Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 47, Issue 7, pp 719–725 | Cite as

A physical decomposition of the stress tensor for complex flows

  • P. C. BolladaEmail author
  • T. N. Phillips
Original Contribution

Abstract

Traditionally, the components of the stress with respect to a relevant coordinate system are used for the purpose of stress visualisation and interpretation. A case for using a flow dependent measure to interpret and visualise stress is made for two dimensional flow, together with a suggestion for extending the idea to three dimensions. The method is illustrated for Newtonian and Oldroyd B fluids in both the eccentrically rotating cylinder and flow past a cylinder benchmark problems. In the context of a generalised Newtonian fluid, the relation between the flow-dependent stress measure to other field variables under certain flow conditions, is examined and is indicative of its importance in complex flow.

Keywords

Stress invariant Principal stress Stress visualisation Shear stress Normal stress difference Stress decomposition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom through a Portfolio Partnership award (EP/C513037).

My thanks to Rene Vargas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico UNAM and Nat Inkson, Cardiff University for their help with flow past a cylinder computations.

References

  1. Clemeur N, Rutgers RPG, Debbaut B (2004) Numerical evaluation of three dimensional effects in planar flow birefringence. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 123:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Harlen OG (2002) The negative wake behind a sphere sedimenting through a viscoelastic fluid. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 108:411–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haupt P (2002) Continuum Mechanics and Theory of Materials. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Keshtiban IJ, Belblidia F, Webster MF (2005) Computation of incompressible and weakly-compressible viscoelastic liquids flow; finite element/volume schemes. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 126:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lodge AS (1956) A network theory of flow birefringence and stress in concentrated polymer solutions. Trans. Faraday Soc, archived at www.rsc.org/ejarchive/TF/1956/TF9565200120.pdf, pp 120–130
  6. Martyn MT, Nakason C, Coates PD (2000) Stress measurements for contraction flows of viscoelastic polymer melts. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 91:123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Phan-Thien N (2002) Understanding Viscoelasticity. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Wapperom P, Renardy M (2005) Numerical prediction of the boundary layers in the flow around a cylinder using a fixed velocity field. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 125:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weissenberg K (1946) Conference of British Rheologists Club, London. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress in Rheology, Amsterdam 1948, 1:29–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations