Advertisement

Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 296, Issue 11, pp 1849–1855 | Cite as

Magnetorheological characterization and electrospinnability of ultrasound-treated polymer solutions containing magnetic nanoparticles

  • Petra PeerEmail author
  • Martin Stenicka
  • Petr Filip
  • Nadezda Pizurova
  • Vladimir Babayan
Original Contribution
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

In order to fabricate a magnetic nanofibrous membrane by electrospinning, it is necessary to follow a suitable method for incorporating nanoparticles into a polymer solution. Ultrasound treatment represents a very effective technique for distributing magnetic nanoparticles within polymer solutions. Adverse effects caused by sonication over time on the given nanofibrous membrane (polymer degradation and appearance of defects) were evaluated by using rotational (magneto)rheometry, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, and magnetometry. A magnetorheological approach was selected to estimate the optimal duration of sonication, and findings were experimentally verified. It was concluded that the processed nanofibrous membrane showed promise as an advanced magnetoactive device.

Keywords

Magnetorheological efficiency Magnetic nanoparticles Ultrasound treatment Poly(ethylene oxide) solution Electrospun nanofibres 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors P.P. and P.F. wish to express their gratitude for the institutional support they received (RVO 67985874). The authors M.S. and V.B. thank the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic for the backing given under Program NPU I (LO1504). The author N.P. also is grateful to the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic for its grant under the project m-IPMinfra (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001823).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC (2010) Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 28:325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal S, Greiner A, Wendorff JH (2013) Functional materials by electrospinning of polymers. Prog Polym Sci 38:963–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xue J, Xie J, Liu W, Xia Y (2017) Electrospun nanofibers: new concepts, materials and applications. Acc Chem Res 50:1976–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savva I, Constantinou D, Marinica O, Vasile E, Vekas L, Krasia-Chistoforou T (2014) Fabrication and characterization of superparamagnetic poly(vinylpyrrolidone)/poly(L-lactide)/Fe3O4 electrospun membranes. J Magn Magn Mater 352:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kidkhunthod P, Nilmoung S, Mahakot S, Rodporn S, Phumying S, Maensiri S (2016) A structural study and magnetic properties of electrospun carbon/manganese ferrite (C/MnFe2O4) composite nanofibers. J Magn Magn Mater 401:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Uthaman S, Thomas RG, Hyun H, Jeong YY, Cho CS, Park IK (2015) Biomedical applications of magnetically functionalized organic/inorganic hybrid nanofibres. Int J Mol Sci 16:13661–13677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhong Y, Leung V, Wan LY, Dutz S, Ko FK, Häfeli UO (2015) Electrospun magnetic nanofibre mats – a new bondable biomaterial using remotely activated magnetic heating. J Magn Magn Mater 380:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tong HW, Wang M, Li ZY, Lu WW (2010) Electrospinning, characterization and in vitro biological evaluation of nanocomposite fibers containing carbonated hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Biomed Mater 5:054111 (13 pp), 054111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim CA, Choi HJ, Kim CB, Jhon MS (1998) Drag reduction characteristics of polysaccharide xanthan gum. Macromol Rapid Commun 19:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sawawi M, Wang TY, Nisbet DR, Simon GP (2013) Scission of electrospun polymer fibres by ultrasonication. Polymer 54:4237–4252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Beck Tan NC (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A (2008) Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer 49:5603–5621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oh JS, Choi SB (2017) State of the art of medical devices featuring smart electro-rheological and magneto-rheological fluids. J King Saud Univ Sci 29:390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felicia LJ, Vinod S, Philip J (2016) Resent advances in magnetorheology of ferrofluids (magnetic nanofluids)-a critical review. J Nanofluids 5:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fang FF, Liu YD, Choi HJ (2013) Electrorheological and magnetorheological response of polypyrrole/magnetite nanocomposite particles. Colloid Polym Sci 291:1781–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peer P, Filip P, Polaskova M, Kucharczyk P, Pavlinek V (2016) The influence of sonication of poly(ethylene oxide) solutions to the quality of resulting electrospun nanofibrous mats. Polym Degrad Stabil 126:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sedlacik M, Moucka R, Kozakova Z, Kazantseva NE, Pavlinek V, Kuritka I, Kaman O, Peer P (2013) Correlation of structural and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with their calorimetric and magnetorheological performance. J Magn Magn Mater 326:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peer P, Stenicka M, Pavlinek V, Filip P (2014) The storage stability of polyvinylbutyral solutions from an electrospinnability standpoint. Polym Degrad Stabil 105:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qin XH, Yang EL, Li N, Wang SY (2007) Effect of different salts on electrospinning of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) polymer solution. J Appl Polym Sci 103:3865–3870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arayanarakul K, Choktaweesap N, Aht-ong D, Meechaisue C, Suppaphol S (2006) Effect of poly(ethylene glycol), inorganic salt, sodium dodecyl sulphate, and solvent system on electrospinning of poly(ethyle oxide). Macromol Mater Eng 291:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shenoy SL, Bates WD, Frisch HL, Wnek GE (2005) Role of chain entanglements on fiber formation during electrospinning of polymer solutions: good solvent, non-specific polymer-polymer interaction limit. Polymer 45:3372–3384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu JH, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC (2006) The role of elasticity in the formation of electrospun fibers. Polymer 47:4789–4797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park BJ, Fang FF, Choi HJ (2010) Magnetorheology: materials and application. Soft Matter 6:5246–5253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gao CY, Kim MW, Bae DH, Dong YZ, Piao SH, Choi HJ (2017) Fe3O4 nanoparticle-embedded polystyrene composite particles fabricated via a Shirasu porous glass membrane technique and their magnetorheology. Polymer 125:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKee MG, Wilkes GL, Colby RH, Long TM (2004) Correlations of solution rheology with electrospun fiber formation of linear and branched polyesters. Macromolecules 37:1760–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jun Z, Hou HQ, Wendorff JH, Greiner A (2005) Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibres by electrospinning: influence of molecular weight on fibre shape. E-Polymers:037Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosic R, Pelipenko J, Kocbek P, Baumgartner S, Bester-Rogac M, Kristl J (2012) The role of rheology of polymer solutions in predicting nanofibre formation by electrospinning. Eur Polym J 48:1374–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunlop DJ (1973) Superparamagnetic and single-domain threshold sizes in magnetite. J Geophys Res 78:1780–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smolkova IS, Kazantseva NE, Parmar H, Babayan V, Smolka P, Saha P (2015) Correlation between coprecipitation reaction course and magneto-structural properties of iron oxide nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys 155:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Peer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Stenicka
    • 2
  • Petr Filip
    • 1
  • Nadezda Pizurova
    • 3
  • Vladimir Babayan
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of SciencesPrague 6Czech Republic
  2. 2.Centre of Polymer Systems, University InstituteTomas Bata University in ZlinZlinCzech Republic
  3. 3.Institute of Physics of Materials of the Czech Academy of SciencesBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations