotoxic agent. Autophagy is the major mechanism for degradation of aggregates [18, 37] and the absence of this process in nuclei might contribute to the staining pattern of misfolded SOD1 observed. There is no evidence for extensive glial cell death in ALS. This suggests that any harmful effects of the misfolded SOD1 would not lead to glial death, but rather to activation causing damage to motoneurons. Whether the nuclear aggregates are cytotoxic, or merely terminal markers of toxic soluble misfolded disulfide-reduced SOD1 (or both species essentially innocent) can only be speculated on at present. Misfolded SOD1 may be toxic by exposing internal structures that interact with essential nuclear factors, or it may aggregate with such factors, or (as aggregates) it may physically block processes in the nuclei. Mutant SOD1 has been reported to have both RNA  and DNA-binding capacity , indicating the possibility of direct interaction with polynucleotides. In this context, it is interesting to note that several proteins found to be mutated in motor neuron diseases, such as TDP-43, FUS, angiogenin, and senataxin, can influence gene transcription and RNA turnover . More details on TDP-43 and SOD1 are reported in Electronic Supplementary Material.
In neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, proteins found to be mutated in some familial patients (amyloid precursor protein/β-amyloid, α-synuclein) are generally assumed to be key players in the pathogenesis in sporadic patients. Immunohistochemical results constitute the strongest evidence for these suppositions. Here we have shown that inclusions of the misfolded SOD1 are regularly present in glial nuclei, both in ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations and in sporadic and familial cases lacking such mutations. The finding expands on the previous demonstration of SOD1 inclusions in the soma of motoneurons in ALS patients lacking SOD1 mutations [5, 12]. Together, these studies suggest that misfolded SOD1 is generally involved in the pathogenesis of ALS.
As with SOD1, mutations in two other proteins, TDP-43 and FUS, have been found to cause ALS with a phenotype spectrum similar to that seen in sporadic disease. Inclusions containing TDP-43 are found in the soma of motoneurons both in carriers of TDP-43 mutations and in sporadic patients [25, 39] but not in carriers of SOD1 mutations  and FUS mutations . Based on this discrepancy, it has been suggested that the pathogenesis of ALS caused by mutant SOD1s is different from that in sporadic ALS and ALS provoked by TDP-43 mutations. Our present findings and the findings of Bosco et al.  contradict this proposition even though no details on TDP-43 or FUS were provided in the latter study. Regarding involvement of the proteins found mutated in FALS pedigrees in sporadic ALS, these proteins possibly occupy different steps or occur in parallel routes in pathogenic chains of events. The fact that intranuclear glial and motoneuron inclusions were seen in the two SBMA patients as well as in the familial non-SOD1 patients suggests that SOD1 might be involved in downstream events even in motoneuron disease induced by mutations in other genes .
In summary, our observation that misfolded SOD1 is present in the nucleus of motoneurons and astrocytes also implicates the nucleus as a potential site of SOD1 toxicity. More studies are needed to clarify the distribution of misfolded SOD1 in non-neuronal cells and to explore in more detail the modes of SOD1 toxicity at different sites.
We thank Eva Bern, Ingalis Fransson, Karin Hjertkvist, Dan Nylund, Ulla-Stina Spetz, Frode Sörli and Agneta Öberg for expert technical assistance and dr Ole Gredal and the ethic committee at the University of Copenhagen. This work was supported by the Swedish Science Council (Grants nr: 2008:2786; 2009:3548; 2009:4942), the Swedish Brain Fund/Hållsten Fund, The Swedish Medical Society/Björklund Fund for ALS Research, King Gustaf and Queen Victoria Fund, The Swedish Association for individuals with Neurological Disabilities, the Torsten and Ragnar Söderbergs Foundations, the Västerbotten County Council, and the Research Fund of the Medical Faculty, Umeå University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.