Rheologica Acta

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 979–987 | Cite as

Experimental observation on the flow-induced assembly of Carbon nanotube suspensions to form helical bands

  • Anson W. K. Ma
  • Malcolm R. MackleyEmail author
  • Sameer S. Rahatekar
Original Contribution


This paper describes optical observations on the way aggregates of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in an epoxy matrix can form unusual helical bands (HBs) that are aligned perpendicular to the shear flow. By applying specific flow conditions, HBs were formed from isotropic aggregates of CNTs suspended in an essentially Newtonian epoxy matrix. Both optical and matching rheological data are presented together with a schematic model of the way HBs are formed. It was discovered that the steady shear rheology of the CNT suspension did not substantially change during the observed micro-structure change. The HB structure may have relevance in terms of potential applications for CNTs.


Fibre suspension Shear-induced structure formation Rheo-optics 



We would like to thank Prof. A.H. Windle and the Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy at the University of Cambridge for providing the base multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Anson Ma would also like to thank the Croucher Foundation Scholarship and the Overseas Research Students Awards Scheme `(ORSAS) for providing financial support.

Supplementary material


  1. Ajayan PM, Stephan O, Colliex C, Trauth D (1994) Aligned carbon nanotube arrays formed by cutting a polymer resin-nanotube composite. Science 265:1212–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science 297:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batchelor GK (1977) The effect of Brownian motion on the block stress in a suspension of particles. J Fluid Mech 83:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bower C, Mackley MR, Smeulders BAS, Barker D, Hayes J (1998) The rheology, processing, and microstructure of complex fluids. In: Ottewill RH, Rennie AR (eds) Modern aspects of colloidal dispersions. Kluwer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgers (1938) On the motion of small particles of elongated form suspended in a viscous liquid. In: Second report on viscosity and plasticity. Nordemann, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvert P (1999) Nanotube composites: a recipe for strength. Nature 399:210–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Degroot JV, Macosko CW, Kume T, Hashimoto T (1994) Flow-induced anisotropic SALS in silica-filled PDMS liquids. J Colloid Interface Sci 166:404–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dresselhaus MS, Avouris P (2001) Introduction to carbon materials research. In: Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (eds) carbon nanotubes, Top Appl Phys 80:1–9Google Scholar
  9. Gervat L, Mackley MR, Nicholson TM, Windle AH (1995) The effect of shear on thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers. Philos Trans Phys Sci Eng 350:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grazian D, Mackley MR (1984a) Shear induced optical textures and their relaxation behaviour in thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 106:73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grazian D, Mackley MR (1984b) Disclinations observed during the shear of MBBA. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 106:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinch EJ, Leal LG (1975) Constitutive equations in suspension mechanics. Part I. J Fluid Mech 71:481–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinch EJ, Leal LG (1976) Constitutive equations in suspension mechanics. Part II. J Fluid Mech 76:187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbie EK, Fry DJ (2006) Nonequilibrium phase diagram of sticky nanotube suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 97:036101-1–036101-4Google Scholar
  15. Hobbie EK, Wang H, Kim H, Han CC, Grulke EA (2003a) Optical measurements of structure and orientation in sheared carbon-nanotube suspensions. Rev Sci Instrum 74:1244–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobbie EK, Wang H, Kim H, Lin-Gibson S, Grulke EA (2003b) Orientation of carbon nanotubes in a sheared polymer melt. Phys Fluids 15:1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoekstra H, Vermant J. Mewis J, Fuller GG (2003) Flow-induced anisotropy and reversible aggregation in two-dimensional suspensions. Langmuir 19:9134–9141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang YY, Ahir SV, Terentjev EM (2006) Dispersion rheology of carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix. Phys Rev B 73:125422-1–125422-9Google Scholar
  19. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature (London) 354:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin-Gibson S, Pathak JA, Grulke EA, Wang H, Hobbie EK (2004) Elastic flow instability in nanotube suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 92:048302-1–048302-4Google Scholar
  21. Mackley MR, Wannaborworn S, Gao P, Zhao F (1999) The optical microscopy of sheared liquids using a newly developed optical stage. J Microsc Anal 69:25–27Google Scholar
  22. Macosko CW (1994) Rheology: principles, measurements and applications. Wiley/VCH, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Montesi A, Peña AA, Pasquali M (2004) Vorticity alignment and negative normal stresses in sheared attractive emulsions. Phys Rev Lett. 92:058303-1–058303-4Google Scholar
  24. Morton WE, Wray GR (1962) An introduction to the study of spinning. Longmans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Petrie CJS (1999) The rheology of fibre suspensions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 87:369–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pignon F, Magnin A, Piau JM (1997) Butterfly light scattering pattern and rheology of a sheared thixotropic clay gel. Phys Rev Lett 79:4689–4692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rahatekar SS, Koziol KKK, Butler SA, Elliott JA, Shaffer MSP, Mackley MR, Windle AH (2006) Optical microstructure and viscosity enhancement for an epoxy resin matrix containing multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Rheol 50(5):599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito S (1997) Carbon nanotubes for next-generation electronics devices. Science 278:77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandler J, Shaffer MSP, Prasse T, Bauhofer W., Schulte K., Windle AH (1999) Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix and the resulting electrical properties. Polymer 40:5967–5971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaffer MSP, Fan X, Windle AH (1998) Dispersion and packing of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 36:1603–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh C, Shaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Production of controlled architectures of aligned carbon nanotubes by an injection chemical vapour deposition method. Carbon 41:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smoluchowski M (1917) Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik kolloider Lösungen. Z Phys Chem 92:129–168Google Scholar
  33. Tans SJ, Verschueren ARM, Dekker C (1998) Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature 393:49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Varadan P, Solomon MJ (2001) Shear-induced microstructural evolution of a thermoreversible colloidal gel. Langmuir 17:2918–2929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vermant J, Solomon MJ (2005) Flow-induced structure in colloidal suspensions. J Phys Condens Matter 17:R187–R216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warren LJ (1981) Shear flocculation. Chemtech 11:180–185Google Scholar
  37. Zheng M, Jagota A, Semke ED, Diner BA, McLean RS, Lustig SR, Richardson RE, Tassi NG (2003) DNA-assisted dispersion and separation of carbon nanotubes. Nat Mater 2:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zollars RI, Ali SI (1986) Shear coagulation in the presence of repulsive interparticle forces. J Colloid Interface Sci 114:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anson W. K. Ma
    • 1
  • Malcolm R. Mackley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sameer S. Rahatekar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations