Rheologica Acta

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 619–632 | Cite as

Viscoelasticity in inkjet printing

  • Neil F. MorrisonEmail author
  • Oliver G. Harlen
Original Contribution


We investigate the effects of viscoelasticity on drop generation in inkjet printing. In drop-on-demand printing, individual ink ‘drops’ are ejected from a nozzle by imposed pressure pulses. Upon exiting the nozzle, the shape of each ‘drop’ is that of a nearly spherical bead with a long thin trailing ligament. This ligament subsequently breaks up under the Rayleigh instability, typically into several small droplets (known as satellite drops). These satellite drops can create unwanted splash on the target substrate and a reduction in printing quality. Satellite drops can potentially be eliminated by adding polymer to the ink; elastic stresses can act to contract the trailing ligament into the main drop before capillary breakup occurs. However, elasticity can also reduce the drop velocity and can delay or even prevent the break-off of the drop from the ink reservoir within the nozzle. To achieve optimal drop shape and speed, non-Newtonian parameters such as the polymer concentration and molecular weight must be chosen correctly. We explore this parameter space via numerical simulations, using the Lagrangian–Eulerian finite-element method of Harlen et al. (J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 60:81–104, 1995). Results are compared with experimental observations taken from real printheads.


Viscoelasticity Finite-element analysis Break-up FENE dumbbell fluids 



This work was carried out within the ‘Next-Generation Inkjet Technology’ consortium, which is supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and by industrial funding. The authors are grateful for the cooperation of the other members of the consortium.


  1. Anna SL, McKinley GH (2001) Elasto-capillary thinning and breakup of model elastic liquids. J Rheol 45:115–138CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazilevskiy AV, Meyer JD, Rozhkov AN (2005) Dynamics and breakup of pulse microjets of polymeric liquids. Fluid Dyn 40:376–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bousfield DW, Keunings R, Marrucci G, Denn MM (1986) Nonlinear analysis of the surface tension driven breakup of viscoelastic filaments. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 21:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castrejón-Pita JR, Martin GD, Hoath SD, Hutchings IM (2008) A simple large-scale droplet generator for studies of inkjet printing. Rev Sci Instrum 79:075108CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilcott MD, Rallison JM (1988) Creeping flow of dilute polymer solutions past cylinders and spheres. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 29:381–432zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christanti Y, Walker LM (2001) Surface tension driven jet break up of strain-hardening polymer solutions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 100:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clasen C, Eggers J, Fontelos MA, Li J, McKinley GH (2006a) The beads-on-string structure of viscoelastic threads. J Fluid Mech 556:283–308zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Clasen C, Plog JP, Kulicke W-M, Owens M, Macosko C, Scriven LE, Verani M, McKinley GH (2006b) How dilute are dilute solutions in extensional flows? J Rheol 50:849–881CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper-White JJ, Fagan JE, Tirtaatmadja V, Lester DR, Boger DV (2002) Drop formation dynamics of constant low-viscosity elastic fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 106:29–59zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Gans B-J, Duineveld PC, Schubert US (2004) Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments. Adv Mater 16:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Gans B-J, Xue L, Agarwal US, Schubert US (2005) Ink-Jet printing of linear and star polymers. Macromol Rapid Commun 26:310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong H, Carr WW, Morris JF (2006) An experimental study of drop-on-demand drop formation. Phys Fluids 18:072102CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelsbrunner H (2000) Triangulations and meshes in computational geometry. Acta Numer 9:133–213CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Entov VM, Hinch EJ (1997) Effect of a spectrum of relaxation times on the capillary thinning of a filament of elastic liquid. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 72:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Étienne J, Hinch EJ, Li J (2006) A Lagrangian-Eulerian approach for the numerical simulation of free-surface flow of a viscoelastic material. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 136:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldin M, Yerushalmi J, Pfeffer R, Shinnar R (1969) Breakup of a laminar capillary jet of a viscoelastic fluid. J Fluid Mech 38:689–711CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Harlen OG, Rallison JM, Szabó P (1995) A split Lagrangian-Eulerian method for simulating transient viscoelastic flows. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 60:81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoath SD, Martin GD, Castrejón-Pita JR, Hutchings IM (2007) Satellite formation in drop-on-demand printing of polymer solutions. In: Proc 23rd int conf on non-impact printing (NIP23). Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Anchorage, pp 331–335Google Scholar
  19. Hoath SD, Hutchings IM, Martin GD, Tuladhar TR, Mackley MR, Vadillo D (2009) Links between ink rheology, drop-on-demand jet formation, and printability. J Imaging Sci Technol 53:041208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchings IM, Martin GD, Hoath SD (2007) High speed imaging and analysis of jet and drop formation. J Imaging Sci Technol 51:438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchings IM, Martin GD, Hoath SD, Morgan RH (2006) High speed imaging and analysis of jet and drop formation. In: Proc 22nd int conf on non-impact printing (NIP22). Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Denver, pp 91–94Google Scholar
  22. Keunings R (1986) An algorithm for the simulation of transient viscoelastic flows with free surfaces. J Comput Phys 62:199–220zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Li J, Fontelos MA (2003) Drop dynamics on the beads-on-string structure for viscoelastic jets: a numerical study. Phys Fluids 15:922–937CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Li R, Ashgriz N, Chandra S, Andrews JR (2008) Contraction of free liquid ligaments. AIChE J 54:3084–3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang RF, Mackley MR (1994) Rheological characterization of the time and strain dependence for polyisobutylene solutions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 52:387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin GD, Hutchings IM, Hoath SD (2006) Jet formation and late-stage ligament instability in drop-on-demand printing. In: Proc 22nd int conf on non-impact printing (NIP22). Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Denver, pp 95–98Google Scholar
  27. Oliveira MSN, Yeh R, McKinley GH (2006) Iterated stretching, extensional rheology and formation of beads-on-a-string structures in polymer solutions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 137:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paige CC, Saunders MA (1975) Solution of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 12:617–629zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Renardy M (1995) A numerical study of the asymptotic evolution and breakup of Newtonian and viscoelastic jets. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 59:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sattler R, Wagner C, Eggers J (2008) Blistering pattern and formation of nanofibers in capillary thinning of polymer solutions. Phys Rev Lett 100:164502CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Shore HJ, Harrison GM (2005) The effect of added polymers on the formation of drops ejected from a nozzle. Phys Fluids 17:033104CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Tuladhar TR, Mackley MR (2008) Filament stretching rheometry and break-up behaviour of low viscosity polymer solutions and inkjet fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 148:97–108zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wathen AJ, Silvester DJ (1993) Fast iterative solution of stabilized Stokes systems part I: using simple diagonal preconditioners. SIAM J Numer Anal 30:630–649zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Westborg H, Hassager O (1989) Creeping motion of long bubbles and drops in capillary tubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 133:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu D, Sánchez Romaguera V, Barbosa S, Travis W, de Wit J, Swan P, Yeates SG (2007) Inkjet printing of polymer solutions and the role of chain entanglement. J Mater Chem 17:4902–4907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu Q, Basaran OA (2007) Computational analysis of drop-on-demand drop formation. Phys Fluids 19:102111CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations