Rheologica Acta

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 665–672 | Cite as

The impact of non-DLVO forces on the onset of shear thickening of concentrated electrically stabilized suspensions

  • Joachim Kaldasch
  • Bernhard Senge
  • Jozua Laven
Original Contribution


This paper exposes an extension of an activation model previously published by the authors. When particles arranged along the compression axis of a sheared suspension, they may overcome the electrostatic repulsion and form force chains associated with shear thickening. A percolation-based consideration allows an estimation of the impact of the force chains on a flowing suspension. It suggests that similar to mode coupling models, the suspension becomes unstable before the critical stress evaluated from the activation model is reached. The percolated force chains lead to discontinuous shear thickening. The model predictions are compared with results from two experimental studies on aqueous suspensions of inorganic oxides; in one of them, hydration repulsion and in the other hydrophobic attraction can be expected. It is shown that the incorporation of non-Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek forces greatly improve predictions of the shear thickening instability.


Suspensions Shear thickening Percolation Activation model 


  1. Bender JW, Wagner NJ (1989) Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. J Rheol 33:329–366Google Scholar
  2. Boersma WH, Laven J, Stein HN (1990) Shear thickening (dilatancy) in concentrated dispersions. AIChE J 36:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brady JF, Bossis G (1985) The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation. J Fluid Mech 155:105–129CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Cates ME, Wittmer JP, Bouchaud J-P, Claudin P (1998) Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter. Phys Rev Lett 81:1841–1844CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Claesson PM, Christenson HK (1988) Very long range attractive forces between uncharged hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon surfaces in water. J Phys Chem 92:1650–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derjaguin BV, Landau LD (1941) Theory of stability of highly charged lyophobic sols and adhesion of highly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Acta Physicochim URSS 14:633–652Google Scholar
  7. Friedlander SK (2000) Smoke, dust, and haze. fundamentals of aerosol dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks VG, Zhou Z, Duin NJ, Boger DV (2000) Effect of interparticle forces on shear thickening of oxide suspensions. J Rheol 44:759–779CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Grabbe A, Horn RG (1993) Relationship between interfacial forces measured by colloid-probe atomic force microscopy and protein resistance of poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted poly(l-lysine) adlayers on metal oxide surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 157:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffman RL (1974) Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. II. Theory and experimental tests. J Colloid Interface Sci 46:491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman RL (1998) Explanations for the cause of shear thickening in concentrated colloidal suspensions. J Rheol 42:111–123CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Hogg R, Healy TW, Fuerstenau DW (1966) Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions. Trans Faraday Soc 62:1638–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes CB, Fuchs M, Cates ME (2003) Jamming transitions in a mode-coupling model of suspension rheology. Europhys Lett 63:240–246CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes CB, Cates ME, Fuchs M, Sollich P (2005) Glass transitions and shear thickening suspension rheology. J Rheol 49:237–269CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Israelachvili J, Pashley RM (1982) The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance. Nature 300:341–342PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaldasch J, Senge B, Laven J (2008) Shear thickening in electrically stabilized colloidal suspensions. Rheol Acta 47:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaldasch J, Senge B, Laven J (2009) Shear thickening in electrically stabilized non-aqueous colloidal suspensions. Appl Rheol 19(2):23493Google Scholar
  18. Krishnamurthy L-N, Wagner NJ, Mewis J (2005) Shear thickening in polymer stabilized colloidal dispersions. J Rheol 49(6):1347–1360CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Maranzano BJ, Wagner NJ (2001) The effects of particle size on reversible shear thickening of concentrated dispersions. J Chem Phys 23(114):10514–10527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melrose JR (2003) Colloid flow during thickening—a particle level understanding for core–shell particles. Faraday Discuss 123:355–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melrose JR, Ball RC (2004) Contact networks in continuously shear thickening colloids. J Rheol 48(5):961–978CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Paunov VN, Dimova RI, Kralchevsky PA, Broze G, Mehreteab A (1996) The hydration repulsion between charged surfaces as an interplay of volume exclusion and dielectric saturation effects. J Colloid Interface Sci 182:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peschel G, Belouschek P, Muller MM, Muller RM, Konig R (1982) The interaction of solid surfaces in aqueous systems. Colloid Polym Sci 260(4):444–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Podgornik R (1989) Electrostatic correlation forces between surface specific ionic interactions. J Chem Phys 91:5840–5849CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabinovich YI, Derjaguin BV (1988) Interaction of hydrophobized filaments in aqueous electrolyte solutions. Colloids Surf 30:243–251Google Scholar
  26. Rabinovich YI, Yoon R-H (1994) Use of atomic force microscope for the measurements of hydrophobic forces between silanated silica plate and glass sphere. Langmuir 10:1903–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabinovich YI, Derjaguin BV, Churaev NV (1982) Direct measurements of long-range surface forces in gas and liquid media. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 16:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smoluchowski M (1917) Versuch einer mathematischen. Theorie der Koagulationskinetic kolloider Lösungen. Z Phys Chem 92:129–168Google Scholar
  29. Song S, Peng C, Gonzalez-Olivares MA, Lopez-Valdivieso A, Fort T (2005) Study on hydration layers near nanoscale silica dispersed in aqueous solutions through viscosity measurement. J Colloid Interface Sci 287:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stauffer D, Aharony A (2003) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis Group, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Verwey EJW, Overbeek JTG (1948) Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou Z, Scales PJ, Boger DV (2001) Chemical and physical control of the rheology of concentrated metal oxide suspensions. Chem Eng Sci 56:2901–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität Berlin, Fakultät III: LebensmittelrheologieBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Laboratory of Materials and Interface ChemistryEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations