Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of graphene derivative/polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposites

  • Lei Du
  • Mina Namvari
  • Florian J. Stadler
Original Contribution
  • 223 Downloads

Abstract

Rheological properties of three different nanocomposites, consisting of graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane grafted reduced graphene oxide (rGO-POSS) as nanofillers and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were investigated by large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS). The viscoelastic nonlinearity of the three nanofluids groups was studied by Lissajous curves, local nonlinear viscoelastic moduli of an oscillatory shear cycle, and Fourier transform rheology as a function of filler concentration and increasing and decreasing strain magnitude. The nonlinear behavior of the nanofluids was compared to understand the variation of internal microstructures. Firstly, GO/PDMS composites behave with higher moduli and smaller linear viscoelastic range comparing to that of other two composites. Secondly, the elastic stress Lissajous curves of these composites changed from elliptic to rectangular with round the corner with increasing the filler level and strain amplitude. Thirdly, all these three nanofluids exhibited intra-cycle strain stiffening with increasing strains and shear thickening at intermediate strain and then shearing thinning with increasing strain further. Fourthly, higher harmonic intensity of rGO/PDMS increased with increasing strain and came to a plateau, while that of other two nanofluids reached a maximum and then decreased. It suggested that different surface functionalization of nanoparticles will present different rheological behavior due to formed different network and LAOS could be used as a potential helpful method to characterize rheological properties of nanocomposites, especially at higher shear strain.

Keywords

Graphene derivatives PDMS nanocomposites LAOS Fourier transform rheology Percolation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation of China (21574086), Nanshan District Key Lab for Biopolymers and Safety Evaluation (No. KC2014ZDZJ0001A), Shenzhen Sci & Tech research grant (ZDSYS201507141105130), and Shenzhen City Science and Technology Plan Project (JCYJ20140509172719311) for financial support.

Supplementary material

397_2018_1087_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2868 kb)

References

  1. Abdel-Goad M, Pötschke P, Zhou DH, Mark JE, Heinrich G (2007) Preparation and rheological characterization of polymer nanocomposites based on expanded graphite. J Macromol Sci Part A-Pure Appl Chem 44:591–598.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10601320701284840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akcora P, Kumar SK, Moll J, Lewis S, Schadler LS, Li Y, Benicewicz BC, Sandy A, Narayanan S, Illavsky J (2010) “gel-like” mechanical reinforcement in polymer nanocomposite melts. Macromolecules 43:1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akcora P, Liu H, Kumar SK, Moll J, Li Y, Benicewicz BC, Schadler LS, Acehan D, Panagiotopoulos AZ, Pryamitsyn V, Ganesan V, Ilavsky J, Thiyagarajan P, Colby RH, Douglas JF (2009) Anisotropic self-assembly of spherical polymer-grafted nanoparticles. Nat Mater 8:354–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckert F, Friedrich C, Thomann R, Mulhaupt R (2012) Sulfur-functionalized Graphenes as macro-chain-transfer and RAFT agents for producing graphene polymer brushes and polystyrene nanocomposites. Macromolecules 45:7083–7090.  https://doi.org/10.1021/Ma301379z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckert F, Held A, Meier J, Mülhaupt R, Friedrich C (2014) Shear- and temperature-induced graphene network evolution in graphene/polystyrene nanocomposites and its influence on rheological, electrical, and morphological properties. Macromolecules 47:8784–8794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj NA, Ewoldt RH (2015) Single-point parallel disk correction for asymptotically nonlinear oscillatory shear. Rheol Acta 54:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmona JA, Ramírez P, Calero N, Muñoz J (2014) Large amplitude oscillatory shear of xanthan gum solutions. Effect of sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration. J Food Eng 126:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang H, Wu H (2013) Graphene-based nanocomposites: preparation, functionalization, and energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ Sci 6:3483–3507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho KS, Hyun K, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2005) A geometrical interpretation of large amplitude oscillatory shear response. J Rheol 49:747–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis WM, Macosko CW (1978) Nonlinear dynamic mechanical moduli for polycarbonate and PMMA. J Rheol 22:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dealy J, Larson RG (2006) Structure and rheology of molten polymers - from structure to flow behavior and back again. Hanser, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1990) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing. Springer, USCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong Z, Wang D, Liu X, Pei X, Chen L, Jin J (2014) Bio-inspired surface-functionalization of graphene oxide for the adsorption of organic dyes and heavy metal ions with a superhigh capacity. J Mater Chem A 2:5034–5040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duvarci OC, Yazar G, Kokini JL (2017) The SAOS, MAOS and LAOS behavior of a concentrated suspension of tomato paste and its prediction using the bird-Carreau (SAOS) and Giesekus models (MAOS-LAOS). J Food Eng 208:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewoldt RH, Hosoi AE, McKinley GH (2008) New measures for characterizing nonlinear viscoelasticity in large amplitude oscillatory shear. J Rheol 52:1427–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewoldt RH, Winter P, Maxey J, McKinley GH (2010) Large amplitude oscillatory shear of pseudoplastic and elastoviscoplastic materials. Rheol Acta 49:191–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-009-0403-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahimi Z, Broedersz CP, van Kempen THS, Florea D, Peters GWM, Wyss HM (2014) A new approach for calculating the true stress response from large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) measurements using parallel plates. Rheol Acta 53:75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0738-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang M, Wang K, Lu H, Yang Y, Nutt S (2009) Covalent polymer functionalization of graphene nanosheets and mechanical properties of composites. J Mater Chem 19:7098–7105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornes TD, Paul DR (2003) Modeling properties of nylon 6/clay nanocomposites using composite theories. Polymer 44:4993–5013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giacomin AJ, Gilbert PH, Merger D, Wilhelm M (2015) Large-amplitude oscillatory shear: comparing parallel-disk with cone-plate flow. Rheol Acta 54:263–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0819-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guimont A, Beyou E, Martin G, Sonntag P, Cassagnau P (2011) Viscoelasticity of graphite oxide-based suspensions in PDMS. Macromolecules 44:3893–3900.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma200076q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heymann L, Peukert S, Aksel N (2002) Investigation of the solid–liquid transition of highly concentrated suspensions in oscillatory amplitude sweeps. J Rheol 46:93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirata M, Gotou T, Horiuchi S, Fujiwara M, Ohba M (2004) Thin-film particles of graphite oxide 1: high-yield synthesis and flexibility of the particles. Carbon 42:2929–2937Google Scholar
  24. Hyun K, Baik ES, Ahn KH, Lee SJ, Sugimoto M, Koyama K (2007) Fourier-transform rheology under medium amplitude oscillatory shear for linear and branched polymer melts. J Rheol 51:1319–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyun K, Kim SH, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2002) Large amplitude oscillatory shear as a way to classify the complex fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 107:51–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyun K, Nam JG, Wilhelm M, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2006) Large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer solutions. Rheol Acta 45:239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-005-0014-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyun K, Wilhelm M (2009) Establishing a new mechanical nonlinear coefficient Q from FT-rheology: first investigation of entangled linear and comb polymer model systems. Macromolecules 42:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iqbal MZ, Abdala AA, Mittal V, Seifert S, Herring AM, Liberatore MW (2016) Processable conductive graphene/polyethylene nanocomposites: effects of graphene dispersion and polyethylene blending with oxidized polyethylene on rheology and microstructure. Polymer 98:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jancar J, Douglas JF, Starr FW, Kumar SK, Cassagnau P, Lesser AJ, Sternstein SS, Buehler MJ (2010) Current issues in research on structure-property relationships in polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 51:3321–3343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kallus S, Willenbacher N, Kirsch S, Distler D, Neidhöfer T, Wilhelm M, Spiess HW (2001) Characterization of polymer dispersions by Fourier transform rheology. Rheol Acta 40:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khandavalli S, Rothstein JP (2015) Large amplitude oscillatory shear rheology of three different shear-thickening particle dispersions. Rheol Acta:1–18Google Scholar
  32. Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. In: Program & Abstracts of the International Symposium on Engineering Plastics. pp 6515–6530Google Scholar
  33. Kirkwood JG, Plock RJ (1956) Non-Newtonian viscoelastic properties of rod-like macromolecules in solution. J Chem Phys 24:665–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krishnamoorti R, Giannelis EP (1997) Rheology of end-tethered polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromolecules 30:4097–4102.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma960550a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leblanc JL (2002) Rubber-filler interactions and rheological properties in filled compounds. Prog Polym Sci 27:627–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00040-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leblanc JL (2006) Fourier transform rheometry on carbon black filled polybutadiene compounds. J Appl Polym Sci 100:5102–5118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leblanc JL, Furtado CRG, Leite MCAM, Visconte LLY, de Souza AMF (2010) Effect of the fiber content and plasticizer type on the rheological and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/green coconut fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci 106:3653–3665.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li C, Adamcik J, Mezzenga R (2012a) Biodegradable nanocomposites of amyloid fibrils and graphene with shape-memory and enzyme-sensing properties. Nat Nanotechnol 7:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li YQ, Yu T, Yang TY, Zheng LX, Liao K (2012b) Bio-inspired nacre-like composite films based on graphene with superior mechanical, electrical, and biocompatible properties. Adv Mater 24:3426–3431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li YZ, Guan YQ, Liu Y, Yin JB, Zhao XP (2016) Highly stable nanofluid based on polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane-decorated graphene oxide nanosheets and its enhanced electro-responsive behavior. Nanotechnology 27:1–11Google Scholar
  41. Lim HT, Ahn KH, Hong JS, Hyun K (2013) Nonlinear viscoelasticity of polymer nanocomposites under large amplitude oscillatory shear flow. J Rheol 57:767–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ma TT, Yang RQ, Zheng Z, Song YH (2017) Rheology of fumed silica/polydimethylsiloxane suspensions. J Rheol 61:205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4973974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Melito HS, Daubert CR, Foegeding EA (2012) Validation of a large amplitude oscillatory shear protocol. J Food Eng 113:124–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merger D, Wilhelm M (2014) Intrinsic nonlinearity from LAOStrain—experiments on various strain- and stress-controlled rheometers: a quantitative comparison. Rheol Acta 53:621–634.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0781-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Münstedt H, Katsikis N, Kaschta J (2008) Rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/Nanoclay composites as investigated by creep recovery in shear. Macromolecules 41:9777–9783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Namvari M, Du L, Stadler FJ (2017) Graphene oxide-based silsesquioxane-crosslinked networks - synthesis and rheological behavior. RSC Adv 7:21531–21540.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA02764H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Namvari M, Namazi H (2014) Synthesis of magnetic citric-acid-functionalized graphene oxide and its application in the removal of methylene blue from contaminated water. Polym Int 63:1881–1888.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Namvari M, Namazi H (2015) Preparation of efficient magnetic biosorbents by clicking carbohydrates onto graphene oxide. J Mater Sci 50:5348–5361.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9082-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Namvari M, Namazi H (2016) Magnetic sweet graphene nanosheets: preparation, characterization and application in removal of methylene blue. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:599–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0885-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ng TSK, Mckinley GH, Ewoldt RH (2011) Large amplitude oscillatory shear flow of gluten dough: a model power-law gel. J Rheol 55:627–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niu R, Gong J, Xu DH, Tang T, Sun ZY (2014) Influence of molecular weight of polymer matrix on the structure and rheological properties of graphene oxide/polydimethylsiloxane composites. Polymer 55:5445–5453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Papon A, Merabia S, Guy L, Lequeux F, Montes H, Sotta P, Long DR (2012) Unique nonlinear behavior of Nano-filled elastomers: from the onset of strain softening to large amplitude shear deformations. Macromolecules 45:2891–2904.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma202278e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul DR, Robeson LM (2008) Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer 49:3187–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul E (1969) Non-Newtonian viscoelastic properties of Rodlike molecules in solution: comment on a paper by Kirkwood and Plock. J Chem Phys 51:1271–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–3228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ramesha GK, Vijaya Kumara A, Muralidhara HB, Sampath S (2011) Graphene and graphene oxide as effective adsorbents toward anionic and cationic dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci 361:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rittigstein P, Priestley RD, Broadbelt LJ, Torkelson JM (2007) Model polymer nanocomposites provide an understanding of confinement effects in real nanocomposites. Nat Mater 6:278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sengupta R, Bhattacharya M, Bandyopadhyay S, Bhowmick AK (2011) A review on the mechanical and electrical properties of graphite and modified graphite reinforced polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 36:638–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sim HG, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2003) Large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of complex fluids investigated by a network model: a guideline for classification. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 112:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Song SQ, Zhai YH, Zhang Y (2016) Bioinspired graphene oxide/polymer nanocomposite paper with high strength, toughness, and dielectric constant. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:31264–31272.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b08606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soskey PR, Winter HH (1984) Large step shear strain experiments with parallel-disk rotational rheometers. J Rheol 28:625–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sugimoto M, Suzuki Y, Hyun K, Hyun Ahn K, Ushioda T, Nishioka A, Taniguchi T, Koyama K (2006) Melt rheology of long-chain-branched polypropylenes. Rheol Acta 46:33–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-005-0065-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun W, Yang Y, Wang T, Liu X, Wang C, Tong Z (2011) Large amplitude oscillatory shear rheology for nonlinear viscoelasticity in hectorite suspensions containing poly(ethylene glycol). Polymer 52:1402–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terzopoulou Z, Kyzas G, Bikiaris D (2015) Recent advances in nanocomposite materials of graphene derivatives with polysaccharides. Materials 8:652–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilhelm M, Maring D, Spiess HW (1998) Fourier-transform rheology. Rheol Acta 37:399–405.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003970050126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xue Y, Liu Y, Lu F, Qu J, Chen H, Dai L (2012) Functionalization of graphene oxide with polyhedral oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) for multifunctional applications. J Phys Chem Lett 3:1607–1612.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3005877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xue Y, Wang H, Yu D, Feng L, Dai L, Wang X, Lin T (2009) Superhydrophobic electrospun POSS-PMMA copolymer fibres with highly ordered nanofibrillar and surface structures. Chem Commun:6418–6420.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B911509A
  68. Xue Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, Dai L, Feng L, Wang X, Lin T (2010) Magnetic liquid marbles: a “precise” miniature reactor. Adv Mater 22:4814–4818.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201001898 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yadav SK, Mahapatra SS, Yoo HJ, Cho JW (2011) Synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid by utilizing click chemistry. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:122–122.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu W, Wang J, You W (2016) Structure and linear viscoelasticity of polymer nanocomposites with agglomerated particles. Polymer 98:190–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang X, Ciesielski A, Richard F, Chen P, Prasetyanto EA, De Cola L, Samorì P (2016) Modular graphene-based 3D covalent networks: functional architectures for energy applications. Small 12:1044–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201503677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhou D, Cheng QY, Cui Y, Wang T, Li X, Han BH (2014) Graphene–terpyridine complex hybrid porous material for carbon dioxide adsorption. Carbon 66:592–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Polymer Science and Technology, Guangdong Research Center for Interfacial Engineering of Functional Materials, Nanshan District Key Laboratory for Biopolymers and Safety EvaluationShenzhen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and System of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of SciencePalacký University in Olomouc 17OlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations