Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 50, Issue 9–10, pp 837–866 | Cite as

Analytic derivation of the Cox–Merz rule using the MLD “toy” model for polydisperse linear polymers

  • David W. MeadEmail author
Original Contribution

Abstract

A general constitutive formalism, the “naïve” polydisperse MLD model, has been developed by Mead et al. (Macromolecules 31:7895–7914, 1998) and Mead (Rheol Acta 46:369–395, 2007) at both the tube coordinate level and the mathematically simplified “toy” level independent of the tube coordinate. The model includes constraint release generated by convection-driven chain retraction (which is equivalent to “convective constraint release” (CCR)), reptation, and tube contour length fluctuations. The properties of the mathematically simplified naïve polydisperse “toy” MLD model are explored in linear and nonlinear steady shear flows where we analytically derive the Cox–Merz rule relating the steady shear viscosity to the modulus of the linear viscoelastic dynamic viscosity. The Cox–Merz rule relating the linear viscoelastic material properties and the nonlinear material properties is shown to be a direct consequence of convective constraint release. The specific feature of CCR that leads to this result is that the relaxation rate due to convective constraint release is proportional to the shear rate, \(\dot{{\gamma }}\), independent of molecular weight. The viability of this well-known empirical relationship is a direct consequence of a coincidence in the mathematical structure of the linear viscoelastic material properties and convective constraint release. There is no physical analogy or relationship between the molecular relaxation mechanisms operative in linear (diffusive relaxation) and nonlinear (convective relaxation) flow regimes. The polydisperse MLD model predictions of the individual molecular weight component contributions to the flow curve, and interpretations thereof, are effectively identical to those first postulated by Bersted (J Appl Polym Sci 19:2167–2177, 1975, J Appl Polym Sci 20:2705–2714, 1976). Following the theoretical developments, a limited experimental study is executed with a commercial polydisperse polystyrene melt. Nearly quantitative agreement between the polydisperse MLD theory and experimental measurements of steady-shear viscosity and dynamic moduli is achieved over a wide range of shear rates.

Keywords

Cox–Merz rule Complex modulus Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

DWM acknowledges stimulating discussions with Professor Masao Doi of Tokyo University, Japan. DWM gratefully acknowledges Professor L.J. Fetters of Cornell University (then Exxon Research & Engineering Co.) for performing the triple detector GPC analysis of the commercial Fina polystyrene sample. DWM also gratefully acknowledges Dr. M.K. Lyon of Exxon-Mobil for stimulating discussions and assistance with software for the simulations. This project was partially supported by NSF-GOALI #DMR-9807262 in collaboration with Rheometric Scientific Inc. (now TA Instruments). Final manuscript preparation was done at the Benjamin Levich Institute for Physio-Chemical Hydrodynamics, City College of New York, CUNY, with financial support from NSF Grant #0625072.

References

  1. Abdel-Goad M, Pyckhout-Hintzen W, Kahle S, Allgaier J, Richter D, Fetters LJ (2004) Rheological properties of 1,4-polyisoprene over a large molecular weight range. Macromolecules 37:8135–8144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annable T, Buscall R, Ettelaie R, Whittleston D (1993) The rheology of solutions of associating polymers: comparison of experimental behavior with transient network theory. J Rheol 37:695–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auhl D, Chambon P, McLeish TCB, Read DJ (2009) Elongational flow of blends of long and short polymers: effective stretch relaxation time. Phys Rev Lett 103:136001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bercea M, Peiti C, Simonescu B, Navard P (1993) Shear rheology of semi-dilute Poly(methylmethacrylate) solutions. Macromolecules 26:7095–7096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bersted BH (1975) An empirical model relating the molecular weight distribution of high density polyethylene to the shear dependence of the steady shear melt viscosity. J Appl Polym Sci 19:2167–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bersted BH (1976) A model relating the elastic properties of high-density polyethylene melts to the molecular weight distribution. J Appl Polym Sci 20:2705–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bersted BH, Slee JD (1977) A relationship between steady state shear melt viscosity and molecular weight distribution in polystyrene. J Appl Polym Sci 21:2631–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, vol 1, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Booij HC (1966) Influence of superimposed steady shear flow on the dynamic properties of non-Newtonian fluids: I Measurements on Non-Newtonian solutions. Rheol Acta 5:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booij HC (1968) Influence of superimposed steady shear flow on the dynamic properties of non-Newtonian fluids: III measurements on oscillatory normal stress components. Rheol Acta 7:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Booij HC, Leblans P, Palmen J, Tiermersa-Thoone G (1983) Nonlinear viscoelasticity and the Cox–Merz relations for polymeric fluids. J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 21:1703–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen HW, Mead DW (2011) Molecular rheology of entangled star and linear polymers II. Nonlinear Viscoelasticity (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Chen HW, Lyon MK, Mead DW, Larson RG, Doi M (2000) Application of binary interaction theory to monodisperse star polymers in nonlinear flows. In: Proc. XIIIth international congress rheology, Cambridge, vol 2, pp 47–49Google Scholar
  14. Cohen A (1991) A Padé approximant to the inverse Langevin function. Rheol Acta 30:270–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colby RH, Fetters LJ, Graessley WW (1987) Melt viscosity–melt molecular weight relationship for linear polymers. Macromolecules 20:2226–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costello BA (1997) Parallel superposition rheology of polyethylene as a function of temperature. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 68:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox WP, Merz EH (1958) Correlation of dynamic and steady flow viscosities. J Polym Sci 28:619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Currie PK (1980) Calculations of the Doi–Edwards model for concentrated polymer solutions. In: Proceedings of the eighth international congress on rheology, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie PK (1982a) Polym Preprints 23:6–7Google Scholar
  20. Currie PK (1982b) Constitutive equations for polymer melts predicted by the Doi–Edwards and Curtiss-Bird kinetic theory models. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 11:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Gennes PG (1971) Reptation of a polymer chain in the presence of fixed obstacles. J Chem Phys 55:572–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Gennes PG (1976) Dynamics of entangled polymer solutions: the Rouse model. Macromolecules 9:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1989) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Dealy JM, Larson RG (2006) Structure and rheology of molten polymers: from structure to flow behavior and back again. Hanser, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  25. des Cloizeaux J (1988) Double reptation vs. simple reptation in polymer melts. J Europhys Lett 5:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. des Cloizeaux J (1990) Relaxation of entangled polymers in melts. Macromolecules 23:4678–4687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doi M (1981) An explanation of the 3.4 power law of viscosity of polymeric liquids based on the tube model. J Polym Sci Lett 19:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doi M (1983) Explanation of the 3.4 power law of viscosity of polymeric liquids based on the tube model. J Polym Sci, Phys Ed 21:667—684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doi M (1987) Basic principle in the viscoelasticity of polymeric liquids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 23:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doi M, Edwards SF (1978) Dynamics of concentrated polymer systems: parts I, II and III. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans. II 74, 1789, 1802, 1818Google Scholar
  31. Doi M, Edwards SF (1979) Dynamics of concentrated polymer systems: part IV. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans II 75:38Google Scholar
  32. Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Doi M, Takimoto J-I (2003) Molecular modeling of entanglements. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond A 361:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doraiswamy D, Mujumdar AN, Tsao I, Beris AN, Danforth SC, Metzner AB (1991) The Cox–Merz rule extended: a rheological model for concentrated suspensions and other materials with a yield stress. J Rheol 35:647–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Earnest TR, MacKnight WJ (1978) Effect of hydrogen bonding and ionic aggregation on the melt rheology of an ethylene-methacrylic acid copolymer and its sodium salt. J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 16:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ewen JA (1997) New chemical tools to create plastics. Sci Am 276:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ferri D, Lomellini P (1999) Melt rheology of randomly branched polystyrenes. J Rheol 43:1355–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fetters LJ, Lohse DJ, Richter D, Witten TA, Zirkel A (1994) Connection between polymer molecular weight, density, chain dimensions, and melt viscoelastic properties. Macromolecules 27:4639–4647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garcia-Franco CA, Lohse DJ, Mendelson RA, Fetters LJ, Milner ST, Hadjichristidis N, Mead DW (2002) Processing Olefin co-polymers. Composition of Matter Patent, US Patent Number 6,417,281Google Scholar
