Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 291, Issue 3, pp 669–681 | Cite as

Polyampholyte gels of a cross-linked polyanion or polycation network into which an oppositely charged polyion was immobilized

Their pH-induced swelling/shrinking characteristics
Original Contribution

Abstract

Three polyampholyte gels (G1 to G3) composed of acrylic acid (AA), 1-vinylimidazole (VI) and N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPA) were prepared: G1 with a pre-gel solution (pH ≈ 12) containing NIPA (700 mM), AA (150 mM), VI (150 mM) and N,N′-methylenebis(acrylamide) (10 mM); G2 with the same pre-gel, except for containing poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) (150 unit mM) instead of AA; and G3 with the same pre-gel, except for containing poly(1-vinylimidazole) (PVI) (150 unit mM) instead of VI. The immobilization of PAA (\( {\overline M_{\text{w}}} = {2}0{5},000 \)) and PVI (\( {\overline M_{\text{w}}} = <$> <$>35,900 \)) resulted in transparent G2 and G3, respectively, while G3 with another PVI (\( {\overline M_{\text{w}}} = {193},000 \)) was opaque. Potentiometric titrations and swelling measurements of an anionic and a cationic copolymer gel (as a control sample) suggested that each polyampholyte gel exhibits an isoelectric point (pI) at pH ≈ 5.6, at which the electrostatic attraction between the carboxylate and imidazole ions leads to gel collapse. Indeed, all the ampholyte gels underwent a collapse transition at pH around the pI upon cyclic pH changes (first increased and then decreased). The pH region where gel collapse was observed, however, was broader for G2 and G3 (with immobilized polyions) than for G1 (random terpolymer gel). The swelling/deswelling characteristics of transparent and opaque G3 gels were different from each other, and also from those of G1 and G2. These results were discussed in terms of the role of hydrogen bonding of the amide with the carboxyl or imidazole groups in the collapse transition of the ampholyte gels.

Keywords

Polyampholyte gels Acrylic acid 1-Vinylimidazole N-Isopropylacrylamide Random copolymerization Gel immobilization 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research to E.K. from the Japan Society for the Promotion Science (No. 20550183).

References

  1. 1.
    Wagner HL, Long FA (1951) Properties of an amphoteric polymer of vinylpyridine and acrylic acid. J Phys Colloid Chem 55:1512–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfrey TJ, Morawetz H (1952) Amphoteric polyelectrolytes I: 2-vinylpyridine-methacrylic acid copolymers. J Am Chem Soc 74:436–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mazur J, Silberberg A, Katchalsky A (1959) Potentiometric behavior of polyampholytes. J Polym Sci 35:43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagasawa M, Noda I (1968) The effect of added neutral salt on the isoionic pH of proteins and synthetic polyampholytes. J Am Chem Soc 90:7200–7204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daoust H, Stpierre S (1975) Effect of chain-length and pH on conformation of alternating polyampholytes of type (L-lysyl-L-aspartyl)n. Can J Chem 53:1861–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Savinova IV, Fedoseeva NA, Evdakov VP, Kabanov VA (1976) Polymer–polymer complexes with participation of synthetic polyampholytes. Vysokomol Soedin A 18:2050–2057Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards SF, King PR, Pincus P (1980) Phase-changes in polyampholytes. Ferroelectrics 30:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merle L, Merle Y (1982) Synthetic polyampholytes 2: sequence distribution in methacrylic-acid (dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate copolymers by C-13 NMR-spectroscopy. Macromolecules 15:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Joerg C, Kardar M, Tanaka T (1996) Freezing transition of compact polyampholytes. Phys Rev Lett 77:3565–3568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas DB, Vasilieva YA, Armentrout RS, McCormick CL (2003) Synthesis, characterization, and aqueous solution behavior of electrolyte- and pH-responsive carboxybetaine-containing cyclocopolymers. Macromolecules 36:9710–9715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kang ET, Tan KL, Liaw DJ, Chiang HH (1996) Surface modification and functionalization of electroactive polymer films via grafting of polyelectrolyte, polyampholyte and polymeric acids. J Mater Sci 31:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asayama S, Nogawa M, Takei Y, Akaike T, Maruyama A (1998) Synthesis of novel polyampholyte comb-type copolymers consisting of a poly(l-lysine) backbone and hyaluronic acid side chains for a DNA carrier. Bioconjug Chem 9:476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akinchina A, Shusharina NP, Linse P (2004) Diblock polyampholytes grafted onto spherical particles: Monte Carlo simulation and lattice mean-field theory. Langmuir 20:0351–10360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bossard F, Tsitsilianis C, Yannopoulos SN, Petekidis G, Sfika V (2005) A novel thermothickening phenomenon exhibited by a triblock polyampholyte in aqueous salt-free solutions. Macromolecules 38:2883–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Linse P (2007) Interaction between colloids with grafted diblock polyampholytes. J Chem Phys 126(1–13):14903Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanjuan S, Tran Y (2008) Stimuli-responsive interfaces using random polyampholyte brushes. Macromolecules 41:8721–8728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baratlo M, Fazli H (2009) Molecular dynamics simulation of semiflexible polyampholyte brushes: the effect of charged monomers sequence. Eur Phys J E 29:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen Y, Liu YF, Tang HL, Tan HM (2010) Study of carboxymethyl chitosan based polyampholyte superabsorbent polymer: I. Optimization of synthesis conditions and pH sensitive property study of carboxymethyl chitosan-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-dimethyldiallylammonium chloride) superabsorbent polymer. Carbohydr Polym 81:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ilmain F, Tanaka T, Kokufuta E (1991) Volume transition in a gel driven by hydrogen bonding. Nature 349:400–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baker JP, Stephens DR, Blanch HW, Prausnitz JM (1992) Swelling equilibria for acrylamide-based polyampholyte hydrogels. Macromolecules 25:1955–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wen S, Stevenson WTK (1993) Synthetic pH sensitive polyampholyte hydrogels: a preliminary study. Colloid Polym Sci 271:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kudaibergenov SE, Nurgalieva DE, Bekturov EA, Shaikhutdinov EM, Nurkeeva ZS, Sigitov VB (1994) Study of polyampholyte hydrogels and interpenetrating polyelectrolyte networks based on 4-(but-3-en-1-ynyl)-1-methylpiperidin-4-ol. Macromol Chem Phys 195:3033–3038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neyret S, Vincent B (1997) The properties of polyampholyte microgel particles prepared by microemulsion polymerization. Polymer 38:6129–6134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loomans D, Schiessel H, Blumen A (1997) Biased reptation of polyampholytes: trapping and enhancement effects. J Chem Phys 107:2636–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thanh LTM, Makhaeva EE, Khokhlov AR (1997) Polyampholyte gels: swelling, collapse and interaction with ionic surfactants. Polym Gels Netw 5:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nisato G, Munch JP, Candau SJ (1999) Swelling, structure, and elasticity of polyampholyte hydrogels. Langmuir 15:4236–4244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tamagawa H, Taya M (2000) A theoretical prediction of the ions distribution in an amphoteric polymer gel. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 285:314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogawa K, Nakayama A, Kokufuta E (2003) Preparation and characterization of thermosensitive polyampholyte nanogels. Langmuir 19:3178–3184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ogawa Y, Ogawa K, Kokufuta E (2004) Swelling–shrinking behavior of a polyampholyte gel composed of positively charged networks with immobilized polyanions. Langmuir 20:2546–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kokufuta E (2005) Polyelectrolyte gel transitions: experimental aspects of charge inhomogeneity in the swelling and segmental attractions in the shrinking. Langmuir 21:1004–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dogu S, Kilic M, Okay O (2009) Collapse of acrylamide-based polyampholyte hydrogels in water. J Appl Polym Sci 113:1375–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Janiak DS, Ayyub OB, Kofinas P (2010) Effects of charge density on the recognition properties of molecularly imprinted polyampholyte hydrogels. Polymer 51:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kudaibergenov SE (1999) Recent advances in the study of synthetic polyampholytes in solutions. Adv Polym Sci 144:115–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mohwald H, Menzel H, Helm CA, Stamm M (2004) Lipid and polyampholyte monolayers to study polyelectrolyte interactions and structure at interfaces. Adv Polym Sci 165:151–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dobrynin AV, Colby RH, Rubinstein M (2004) Polyampholytes. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 42:3513–3538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ciferri A, Kudaibergenov SE (2007) Natural and synthetic polyampholytes: 1(a) theory and basic structures. Macromol Rapid Commun 28:1953–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kitano H, Gemmei-Ide M (2010) Structure of water in the vicinity of amphoteric polymers as revealed by vibrational spectroscopy. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 21:1877–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wulff G, Liu J (2012) Design of biomimetic catalysts by molecular imprinting in synthetic polymers: the role of transition state stabilization. Account Chem Res 45:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ramirez P, Mafe S, Alcaraz A, Cervera J (2003) Modeling of pH-switchable ion transport and selectivity in nanopore membranes with fixed charges. J Phys Chem B 107:13178–13187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nonaka T, Matsumura S, Ogata T, Kurihara S (2003) Synthesis of amphoteric polymer membranes from epithiopropyl methacrylate–butylmethacrylate-N, N-dimethylamino-propyl acrylamide–methacrylic acid copolymers and the permeation behavior of various solutes through the membranes. J Membr Sci 212:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Khayat Z, Griffiths PC, Grillo I, Heenan RK, King SM, Duncan R (2006) Characterising the size and shape of polyamidoamines in solution as a function of pH using neutron scattering and pulsed-gradient spin–echo NMR. Int J Pharm 317:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kokufuta E, Wang B, Yoshida R, Khokhlov AR, Hirata M (1998) Volume phase transition of polyelectrolyte gels with different charge distributions. Macromolecules 31:6878–6884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Masaki M, Ogawa K, Kokufuta E (2009) Unusual behavior in light scattering experiments of poly(N-vinylimidazole) prepared by precipitation polymerization. Colloid Polym Sci 287:1405–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Furukawa M, Farinato RS, Kokufuta E (2008) Potentiometric titration behavior of poly(acrylic acid) within a cross-linked polymer network having amide groups. Colloid Polym Sci 286:1425–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suzuki H, Wang B, Yoshida R, Kokufuta E (1999) Potentiometric titration behaviors of polymer and gel consisting of N-isopropylacrylamide and acrylic acid. Langmuir 15:4283–4288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kokufuta E, Suzuki H, Yoshida R, Yamada K, Hirata M, Kaneko F (1998) Role of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction in the volume collapse of a poly(ethyleneimine) gel. Langmuir 14:788–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Noda I, Nagasawa M, Ota M (1964) Electrophoresis of a polyelectrolyte in solutions of high ionic strength. J Am Chem Soc 86:5075–5079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen GH, Hoffman AS (1995) Graft-copolymers that exhibit temperature-induced phase-transitions over a wide-range of pH. Nature 373:49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Institute of Applied BiochemistryUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations