Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 357–371 | Cite as

Optimization of the vane geometry

Applications to complex fluids
  • Aminallah RabiaEmail author
  • Samir Yahiaoui
  • Madeleine Djabourov
  • François Feuillebois
  • Thierry Lasuye
Original Contribution

Abstract

The use of nonstandard geometries like the vane is essential to measure the rheological characteristics of complex fluids such as non-Newtonian fluids or particle dispersions. For this geometry which is of Couette type, there is no analytical simple model defining the relation between the shear stress and the torque or relating the angular velocity to the shear rate. This study consists on calibrating a nonstandard vane geometry using a finite volume method with the Ansys Fluent software. The influence of geometrical parameters and rheological characteristics of the complex fluids are considered. First, the Newtonian fluid flow in a rotative vane geometry was simulated and a parametric model is derived therefrom. The results show an excellent agreement between the calculated torque and the measured one. They provide the possibility to define equivalent dimensions by reference to a standard geometry with concentric cylinders where the relationships between shear stress (resp. shear rate) and the torque (resp. the angular rotation) are classical. Non-Newtonian fluid flows obeying a power law rheology with different indices were then simulated. The results of these numerical simulations are in very good agreement with the preceding Newtonian-based model in some ranges of indices. The absolute difference still under 5 % provided the index is below 0.45. Finally, this study provides a calibration protocol in order to use nonstandard vane geometries with various heights, gaps, and distance to the cup bottom for measuring the rheology of complex fluids like shear thinning fluids and concentrated suspensions.

Keywords

Vane geometry Complex fluids Non-Newtonian Shear thinning fluids 

References

  1. Ait-Kadi A, Marchal P, Choplin L, Chrissemant AS, Bousmina M (2002) Quantitative analysis of mixer-type rheometers using couette analogy. Canad J Chem Engen 80:1166–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSYS® (2012) Fluent—Academic Research Release 14.0, ANSYS, IncGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes HA, Carnali JO (1990) The vane-in-cup as a novel rheometer geometry for shear thinning and thixotropic materials. J Rheol 34:841–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boger DV (2013) Rheology of slurries and environmental impacts in the mining industry. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 4:239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bousmina M, Ait-Kadi A, Faisant JB (1998) Determination of shear rate and viscosity from batch mixer data. J Rheol 43(2):415– 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couarraze G, Grossiord JL (2000) Initiation la rhologie. Tec & Doc LavoisierGoogle Scholar
  7. Derakhshandeh B, Hatzikiriakos S, Bennington C (2010) The apparent yield stress of pulp fiber suspensions. J Rheol 54:1137–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estelle P, Lanos C (2012) High torque vane rheometer for concrete: principle and validation from rheological measurements. Appl Rheol 22:12, 881Google Scholar
  9. Fisher DT, Clayton SA, Boger DV, Scales PJ (2007) The bucket rheometer for shear stress-shear rate measurement of industrial suspensions. J Rheol 51:821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keentok M (1982) The measurement of the yield stress of liquids. Rheol Acta 21:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krulis M, Rohm H (2004) Adaption of a vane tool for the viscosity determination of flavoured yoghurt. Eur Food Technol 218:598–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nguyen QD, Boger DV (1983) Yield stress measurement for concentrated suspensions. J Rheol 27(4):321–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nguyen QD, Boger DV (1985) Direct yield stress measurement with the vane method. J Rheol 29(3):335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ovarlez G, Bertrand F, Rodts S (2006) Local determination of the constitutive law of a dense suspension of noncolloidal particles through magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheol 50(3):259–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ovarlez G, Mahaut F, Bertrand F, Chateau X (2011) Flows and heterogeneities with a vane tool: magnetic resonance imaging measurements. J Rheol 55:197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Potanin A (2010) 3d simulations of the flow of thixotropic fluids, in large-gap couette and vane-cup geometries. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 165:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rabia A, Djabourov M, Feuillebois F, Lasuye T (2010) Rheology of wet pastes of PVC particles. Appl Rheol 20:11961(9 pages)Google Scholar
  18. Roos H, Bolmstedt U, Axelsson A (2006) Evaluation of new methods and measuring systems for characterisation of flow behaviour of complex foods. Appl Rheol 16:19–25Google Scholar
  19. Savarmand S, Heniche M, Béchard V, Bertrand F, Carreau PJ (2007) Analysis of the vane rheometer using 3d finite element simulation. J Rheol 51(2):161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sherwood JD, Meeten GH (1991) The use of the vane to measure the shear modulus of linear elastic solids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 41:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aminallah Rabia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samir Yahiaoui
    • 1
  • Madeleine Djabourov
    • 1
  • François Feuillebois
    • 2
  • Thierry Lasuye
    • 3
  1. 1.ESPCI ParisTech - Laboratoire de Physique ThermiqueParis Cedex 5France
  2. 2.LIMSI, UPR 3251 - CNRSOrsay CedexFrance
  3. 3.INEOS ChlorVinylsMazingarbeFrance

Personalised recommendations