  40. Gleissle W (1980) Two simple time-shear rate relations combining viscosity and first normal stress coefficient in the linear and non-linear flow range. In: Astarita G, Marrucci G, Nicolais L (eds) Rheology, vol 2. Plenum, New York, pp 457–462Google Scholar
  41. Graessley WW (1984) Chapter 3. In: Mark JE, Eisenberg A, Graessley WW, Mandelkern L, Koenig JL (eds) Physical properties of polymers. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 97–153Google Scholar
  42. Green MS, Tobolsky AV (1946) A new approach to the theory of relaxing polymeric media. J Chem Phys 14:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ianniruberto G, Marrucci G (1996) On compatibility of the Cox–Merz rule with the model of Doi and Edwards. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 65:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kapnistos M, Lang M, Vlassopoulos D, Pyckhout-Hintzen W, Richter D, Cho D, Chang T, Rubinstein M (2008) Unexpected power-law stress relaxation of entangled ring polymers. Nature Materials 7:997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein J (1978) Evidence of reptation in an entangled polymer melt. Nature (Lond) 271:143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein J, Briscoe C (1979) The diffusion of long chain molecules through bulk polyethylenes. Proc Royal Soc Lond A 365:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kulicke WM, Kniewske R (1984) The shear viscosity dependence on concentration, molecular weight, and shear rate of polystyrene solutions. Rheol Acta 23:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kulicke WM, Porter RS (1980) Relation between steady shear flow and dynamic rheology. Rheol Acta 19:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Larson RG (1988) Constitutive equations for polymer melts and solutions. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Larson RG (1999) Structure and rheology of complex fluids. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Larson RG, Mead DW (1990) Rheo-optical study of stiff polymers. Macromolecules 23:2524–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Laun HM (1986) Predictions of elastic strains in polymer melts in shear and elongation. J Rheol 30:459–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leblans PJR, Sampers J, Booij HC (1985) The mirror relations and nonlinear viscoelasticity of polymer melts. Rheol Acta 24:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lodge AS (1956) A network theory of flow birefringence and stress in concentrated solutions. Trans Faraday Soc 52:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lodge AS (1964) Elastic liquids: an introductory vector treatment of finite strain polymer rheology. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Lodge AS (1968) Constitutive equations from molecular network theories for polymer solutions. Rheol Acta 7:379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Malkin AY (1990) Some inverse problems in rheology leading to integral equations. Rheol Acta 29:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Malkin AY, Teishev AE (1991) Flow curve—molecular weight distribution: is the solution of the inverse problem possible? Polym Eng Sci 31:1590–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marrucci G (1996) Dynamics of entanglements: a nonlinear model consistent with the Cox–Merz rule. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 62:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marrucci G, Ianniruberto G (1997) Effect of flow on topological interactions in polymers. Macromol Symp 117:233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marrucci G, Grizzuti N (1988a) Fast flows of concentrated polymers: predictions of the tube model on chain stretching. Gazz Chim Ital 118:179Google Scholar
  62. Marrucci G, Grizzuti N (1988b) Topics in molecular modeling of entangled polymer rheology. In: Proceedings Xth international congress rheology, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  63. Marrucci G, Ianniruberto G (1999) Open problems for tube models for concentrated polymers. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 82:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Matsumoto T, Hitomi C, Onogi S (1975) Rheological properties of disperse systems of spherical particles in polystyrene solution at long time scales. Trans Soc Rheol 19:541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mead DW (1994) Experimental determination of molecular weight distributions from linear viscoelastic material functions for linear flexible polymers. J Rheol 38:1797–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mead DW (1995a) The reptation model with chain stretching. I) Basic equations and general properties. Rheol Acta 34:339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mead DW (1995b) The reptation model with chain stretching. II) Steady flow properties. Rheol Acta 34:360–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mead DW (1996) Component predictions and the relaxation spectrum of the double reptation mixing rule for polydisperse linear polymers. J Rheol 40, 633–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mead DW (2007) Development of the “Binary interaction” theory for entangled polydisperse linear polymers. Rheol Acta 46:369–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mead DW (2011a) Derivation of the “Switch function” in the Mead-Larson-Doi Theory. Rheol Acta. doi: 10.1007/s00397-011-0543-4
  71. Mead DW (2011b) Small amplitude oscillatory shear flow superposed on parallel or perpendicular steady shear of polydisperse linear polymers: the MLD model. Rheol Acta (in press)Google Scholar
  72. Mead DW, Larson RG (1990) Rheo-optical study of isotropic solutions of stiff polymers. Macromolecules 23:2524–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mead DW, Herbolzheimer EA (1992) The effect of segmental stretch on theoretical predictions of the Doi–Edwards model. In: Proceedings of the XIth international congress of rheology, Brussels 100Google Scholar
  74. Mead DW, Larson RG, Doi M (1998) A molecular theory for fast flows of entangled polymers. Macromolecules 31:7895–7914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Menezes EV, Graessley WW (1982) Nonlinear rheological behavior of polymer systems for several shear flow histories. J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 20:1817–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Milner ST (1996) Relating the shear-thinning curve to the molecular weight distribution in linear polymer melts. J Rheol 40:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mishler SD (2001) A quantitative molecular model for the nonlinear rheology of polydisperse linear polymer melts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  78. Mishler SD, Mead DW (2011) Application of the MLD “Toy” model to extensional flows of broadly polydisperse linear polymers. Rheol Acta (in press)Google Scholar
  79. Mishler SD, Dreze H, Lyon MK, Mead DW, Larson RG, Doi M (2000) Application of binary interaction theory to general extensional flows: polydisperse polymers. In: Proc. XIIIth international congress of rheology, Cambridge, vol 1, pp 154–156Google Scholar
  80. Onogi S, Kato H, Ueki S, Ibaragi T (1966) Rheological properties of polystyrene melts. J Polym Sci, C, Polym Symp 15:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Onogi S, Masuda T, Ibaragi T (1968) Rheological properties of polymethyl methacrylate and polyvinyl acetate in the molten state. Kolloid-Z 222:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pearson DS (1987) Recent advances in the molecular aspects of polymer viscoelasticity. Rubber Chem Technol 60:439–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pearson DS, Herbolzheimer EA, Marrucci G, Grizzuti N (1991) Transient behavior of entangled polymers at high shear rates. J Polym Sci, Phys Ed 29:1589–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sakamoto K, MacKnight WJ, Porter RS (1970) Dynamic and steady-shear melt rheology of and ethylene-methacrylic acid copolymer and its salts. J Polym Sci, A-2 Polym Phys 8:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shaw MY, Tuminello WH (1994) A closer look at the MWD-Viscosity transform. Polym Eng Sci 34:159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simmons JM (1968) Dynamic modulus of polyisobutylene solutions in superposed steady shear. Rheol Acta 7:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Somma E, Valentino O, Titomanlio G, Ianniruberto G (2007) Parallel superposition in entangled polydisperse polymer melts: experiment and theory. J Rheol 51:987–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thayer AM (1995) Metallocene catalysts initiate new era in polymer systems. C&E News 73:15Google Scholar
  89. Treloar LRG (1975) The physics of rubber elasticity, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsenoglou C (1987) Viscoelasticity of binary homopolymer blends. ACS Polym Preprints 28:185–186Google Scholar
  91. Tsenoglou C (1991) Molecular weight polydispersity effects on the viscoelasticity of entangled linear polymers. Macromolecules 24:1762–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tuminello WH (1986) Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution from dynamic measurements of polymer melts. Polym Eng Sci 26:1339–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tuminello WH (1989) Molecular weight distributions of tetra-fluoroethylene hexa-fluoropropylene copolymers. Polym Eng Sci 29:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tuminello WH, Cudré-Maroux N (1991) Determining molecular weight distributions from viscosity versus shear rate curves. Polym Eng Sci 31:1496–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tuminello WH, Treat T, English AD (1988) Poly(tetrafluoroethylene): molecular weight distribution and chain stiffness. Macromolecules 21:2606–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Uppuluri S, Keinath SE, Tomalia DA, Dvornic PR (1998) Rheology of dendrimers: I Newtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA) solvent. Macromolecules 31:4498–4510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Utracki LA, Gendron R (1984) Pressure oscillation during extrusion of polyethylenes. J Rheol 28:601–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Venkatraman S, Okano M (1990) A comparison of torsional and capillary rheometry for polymer melts: the Cox–Merz rule revisited. Polym Eng Sci 30:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang J, Knox JR, Porter RS (1978) Steady-state and dynamic rheology of poly(1-olefin) melts. J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 16:1709–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Winter HH (2009) Three views of viscoelasticity for Cox–Merz materials. Rheol Acta 48:241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wissbrun KF (1986) Numerical comparison of empirical rules for prediction of nonlinear rheology from linear viscoelasticity. J Rheol 30:1143–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wood-Adams PM, Dealy JM (1996) Use of rheological measurements to estimate molecular weight distribution of linear polyethylene. J Rheol 40:761–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yamamoto J (1956) The viscoelastic properties of network structure I. General formalism. Phys Soc Japan 11:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yamamoto J (1957) The viscoelastic properties of network structure II. Structural viscosity. Phys Soc Japan 12:1148–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yamamoto J (1958) The viscoelastic properties of network structure III. Normal stress effect. Phys Soc Japan 13:1200–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yasuda K, Armstrong RC, Cohen RE (1981) Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of linear and star branched polystyrenes. Rheol Acta 20:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Molecular Study of Condensed Soft MatterIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations