Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 189–200 | Cite as

Rheology of immiscible blends with particle-induced drop clusters

  • Prachi Thareja
  • Sachin VelankarEmail author
Original Contribution

Abstract

We consider the effects of 2.7-μm-diameter hydrophobic silica particles added to droplet–matrix blends of polyethylene oxide (PEO) and polyisobutylene (PIB). The particles adsorb on the surface of the PEO drops but protrude considerably into the PIB phase. Hence, it is possible for a single particle to adsorb onto two PEO drops simultaneously. Such particles are called “bridging” particles, and they the glue drops into noncoalescing clusters. Flow visualization studies show that shearing the sample promotes bridging-induced clustering of drops and that the structure of the clusters depends on the shear rate. Rheologically, the most significant consequence of bridging-induced drop clustering appears to be a plateau in G′ at low frequencies characteristic of gel-like behavior. The gel-like behavior develops fully after shearing the sample, and the kinetics of gel formation are faster with increasing shear stress or increasing drop volume fraction. The gel-like behavior suggests that the bridging-induced drop clusters form a weak network. Apart from particle bridging, optical microscopy also reveals that particles can organize into a hexagonal lattice on the drops’ surfaces, a phenomenon that has only been noted in aqueous systems previously. Finally, rheology and flow visualization both suggest that particles promote coalescence of drops. This is surprising in light of much past research that shows that particles that are preferentially wetted by the continuous phase generally hinder coalescence in droplet–matrix systems.

Keywords

Polymer blend Particle Bridging Pickering emulsion Interfacial tension 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by a National Science Foundation grant, ENG-CTS-0431349. We are grateful to Soltex for making the PIB available for this research and to Prof. Barnard, University of Pittsburgh, for the use of his pendant drop apparatus.

References

  1. Ashby NP, Binks BP, Paunov VN (2004) Bridging interaction between a water drop stabilised by solid particles and a planar oil/water interface. Chem Commun 4:436–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aveyard R, Clint JH, Nees D, Paunov VN (2000) Compression and structure of monolayers of charged latex particles at air/water and octane/water interfaces. Langmuir 16:1969–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aveyard R, Binks BP et al (2002) Measurement of long-range repulsive forces between charged particles at an oil–water interface. Phys Rev Lett 88:246102–1–246102-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binks BP (2002) Particles as surfactants—similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boode K, Walstra P (1993) Partial coalescence in oil-in-water emulsions.1. Nature of the aggregation. Colloids Surf A 81:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boode K, Walstra P, Degrootmostert AEA (1993) Partial coalescence in oil-in-water emulsions. 2. Influence of the properties of the fat. Colloids Surf A 81:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandriss S, Margel S (1993) Synthesis and characterization of self-assembled hydrophobic monolayer coatings on silica colloids. Langmuir 9:1232–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Bruijn RA (1989) Deformation and breakup of drops in simple shear flows. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Denkov ND, Marinova KG (2006) Antifoam effects of solid particles, oil drops, and oil–solid compounds in aqueous foams. In: Binks BP, Horozov TS (eds) Colloidal particles at liquid interfaces. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson E (2006) Food emulsions. In: Binks BP, Horozov TS (eds) Colloidal particles at liquid interfaces. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrett PR (1993) Mode of action of antifoams. In: Garrett PR (ed) Defoaming. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelfer MY, Song HH, Liu LZ, Hsiao BS, Chu B, Rafailovich M, Si MY, Zaitsev V (2003) Effects of organoclays on morphology and thermal and rheological properties of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 41:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grace HP (1982) Dispersion phenomena in high viscosity immiscible fluid systems and applications of static mixers as dispersion devices. Chem Eng Commun 14:225–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graebling D, Muller R (1991) Determination of interfacial-tension of polymer melts by dynamic shear measurements. Colloids Surf 55:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gray NCC, Stewart AL, Cairns WL, Kosaric N (1984) Bacteria-induced de-emulsification of oil-in-water petroleum emulsions. Biotechnol Lett 6:419–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong JS, Namkung H, Ahn KH, Lee SJ, Kim C (2006) The role of organically modified layered silicate in the breakup and coalescence of droplets in PBT/PE blends. Polymer 47:3967–3975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horozov TS, Aveyard R, Clint JH, Binks BP (2003) Order–disorder transition in monolayers of modified monodisperse silica particles at the octane–water interface. Langmuir 19:2822–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horozov TS, Aveyard R, Binks BP, Clint JH (2005a) Structure and stability of silica particle monolayers at horizontal and vertical octane–water interfaces. Langmuir 21:7405–7412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horozov TS, Aveyard R, Clint JH, Neumann B (2005b) Particle zips: vertical emulsion films with particle monolayers at their surfaces. Langmuir 21:2330–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horozov TS, Binks BP (2006) Particle-stabilized emulsions: a bilayer or a bridging monolayer. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:773–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosaric N, Cairns WL, Gray NCC (1987) Microbial deemulsifiers. In: Kosaric N, Cairns WL, Gray NCC (eds) Biosurfactants and biotechnology. vol. 25. Marcel Decker, New York, pp 247–321Google Scholar
  22. Kralchevsky PA, Denkov ND, Danov KD (2001) Particles with an undulated contact line at a fluid interface: interaction between capillary quadrupoles and rheology of particulate monolayers. Langmuir 17:7694–7705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mizrahi J, Barnea E (1970) Effects of solid additives on the formation and separation of emulsions. Br Chem Eng 15:497–503Google Scholar
  24. Nikolaides MG, Bausch AR, Hsu MF, Dinsmore AD, Brenner MP, Weitz DA (2002) Electric-field-induced capillary attraction between like-charged particles at liquid interfaces. Nature 420:299–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oldroyd JG (1953) The elastic and viscous properties of emulsions and suspensions. Proc R Soc Lond A 218:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palierne JF (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pickering SU (1908) Emulsions. J Chem Soc Abstr 91–92:2001–2021Google Scholar
  28. Pieranski P (1980) Two-dimensional interfacial colloidal crystals. Phys Rev Lett 45:569–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pugh RJ (1996) Foaming, foam films, antifoaming and defoaming. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 64:67–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramsden W (1903) Separation of solids in the surface-layers of solutions and ‘suspensions’ (observations on surface-membranes, bubbles, emulsions, and mechanical coagulation)—preliminary account. Proc R Soc Lond A 72:156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Si M, Araki T, Ade H, Kilcoyne ALD, Fisher R, Sokolov JC, Rafailovich MH (2006) Compatibilizing bulk polymer blends by using organoclays. Macromolecules 39:4793–4801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stancik EJ, Fuller GG (2004) Connect the drops: Using solids as adhesives for liquids. Langmuir 20:4805–4808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stancik EJ, Gavranovic GT, Widenbrant MJO, Laschitsch AT, Vermant J, Fuller GG (2003) Structure and dynamics of particle monolayers at a liquid–liquid interface subjected to shear flow. Faraday Discuss 123:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stancik EJ, Kouhkan M, Fuller GG (2004) Coalescence of particle-laden fluid interfaces. Langmuir 20:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart AL, Gray NCC, Cairns WL, Kosaric N (1983) Bacteria-induced de-emulsification of water-in-oil petroleum emulsions. Biotechnol Lett 5:725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tambe DE, Sharma MM (1993) Factors controlling the stability of colloid-stabilized emulsions.1. An experimental investigation. J Colloid Interface Sci 157:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tambe DE, Sharma MM (1994) The effect of colloidal particles on fluid–fluid interfacial properties and emulsion stability. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 52:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thareja P, Velankar SS (2007) Particle-induced bridging in immiscible polymer blends. Rheol Acta 46:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP (2003) Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:503–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vermant J, Cioccolo G, Nair KG, Moldenaers P (2004) Coalescence suppression in model immiscible polymer blends by nano-sized colloidal particles. Rheol Acta 43:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations