Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 405–412 | Cite as

Particle-induced bridging in immiscible polymer blends

  • Prachi Thareja
  • Sachin VelankarEmail author
Original Contribution

Abstract

Pickering emulsions are emulsions whose drops are stabilized against coalescence by particles adsorbed at their interface. Recent research on oil/water/particle systems shows that particles can sometimes adsorb at two oil/water interfaces. Such “bridging particles” can glue together drops of oil in water or vice versa. We hypothesize that the same effect should apply in immiscible polymer blends with droplet-matrix morphologies, viz., added particles should glue together drops and give rise to particle-bridged drop clusters. We test this hypothesis in PIB-in-PDMS blends [PIB, poly(isobutylene); PDMS, poly(dimethylsiloxane)] with fumed silica particles. Direct visualization shows that the particles can indeed induce clustering of the drops, and the blends appear to show gel-like behavior. Such gel-like behavior is confirmed by dynamic oscillatory experiments. However, we are unable to conclusively attribute the gel-like behavior to droplet clustering: Association of the fumed silica particles in the bulk, which itself causes gel-like behavior, confounds the results and prevents clear analysis of the gluing effect of the particles. We conclude that PIB/PDMS/fumed silica is not a good model system, for studying particle-containing polymer blends. We instead propose that spherical monodisperse silica particles can offer a far more convenient model system, and provide direct visual evidence of gluing of PIB drops in a PDMS matrix.

Keywords

Spherical monodisperse silica particles Drop clustering PIB PDMS Fumed silica 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant #ENG-CTS-0431349 from the National Science Foundation. We are grateful to Soltex, Inc., Rhodia, Inc., and Degussa for making the PIB, PDMS, and the silica particles available for this research.

Note added to proofs

A very recent article, Horozov et al., Angewandte Chemie-International Edition (2006) Particle–stabilized emulsions: A bilayer or a bridging monolayer? 45:773–776, discusses oil/water emulsions stabilized by bridging particles. They have followed the same strategy as described at the end of this paper: using monodisperse micron-sized silica particles rendered hydrophobic by silanization, to visualize bridging directly.

References

  1. Ashby NP, Binks BP, Paunov VN (2004) Bridging interaction between a water drop stabilised by solid particles and a planar oil/water interface. Chem Commun 436–437Google Scholar
  2. Binks BP (2002) Particles as surfactants—similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandriss S, Margel S (1993) Synthesis and characterization of self-assembled hydrophobic monolayer coatings on silica colloids. Langmuir 9:1232–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards DA, Brenner D, Wasan DT (1991) Interfacial transport processes and rheology. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Graebling D, Muller R, Palierne JF (1993) Linear viscoelasticity of incompatible polymer blends in the melt in relation with interfacial properties. J Phys IV 3:1525–1534Google Scholar
  6. Horozov TS, Aveyard R, Binks BP, Clint JH (2005) Structure and stability of silica particle monolayers at horizontal and vertical octanewater interfaces. Langmuir 21: 7405–7412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maric M, Macosko CW (2001) Improving polymer blend dispersions in mini-mixers. Polym Eng Sci 41:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oldroyd JG (1953) The elastic and viscous properties of emulsions and suspensions. Proc R Soc Lond A218:122–132Google Scholar
  9. Palierne JF (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pickering SU (1908) Emulsions. J Chem Soc Abstr 91–92:2001–2021Google Scholar
  11. Ramsden W (1903) Separation of solids in the surface-layers of solutions and ‘suspensions’ (observations on surface-membranes, bubbles, emulsions, and mechanical coagulation).—Preliminary account. Proc R Soc Lond A 72:156–164Google Scholar
  12. Stancik EJ, Fuller GG (2004) Connect the drops: using solids as adhesives for liquids. Langmuir 20:4805–4808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stancik EJ, Kouhkan M, Fuller GG (2004) Coalescence of particle-laden fluid interfaces. Langmuir 20:90–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tambe DE, Sharma MM (1994) The effect of colloidal particles on fluid–fluid interfacial properties and emulsion stability. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 52:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Blaaderen A, Vrij A (1992) Synthesis and characterization of colloidal dispersions of fluorescent, monodisperse silica spheres. Langmuir 8:2921–2931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Helden AK, Jansen JW, Vrij A (1981) Preparation and characterization of spherical monodisperse silica dispersions in nonaqueous solvents. J Colloid Interface Sci 81:354–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vermant J, Cioccolo G, Nair KG, Moldenaers P (2004) Coalescence suppression in model immiscible polymer blends by nano-sized colloidal particles. Rheol Acta 43:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vignati E, Piazza R, Lockhart TP (2003) Pickering emulsions: interfacial tension, colloidal layer morphology, and trapped-particle motion. Langmuir 19:6650–6656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vinckier I, Mewis J, Moldenaers P (1996) Relationship between rheology and morphology of model blends in steady shear flow. J Rheol 40:613–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vinckier I, Moldenaers P, Terracciano AM, Grizzuti N (1998) Droplet size evolution during coalescence in semiconcentrated model blends. AIChE J 44:951–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations