Advertisement

Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 296, Issue 9, pp 1555–1571 | Cite as

Hybrid collagen/pNIPAAM hydrogel nanocomposites for tissue engineering application

  • Nistor Manuela Tatiana
  • Vasile Cornelia
  • Rodica Tatia
  • Chiriac Aurica
Original Contribution
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The present work explores new hybrid bioactive, enzymatically degradable hydrogel nanocomposites. They are composed by stimuli-sensitive semi-interpenetrating collagen/poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) polymeric matrix, Dellite® 67G and Cloisite® 93A nanoclays, and hydroxyapatite particles. Morphology of the hybrid hydrogel nanocomposites was examined by near infrared chemical imaging, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy techniques. It has been found that the porous hydrogel nanocomposites showed a mix between intercalated and exfoliated structure, with interconnected pores and the inorganic material was evenly distributed in the polymeric matrix because of specific interactions between components. The collagen resistance against enzymatic degradation and the thermal stability were improved due to the protein encapsulation in the synthetic polymer matrix. The hydrogel nanocomposites showed suitable swelling characteristics for tissue engineering. In vitro cytocompatibility and cell viability revealed that the hybrid nanocomposites were non-cytotoxic for rat osteoblasts. These hybrid nanocomposites were designed as potential synthetic bone tissue engineering.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Hydrogels Nanocomposites Tissue engineering Reinforcement Enzymatic degradation Swelling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project BIONANOMED 164/2012.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

396_2018_4367_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (63 kb)
ESM 1 (PPTX 62 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Recker RR, Barger-Lux J (2002) Embryology, anatomy, and microstructure of bone. In: Coe FL, Favus MJ (eds) Disorders of bone and mineral metabolismEd 2 edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 177–198Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalfas IH (2001) Principles of bone healing. Neurosurg Focus 10:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swetha M, Sahithi K, Moorthi A, Srinivasan N, Ramasamy K, Selvamurugan N (2010) Biocomposites containing natural polymers and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Intern J Biol Macromol 47:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayashi M, Muramatsu H, Sato M, Tomizuka Y, Inoue M, Yoshimoto S (2013) Surgical treatment of facial fracture by using unsintered hydroxyapatite particles/poly L-lactide composite device (OSTEOTRANS MX®): a clinical study on 17 cases. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 41:783–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujii T, Tanaka T, Ohkawa K (2009) Biomineralization of calcium phosphate on human hair protein film and formation of a novel hydroxyapatite protein composite material. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 91:528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim M-J, Koh Y-H (2013) Synthesis of aligned porous poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)/hydroxyapatite (HA) composite microspheres. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2266–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kutikov AB, Song J (2013) An amphiphilic degradable polymer/hydroxyapatite composite with enhanced handling characteristics promotes osteogenic gene expression in bone marrow stromal cells. Acta Biomater 9:8354–8364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong TW, Wahit MU, Kadir MRA, Soheilmoghaddam M, Balakrishnan H (2014) A novel poly(xylitol-co-dodecanedioate)/hydroxyapatite composite with shape-memory behaviour. Mater Letters 126:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H, Che L, Ha Y, Ryu WH (2014) Mechanically-reinforced electrospun composite silk fibroin nanofibers containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng C 40:324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu X, Shen H, Yang F, Liang X, Wang S, Wu D (2014) Modified composite microspheres of hydroxyapatite and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) as an injectable scaffold. Appl Surf Sci 292:764–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bareiro O, Santos LA (2014) Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) applied in the surface modification of hydroxyapatite to develop polydimethylsiloxane/hydroxyapatite composites. Coll Surf B: Biointerfaces 115:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vasile E, Popescu LM, Piticescu RM, Burlacu A, Buruiana T (2012) Physico-chemical and biocompatible properties of hydroxyapatite based composites prepared by an innovative synthesis route. Mater Letters 79:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang S, Tian B, Guo Y-J, Zhu Z-A, Guo Y-P (2014) Chitosan/carbonated hydroxyapatite composite coatings: fabrication, structure and biocompatibility. Surf Coatings Technol 251:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma X-Y, Feng Y-F, Ma Z-S, Li X, Wang J, Wang L, Lei W (2014) The promotion of osteointegration under diabetic conditions using chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite coating on porous titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 35:7259–7270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mueller B, Koch D, Lutz R, Schlegel KA, Treccani L, Rezwan K (2014) A novel one-pot process for near-net-shape fabrication of open-porous resorbable hydroxyapatite/protein composites and in vivo assessment. Mater Sci Eng C 42:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aghaei H, Nourbakhsh AA, Karbasi S, JavadKalbasi R, Rafienia M, Nourbakhsh N, BonakdarS MKJD (2014) Investigation on bioactivity and cytotoxicity of mesoporous nano-composite MCM-48/hydroxyapatite for ibuprofen drug delivery. Ceram Int 40:735–7362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trandafir D-L, Mirestean C, Turcu RVF, Frentiu B, Eniu D, Simon S (2014) Structural characterization of nanostructured hydroxyapatite-iron oxide composites. Ceram Int 40:11071–11078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gunduz O, Gode C, Ahmad Z, Gökçe H, Yetmez M, Kalkandelen C, Sahin YM, Oktar FN (2014) Preparation and evaluation of cerium oxide-bovine hydroxyapatite composites for biomedical engineering applications. J Mechan Behavior Biomed Mater 35:70–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O'Brien FJ (2010) The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:461–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wahl DA, Czernuszka JT (2006) Collagen–hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. European Cells Mater 11:43–56.  https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v011a06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O'Brien FJ, Review, Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 2011;14:88–95Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan BP, Leong KW. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J 2008;17: (Suppl 4), 467–479. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3
  23. 23.
    Cortes DH, Jacobs NT, DeLucca JF, Elliott DM (2014) Elastic, permeability and swelling properties of human intervertebral disc tissues: a benchmark for tissue engineering. J Biomech 47:2088–2094.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.021 Epub 2013 Dec 25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sudhakar CK, Upadhyay NN, Jain A, Verma A, Narayana Charyulu R, Jain S. Smart biomaterials for tissue engineering of cartilage, Chap 5: In: Thomas S, Grohens Y, Ninan N. (Editors) Nanotechnology applications for tissue engineering, in micro and nanotechnologies series, Oxford, Elsevier UK, 2015, p.77–95Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nistor MT, Chiriac AP, Vasile C, Verestiuc L, Nita LE (2011) Synthesis of hydrogels based on poly(NIPAM) inserted into collagen sponge. Colloid Surf B Biointer 87:382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fahmy MD, Shah B, Razavi M, Jazayeri H, Fahimipour F, White J, Masri R, Tayebi L. Smart biomaterials for tissue engineering of cartilage, Chap. 8. In: Wang Q. (Editor) Smart materials for tissue engineering. Applications. In Smart Materials Series, Croydon, Royal Soc. Chemistry, UK, 2017, pp. 194–229Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kalpokaitė-Dičkuvienė R, Lukošiūtė I, Čėsnienė J, Baltušnikas A, Brinkienė K. Influence of the organically modified nanoclay on properties of cement paste, http://www.laviosa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/LAVIOSA_Plastic_InfluenceOfTheOrganicallyModifiedNanoclayOnPropertiesOfCementPaste.pdf
  28. 28.
    Esposito Corcione C, Striani R, Montagna F, Cannoletta D (2015) Organically modified montmorillonite polymer nanocomposites for stereolithography building process. Polym Adv Technol 26:92–98.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rao RR, Ceccarelli J, Vigen ML, Gudur M, Singh R, Deng CX, Putnam AJ, Stegemann JP (2014) Effects of hydroxyapatite on endothelial network formation in collagen/fibrin composite hydrogels in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater 10:3091–3097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tien W-B, Chen M-T, Yao P-C (2012) Effects of pH and temperature on microstructure and morphology of hydroxyapatite/collagen composites synthesized in vitro. Mater Sci Engin C 32:2096–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salah TA, Mohammad AM, Hassan MA, El-Anadouli BE (2014) Development of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite for cadmium ions removal in wastewater treatment. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:1571–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mocanu A, Furtos G, Rapuntean S, Horovitz O, Flore C, Garbo C, Danisteanu A, Rapuntean G, Prejmerean C, Tomoaia-Cotisel M (2014) Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial effects of composites based on multi-substituted hydroxyapatite and silver nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 298:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Azzaoui K, Lamhamdi A, Mejdoubi EM, Berrabah M, Hammouti B, Elidrissi A, Fouda MG, Al-Deyab SS (2014) Synthesis and characterization of composite based on cellulose acetate and hydroxyapatite application to the absorption of harmful substances. Carbohydr Polym 111:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Council of Europe. Protocole d’amendement à la Convention Européenne sur la Protection des Animaux Vertébrés Utilisés à des Fins Expérimentales ou à d’autres Fins Scientifiques; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 1998Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zimmermann MAVMA (1983) Guidelines on euthanasia 2007. Pain 16:109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maneshi A. Polyethylene clay nanocomposites: modeling and experimental investigation of particle morphology IPR May 2007, https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-polymer-research/sites/ca.institute-polymer-research/files/uploads/files/abolfazlmaneshi.pdf
  37. 37.
    Nistor MT, Vasile C (2013) Influence of the nanoparticle type on the thermal decomposition of the green starch/poly(vinyl alcohol)/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim 111:1903–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nistor MT, Chiriac AP, Niţă LE, Vasile C (2013) Characterization of the semi-interpenetrated network based on collagen and poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide-co-diethylene glycol diacrylate). Int J Pharm 452:92–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu KL, Choo ES, Wong SY et al (2010) Designing poly(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-based polyurethane block copolymers for electrospun nanofiber scaffolds with improved mechanical properties and enhanced mineralization capability. J Phys Chem B 114:7489–7498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Janik H, Marzec M (2015) A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 48:586–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kucinska-Lipka J, Marzec M, Gubanska I, Janik H (2016) Porosity and swelling properties of novel polyurethane–ascorbic acid scaffolds prepared by different procedures for potential use in bone tissue engineering. J Elastomers Plastics 12:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244316672093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Korsmeyer RW, Lustig SR, Peppas NA (1986) Solute and penetrant diffusion in swellable polymers. I. Mathematical modeling. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 24:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Control Release 5:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nistor Manuela Tatiana
    • 1
  • Vasile Cornelia
    • 1
  • Rodica Tatia
    • 2
  • Chiriac Aurica
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Chemistry of Polymers“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular ChemistryIasiRomania
  2. 2.National Institute for Biological SciencesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations