Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 297, Issue 5, pp 741–748 | Cite as

Improving the conductivity and permselectivity of ion-exchange membranes by introduction of inorganic oxide nanoparticles: impact of acid–base properties

  • D. V. Golubenko
  • R. R. Shaydullin
  • A. B. YaroslavtsevEmail author
Original Contribution


In the present paper, the influence of acid–base properties of inorganic particles in ion-exchange membrane-based nanocomposites on their physicochemical and transport properties was investigated. For this purpose, particles of Zr, Ti, and Si oxides have been synthesized in situ in the system of pores and channels of the membranes. Depending on the acid–base properties of oxides, introduction of nanoparticles can increase or decrease the water uptake, conductivity, and selectivity. A new approach to cross-linking of ion-exchange membranes by incorporating ZrO2 particles into their matrix is proposed. Such cross-linking provides an improvement of swelling, conductivity, and salt permselectivity of the membrane in Na+-form. These parameters are important for successful application of such materials in direct and reverse electrodialysis, electrodeionization, and diffusion dialysis. For example, incorporation of 10 wt% of zirconia leads to a “cross-linking” of the membrane, i.e., binding of 45–50% of sulfonic groups, accompanied by a decrease of the water uptake by more than twofold and an increase of apparent transport numbers.


Charge transport Composites Graft-copolymers Membranes Nanoparticles Cross-linking 



The work was carried using the equipment of the JRC PMR IGIC RAS, functioning within the State Assignment on Fundamental Research to the Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry.

Funding information

This study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (project no. 17-79-30054).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Strathmann H, Grabowski A, Eigenberger G (2013) Ion-exchange membranes in the chemical process industry. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:10364–10379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao W-Y, Zhou M, Yan B, Sun X, Liu Y, Wang Y, Xu T, Zhang Y (2018) Waste conversion and resource recovery from wastewater by ion exchange membranes: state-of-the-art and prospective. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:6025–6039. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faucher M, Serre É, Langevin M-È, Mikhaylin S, Lutin F, Bazinet L (2018) Drastic energy consumption reduction and ecoefficiency improvement of cranberry juice deacidification by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes at semi-industrial scale: reuse of the recovery solution. J Membr Sci 555:105–114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melnikov S, Kolot D, Nosova E, Zabolotskiy V (2018) Peculiarities of transport-structural parameters of ion-exchange membranes in solutions containing anions of carboxylic acids. J Membr Sci 557:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strathmann H (1995) Electrodialysis and related processes. In: Noble RD, Stern SA (eds) Membrane separation technology, principles and applications. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam, pp 213–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campione A, Gurreri L, Ciofalo M, Micale G, Tamburini A, Cipollina A (2018) Electrodialysis for water desalination: a critical assessment of recent developments on process fundamentals, models and applications. Desalination 434:121–160. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hong JG, Zhang B, Glabman S, Uzal N, Dou X, Zhang H, Wei X, Chen Y (2015) Potential ion exchange membranes and system performance in reverse electrodialysis for power generation: a review. J Membr Sci 486:71–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashu R, Pawlowski S, Veerman J et al (2018) Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage. Appl Energy 225:290–331. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knox CK, Voth GA (2010) Probing selected morphological models of hydrated nation using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 114:3205–3218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gierke TD, Munn GE, Wilson FC (1981) The morphology in Nafion® perfluorinated membrane products, as determined by wide- and small-angle x-ray studies. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 19:1687–1704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mauritz KA, Moore RB (2004) State of understanding of Nafion. Chem Rev 104:4535–4585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kononenko N, Nikonenko V, Grande D, Larchet C, Dammak L, Fomenko M, Volfkovich Y (2017) Porous structure of ion exchange membranes investigated by various techniques. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 246:196–216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geise GM, Paul DR, Freeman BD (2014) Fundamental water and salt transport properties of polymeric materials. Prog Polym Sci 39:1–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golubenko DV, Pourcelly G, Yaroslavtsev AB (2018) Permselectivity and ion-conductivity of grafted cation-exchange membranes based on UV-oxidized polymethylpenten and sulfonated polystyrene. Sep Purif Technol 207:329–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Liu H, Xu Y, Seo JW, Shen J, Gao C, van der Bruggen B (2018) Formation of morphologically confined nanospaces via self-assembly of graphene and nanospheres for selective separation of lithium. J Mater Chem A 6:18859–18864. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sata T (2004) Ion exchange membranes—preparation, characterization, modification and application. The Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ran J, Wu L, He Y, Yang Z, Wang Y, Jiang C, Ge L, Bakangura E, Xu T (2017) Ion exchange membranes: new developments and applications. J Membr Sci 522:267–291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mizutani Y (1990) Structure of ion exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 49:121–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kerres J, Cui W, Junginger M (1998) Development and characterization of crosslinked ionomer membranes based upon sulfinated and sulfonated PSU. Crosslinked PSU blend membranes by alkylation of sulfinate groups with dihalogenoalkanes. J Membr Sci 139:227–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerres J, Zhang W, Ullrich A, Tang CM, Hein M, Gogel V, Frey T, Jörissen L (2002) Synthesis and characterization of polyaryl blend membranes having different composition, different covalent and/or ionical cross-linking density, and their application to DMFC. Desalination 147:173–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hwang HY, Koh HC, Rhim JW, Nam SY (2008) Preparation of sulfonated SEBS block copolymer membranes and their permeation properties. Desalination 233:173–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaidi SM (2003) Polymer sulfonation—a versatile route to prepare proton-conducting membrane material for advanced technologies. Arab J Sci Eng 28:183–194Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xue L, Gao C, Ruan H et al (2017) Sulfonated reduced graphene oxide modification layers to improve monovalent anions selectivity and controllable resistance of anion exchange membrane. J Membr Sci 536:167–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jang HR, Yoo ES, Kannan R, Kim JS, Lee K, Yoo DJ (2017) Facile tailor-made enhancement in proton conductivity of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) by graphene oxide nanosheet for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell applications. Colloid Polym Sci 295:1059–1069. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alabi A, AlHajaj A, Cseri L, Szekely G, Budd P, Zou L (2018) Review of nanomaterials-assisted ion exchange membranes for electromembrane desalination. NPJ Clean Water 1:10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jalani NH, Dunn K, Datta R (2005) Synthesis and characterization of Nafion®-MO2 (M = Zr, Si, Ti) nanocomposite membranes for higher temperature PEM fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 51:553–560. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sohn J-Y, Sung H-J, Shin J, Ko BS, Song JM, Nho YC (2012) Radiation grafting of binary monomers for the preparation of organic/inorganic hybrid membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application. Macromol Res 20:912–919. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Golubenko DV, Karavanova YA, Melnikov SS, Achoh AR, Pourcelly G, Yaroslavtsev AB (2018) An approach to increase the permselectivity and mono-valent ion selectivity of cation-exchange membranes by introduction of amorphous zirconium phosphate nanoparticles. J Membr Sci 563:777–784. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu H, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B et al (2016) An anion exchange membrane modified by alternate electro-deposition layers with enhanced monovalent selectivity. J Membr Sci 520:262–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao Y, Zhu J, Li J, Zhao Z, Charchalac Ochoa SI, Shen J, Gao C, van der Bruggen B (2018) Robust multilayer graphene-organic frameworks for selective separation of monovalent anions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:18426–18433. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gerasimova E, Safronova E, Ukshe A, Dobrovolsky Y, Yaroslavtsev A (2016) Electrocatalytic and transport properties of hybrid Nafion® membranes doped with silica and cesium acid salt of phosphotungstic acid in hydrogen fuel cells. Chem Eng J 305:121–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kondratenko MS, Ponomarev II, Gallyamov MO, Razorenov DY, Volkova YA, Kharitonova EP, Khokhlov AR (2013) Novel composite Zr/PBI-O-PhT membranes for HT-PEFC applications. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 4:481–492. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Silva VS, Ruffmann B, Silva H, Silva VB, Mendes A, Madeira LM, Nunes S (2006) Zirconium oxide hybrid membranes for direct methanol fuel cells—evaluation of transport properties. J Membr Sci 284:137–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahmoud Nasef M, Saidi H (2003) Preparation of crosslinked cation exchange membranes by radiation grafting of styrene/divinylbenzene mixtures onto PFA films. J Membr Sci 216:27–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prastomo N, Muto H, Sakai M, Matsuda A (2010) Formation and stabilization of tetragonal phase in sol-gel derived ZrO2 treated with base-hot-water. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Technol 173:99–104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Safronova EY, Golubenko DV, Shevlyakova NV, D’yakova MG, Tverskoi VA, Dammak L, Grande D, Yaroslavtsev AB (2016) New cation-exchange membranes based on cross-linked sulfonated polystyrene and polyethylene for power generation systems. J Membr Sci 515:196–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yaroslavtsev AB, Stenina IA, Voropaeva EY, Ilyina AA (2009) Ion transfer in composite membranes based on MF-4SC incorporating nanoparticles of silica, zirconia, and polyaniline. Polym Adv Technol 20:566–570. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peighambardoust SJ, Rowshanzamir S, Amjadi M (2010) Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:9349–9384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Safronova EY, Lysova AA, Novikova SA, Yaroslavtsev AB (2011) On the mechanism of increasing ion conductivity in hybrid membranes. Russ Chem Bull 60:20–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kalappa P, Lee J (2007) Proton conducting membranes based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/TiO2 nanocomposites for a direct methanol fuel cell. Polym Int 56:371–375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Amjadi M, Rowshanzamir S, Peighambardoust SJ, Hosseini MG, Eikani MH (2010) Investigation of physical properties and cell performance of Nafion/TiO2nanocomposite membranes for high temperature PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:9252–9260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silva VS, Silva VB, Mendes A, Madeira LM, Silva H, Michaelmann J, Ruffmann B, Nunes SP (2007) Pre-treatment effect on the sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membrane transport properties and direct methanol fuel cell performance. Sep Sci Technol 42:2909–2925. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yurova PA, Stenina IA, Yaroslavtsev AB (2018) A comparative study of the transport properties of homogeneous and heterogeneous cation-exchange membranes doped with zirconia modified with phosphoric acid groups. Pet Chem 58:1144–1153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Busca G (1999) The surface acidity of solid oxides and its characterization by IR spectroscopic methods. An attempt at systematization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 1:723–736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gervasini A, Aurox A (1991) Acidity and basicity of metal oxide surfaces II. Determination by catalytic decomposition of isopropanol. J Catal 131:190–198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Golubenko DV, Yurova PA, Karavanova YA, Stenina IA (2017) Surface modification of zirconia with acid groups. Inorg Mater 53:1053–1057. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ali AA, Zaki M (1999) Thermal and spectroscopic studies of polymorphic transitions of zirconia during calcination of sulfated and phosphated Zr(OH)4 precursors of solid acid catalysts. Thermochim Acta 336:17–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ayyaru S, Dharmalingam S (2015) A study of influence on nanocomposite membrane of sulfonated TiO2 and sulfonated polystyrene-ethylene-butylene-polystyrene for microbial fuel cell application. Energy 88:202–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zong E, Wei D, Wan H, Zheng S, Xu Z, Zhu D (2013) Adsorptive removal of phosphate ions from aqueous solution using zirconia-functionalized graphite oxide. Chem Eng J 221:193–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kerres J, Ullrich A, Meier F, Haring T (1999) Synthesis and characterization of novel acid-base polymer blends for application in membrane fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 125:243–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu L, Zhou D, Wang H, Pan Q, Ran J, Xu T (2015) Ionically cross-linked proton conducting membranes for fuel cells. Fuel Cells 15:189–195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yaroslavtsev AB, Yampolskii YP (2014) Hybrid membranes containing inorganic nanoparticles. Mendeleev Commun 24:319–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Golubenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. R. Shaydullin
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. B. Yaroslavtsev
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.N.S. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic ChemistryRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Institute of Problems of Chemical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussian Federation
  3. 3.Institute of Problems of Chemical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussian Federation
  4. 4.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations