Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 58, Issue 3–4, pp 109–130 | Cite as

Dynamics, rheology, and applications of elastic deformable particle suspensions: a review

  • Massimiliano M. VilloneEmail author
  • Pier Luca Maffettone
Review

Abstract

Suspensions with deformable solid inclusions have both scientific and industrial interest. Examples include microgel particle suspensions, biological fluids, and filled polymers. Due to the interplay of numerous factors (e.g., particle size, shape, and mechanical properties, suspending liquid rheology and flow conditions, flow cell shape, interactions between the particles and the flow channel and among the particles), these systems can show many different flow behaviors. The study of the flow behavior of soft particle suspensions is an open field and is attracting an increasing interest from the scientific community. As elastic beads are good models for biological cells, one reason for such interest is related to the possibility of exploiting particle mechanical-property-dependent flow behavior to diagnose diseases. On the other hand, in the recent years, suspensions of elastic microparticles are also proving useful in a completely different technological field, namely oil recovery from porous media. This paper gives an overview of the state of the art and envisages possible future perspectives on the dynamics, rheology, and applications of elastic particle suspensions.

Graphical Abstract

Suspensions with deformable solid inclusions have both scientific and industrial interest. Examples include microgel particle suspensions, biological fluids, and filled polymers. in the recent years, suspensions of elastic microparticles are also proving useful in a completely different technological field, namely oil recovery from porous media.

Keywords

Elastic particle suspensions Flow-induced deformation Rheology Mechanical properties Review 

Notes

References

  1. Abate AR, Han L, Jin L, Suo Z, Weitz DA (2012) Measuring the elastic modulus of microgels using microdrops. Soft Matter 8(39):10,032–10,035Google Scholar
  2. Adams S, Frith WJ, Stokes JR (2004) Influence of particle modulus on the rheological properties of agar microgel suspensions. J Rheol 48(6):1195–1213Google Scholar
  3. Ai Y, Mauroy B, Sharma A, Qian S (2011) Electrokinetic motion of a deformable particle: dielectrophoretic effect. Electrophoresis 32(17):2282–2291Google Scholar
  4. Avazmohammadi R, Castañeda PP (2015) The rheology of non-dilute dispersions of highly deformable viscoelastic particles in newtonian fluids. J Fluid Mech 763:386–432Google Scholar
  5. Avazmohammadi R, Castañeda PP (2016) Macroscopic rheological behavior of suspensions of soft solid particles in yield stress fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 234:139–161Google Scholar
  6. Barthes-Biesel D (2016) Motion and deformation of elastic capsules and vesicles in flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:25–52Google Scholar
  7. Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59(1–6):1–152Google Scholar
  8. Chen L, Wang KX, Doyle PS (2017) Effect of internal architecture on microgel deformation in microfluidic constrictions. Soft Matter 13(9):1920–1928Google Scholar
  9. D’Avino G, Greco F, Maffettone PL (2017) Particle migration due to viscoelasticity of the suspending liquid and its relevance in microfluidic devices. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49:341–360Google Scholar
  10. Desse M, Fraiseau D, Mitchell J, Budtova T (2010) Individual swollen starch granules under mechanical stress: evidence for deformation and volume loss. Soft Matter 6(2):363–369Google Scholar
  11. Esmailzadeh H, Passandideh-Fard M (2014) Numerical and experimental analysis of the fluid-structure interaction in presence of a hyperelastic body. J Fluids Eng 136(11):111,107Google Scholar
  12. Farahbakhsh I, Ghassemi H, Sabetghadam F (2016) A vorticity based approach to handle the fluid-structure interaction problems. Fluid Dyn Res 48(1):015,509Google Scholar
  13. FitzGerald PA, Dupin D, Armes SP, Wanless EJ (2007) In situ observations of adsorbed microgel particles. Soft Matter 3(5):580–586Google Scholar
  14. Fraldi M, Cugno A, Deseri L, Dayal K, Pugno NM (2015) A frequency-based hypothesis for mechanically targeting and selectively attacking cancer cells. J R Soc Interface 12(111):20150,656Google Scholar
  15. Fröhlich A, Sack R (1946) Theory of the rheological properties of dispersions. Proc R Soc Lond A 185 (1003):415–430Google Scholar
  16. Galaev I, Mattiasson B (eds) (2007) Smart polymers: applications in biotechnology and biomedicine. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao T, Hu HH (2009) Deformation of elastic particles in viscous shear flow. J Comput Phys 228(6):2132–2151Google Scholar
  18. Gao T, Hu HH, Castañeda PP (2011) Rheology of a suspension of elastic particles in a viscous shear flow. J Fluid Mech 687:209–237Google Scholar
  19. Gao T, Hu HH, Castañeda PP (2012) Shape dynamics and rheology of soft elastic particles in a shear flow. Phys Rev Lett 108(5):058, 302Google Scholar
  20. Gao T, Hu HH, Castañeda PP (2013) Dynamics and rheology of elastic particles in an extensional flow. J Fluid Mech 715:573–596Google Scholar
  21. Gent AN (1996) A new constitutive relation for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 69(1):59–61Google Scholar
  22. Girardo S, Traeber N, Wagner K, Cojoc G, Herold C, Goswami R, Schluessler R, Abuhattum S, Taubenberger A, Reichel F et al (2018) Standardized microgel beads as elastic cell mechanical probes. bioRxiv p 290569Google Scholar
  23. Goddard JD, Miller C (1967) Nonlinear effects in the rheology of dilute suspensions. J Fluid Mech 28 (4):657–673Google Scholar
  24. Guo M, Wyss HM (2011) Micromechanics of soft particles. Macromol Mater Eng 296(3-4):223–229Google Scholar
  25. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11(2):127–140Google Scholar
  26. Hashmi SM, Dufresne ER (2009) Mechanical properties of individual microgel particles through the deswelling transition. Soft Matter 5(19):3682–3688Google Scholar
  27. Hertz H (1881) Über die berührung fester elastischer körper. Journal fü,r die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 92:156–171Google Scholar
  28. Hou HW, Li QS, Lee GYH, Kumar AP, Ong CN, Lim CT (2009) Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices 11(3):557–564Google Scholar
  29. Hur SC, Henderson-MacLennan NK, McCabe ERB, Di Carlo D (2011) Deformability-based cell classification and enrichment using inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 11(5):912–920Google Scholar
  30. Hwang MY, Kim SG, Lee HS, Muller SJ (2017) Generation and characterization of monodisperse deformable alginate and pnipam microparticles with a wide range of shear moduli. Soft Matter 13(34):5785–5794Google Scholar
  31. Hwang MY, Kim SG, Lee HS, Muller SJ (2018) Elastic particle deformation in rectangular channel flow as a measure of particle stiffness. Soft Matter 14(2):216–227Google Scholar
  32. Ii S, Sugiyama K, Takeuchi S, Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2011) An implicit full Eulerian method for the fluid–structure interaction problem. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65(1-3):150–165Google Scholar
  33. Ji X, Xu L, Zhou T, Shi L, Deng Y, Li J (2018) Numerical investigation of dc dielectrophoretic deformable particle–particle interactions and assembly. Micromachines 9(6):260Google Scholar
  34. Kumachev A, Tumarkin E, Walker GC, Kumacheva E (2013) Characterization of the mechanical properties of microgels acting as cellular microenvironments. Soft Matter 9(10):2959–2965Google Scholar
  35. Li Y, Kumacheva E, Ramachandran A (2013) The motion of a microgel in an axisymmetric constriction with a tapered entrance. Soft Matter 9(43):10,391–10,403Google Scholar
  36. Li Y, Sarıyer OS, Ramachandran A, Panyukov S, Rubinstein M, Kumacheva E (2015) Universal behavior of hydrogels confined to narrow capillaries. Sci Rep 5:17,017Google Scholar
  37. Liétor-Santos JJ, Sierra-Martín B, Fernández-Nieves A (2011) Bulk and shear moduli of compressed microgel suspensions. Phys Rev E 84(6):060,402Google Scholar
  38. Liu Y, Hou J, Wang Q, Liu J, Guo L, Yuan F, Zhou K (2017) Flow of preformed particle gel through porous media: a numerical simulation study based on the size exclusion theory. Indus Eng Chem Res 56 (10):2840–2850Google Scholar
  39. Matzelle TR, Geuskens G, Kruse N (2003) Elastic properties of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) and poly (acrylamide) hydrogels studied by scanning force microscopy. Macromolecules 36(8):2926– 2931Google Scholar
  40. Mietke A, Otto O, Girardo S, Rosendahl P, Taubenberger A, Golfier S, Ulbricht E, Aland S, Guck J, Fischer-Friedrich E (2015) Extracting cell stiffness from real-time deformability cytometry: theory and experiment. Biophys J 109(10):2023–2036Google Scholar
  41. Mokbel M, Mokbel D, Mietke A, Traber N, Girardo S, Otto O, Guck J, Aland S (2017) Numerical simulation of real-time deformability cytometry to extract cell mechanical properties. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3(11):2962–2973Google Scholar
  42. Murata T (1980) On the deformation of an elastic particle falling in a viscous fluid. J Physical Soc Japan 48 (5):1738–1745Google Scholar
  43. Murata T (1981) Deformation of an elastic particle suspended in an arbitrary flow field. J Physical Soc Japan 50(3):1009–1016Google Scholar
  44. Nasouri B, Khot A, Elfring GJ (2017) Elastic two-sphere swimmer in stokes flow. Phys Rev Fluids 2(4):043,101Google Scholar
  45. Nguyen VB, Wang CX, Thomas CR, Zhang Z (2009) Mechanical properties of single alginate microspheres determined by microcompression and finite element modelling. Chem Eng Sci 64(5):821–829Google Scholar
  46. Niu Y, Zhang X, Si T, Zhang Y, Qi L, Zhao G, Xu RX, He X, Zhao Y (2017) Simultaneous measurements of geometric and viscoelastic properties of hydrogel microbeads using continuous-flow microfluidics with embedded electrodes. Small 13(48):1702,821Google Scholar
  47. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19(1):3–20Google Scholar
  48. Ottemann KM, Miller JF (1997) Roles for motility in bacterial–host interactions. Mol Microbiol 24(6):1109–1117Google Scholar
  49. Pal R (2016) Fundamental rheology of disperse systems based on single-particle mechanics. Fluids 1(4):40Google Scholar
  50. Pozrikidis C (2003) Modeling and simulation of capsules and biological cells. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Pu W, Zhao S, Wang S, Wei B, Yuan C, Li Y (2018) Investigation into the migration of polymer microspheres (PMs) in porous media: implications for profile control and oil displacement. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 540:265–275Google Scholar
  52. Rivlin RSl (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. I. Fundamental concepts. Philoso Trans R Soc London A 240(822):459–490Google Scholar
  53. Roscoe R (1967) On the rheology of a suspension of viscoelastic spheres in a viscous liquid. J Fluid Mech 28(2):273–293Google Scholar
  54. Rosti ME, Brandt L (2018) Suspensions of deformable particles in a Couette flow. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosti ME, Brandt L, Mitra D (2018) Rheology of suspensions of viscoelastic spheres: deformability as an effective volume fraction. Phys Rev Fluids 3(1):012,301Google Scholar
  56. Segré G, Silberberg A (1961) Radial particle displacements in Poiseuille flow of suspensions. Nature 189 (4760):209Google Scholar
  57. Sierra-Martin B, Frederick JA, Laporte Y, Markou G, Lietor-Santos JJ, Fernandez-Nieves A (2011a) Determination of the bulk modulus of microgel particles. Colloid Polym Sci 289(5-*6):721–728Google Scholar
  58. Sierra-Martin B, Laporte Y, South AB, Lyon LA, Fernández-Nieves A (2011b) Bulk modulus of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels through the swelling transition. Phys Rev E 84(1):011,406Google Scholar
  59. Subramaniam DR, Gee DJ (2016) Shape oscillations of elastic particles in shear flow. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:534–544Google Scholar
  60. Sugiyama K, Ii S, Takeuchi S, Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2011) A full Eulerian finite difference approach for solving fluid–structure coupling problems. J Comput Phys 230(3):596–627Google Scholar
  61. Takeuchi S, Yuki Y, Ueyama A, Kajishima T (2010) A conservative momentum-exchange algorithm for interaction problem between fluid and deformable particles. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64(10–12):1084–1101Google Scholar
  62. Tam CKW, Hyman WA (1973) Transverse motion of an elastic sphere in a shear field. J Fluid Mech 59 (1):177–185Google Scholar
  63. Trofa M, Villone MM, D’Avino G, Hulsen MA, Netti PA, Maffettone PL (2016) Numerical simulations of the separation of elastic particles in a T-shaped bifurcation. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 233:75–84Google Scholar
  64. Villone MM, Greco F, Hulsen MA, Maffettone PL (2014a) Simulations of an elastic particle in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids subjected to confined shear flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 210:47–55Google Scholar
  65. Villone MM, Hulsen MA, Anderson PD, Maffettone PL (2014b) Simulations of deformable systems in fluids under shear flow using an arbitrary lagrangian eulerian technique. Comput Fluids 90:88–100Google Scholar
  66. Villone MM, D’Avino G, Hulsen MA, Maffettone PL (2015) Dynamics of prolate spheroidal elastic particles in confined shear flow. Phys Rev E 92(6):062,303Google Scholar
  67. Villone MM, Greco F, Hulsen MA, Maffettone PL (2016) Numerical simulations of deformable particle lateral migration in tube flow of Newtonian and viscoelastic media. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 234:105–113Google Scholar
  68. Villone MM, Trofa M, Hulsen MA, Maffettone PL (2017) Numerical design of a T-shaped microfluidic device for deformability-based separation of elastic capsules and soft beads. Phys Rev E 96(5):053,103Google Scholar
  69. Villone MM, Nunes JK, Li Y, Stone HA, Maffettone PL (2019) Design of a microfluidic device for the measurement of the elastic modulus of deformable particles. Soft Matter 15(5):880–889Google Scholar
  70. Wang L, Shelton RM, Cooper PR, Lawson M, Triffitt JT, Barralet JE (2003) Evaluation of sodium alginate for bone marrow cell tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24(20):3475–3481Google Scholar
  71. Wiedemair J, Serpe MJ, Kim J, Masson JF, Lyon LA, Mizaikoff B, Kranz C (2007) In-situ AFM studies of the phase-transition behavior of single thermoresponsive hydrogel particles. Langmuir 23(1):130–137Google Scholar
  72. Willis JR (1977) Bounds and self-consistent estimates for the overall properties of anisotropic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 25(3):185–202Google Scholar
  73. Wu J, Aidun CK (2010) Simulating 3D deformable particle suspensions using lattice Boltzmann method with discrete external boundary force. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 62(7):765–783Google Scholar
  74. Wyss HM, Franke T, Mele E, Weitz DA (2010) Capillary micromechanics: measuring the elasticity of microscopic soft objects. Soft Matter 6(18):4550–4555Google Scholar
  75. Yao C, Lei G, Li L, Gao X (2012a) Selectivity of pore-scale elastic microspheres as a novel profile control and oil displacement agent. Energy & Fuels 26(8):5092–5101Google Scholar
  76. Yao C, Lei G, Li W, Li L, Gao X (2012b) An experiment and simulation of elastic microspheres enhanced oil recovery (EMEOR). Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 34(8):692–701Google Scholar
  77. Yao C, Lei G, Cathles LM, Steenhuis TS (2014) Pore-scale investigation of micron-size polyacrylamide elastic microspheres (MPEMs) transport and retention in saturated porous media. Environ Sci Technol 48(9):5329–5335Google Scholar
  78. Yao C, Lei G, Hou J, Xu X, Wang D, Steenhuis TS (2015) Enhanced oil recovery using micron-size polyacrylamide elastic microspheres: underlying mechanisms and displacement experiments. Indus Eng Chem Res 54 (43):10,925–10,934Google Scholar
  79. Yuan M, Ju X, Xie R, Wang W, Chu L (2015) Micromechanical properties of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel microspheres determined using a simple method. Particuology 19:164–172Google Scholar
  80. Zhao H, Freund JB, Moser RD (2008) A fixed-mesh method for incompressible flow–structure systems with finite solid deformations. J Comput Phys 227(6):3114–3140Google Scholar
  81. Zhao S, Pu W, Wei B, Xu X (2019) A comprehensive investigation of polymer microspheres (PMs) migration in porous media: EOR implication. Fuel 235:249–258Google Scholar
  82. Zhou T, Yeh LH, Li FC, Mauroy B, Joo SW (2016) Deformability-based electrokinetic particle separation. Micromachines 7(9): 170Google Scholar
  83. Zhou K, Hou J, Sun Q, Guo L, Bing S, Du Q, Yao C (2017) An efficient LBM-DEM simulation method for suspensions of deformable preformed particle gels. Chem Eng Sci 167:288–296Google Scholar
  84. Zhou T, Ge J, Shi L, Fan J, Liu Z, Woo Joo S (2018) Dielectrophoretic choking phenomenon of a deformable particle in a converging-diverging microchannel. Electrophoresis 39(4):590–596Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimiliano M. Villone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pier Luca Maffettone
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione IndustrialeUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations