Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 77–83 | Cite as

UV-visible assessment of hydrocluster formation and rheological behaviour in bimodal and mono-disperse shear thickening fluids

  • Masoud Fahool
  • Ali Reza SabetEmail author
Original Contribution

Abstract

When an applied shear to a fluid results in a steep rise in its viscosity, it is referred to as shear thickening fluid (STF). This study followed two aims: first, to investigate the hydrocluster formation in STF using a novel technique via UV-visible spectroscopy in bimodal and mono-dispersed systems and second, to study the rheological response of bimodal as against mono-dispersed nano-sized silica particles in an STF system. Two nano-sized silica particles (50-nm fumed silica and 12-nm colloidal silica) were dispersed in polyethylene glycol in various compositions and compared with mono-dispersed STF. Bimodal STF in 30 and 35 wt.% (with different ratios of the two nanoparticles) and mono-disperse in 35, 40 and 45 wt.% of OX50 silica particles were prepared. Results showed a lower critical shear rate for the shear thickening in bimodal STF than that in mono-dispersed STF. Also, bimodal system results in reduced amount of nanoparticle used. Higher viscosities were also observed in different composition of bimodal system.

Keywords

Shear thickening fluid UV-visible Hydrocluster Bimodal Mono-disperse 

References

  1. Barnes H (1989) Shear-thickening (‘Dilatancy’) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J Rheol 33:329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender J, Wagner NJ (1996) Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. J Rheol 40:899. doi: 10.1122/1.550767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown E, Forman NA, Orellana CS et al (2010) Generality of shear thickening in dense suspensions. Nat Mater 9:220–4. doi: 10.1038/nmat2627 Google Scholar
  4. Brown E, Zhang H, Forman NA et al (2011) Shear thickening and jamming in densely packed suspensions of different particle shapes. Phys Rev E 84:10Google Scholar
  5. Chaffey CE, Wagstaff I (1977) Shear thinning and thickening rheology: II. Volume fraction and size of dispersed particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng X, McCoy JH, Israelachvili JN, Cohen I (2011) Imaging the microscopic structure of shear thinning and thickening colloidal suspensions. Science 333(80):1276–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Haene P, Mewis J (1994) Rheological Characterization of Bimodal Colloidal Dispersions. Rheologica acta 33: 165–74.Google Scholar
  8. Haiss W, Thanh NTK, Aveyard J, Fernig DG (2007) Determination of size and concentration of gold nanoparticles from UV-vis spectra. Anal Chem 79:4215–4221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helber R, Doncker F, Bung R (1990) Vibration attenuation by passive stiffness switching mounts. J Sound Vib 138:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller DS, Keller DV (1991) The effect of particle size distribution on the antithixotropic and shear thickening properties of coal–water dispersions. J Rheol 35:1583. doi: 10.1122/1.550246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krieger IM, Elrod H (1953) Direct determination of the flow curves of non‐Newtonian fluids. II. Shearing rate in the concentric cylinder viscometer. J Appl Phys 24:134–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laun HM, Bung R, Hess S et al (1992) Rheological and small angle neutron scattering investigation of shear - induced particle structures of concentrated polymer dispersions submitted to plane Poiseuille and Couette flowa. J Rheol 36:743–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maranzano BJ, Wagner NJ (2001) The effects of interparticle interactions and particle size on reversible shear thickening: hard-sphere colloidal dispersions. J Rheol 45:1205. doi: 10.1122/1.1392295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maranzano BJ, Wagner NJ (2002) Flow-small angle neutron scattering measurements of colloidal dispersion microstructure evolution through the shear thickening transition. J Chem Phys 117Google Scholar
  15. Raghavan SR, Khan SA (1997) Shear-thickening response of fumed silica suspensions under steady and oscillatory shear. J Colloid Interface Sci 185:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Waitukaitis SR, Jaeger HM (2012) Impact-activated solidification of dense suspensions via dynamic jamming fronts. Nature 487:205–9. doi: 10.1038/nature11187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CompositesIran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute (IPPI)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations