Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 284, Issue 5, pp 489–496 | Cite as

The binding of benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide to acrylamide-co-sodium-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate copolymers: thermodynamical and conformational aspects

Original contribution

Abstract

The binding isotherms of benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide (BDDAB) to copolymers of acrylamide and sodium-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate (AMPS), 5 or 20% in mole ratios (AMPS5 and AMPS20, respectively), are determined by membrane ultrafiltration and analysed with the Satake–Yang formalism in terms of binding constants and cooperativities. Complexation is further investigated by steady-state fluorescence of solubilized pyrene, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and laser Doppler electrophoresis (LDE). Hydrophobic aggregates bound to AMPS20 appear similar to BDDAB free micelles, whereas those borne by AMPS5 increase in size more distinctly under the non-stoichiometric complexation mechanism. Multimolecular association and dissociation equilibria are displayed by DLS in the AMPS5 biphasic domain. Above the critical aggregation concentration, electrophoretic mobilities of the complexes initially remain unchanged by compensation of antagonistic electrostatic contributions. Upon progressive binding of micelles the charge-to-friction ratio of the polyons is reduced by condensation of the counter-ions.

Keywords

Anionic–nonionic copolymers Benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide Binding isotherms Light scattering Pyrene fluorescence Electrophoretic mobilities 

References

  1. 1.
    Hayakawa K, Kwak J (1991) Interactions between polymers and cationic surfactants. In: Rubingh D, Holland PM (eds) Cationic surfactants: physical chemistry, surfactant science series, vol 37. Dekker, New York, p 189Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindman B, Thalberg K (1993) Polymer-surfactant interactions—recent developments. In: Goddard ED, Ananthapadmanabhan KP (eds) Interactions of surfactants with polymers and proteins. CRC, Boca Raton, chaps 4–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maloney C, Huber KJ (1994) Mixtures of polyacrylic acid and nonionic surfactants at the air–water interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 164:463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergeron V, Langevin D, Asnacios A (1996) Thin-film forces in foam films containing anionic polyelectrolyte and charged surfactants. Langmuir 12:1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khandurina YV, Dembo AT, Rogacheva VB, Zezin AB, Kabanov VA (1994) Polym Sci USSR 36:189Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ober CK, Wegner G (1997) Polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes in the solid-state: facile building blocks for self-organizing materials. Adv Mater 9:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou S, Burger C, Yeh F, Chu B (1998) Charge density effect of polyelectrolyte chains on the nanostructures of polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes. Macromolecules 31:8157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tripathy SK, Kumar J, Nalwa HS (eds) (2002) Handbook of polyelectrolytes and their applications, vol 1. American Scientific, Stevenson RanchGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayakawa K, Kwak JCT (1983) Study of surfactant-polyelectrolyte interactions. 2. Effect of multivalent counterions on the binding of dodecyltrimethyammonium ions by sodium dextran sulfate and sodium poly(styrenesulfonate) in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 87:506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takisawa N, Hall DG, Wyn-Jones E, Brown P (1988) The construction and characteristics of drug-selective electrodes. Applications for the determination of complexation constants of inclusion complexes with α- and β-cyclodextrins including a kinetic study. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 84:3059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khorkhlov AR, Kramarenko EY, Makhaeva EE, Starodubtzev SG (1992) Collapse of polyelectrolyte networks induced by their interaction with oppositely charged surfactants. Makromol Chem Theory Simul 1:105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okuzaki H, Osada Y (1993) A chemomechanical polymer gel with electrically driven motility. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 4:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okuzaki H, Osada Y (1994) Effects of hydrophobic interaction on the cooperative binding of a surfactant to a polymer network. Macromolecules 27:502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okuzaki H, Osada Y (1994) Electro-driven polymer gels with biomimetic motility. Polym gels Netw 2:267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okuzaki H, Osada Y (1995) Role and effect of cross-linkage on the polyelectrolyte–surfactant interactions. Macromolecules 28:4554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gong JP, Osada Y (1995) Theoretical analysis of the cross-linking effect on the polyelectrolyte–surfactant interaction. J Phys Chem 99:10971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsukata M, Hirata M, Gong JP, Osada Y, Sakurai Y, Okano T (1998) Two-step surfactant binding of solvated and cross-linked poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-(2-acrylamide-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid)). Colloid Polym Sci 276:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Travaš-Sejdiæ J, Easteal AJ (2000) Equilibrium swelling of poly(AAm-co-AMPS) gels in surfactant solutions. Polymer 41:7451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mylonas Y, Staikos G (2001) Study of the complexation of sodium dodecylsulfate with cationically charged acrylamide and N-isopropylacrylamide based copolymers: the role of the polymer chain hydrophobicity and of its charge density. Langmuir 17:3586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Satake I, Yang JT (1976) Interaction of sodium decyl sulfate with poly(l-ornithine) and poly(l-lysine) in aqueous solution. Biopolymers 15:2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chu DY, Thomas JKJ (1986) Effect of cationic surfactants on the conformation transition of poly(methacrylic acid). J Am Chem Soc 108:6260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubin PL, Rigsbee DR, Mcquigg DWJ (1985) Turbidimetric and dynamic light scattering studies of mixtures of cationic polymers and anionic mixed micelles. J Colloid Interface Sci 105(2):509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thalberg K, Lindman B (1989) Interaction between hyaluronan and cationic surfactants. J Phys Chem 93:1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seki M, Morishima Y, Kamachi M (1992) Characterization of the complexes of amphiphilic polyanions and double-chain cationic surfactants. Macromolecules 25:6540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim B, Ishizawa M, Gong J, Osada Y (1999) Molecular and supramolecular structures of complexes formed by polyelectrolyte-surfactant interactions: effects of charge density and compositions. J Polym. Sci Part A: Polymer Chemistry 37:635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reščič J, Linse P (2001) Gas–liquid phase separation in charged colloidal systems. J Chem Phys 114:10131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thalberg K, Lindman B, Karlström G (1991) Phase behavior of a system of cationic surfactant and anionic polyelectrolyte: the effect of salt. J Phys Chem 95:6004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hayakawa K, Fukutome T, Satake I (1990) Solubilization of water-insoluble dye by a cooperative binding system of surfactant and polyelectrolyte. Langmuir 6:1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansson P, Almgren M (1995) Polyelectrolyte-induced micelle formation of ionic surfactants and binary surfactant mixtures studied by time-resolved fluorescence quenching. J Phys Chem 99:16684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCormick CL, Chen GS (1982) Water-soluble copolymers. IV. Random copolymers of acrylamide with sulfonated comonomers. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 20:817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kalyanasundaram K, Thomas JKJ (1977) Environmental effects on vibronic band intensities in pyrene monomer fluorescence and their application in studies of micellar systems. J Am Chem Soc 99:2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hansson P, Almgren M (1996) Interaction of Cn TAB with sodium (carboxymethyl)cellulose: effect of polyion linear charge density on binding isotherms and surfactant aggregation number. J Phys Chem 100:9038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lianos P, Viriot M-L, Zana R (1984) Study of the solubilization of aromatic hydrocarbons by aqueous micellar solutions. J Phys Chem 88:1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hansson P, Almgren M (1995) Large C12TAB Micelles formed in complexes with polyvinylsulfate and dextran sulfate. J Phys Chem 99:16694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fundin J, Brown W, Iliopoulos I, Claeson PM (1999) The interaction between sodium dodecylsulfate and the cationic-nonionic random copolymer (3-(2-methylpropionamide)propyl) trimethylammonium chloride-acrylamide of two different charge densities studied using dynamic light scattering and rheometry. Colloid Polym Sci 277:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Long D, Dobrynin AV, Rubinstein M, Adjari A (1998) Electrophoresis of polyampholytes. J Chem Phys 108:1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manning GS (1981) Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions. 7. Electrophoretic mobility and conductance. J Phys Chem 85:1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miura N, Dubin PL, Moorefield CN, Newkome GR (1999) Complex formation by electrostatic interaction between carboxyl-terminated dendrimers and oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 15:4245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LAMMI, UMR-5072CNRSUniversitéMontpellier IIMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Medin TechSt. LaurentCanada

Personalised recommendations