Rheologica Acta

, 45:132

A frictional molecular model for the viscoelasticity of entangled polymer nanocomposites

Original contribution


The dynamics of polymer melts and concentrated solutions reinforced with nanoscale rigid spherical particles is analyzed. Nanocomposites with low filler volume fraction and strong polymer-filler interactions are considered. Entanglement effects are represented by requiring the diffusion in the chain contour direction to be more pronounced than in the direction transverse to the chain primitive path. Filler particles are treated as material points. They reduce the polymer mobility in both longitudinal and transverse tube directions due to short-range energetic filler-polymer interactions. Hence, the contribution to chain dynamics and stress production of both filler-polymer and polymer-polymer interactions is considered to be purely frictional in nature. In the model, the strain rate sensitivity is associated with the thermal motion of chains, with the convective relaxation of entanglement constrains and with the polymer-filler attachment/detachment process. The effect of model parameters is discussed and the predictions are compared with experimental data.


Polymer nanocomposites Topological and energetic constraint release 


  1. Aubouy M, Raphaël E (1998) Scaling description of a colloidal particle clothed with polymers. Macromolecules 31:4357–4363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxandall LG (1987) Anisotropic friction in polymer models. I. The elastic dumbbell and reptating chain. J Chem Phys 87:2297–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird RB, Deaguiar JR (1983) An encapsulated dumbbell model for concentrated polymer solutions and melts I. Theoretical development and constitutive equation. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 13:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird RB, Wiest JM (1984) Anisotropic effects in dumbbell kinetic theory. J Rheol 29:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassagnau Ph, Mélis F (2003) Non-linear viscoelastic behavior and modulus recovery in silica filled polymers. Polymer 44:6607–6615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtiss CF, Bird RB (1981) A kinetic theory for polymer melts. I. The equation for the single-link orientational distribution function. J Chem Phys 74:2016–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaguiar JR (1983) An encapsulated dumbbell model for concentrated polymer solutions and melts II. Calculation of material functions and experimental comparisons. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 13:161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) Theory of polymer dynamics. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Donnet JB (2003) Nano and microcomposites of polymers elastomers and their reinforcement. Compo Sci Technol 63:1085–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frenkel J (1946) Kinetic theory of liquids. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Havet G, Isayev AI (2001) A thermodynamic approach to the rheology of highly interactive filler-polymer mixtures: Part I-Theory. Rheol Acta 40:570–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Havet G, Isayev AI (2003) A thermodynamic approach to the rheology of highly interactive filler-polymer mixtures. Part II-Comparison with polystyrene/nanosilica mixtures. Rheol Acta 42:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinrich G, Klüppel M (2002) Recent advances in the theory of filler networking in elastomers. Adv Polym Sci 160:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kavassalis TA, Noolandi J (1987) New view of entanglements in dense polymer systems. Phys Rev Lett 59:2674–2677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kavassalis TA, Noolandi J (1988) A new theory of entanglements and dynamics in dense polymer systems. Macromolecules 21:2869–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leonov AI (1990) On the rheology of filled polymers. J Rheol 34:1039–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marrucci G (1996) Dynamics of entanglements: a nonlinear model consistent with the Cox-Merz rule. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 62:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marrucci G, Ianniruberto G (1997) Effect of flow on topological interactions in polymers. Macromol Symp 117:233–240Google Scholar
  20. Marrucci G, Ianniruberto G (2001) Constitutive equation for polymeric solution close to the overlap concentration. Chem Eng Sci 56:5539–5544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozmusul MS, Picu RC, Sternstein SS, Kumar S (2005) Lattice Monte Carlo simulations of chain conformations in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Reynaud E, Jouen T, Gauthier C, Vigier G, Varlet J (2001) Nanofillers in polymeric matrix: a study on silica reinforced PA6. Polymer 42:8759–8768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer Physics. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarvestani AS, Picu RC (2004) Network model for viscoelastic behavior of polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 45:7779–7790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Subbotin A, Semenov A, Manias E, Hadziioannou G, ten Brinke G (1995) Rheology of confined polymer melts under shear flow: strong adsorption limit. Macromolecules 28:1511–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Subbotin A, Semenov A, Doi M (1997) Friction in strongly confined polymer melts: effect of polymer bridges. Phys Rev E 56:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang Q, Archer LA (2002) Poly(ethylene oxide)/silica nanocomposites: structure and rheology. Langmuir 18:10435–10442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Q, Archer LA (2004) Optical polarimetry and mechanical rheometry of poly(ethylene oxide)-silica dispersions. Macromolecules 37:1928–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MechanicalAerospace and Nuclear Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations