Wenn (noch?) nicht drin ist, was drauf steht

Kommentar zur minimal-invasiven Venenentnahme
Kommentar

When expectations are not (yet) filled

A commentary on minimally-invasive vein harvesting

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W et al (2005) Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Controlled Trials. Innovations 1:61–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen K, Cheng D, Cohn W et al (2005) Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS). Innovations 1:51–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB et al (2009) Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 361:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zenati MA, Shroyer AL, Collins JF et al (2011) Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markar SR, Kutty R et al (2010) A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:266–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dacey LJ, Braxton JH Jr, Kramer RS et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 123:147–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Abteilung für Herzchirurgie, Herzzentrum Universität LeipzigLeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations