Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 51, Issue 7, pp 637–647 | Cite as

Shear thickening of chemical mechanical polishing slurries under high shear

  • Nathan C. Crawford
  • S. Kim R. Williams
  • David Boldridge
  • Matthew W. Liberatore
Original Contribution

Abstract

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is a fundamental technology used in the semiconductor manufacturing industry to polish and planarize electronic materials. During the high shear (≥1,000,000 s − 1) polishing process, it is hypothesized that individual slurry particles begin to interact and collide with one another forming large agglomerates (≥0.5 μm). These agglomerates are suspected of causing defects such as scratches or gouges during polishing, which costs the semiconductor industry billions of dollars annually. We have developed a method for investigating the shear thickening behavior of fumed silica slurries (20–34 wt.%) under high shear using a parallel-plate geometry in a conventional rotating rheometer. The CMP slurries displayed irreversible thickening at shear rates exceeding 10,000 s − 1. Viscous heating and sample evaporation are shown to be inconsequential to the witnessed shear thickening behavior. Also, the observed thickening is not a result of a critical rheometer speed, as the thickening was independent of the experimental gap height. In agreement with previous work, the slurries thickened at lower shear rates as silica concentration was increased. The shear thickening of the fumed silica slurries is truly shear-induced, and therefore, the thickening of CMP slurries can be examined using a rotational rheometer at small gap heights (≤100 μm).

Keywords

Shear thickening Chemical mechanical polishing Fumed silica Rheology High shear 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation (CBET-0968042) for providing the funding for this work. Also, we acknowledge Cabot Microelectronics Corporation for supplying the slurries and for allowing us to share our findings.

References

  1. Abbott JR, Tetlow N, Graham AL, Altobelli SA, Fukushima E, Mondy LA, Stephens TS (1991) Experimental-observations of particle migration in concentrated suspensions—Couette-flow. J Rheol 35(5):773–795. ISSN 0148-6055. doi: 10.1122/1.550157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes HA (1989) Shear thickening (dilatancy) in suspensions of non-aggregating solid particles dispersed in newtonian liquids. J Rheol 33(2):329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basim GB, Moudgil BM (2002) Effect of soft agglomerates on CMP slurry performance. J Colloid Interface Sci 256:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender JW, Wagner NJ (1995) Optical measurement of the contributions of colloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 172(1): 171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bender JW, Wagner NJ (1996) Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. J Rheol 40(5):899–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2007) Transport phenomena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Boersma WH, Laven J, Stein HN (1990) Shear thickening (dilatancy) in concentrated dispersions. AIChE J 36(3):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boldridge D (2010) Morphological characterization of fumed silica aggregates. Aerosol Sci Tech 44:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossis G, Brady JF (1989) The rheology of Brownian suspensions. J Chem Phys 91(3):1866–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brader JM (2010) Nonlinear rheology of colloidal dispersions. J Phys-Condens Mat 22(36):363101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady JF, Bossis G (1988) Stokesian dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 20:111–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman BK (1990) Shear induced migration phenomena in concentrated suspensions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  13. Chevalier J, Tillement O, Ayela F (2009) Structure and rheology of SiO2 nanoparticle suspensions under very high shear rates. Phys Rev E 80(5):051403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chow AW, Sinton SW, Iwamiya JH, Stephens TS (1994) Shear-induced particle migration in Couette and parallel-plate viscometers—NMR imaging and stress measurements. Phys Fluids 6(8):2561–2576. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/1.868147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins MW, Keynejad M (1983) Effects of temperature-dependence of viscosity and viscous dissipation on laminar flow heat transfer in circular tubes. Int J Heat Fluid Fl 4(1):33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connelly RW, Greener J (1985) High-shear viscometry with a rotational parallel-disk device. J Rheol 29(2):209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D’Haene P, Mewis J, Fuller GG (1993) Scattering dichroism measurements of flow-induced structure of a shear thickening suspension. J Colloid Interf Sci 156(2):350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman RL (1972) Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. I. Observation of a flow instability. J Rheol 16(1):155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman RL (1974) Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. II. Theory and experimental tests. J Colloid Interf Sci 46(3):491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaffashi B, O’Brien VT, Mackay ME, Underwood SM (1997) Elastic-like and viscous-like components of the shear viscosity for nearly hard sphere, Brownian suspensions. J Colloid Interf Sci 187(1):22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelly AL, Gough T, Whiteside BR, Coates PD (2009) High shear strain rate rheometry of polymer melts. J Appl Polym Sci 114(2):864–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krishnan GP, Beimfohr S, Leighton DT (1996) Shear-induced radial segregation in bidisperse suspensions. J Fluid Mech 321:371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laun HM, Bung R, Schmidt F (1991) Rheology of extremely shear thickening polymer dispersions (passively viscosity switching fluids). J Rheol 35(6):999–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laun HM, Bung R, Hess S, Loose W, Hess O, Hahn K, Hadicke E, Hingmann R, Schmidt F, Lindner P (1992) Rheological and small-angle neutron-scattering investigation of shear induced particle structures of concentrated polymer dispersions submitted to plane Poiseuille and Couette-flow. J Rheol 36(4):743–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee YS, Wagner NJ (2003) Dynamic properties of shear thickening colloidal suspensions. Rheol Acta 42(3):199–208Google Scholar
  26. Lortz W, Menzel F, Brandes R, Klaessig F, Knothe T, Shibasaki T (2003) News from the m in CMP—viscosity of CMP slurries, a constant? Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 767(1): F1.7.1–F1.7.10Google Scholar
  27. Maranzano BJ, Wagner NJ (2002) Flow-small angle neutron scattering measurements of colloidal dispersion microstructure evolution through the shear thickening transition. J Chem Phys 117(22):10291–10302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matijevic E, Babu SV (2008) Colloid aspects of chemical–mechanical planarization. J Colloid Interf Sci 320:219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moinpour M, Tregub A, Oehler A, Cadien K (2002) Advances in characterization of CMP consumables. MRS Bull 27(10):766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mriziq KS, Cochran HD, Dadmun MD (2007) Rheology and birefringence of Fomblin YR at very high shear rates. Rheol Acta 46(6):839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mriziq KS, Dai HJ, Dadmun MD, Jellison GE, Cochran HD (2004) High-shear-rate optical rheometer. Rev Sci Instrum 75(6):2171–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Negi AS, Osuji CO (2009) New insights on fumed colloidal rheology—shear thickening and vorticity-aligned structures in flocculating dispersions. Rheol Acta 48:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien VT, Mackay ME (2000) Stress components and shear thickening of concentrated hard sphere suspensions. Langmuir 16(21):7931–7938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Osborne M (2010) Only 4.6% growth expected for the semiconductor industry in 2011, says gartner. http://www.fabtech.org/news/a/only 4.6 growth expected for the semiconductor industry in 2011 says gartne/
  35. Osuji CO, Kim C, Weitz DA (2008) Shear thickening and scaling of the elastic modulus in a fractal colloidal system with attractive interactions. Phys Rev E 77(6):060402–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phung T, Brady JF (1992) Microstructured fluids: structure, diffusion and rheology of colloidal dispersions. AIP Conf Proc 256:391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pipe CJ, Majmudar TS, McKinley GH (2008) High shear rate viscometry. Rheol Acta 47(5–6):621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raghavan S, Keswani M, Jia R (2008) Particulate science and technology in the engineering of slurries for chemical mechanical planarization. Kona Powder Part J 26:94–105Google Scholar
  39. Remsen EE, Anjur S, Boldridge D, Kamiti M, Li S, Johns T, Dowell C, Kasthurirangan J, Feeney P (2006) Analysis of large particle count in fumed silica slurries and its correlation with scratch defects generated by CMP. J Electrochem Soc 153(5):G453–G461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith WE, Zukoski CF (2004) Flow properties of hard structured particle suspensions. J Rheol 48(6):1375–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanner RI, Keentok M (1983) Shear fracture in cone-plate rheometry. J Rheol 27(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner NJ, Brady JF (2009) Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Phys Today 62(10):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yokoyama K, Koike Y, Masuda A, Kawaguchi M (2007) Rheological properties of fumed silica suspensions in the presence of potassium chloride. Jpn J Appl Phys Part 1 Regul Pap Brief Commun Rev Pap 46(1):328–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan C. Crawford
    • 1
  • S. Kim R. Williams
    • 2
  • David Boldridge
    • 3
  • Matthew W. Liberatore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and GeochemistryColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  3. 3.Cabot Microelectronics CorporationAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations