The progression of pathology in longitudinally followed patients with Parkinson’s disease
- 1.3k Downloads
The present study describes the pathological progression of longitudinally followed cases with levodopa-responsive Parkinson’s disease who came to autopsy during the Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson’s disease. Standardised clinical and neuropathological assessments over five epochs of time verified three different clinicopathological groups. A group of younger onset patients with a typical long duration clinical course of Parkinson’s disease. This group of cases had Lewy body distributions consistent with the Braak staging of disease. In this group, brainstem Lewy bodies dominate in those surviving to 5 years; by 13 years, 50% of cases have a limbic distribution of Lewy bodies; and by 18 years, all will have at least this pathological phenotype. Approximately 25% of cases had an early malignant, dementia-dominant syndrome and severe neocortical disease consistent with dementia with Lewy bodies. The last group had an older onset, shorter survival, and a more complex disease course with higher Lewy body loads and a higher proportion with additional neuropathologies. These cases with higher loads of Lewy bodies and shorter survivals suggest that widespread Lewy body pathology either occurs at the onset of clinical disease or rapidly infiltrates the brain. In these cases with shorter survivals, there was more plaque pathology, supporting a more aggressive and linked phenotype. Our data suggest that the selection of similar study cohorts by pathology alone would not be able to differentiate the three different phenotypes identified. The data are also not consistent with a unitary concept of the pathogenesis of Lewy body disease.
KeywordsDementia Disease progression Lewy bodies Longitudinal study Parkinson’s disease
Brain donations were made to the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute Tissue Resource Centre, which is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Enabling Grant #282933) and the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. The work was supported through research grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (project #222727; fellowship #157212). We wish to thank Heather McCann and Karen Murphy for research assistance.
- 7.Halliday G, Ng T, Rodriguez M, Harding A, Blumbergs P, Evans W, Fabian V, Fryer J, Gonzales M, Harper C, Kalnins R, Masters CL, McLean C, Milder DG, Pamphlett R, Scott G, Tannenberg A, Kril J (2002) Consensus neuropathological diagnosis of common dementia syndromes: testing and standardising the use of multiple diagnostic criteria. Acta Neuropathol 104:72–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hely MA, Morris JG, Reid WG, O’Sullivan DJ, Williamson PM, Rail D, Broe GA, Margrie S (1994) The Sydney Multicentre Study of Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, prospective five year study comparing low dose bromocriptine with low dose levodopa–carbidopa. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:903–910PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hely MA, Morris JGL, Reid WGJ, Adena MA, Halliday GM (2008) Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord (in press)Google Scholar
- 20.McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H, Cummings J, Duda JE, Lippa C, Perry EK, Aarsland D, Arai H, Ballard CG, Boeve B, Burn DJ, Costa D, Del Ser T, Dubois B, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Goetz CG, Gomez-Tortosa E, Halliday G, Hansen LA, Hardy J, Iwatsubo T, Kalaria RN, Kaufer D, Kenny RA, Korczyn A, Kosaka K, Lee VM, Lees A, Litvan I, Londos E, Lopez OL, Minoshima S, Mizuno Y, Molina JA, Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Pasquier F, Perry RH, Schulz JB, Trojanowski JQ, Yamada M (2005) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 65:1863–1872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar