Measuring average rheological quantities of cell monolayers in the linear viscoelastic regime
- 310 Downloads
During the last decades, the rheology of cells has been studied almost entirely in single cells. While cell-to-cell variation is typically very large and most studies were carried out in the nonlinear viscoelastic regime, we quantify average linear viscoelastic cell properties like storage and loss moduli and normal stress in monolayers of different cell types showing that murine 3T6 fibroblasts, human fibroblasts, and HeLa cells differ considerably in their storage modulus. To this end, we modified a commercial rheometer to set up a parallel-disk configuration at gap widths of a few micrometers and optically detected the cell concentration in the gap. This enables studying the linear viscoelastic behavior of the cells and permits quantifying the impact of drugs affecting the cytoskeleton or the extracellular matrix connection. Thus, due to its high-content approach, without the need of treating the samples in the rheometer, this envisions the use of this method as a fast diagnostic tool. The method also allows for quantitatively studying of the impact of pre-stress on the storage and loss moduli of the cells.
KeywordsCell rheology Linear viscoelasticity Narrow-gap rheometry Parallel-disk configuration Cell monolayer Biochemical treatment Pre-stress Primary cells Cell lines
H. D. gratefully acknowledges the financial support by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD), Germany, and the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Iraq. H. E. gratefully acknowledges the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, under project number 031A305E. We thank Mr. J. Heubeck and Mr. H. Weber for implementing the setup and S. Schürmann for the helpful discussions.
- Dakhil H, Wierschem A (2014) Measuring low viscosities and high shear rates with a rotational rheometer in a thin-gap parallel-disk configuration. Appl Rheo 24:63795Google Scholar
- Freshney RI (1993) Culture of animal cells. A manual of basic techniques. 3rd ed. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gey GO, Coffmann WD, Kubieck MT (1952) Tissue culture studies of the proliferative capacity for cervical carcinoma and normal epithelium. Cancer Res 12:264–265Google Scholar
- Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Wottawah F, Ebert S, Romeyke M, Lenz D, Erickson HM, Ananthakrishnan R, Mitchell D, Käs J, Ulvick S, Bilby C (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88:3689–3698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lucey BP, Nelson-Rees WA, Hutchins GM (2009) Henrietta lacks, HeLa cells, and cell culture contamination. Arch Path Lab Med 133:1463–1467Google Scholar
- Micoulet A, Spatz JA, Ott A (2005) Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching. Chem Phys Chem 6:663–670Google Scholar
- Stamenović D, Rosenblatt N, Montoya-Zavala M, Matthews BD, Hu S, Suki B, Wang N, Ingber DE (2007) Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent. Bio J 93:L39–L41Google Scholar