Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 295, Issue 5, pp 783–792 | Cite as

Equilibrium adsorption of polyvinylpyrrolidone and its role on thermoregulating microcapsules synthesis process

  • Anna M. Szczotok
  • Manuel Carmona
  • Anna-Lena Kjøniksen
  • Juan F. RodriguezEmail author
Open Access
Original Contribution


The adsorption of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) by the thermoregulating microcapsules has been studied. The mass ratio of PVP has been changed from 1 to 20, with respect to the lowest amount of PVP value (4.08 g). The results confirmed that a large amount of PVP was adsorbed by the polymeric shell. Experimental data were perfectly fitted by Langmuir model, obtaining at a confidence level of 95% values of 192.9 ± 0.4 g/kg and 0.18 ± 0.11 m3/kg for the maximum adsorption capacity and the equilibrium constant, respectively. It was found that utilizing PVP, at a concentration of 5.03 wt% of the total mass provided optimum conditions for synthesizing thermoregulating microcapsules containing Rubitherm®RT27 from poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) (P(St-DVB)), with the best thermal and physical properties. Finally, the robustness of the process was checked at a large scale by using a reactor that maintains geometrical similarities with that used at laboratory scale. The thermal properties, the encapsulation efficiency, and the microcapsule yield were similar, but at pilot plant scale, narrower particle size distributions were obtained.


Adsorption Langmuir model Microencapsulation Phase change material Suspending agent Yield 


The tensioactive agent is a key player in the processes of emulsion, suspension, particle, and capsule formation at nano- and microscale. Its influence and role on the particles size distribution, particle shape, agglomeration, or settling have been thoroughly studied [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Most of these studies pay all the attention on the ability of such compounds to modify the interfacial relations in terms of hydrophobicity, amphoteric properties, viscosity, and so on. Nevertheless, very few of such studies have considered not only the tensioactive as a skin of the particle but a constitutive portion of the material formed (particles or capsules).

Phase change materials (PCMs) are functional materials that can absorb energy (heat) during the melting process while keeping the temperature constant until the phase transition is completed. Moreover, during the solidification process, this energy will be released once again. Many scientists and companies have studied the use of PCMs in passive and active applications at low and middle temperatures. Among the passive storage systems in building applications, it is possible to distinguish PCM trombe walls, PCM wallboards, PCM shutter, PCM building blocks, air-based heating system, and ceiling boards. On the other hand, active storage systems include floor heating and ceiling boards [6]. Moreover, Kaygusuz and Ayhan [7] developed a solar heat pump system containing energy storage by encapsulated PCM for residential heating. They concluded that the highest saved net energy during the heating season was a dual source system (saving 12,056 kW), followed by a solar-assisted series of heat pumps (saving 10,120 kW) and a solar-assisted parallel system (saving 9390 kW). Further applications of PCM are ventilation nighttime cooling system as an alternative to air conditioning [8], thermoelectric refrigeration [9], and solar space heating [6], which are able to reduce energy consumption between 18 and 32%.

Different microencapsulation processes have been developed in order to solve the problems related with the PCM applications, such as leakage of the melted PCM, reactivity with the environment, volume change during the phase change transition state, and the heat transfer efficiency [10, 11]. Microencapsulation is a process where a thin shell is created around a microscopic droplet of active substance to produce capsules with useful properties. Solids, liquids, and gases can be encapsulated, and the size of microcapsules can range between 1 and 1000 μm, depending on the microencapsulation method. These methods can be categorized into chemical and physical processes. The most important techniques are interfacial polymerization [12, 13, 14], emulsion polymerization [15, 16], in situ polymerization [12, 17, 18], spray drying [5, 19], and suspension polymerization [20, 21, 22]. The selection of the encapsulation method is limited by the price of processing and core/shell requirement [23].

A large number of publications are related to the synthesis of microcapsules containing PCMs [4, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26]. However, only few of them have examined how the stabilizers affect the properties of the product and the microcapsule yield. The adsorption of nonionic surfactants onto solid surfaces has been studied previously [27, 28, 29, 30], observing that a large amount of the suspending agent is loaded onto the solid material. Smith et al. [30] found a high-affinity adsorption of PVP onto polystyrene lattices in water, where the maximum adsorption capacity was independent on the PVP molecular weight. On the contrary, when they used lattices in 0.5 N of NaCl, the adsorption of PVP onto polystyrene lattices increased with the molecular weight. In the same way, Geffroy et al. [29] studied the adsorption of different nonionic surfactants formed by combining alkyl groups C8 or C12 with an ethylene oxide oligomer (EO). They found that the maximum adsorption capacity varied with the size of the polar headgroup. Hence, it is possible that surfactant agents could be incorporated to the microcapsules containing thermoregulating materials, and the quantity may depend on the molecular weight and polarity of the surfactants. Thus, a part of its tensioactive function, this compound is incorporated as a constitutive part of the microcapsule shell. This incorporation will increase the apparent microcapsule yield. However, there is a general lack of knowledge on the way in which the inclusion of the tensioactive agents influences not only the size/shape but also the intrinsic properties of the microparticles or microcapsules.

In previous studies, it was found that PVP is a suitable suspending agent for the production of microcapsules from styrene (St) and methyl methacrylate-styrene (MMA-St) copolymer containing PCMs [4, 21, 22, 31]. Nevertheless, thermoregulating microcapsules from styrene and divinylbenzene (DVB) with a spherical shape, smooth surface, and a high mechanical resistance, similar to those of ion exchange resins, have not been reported in the literature. The greater physical resistance of the cross-linked shell of these materials is necessary for their employment in active thermo-accumulating systems in which the particles have to be circulated and pumped by ducts as slurries. An approach to these kinds of materials is reported by You et al. [26] and Li et al. [32] encapsulating n-octadecane. However, the microcapsules present holes, making them concave in shape. Alcazar et al. [33] obtained the desired physical and mechanical properties encapsulating extractant agents from poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) by using toluene and a mixture of arabic gum and poly(vinyl alcohol) (GA:PVA) as porogen and suspending agents, respectively. Hence, in the present study, the applicability of PVP and toluene for producing thermoregulating microcapsules from poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) containing Rubitherm®RT27 is examined. In addition, the microcapsule yield, the adsorption of PVP in the final product, and the robustness of the process at large scale have been studied.

Materials and methods


The monomers, styrene of reagent grade (St, 99 wt%, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.), and divinylbenzene of technical grade (DVB, containing 80% DVB isomers, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) were purified by washing with an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (1.25 N) and calcium chloride as desiccant. The remaining reagents were used as received, without further purification. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO, humidified with ∼25% of H2O pure, pharma grade, PanReac Co.) was used as initiator. Rubitherm®RT27 was used as core material. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, K30, Mw 40,000g mol−1, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) of reagent grade was used as suspending agent. Toluene and ethanol of reagent grade was used as inert diluents, and cleaner of the samples were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. Water with a conductivity of 1 μS/cm was produced in our laboratory by distillation followed by deionization using ion exchange. Nitrogen was high-purity grade.

Synthesis of microparticles

Microcapsules were prepared by a suspension-like polymerization technique based on the recipe used by Alcazar et al. [33]. Polymerization reactions were performed in a 0.5-L jacketed glass reactor equipped with a reflux condenser, a nitrogen gas inlet tube, a digital control of stirring, and a thermostatic bath to keep the reaction at the required conditions. The installation set up was described in detail in [21].

As mentioned above, the synthesis include two phases: a continuous phase containing water and the suspending agent, and a discontinuous phase containing styrene, divinylbenzene, Rubitherm®RT27, toluene, and benzoyl peroxide. The recipe for the microcapsule synthesis is shown in Table 1. In order to obtain the desired microparticles, the continuous phase was transferred to the glass reactor fixing the agitation at 800 rpm and the temperature at 80 °C. The initiator was dissolved and premixed with monomers and the Rubitherm®RT27 at 50 °C, allowing an efficient polymerization reaction and avoiding idle time. When the discontinuous phase was added into the continuous phase, the polymerization process was carried out for 5 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. After polymerization, the product was purified by repeated washing with ethanol and filtrated to remove impurities. Finally, the product was left dried at room temperature for at least 24 h.
Table 1

The initial recipe used for obtaining microcapsules with Rubitherm®RT27




Continuous phase (g)

Water (Mili-Q)


Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)


Discontinuous phase (g)



Styrene (St)


Divinylbenzene (DVB)




Benzoyl peroxide (BPO)


Seven different experiments were performed changing the mass of PVP from 4.08 to 81.60 g, following the sequence PVP1, PVP2, PVP 4 , PVP6, PVP8, PVP10, and PVP20. PVPi corresponds to the mass ratio between the specific experimental PVP compared to the lowest value used. Furthermore, three additional experiments were carried out in a 100-L reactor, maintaining the same temperature, using the following PVP mass ratios: PVP2, PVP6, and PVP10 but a decreasing agitation rate of 300 rpm. The design properties of both reactors are shown in Fig. 1. The 100-L reactor maintains geometrical similarities to the reactor used at lab scale. The dimensionless correlations in diameter of the reactor and Rushton impeller were established based on the stirrer configuration reported by Shäfer et al. [34],
$$ \frac{d_1}{D}=\frac{1}{3} $$
$$ \frac{H}{D}=1 $$
$$ \frac{W}{d_1}=\frac{1}{5} $$
$$ \frac{L}{d_1}=\frac{1}{4} $$
$$ \frac{d_2}{d_1}=\frac{3}{4} $$
Fig. 1

Scheme of the reactors and impeller dimensions for laboratory and pilot plant scales

where D is the reactor diameter (m), H is the height of the liquid (m), d 1 is the impeller diameter (m), d 2 is the disc diameter (m), and W and L are the weight and length of the blade (m), respectively. The repeatability and robustness of the microencapsulation process were confirmed performing every experiment three times.



The microcapsule yield (ηr) was determined by considering the maximum amount of the product as that constituted by the polymer from monomers P(St-DVB)MC, and encapsulated Rubitherm®RT27 (RT27MC) by:
$$ {\upeta}_{\mathrm{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{RT}{27}_{\mathrm{MC}}+\mathrm{P}{\left(\mathrm{St}-\mathrm{DVB}\right)}_{\mathrm{MC}}}{\mathrm{RT}{27}_{\mathrm{feed}}+{\left(\mathrm{St}-\mathrm{DVB}\right)}_{\mathrm{feed}}} $$
where RT27feed and (St-DVB)feed are the weights of the Rubitherm®RT27 and monomers fed to the reactor, respectively.

Differential scanning calorimetry

Measurements of melting point and latent heat storage capacities of different materials were performed in a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) model Q100 from TA Instruments, equipped with a refrigerated cooling system and nitrogen as the purge gas. Measurements were carried out in the temperature range from −40 to 80 °C with heating and cooling rate of 3 °C/min.

The paraffin content (CPCM) in the microcapsule was calculated based on the enthalpy values:
$$ {\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{PCM}}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{{\varDelta \mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{MC}}}{{\varDelta \mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{RT}27}}\times 100\% $$
where ΔHMC is the enthalpy for the analyzed microcapsules (J/g) and ΔHRT27 is the enthalpy of pure Rubitherm®RT27 (171.2 J/g). The encapsulation efficiency (EE) can be calculated from the relationship between the Rubitherm®RT27 inside the total microcapsules (RT27MC) and the Rubitherm®RT27 fed (RT27feed):
$$ \mathrm{EE}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{{\mathrm{RT}27}_{\mathrm{MC}}}{{\mathrm{RT}27}_{\mathrm{feed}}}\times 100\% $$

Microcapsules can contain Rubitherm®RT27, monomers, toluene, and suspending agent. In order to know the contribution of these different compounds, thermal analyses were carried out.

Thermogravimetric analysis

The thermal stability, amount of Rubitherm®RT27, and toluene content of the synthesized microcapsules were obtained by using the TA instruments SDT Q600 Simultaneous DSC-TGA from room temperature to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere.

Scanning electron microscopy

The morphology and the surface features of the microcapsules were observed by using Quanta 250 (FEI Company) with a tungsten filament operating at a working potential 12.5 or 15 kV equipped with an EDAX Apollo X (AMETEK), an energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (EDX), which analyze the chemical composition of the samples with the detection limits about 1000 ppm or 0.1 wt%.

Particle size and particle size distribution

Volume average particle size (dv0.5) and number average particle size (dn0.5) of the microcapsules were determined by low-angle laser light scattering (LALLS) laser diffraction, utilizing a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 equipped with a Scirocco 2000 unit for analyzing dispersions of the particles in air and a software that uses the Mie theory to analyze the experimental data.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the effect of the amount of PVP on the morphology of the synthesized microcapsules at lab scale and also an example of the product obtained at pilot plant scale. The only product that presents an irregular shape was produced by using a mass ratio PVP1 (Fig. 2a). Accordingly, this amount of surfactant is not enough to ensure a good dispersion of the discontinuous phase into the continuous one. All the other products have a spherical shape and a smooth surface, also indicating that the use of toluene as porogen prevent the formation of holes.
Fig. 2

SEM micrographs of microcapsules synthesized by different amounts of stabilizers. a MC(PVP1). b MC(PVP2). c MC(PVP4). d MC(PVP6). e MC(PVP8). f MC(PVP10). g MC(PVP20). h MC(PVP6)100L

It is also observed that all products seem to be quite homogeneous in particle size. As can be seen from Fig. 3, the particle size is decreasing with the amount of PVP, except for the highest PVP concentration (PVP20). This indicates that a large amount of suspending agent is unfavorable for the formation of single particles, promoting the coagulation process.
Fig. 3

Particle size distribution for microcapsules with different amounts of PVP. a Volume average. b Number average

An increase in the amount of stabilizer from a mass ratio PVP1 to PVP10 results in a product with the desired properties: smaller particle size, spherical and regular shape, and also a smooth surface. It was observed that the product having the smallest particle size in volume was achieved by using the reactor of 100 L and a mass ratio PVP10. This result could be related with the energy dissipation rate. If the energy delivered by the stirrer at both scales were the same, the particle size should be equal [31]. The particle size of the microcapsules is smaller in the pilot plant run even though a much slower stirring rate was used at pilot plant scale (300 rpm) than at laboratory scale (800 rpm). This means that the geometrically similar Rushton stirrer utilized in the pilot plant is more efficient in delivering energy to the bulk.

According to the SEM photographs, the optimal PVP mass ratio must be between PVP6 and PVP10. The results illustrate that it is possible to synthesize microcapsules (MC(PVPi)) by this proposed method, satisfying user’s requirements in lab scale as well as in pilot plant.

The volume and the number average particle size distribution of the different products have been analyzed by laser diffraction, and the results are shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3a indicates that all products present unimodal volume average distributions. As expected, the widest distribution was observed for the irregular product obtained using a mass ratio PVP1. However, Fig. 3b shows that the number average particle size distribution for the mass ratio PVP10 and PVP20 at lab scale are bimodal. These results confirm that an excess of suspending agent favors the formation of smaller particles, which agglomerates during the reaction time, promoting the formation of larger particles. Hence, in order to obtain unimodal distributions, a mass ratio of PVP6 should be used at lab scale. Nevertheless, Fig. 3 also illustrates that the number and the volume average particle size distributions for the product obtained at pilot plant scale are very similar to each other at mass ratio PVP10, indicating that it is possible to obtain monodisperse materials in this conditions.

Figure 4 shows the influence of the amount of PVP on the volume average and the number average particle size.
Fig. 4

Influence of PVP concentration on the volume average (dv0.5) and number average (dn0.5) particle size

As can be seen, the volume and number average sizes do not follow the same trend. While the behavior of the number average increases with the PVP mass ratio and seems to be nearly linear, the volume average presents a minimum at PVP10.5 at lab scale. The number average sizes are more sensitive to the presence of small particles, while the volume average sizes are biased toward large particles. Accordingly, the results suggest that as the concentration of PVP is increased up to PVP10, fewer of the largest particles are produced (reduction in dv0.5) combined with fewer very small particles (increase in dn0.5) at both studies. In general, increasing the mass ratio of PVP in pilot plant scale, all products present a larger particle size in number but a lower particle size in volume than those obtained at lab scale, being closer to the gap between them and indicating the possibility to synthesize monodisperse material.

The minimum in the volume average sizes and the increase in the number average sizes may be related to the solubility of PVP in water. According to the data sheet from the PVP supplier, at a molecular weight of 40,000 g/mol, the solubility is 100 mg/mL at 25 °C. This is lower than the 233 mg/mL of the PVP20. At the highest concentration, some of the PVP with therefore be in solid state, dispersed as small particles in the solvent. These solid particles may act as nuclei on which the polymer drops grow, leading to the formation larger microcapsules. In the case of the 100-L reactor, the volume and number averages are closer to each other than for the lab-scale experiments, which is indicative of a narrower size distribution. Two main conclusions can be extracted from these observations: (1) for devices that are geometrically similar, the power delivery is more effective at large scale. (2) When increasing the scale using the same mass ratio, it is possible to reach a more monodisperse product.

These results are not in agreement with those reported by Ma et al. [35], obtaining stable particle size from 21.6 to 20.9 μm when the PVP concentration was changed from 2.0 to 7.0 g in 225 g of water, respectively. In addition, they obtained an increase in the amount of coagulum for a PVP concentration higher than 4.0 g in 225 g of water, a phenomenon that only appears in our case for the largest studied PVP mass ratio (PVP20).

In order to examine the presence of toluene and PVP in the microcapsules, thermal analyses were performed. The TGA curves for the pure Rubitherm®RT27, St-DVB copolymer, pure PVP, and some microcapsules obtained at different PVP mass ratios were shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5

TGA curves for the studied materials: P(St-DVB) copolymer, pure Rubitherm®RT27, PVP, and microcapsules synthesized by using the different PVP mass ratios

This figure shows that the pure material with the greatest volatility is the Rubitherm®RT27, followed by the evaporation of the Rubitherm®RT27 encapsulated by the polymeric shell and finally, the decomposition processes of P(St-DVB) and PVP. It is also observed that while the Rubitherm®RT27 presents only one weight loss peak from 150 to 250 °C, polymer materials (PVP and P(St-DVB)) and microcapsules exhibit two different weight losses. In the case of PVP, the first weight loss takes place at 100 °C, and it is related with the water content, whereas for P(St-DVB) and microcapsules, the first weight loss appears from 120 to 220 °C, due to the evaporation of monomer, Rubitherm®RT27, and polymer having a low molecular weight. Hence, MC(PVP6) are the microcapsules with the highest content of Rubitherm®RT27, followed by the MC(PVP6)100L, and obtaining a minimum in the case of MC(PVP)20. These results indicate that the larger the mass ratio of PVP, the lower the paraffin content in the microcapsules.

The second weight loss is due to the polymer degradation, being the mean degradation temperatures 431.87 and 422.07 °C for PVP and P(St-DVB), respectively. Therefore, the degradation temperatures of PVP and P(St-DVB) suggest that TGA is not a good technique to differ between the presence of PVP or P(St-DVB) in the microcapsules. Finally, the amount of residue obtained in this TGA after 500 °C shows that Rubitherm®RT27 is completely evaporated, but the polymeric materials, PVP and P(St-DVB), present practically the same amount of residue, indicating that the PVP could be present in the copolymer, since it was synthesized by using PVP as a surfactant agent. In the case of microcapsules, the residue increases with the mass ratio of PVP used in the recipe, explaining why the microcapsules produced by using a high mass ratio of PVP have a lower paraffin content.

Figure 6 shows latent heat (ΔH) of the different synthesized microcapsules. These results indicate that using this technology, microcapsules with thermal energy storage (TES) capacity higher than 80 J/g can be produced. The maximum values 101.80 and 96.08 J/g were reached for the microcapsules synthesized using a mass ratio of PVP6 at laboratory and pilot plant scales, respectively. This does not follow the observation of Li et al. [36] where a two-step miniemulsion polymerization method resulted in an increase in the latent heat of the microcapsules from 114.6 to 143.7 J/g when the amount of surfactant was changed from 0.05 to 0.20 g in the water. This indicates that thermal properties of microcapsules are mainly dependent on the microencapsulation technology.
Fig. 6

Latent heat of the microcapsules as function of the PVP mass ratio

According to the latent heat, PVP6 can be considered as the optimal PVP mass ratio to produce microcapsules having a large TES capacity. Nevertheless, before taking a final decision about the optimal recipe, the effect of PVP mass ratio on other important variables was studied. As it has been stated in the introduction, the final goal of the article is to clarify the role of the tensioactive agent not only on the particle size but also on other important variables such as the encapsulation efficiency, the paraffin content, and the microcapsule yield. The hypothesis is that the tensioactive agent remains as a constitutive part of the particle after the synthesis, with significant influence on its final properties. The paraffin content (CPCM), encapsulation efficiency (EE), and the microcapsule yield (ηr) are depicted in Fig. 7 as function of the PVP mass ratio.
Fig. 7

Effect of PVP amount on microcapsule yield (ηr), paraffin content (CPCM), and encapsulation efficiency (EE)

A slight increase of EE and ηr with the mass ratio of PVP is observed whereas the CPCM seems to be almost stable at 53%, although a highest value of 59.46% was obtained for PVP6. These values of CPCM are twice as high as that (28.69 wt%) reported by Sanchez et al. [21] synthesizing microcapsules containing Rubitherm®RT27 from polystyrene but in the absence of a porogen agent.

The highest values of encapsulation efficiency (77.59%) and microcapsule yield (84.28%) were found for the products using mass ratios of PVP6 and PVP10, respectively. These results are contrary to those reported by Khakzad et al. [25] encapsulating hexadecane in a melamine formaldehyde shell by using the in situ dispersion polymerization technique in aqueous media. They observed a decrease in the encapsulation efficiency from 121 to 84.4%, increasing the poly(vinyl alcohol) concentration from 1 to 8 wt%. In the case of the yield, Ma et al. [35] synthesizing polystyrene-polyacrylamide composite microspheres from water/oil/water emulsion and further suspension polymerization reported a maximum of 90.2% when they used 5 g of PVP in 225 g water. Hence, there is no rule that allows establishing the optimum concentration of the stabilizer in the manufacture of microcapsules, as it is dependent on the microencapsulation technology. As expected, values of CPCM, EE, and ηr obtained at pilot plant scale are similar to those reached at laboratory scale but requiring a lower amount of suspending agent for leading the same encapsulation efficiency and microcapsule yield (78.86 and 79.99%, respectively for mass ratio PVP6). Hence, by changing the PVP mass ratio, it is possible to increase the paraffin content and to obtain microcapsules with the desired characteristics.

As commented above, the suspending agent forms part of the microcapsules. The presence of PVP in the microcapsules (f SA) can be quantified from the DSC analyses and weighing the total amount of product (PMC) obtained in each reaction. A 100% of monomer conversion was assumed.
$$ {P}_{MC}={RT27}_{MC}+ P{\left( St- DVB\right)}_{MC}+ f\ SA $$
where SA is the total amount of the suspending agent used in the synthesis.
In this way, the fraction of suspending agent that constitutes the microcapsules f can be calculated by:
$$ f=\frac{P_{MC}- RT{27}_{MC}- P{\left( St- DVB\right)}_{MC}}{SA} $$
Once values of f are calculated, the amount of PVP on the microcapsules (Г in g/kg) and the concentration of PVP in the bulk solution at the end of the process (Cb in kg/m3) can be estimated by Eqs. 11 and 12, respectively.
$$ \varGamma =\frac{fSA}{P_{MC}} $$
$$ {C}_b=\frac{\left(1- f\right) SA}{V} $$
where V is the total volume of the bulk solution.
Figure 8 shows the relationship between Г and Cb. According to this figure, PVP is strongly loaded by P(St-DVB) even at a very low concentration in water/toluene media. This behavior is a characteristic of those sorbents that present a high affinity for the solute in adsorption systems [30]. Besides, as in most of the conventional adsorption process, it was observed that a maximum value of PVP incorporation to the microcapsules is reached. The interaction established between the P(St-DVB) and PVP can be explained by the observations of Smith et al. [30]. They studied the adsorption of PVP onto polystyrene lattice and concluded that “in water, interaction with the PSt occurred through the PVP hydrophobic methylene/methane groups and the positive dipole of the amide nitrogen of the pyrrolidone ring. The negative dipole associated with the amide oxygen is directed away from the surface into the solution”.
Fig. 8

Adsorption isotherm of PVP onto P(St-DVB) in water/toluene media at 80 °C

In order to fit these data, the Langmuir model (Eq. 13) usable for monolayer materials was selected [27].
$$ \frac{\varGamma}{\varGamma^{max}}=\frac{K{C}_b}{1+ K{C}_b} $$
where Г max is the maximum retention capacity of the P(St-DVB) and K is the equilibrium constant of the system, defined as the ratio between adsorption and desorption rate constants, respectively.

Experimental data were fitted to Eq. 13 in order to obtain the two unknown parameters Г max and K. For that purpose, a fitting tool for solving non-linear equations based on Marquardt’s algorithm was utilized. The fitting values of Г max and K and their confidence interval using a confidence level of 95% (α = 0.05) were 192.9 ± 0.4 g/kg and 0.18 ± 0.11 m3/kg, respectively. The proposed model gives a good fit to the experimental data, illustrating that the distribution of the PVP between the solid and liquid phases at the end of the polymerization process follows a Langmuir type trend.

The value of Г for MC(PVP6) was also confirmed by EDAX analyzing the nitrogen content of the microcapsules. In this way, EDAX analyses were performed in MC(PVP6) on the external surface and at the center of the microcapsule. A small difference was found between the external and internal nitrogen contents 1.46 and 2.30 wt%, respectively. These values are within the respective theoretical nitrogen content (2.10 wt%) obtained from the adsorption curve (167.01 g/kg) and the nitrogen content of the PVP (12.60 wt%). This distribution of nitrogen through the microcapsules also indicates that the adsorption of PVP takes place in the whole microcapsule structure.

Hence, thermoregulating microcapsules from P(St-DVB) could contain up to a 19.3 wt% of surfactant when the percentage of PVP of the total mass is higher than 5.03 wt%. Moreover, a large amount of PVP decreased the particle size of the microcapsules, and its presence in the final product was undesirable, as it prevents reaching a high TES capacity. Finally, regarding the physical and thermal properties, PVP6 is the most suitable PVP mass ratio, because it allows the production of microcapsules with the highest thermal energy storage capacity (101.8 J/g), while obtaining spherical particles with a uniform and small size distribution and the lowest formation of agglomerated material. Besides, the good results reached at pilot plant scale confirm the robustness of the selected conditions and the technology for manufacturing thermoregulating microcapsules.


An important incorporation of the surfactant agent into the thermoregulating microcapsules was confirmed. It was found that PVP is retained by the P(St-DVB) microcapsules. The distribution of the PVP between the solid and liquid phases at the end of the polymerization process follows a Langmuir type trend. The PVP distribution data were fitted by the Langmuir model obtaining a value of 192.9 g/kg and 0.18 m3/kg for the maximum retention capacity and the equilibrium constant, respectively. The adsorption of surfactant agents on polymeric materials has been reported previously by other authors [28, 29], but as far as we know not quantified and modeled for thermoregulating microcapsules. In this way, kinetic studies for determining the uptake of PVP by microcapsules from P(St-DVB) as function on the time must be accomplished in the future [27]. The amount of surfactant is shown to be a key variable in order to synthesize thermoregulating microcapsules with the desired characteristics. By using a mass ratio of PVP6 (5.03 wt%), microcapsules containing Rubitherm®RT27 with the best thermal and physical properties were obtained. Finally, the robustness of the process was checked at pilot plant scale, obtaining more monodisperse materials, a TES capacity of 96.1 J/g, an encapsulation efficiency of 79.0% and a microcapsule yield of 80.0%. These characteristics were similar to those obtained at laboratory scale, although the particle size distribution was improved at pilot plant scale.



We gratefully acknowledge the funding from the Research Council of Norway, project number 238198. The authors also acknowledge the support of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through the project ref. CTQ2015-69299-R.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    van Zyl AJP, Wet-Roos D, Sanderson RD, Klumperman B (2004) The role of surfactant in controlling particle size and stability in the miniemulsion polymerization of polymeric nanocapsules. Eur Polym J 40(12):2717–2725. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayya KS, Bhattacharyya A, Argillier JF (2003) Micro-encapsulation by complex coacervation: influence of surfactant. Polym Int 52:664–647. doi: 10.1002/pi.1125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Su J-F, Wang L-X, Ren L (2007a) Synthesis of polyurethane microPCMs containing n-octadecane by interfacial polycondensation. Colloid Surface A 299(1–3):268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sánchez-Silva L, Rodríguez JF, Sánchez P (2011) Influence of different suspension stabilizers on the preparation of Rubitherm RT31 microcapsules. Colloid Surface A 390(1–3):62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borreguero AM, Carmona M, Sanchez ML, Valverde JL, Rodriguez JF (2010) Improvement of the thermal behaviour of gypsum blocks by the incorporation of microcapsules containing PCMS obtained by suspension polymerization with an optimal core/coating mass ratio. Appl Therm Eng 30(10):1164–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tyagi VV, Buddhi D (2007) PCM thermal storage in buildings. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(6):1146–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaygusuz K, Ayhan T (1999) Experimental and theoretical investigation of combined solar heat pump system for residential heating. Energ Convers Manage 40(13):1377–1396. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00026-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turnpenny JR, Etheridge DW, Reay DA (2000) Novel ventilation cooling system for reducing air conditioning in buildings. Appl Therm Eng 20(11):1019–1037. doi: 10.1016/S1359-4311(99)00068-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riffat SB, Omer SA, Ma X (2001) A novel thermoelectric refrigeration system employing heat pipes and a phase change material. Renew Energ 23(2):313–323. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00170-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fang G, Chen Z, Li H (2010) Synthesis and properties of microencapsulated paraffin composites with SiO2 shell as thermal energy storage materials. Chem Eng J 163(1–2):154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jamekhorshid A, Sadrameli SM, Farid M (2014) A review of microencapsulation methods of phase change materials (PCMs) as a thermal energy storage (TES) medium. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:531–542. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang H, Wang X (2009) Fabrication and performances of microencapsulated phase change materials based on n-octadecane core and resorcinol-modified melamine–formaldehyde shell. Colloid Surface A 332(2–3):129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Su J-F, Wang L-X, Ren L, Huang Z (2007b) Mechanical properties and thermal stability of double-shell thermal-energy-storage microcapsules. J Appl Polym Sci 103(2):1295–1302. doi: 10.1002/app.25252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu L-Y, Xie R, Zhu J-H, Chen W-M, Yamaguchi T, Nakao S-I (2003) Study of SPG membrane emulsification processes for the preparation of monodisperse core–shell microcapsules. J Colloid Interf Sci 265(1):187–196. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00350-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alkan C, Sarı A, Karaipekli A, Uzun O (2009) Preparation, characterization, and thermal properties of microencapsulated phase change material for thermal energy storage. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 93(1):143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McDonald CJ, Devon MJ (2002) Hollow latex particles. Adv Colloid Interfac 99(3):181–213. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00034-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang R, Xu H, Zhang Y (2003) Preparation, physical property and thermal physical property of phase change microcapsule slurry and phase change emulsion. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 80(4):405–416. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2003.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jin Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Yang Z (2008) Synthesis and properties of paraffin capsules as phase change materials. Polymer 49(12):2903–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hawlader MNA, Uddin MS, Khin MM (2003) Microencapsulated PCM thermal-energy storage system. Appl Energ 74(1–2):195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00146-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jönsson J-E, Karlsson OJ, Hassander H, Törnell B (2007) Semi-continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene in the presence of poly(methyl methacrylate) seed particles. Polymerization conditions giving core–shell particles. Eur Polym J 43(4):1322–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sánchez L, Sánchez P, Lucas A, Carmona M, Rodríguez JF (2007) Microencapsulation of PCMs with a polystyrene shell. Colloid Polym Sci 285(12):1377–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00396-007-1696-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sánchez L, Sánchez P, Carmona M, Lucas A, Rodríguez JF (2008) Influence of operation conditions on the microencapsulation of PCMs by means of suspension-like polymerization. Colloid Polym Sci 286(8–9):1019–1027. doi: 10.1007/s00396-008-1864-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao CY, Zhang GH (2011) Review on microencapsulated phase change materials (MEPCMs). Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(8):3813–3832. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang XX, Fan YF, Tao XM, Yick KL (2004) Fabrication and properties of microcapsules and nanocapsules containing n-octadecane. Mater Chem Phys 88(2–3):300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khakzad F, Alinejad Z, Shirin-Abadi AR, Ghasemi M, Mahdavian AR (2014) Optimization of parameters in preparation of PCM microcapsules based on melamine formaldehyde through dispersion polymerization. Colloid Polym Sci 292(2):355–368. doi: 10.1007/s00396-013-3076-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    You M, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhang L, Wang J (2011) Microencapsulated n-octadecane with styrene-divinybenzene co-polymer shells. J Polym Res 18(1):49–58. doi: 10.1007/s10965-010-9390-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tabor RF, Eastoe J, Dowding PJ (2010) A two-step model for surfactant adsorption at solid surfaces. J Colloid Interf Sci 346(2):424–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.03.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Esumi K, Takamine K, Ono M, Osada T, Ichikawa S (1993) The interaction of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) and solid particles in ethanol. J Colloid Interf Sci 161(2):321–324. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1993.1473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geffroy C, Cohen Stuart MA, Wong K, Cabane B, Bergeron V (2000) Adsorption of nonionic surfactants onto polystyrene. Langmuir 16(16):6422–6430. doi: 10.1021/la0000769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith JN, Meadows J, Williams PA (1996) Adsorption of polyvinylpyrrolidone onto polystyrene latices and the effect on colloid stability. Langmuir 12(16):3773–3778. doi: 10.1021/la950933m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sánchez-Silva L, Rodríguez JF, Romero A, Borreguero AM, Carmona M, Sánchez P (2010) Microencapsulation of PCMs with a styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer shell by suspension-like polymerisation. Chem Eng J 157(1):216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li W, Zhang X-X, Wang X-C, Tang G-Y, Shi H-F (2012) Fabrication and morphological characterization of microencapsulated phase change materials (MicroPCMs) and macrocapsules containing MicroPCMs for thermal energy storage. Energy 38(1):249–254. doi: 10.1016/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alcázar Á, Lucas A, Carmona M, Rodríguez JF (2011) Synthesis of sulphonated microcapsules of P(St–DVB) containing di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid. React Funct Polym 71(8):891–898. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2011.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schäfer M, Karasozen B, Uludağ Y, Yapıcı K, Uğur Ö (2005) Numerical method for optimizing stirrer configurations. Comput Chem Eng 30(2):183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ma G-H, Sone H, Omi S (2004) Preparation of uniform-sized polystyrene−polyacrylamide composite microspheres from a W/O/W emulsion by membrane emulsification technique and subsequent suspension polymerization. Macromolecules 37(8):2954–2964. doi: 10.1021/ma035316g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li MG, Zhang Y, Xu YH, Zhang D (2011) Effect of different amounts of surfactant on characteristics of nanoencapsulated phase-change materials. Polym Bull 67(3):541–552. doi: 10.1007/s00289-011-0492-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna M. Szczotok
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manuel Carmona
    • 1
  • Anna-Lena Kjøniksen
    • 2
  • Juan F. Rodriguez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringØstfold University CollegeHaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations