Basic Research in Cardiology

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 5–21 | Cite as

Collateral circulation

Past and present
  • Wolfgang SchaperEmail author
Open Access


Following an arterial occlusion outward remodeling of pre-existent inter-connecting arterioles occurs by proliferation of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. This is initiated by deformation of the endothelial cells through increased pulsatile fluid shear stress (FSS) caused by the steep pressure gradient between the high pre-occlusive and the very low post-occlusive pressure regions that are interconnected by collateral vessels. Shear stress leads to the activation and expression of all NOS isoforms and NO production, followed by endothelial VEGF secretion, which induces MCP-1 synthesis in endothelium and in the smooth muscle of the media. This leads to attraction and activation of monocytes and T-cells into the adventitial space (peripheral collateral vessels) or attachment of these cells to the endothelium (coronary collaterals). Mononuclear cells produce proteases and growth factors to digest the extra-cellular scaffold and allow motility and provide space for the new cells. They also produce NO from iNOS, which is essential for arteriogenesis. The bulk of new tissue production is carried by the smooth muscles of the media, which transform their phenotype from a contractile into a synthetic and proliferative one. Important roles are played by actin binding proteins like ABRA, cofilin, and thymosin beta 4 which determine actin polymerization and maturation. Integrins and connexins are markedly up-regulated. A key role in this concerted action which leads to a 2-to-20 fold increase in vascular diameter, depending on species size (mouse versus human) are the transcription factors AP-1, egr-1, carp, ets, by the Rho pathway and by the Mitogen Activated Kinases ERK-1 and -2. In spite of the enormous increase in tissue mass (up to 50-fold) the degree of functional restoration of blood flow capacity is incomplete and ends at 30% of maximal conductance (coronary) and 40% in the vascular periphery. The process of arteriogenesis can be drastically stimulated by increases in FSS (arterio-venous fistulas) and can be completely blocked by inhibition of NO production, by pharmacological blockade of VEGF-A and by the inhibition of the Rho-pathway. Pharmacological stimulation of arteriogenesis, important for the treatment of arterial occlusive diseases, seems feasible with NO donors.


arteriogenesis growth factor integrins shear stress MAP kinases 

1 Introduction

Modern research in arteriogenesis began with the observations by Fulton [44, 46, 47] who developed a new technique of postmortem injection into the human coronary arteries consisting of high X-ray contrast material combined with the use of “soft X-rays” that produced images of such clarity and precision that remained unchallenged even by modern imaging methods. From his research and that of others it became clear that coronary artery occlusions may not always lead to infarction. If infarcts had occurred they may encompass only a fraction of the region at risk and angina pectoris may occur less frequently after some time due to the development of collateral arteries from pre-existent interconnecting arterioles. Baroldi [5] had provided ample and definitive evidence on the basis of post mortem angiograms and corrosion-cast preparations that normal human coronary arteries are not end-arteries but are interconnected with an arteriolar network that considerably expands in cases of coronary occlusions. This network is already present in the newborn. These observations gave rise to hypotheses to be tested in laboratory animals and after profiting from the general progress in molecular and cellular biology the mechanisms of arteriogenesis became much clearer and new medicinal therapies are now being developed. Although the primary observations were almost 100 years old, battles are still fought today over problems that had been phrased almost as long ago:
  • are arteriolar collateral vessels pre-existent? can collaterals form de-novo?

  • what is the primary growth stimulus: chemical (ischemia?) or physical?

  • if physical, is it pressure or flow related?

And new debates arose in recent years, namely:
  • do angiogenic growth factors play a role and if yes which one?

  • are stem cells, adult or precursor, important for arteriogenesis?

To position this review we will briefly answer these questions and furnish more detailed elaborations further on.

2 Arteriogenesis: pre-existent and/or de-novo?

Fulton [46] and Baroldi [5] provided incontrovertible evidence that coronary collateral arterioles exist in the normal human heart that are potentially able to grow into larger structures that are potentially able to save myocardium from necrosis. Zbinden recently supported this view with functional data in beating normal human hearts studied with intra-coronary measurements of wedge pressures and flow wires resulting in the collateral flow index [166, 167]. Seiler concluded that a well-trained normal human heart is able to survive an acute coronary occlusion with only minimal necrosis due to good collateralization [166]. This view, that pre-existent arteriolar connections exist that enlarge by growth in response to arterial occlusion, still stands today but is supplemented by the opinion that capillaries may be able to recruit smooth muscle and that muscular collateral arteries can form de-novo [20]. Being a possibility, final proof that this process exists in mammalian hearts, that it develops in the right place at the interface between a normoxic and ischemic region and that it is connected to an arterial pressure source and is able to save or salvage muscular tissue is still lacking. Collaterals do not form de-novo in the peripheral circulation of rabbits, rats and mice. In man preformed collateral pathways exist in the vascular periphery that enlarge when stenoses form in the iliacal arteries with little inter-individual variation and some are classified under specific names like “Riordan” collaterals (see Ritter in ref. [125]). In rats a particularly large collateral is visible with the unarmed eye after contrast injection already before occlusion which enlarges and carries most of the collateral flow [64]. A finite number of interconnecting arterioles normally exists, 8 in C57BL/6J mice and 38 in rabbits, that enlarge after femoral occlusion [129, 156]. The number of pre-existing collaterals does not increase after arterial occlusion, not even after maximal stimulation by increased shear stress. The observed spurious increase in collateral number in the rabbit hind leg is due to the limitations of detection by X-ray based methods that recognize vessels only after they pass the threshold of detection by growth.

3 Is ischemia the stimulus for arteriogenesis?

Arterial occlusion leads to ischemia and to the development of collateral vessels if conditions are favorable and the occlusion develops gradually. It is therefore suggestive to assume that ischemia is the stimulus for arteriogenesis. However, stenoses slowly progressing toward complete occlusions signify only minimal ischemia, and this is the condition where collaterals show their maximum of adaptation. Acute infarctions are very poor stimuli for arteriogenesis: scar tissue needs little perfusion. Often the ischemic region and the location of growing collateral vessels lie closely together, like in the heart, and make it difficult to decide where ischemia ends and normoxia starts and where exactly the growth occurs. However, Fulton had already pointed out that the stem (origin) of coronary collaterals in the human coronary circulation expands already in normoxic tissue [44], a consequence of the increased FSS. The problem is easier to study in the peripheral circulation because of the large distances between the point of arterial occlusion and the location of ischemia. In the rabbit, rat and mouse proximal femoral artery occlusion leads to ischemia in the lower leg but not in the upper leg where collaterals form [130] with the exception of the white Balb/C mouse, a strain known for its paucity of pre-existent collateral vessels [62]. A strong argument against a role of ischemia stems from recent research in zebrafish where the occlusion of the aorta is rapidly compensated for by collateral vessel growth in an environment that cannot become hypoxic [51]. An argument in favor of ischemia is the observation that it is indeed the stimulus for the transcription and translation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), necessary for the angiogenic sprouting of capillaries [93, 114, 133, 143]. We will explain later that VEGF is indeed a necessary component of arteriogenesis but that ischemia is not the stimulus for arteriogenesis because it is expressed in the endothelium of growing collaterals that are constantly perfused with well-oxygenated blood, and are by definition not ischemic. The skeletal muscles surrounding growing collaterals after femoral artery occlusion in black mice are never ischemic (tested by electron spin resonance resulting in normal muscular pO2 and by magnetic resonance spectroscopy resulting in normal ATP and PCR values) [62, 156] but collateral vessels develop nevertheless and much faster than in ischemic white mice under the same circumstances. Attraction of monocytes, essential for arteriogenesis, is strongly inhibited by hypoxia [53]. Dogs, well endowed with native coronary collaterals, react much faster with growth to repetitive occlusions compared to dogs with a lesser-developed native collateral network [42, 43]. Thus, the lesser the ischemia, and the higher the FSS due to already present collateral vessels, the faster the growth.

A prime example of shear stress-induced arterial growth without accompanying ischemia is the outward remodeling of the uterine artery during pregnancy [97]. We conclude therefore that ischemia, often present at the time when collaterals develop, is not necessary to explain the growth of collateral vessels.

It could still be argued that the venous return from the ischemic lower limb in femoral artery occlusion carries growth factors into the region where arteriogenesis takes place. Although this is an untested hypothesis we can argue that in our high shear stress model where the collateral flow was shunted directly into the venous system the veins are perfused with arterial blood and the extremely high shunt flow would markedly dilute the infinitely small amounts of hypothetical factors. The initially and only briefly ischemic lower leg in black mice [62] recovers fast due to the increase in collateral flow but also due to the decrease in metabolism [66] probably by hibernation and preconditioning causing the rapid restoration of tissue hemoglobin saturation at times of continuing active collateral growth [125]. Anecdotal evidence exists from case reports where due to war wounds AV-shunts persisted in the upper leg with the typical increased vascularization in spite of lower leg amputation.

4 Pressure- or flow-derived stimuli?

It is generally assumed that a physical stimulus starts the remodeling process whereby increased pressure leads to increased wall thickness and increased flow to increased arterial diameter. Pressure-dependent forces are by far the highest in magnitude and they affect both the endothelium as well as the muscular media. It is therefore logical to assume that these are important factors for remodeling [83, 121, 122]. Vasodilatation of the collateral arcade, which occurs after arterial occlusion, may increase circumferential wall stress according to Laplace’s Law because diameter increases and wall thickness decreases, however, pressure falls precipitously after occlusion and it is questionable whether circumferential wall stress changes significantly. However, in collateral growth with its pressure gradient driven increase in flow the much weaker FSS, which the viscous drag of flowing blood exerts on the endothelial lining, is the determining force [8, 17, 35, 49, 85, 114, 142, 145, 149]. However, pressure derived pulsatile stretch is also discussed [83, 88, 110] and the transcription factor AP-1 is the molecular transducer. However, AP-1 is also activated by FSS [96]. Pulsatile stretch can only be tested acutely and in vitro with its inherent limits. Cultured endothelium under stretch alters translation and transcription of growth factors and changes the sensitivity to cytokines[14, 32, 110]. If pulsatile stretch is a molding force it must be demonstrated that in collateral growth pulsatile stretch is higher than the physiological levels in normal small arteries. Furthermore, in arterial occlusion the intravascular pressure downstream from the occlusion (and hence in the receiving end of the collateral arcade) is much lower than the systemic arterial pressure (100 mmHg proximal, 30 mmHg distal) and the probability of increased stretch is low under in-vivo conditions. In order to test the influence of physical forces we designed an experiment where post-occlusion pressure was lowered even more and where flow was drastically increased by shunting the collateral flow directly into the venous system, which maximized collateral growth [35, 106]. This experiment clearly demonstrates that flow dependent forces had dominated growth.

5 The shear stress paradox

Although there is compelling evidence that FSS is the primary morphogenic physical factor that determines the size of an artery and in particular the size of a growing collateral vessel, several problems still exist [85, 113, 114]. FSS is a weak force that acts only on endothelial cells in addition to the circumferential wall stress (up to over one thousand times higher) that acts both on endothelium and on the smooth muscles of the media. It is at first difficult to understand that the weak force directs the fate of the structures that cope with and resist the strong force. However, numerous physiological examples can be cited where weak forces function as amplifiers. Another difficulty arises from the fact that FSS falls precipitously with the 3rd power of the radius when it increases due to growth. One could argue that flow increases, according to Poissieulles Law, with the 4th power of the radius so that with any increase in radius sufficient shear stress remains. However, these musings do not reflect reality because flow in the arterial circulation is never ideally laminar and the exponent of the radius is probably much less than 4 [58, 161]. By analogy the r-exponent in the shear stress equation is therefore most certainly less than 3 because the condition of laminarity is also not met. Tortuosity, the typical feature of collateral vessels, makes the issue of FSS even more complex because shear stress in the outer curvature of a bend is probably higher than the radius at that point would predict. Curvature flow, as described by the Dean Equation [130] is part of the resistance in tortuous collateral vessels but shear stress can be imagined to be highest at the outer curvature.

Three observations suggest the leading role of the endothelium in arteriogenesis: endothelial denudation of the a. iliaca prevents positive remodeling after an experimental AV-shunt [55], L-NAME and other more specific inhibitors of eNOS prevent arteriogenesis and remodeling of collateral vessels, and after arterial occlusion dedifferentiated smooth muscle cells (SMCs) migrate toward the endothelium before they divide and form the intimal layer of new cells.

If Circumferential Wall Stress (CWS) were the morphogenic influence, proliferation should have commenced at the outer, adventitial, SMC layer, which according to the Law of Laplace, is markedly more stretched.

However, if we assume FSS as the leading force of arteriogenesis a new set of problems arise:
  1. 1.

    How are signals, generated in endothelial cells, translated into a growth stimulus for the smooth muscle layer of the media that is separated from the endothelium by the internal elastic lamina? We as well as others were unable to find endothelial-to-smooth muscle junctions in collaterals [122, 125], which reduce the means of communication to diffusible transmitters, like NO, oxygen radicals, endothelin, and diffusible factors like VEGF. Co-culture studies with endothelial- and SMCs in close contact do not necessarily reflect the in-vivo situation. This is highlighted by reports showing that FSS decreases the expression of MCP-1 in cultured endothelium, which is in contrast to the in-vivo situation, and that FSS and NO reduce monocyte attachment in vitro but the exact opposite occurs during collateral artery growth [125, 146, 147, 168].

  2. 2.

    Are special organelles like cilia, that protrude from the endothelial surface and float in the blood stream and sense velocity, shear stress transducers [67, 101, 108] or is the deformation of the entire endothelial cell, the tensegrity model of Ingber, required for gene activity typical for vascular remodeling [72, 73, 74, 75]? In our work in peripheral arteriogenesis the presence of cilia could not be verified on the basis of transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Deformation of the endothelium under high FSS is a typical feature of early arteriogenesis and is amplified by the intracellular edema and loss of volume control by activation of ion channels [154]. This would stress the cytoskeleton similarly as in the tensegrity model.

  3. 3.

    Mathematical modeling of vessels arranged in parallel showed that FSS cannot be an organizing principle of vessel growth because the model predicts instability with a preference for few but large vessels [56]. However, this reflects arteriogenic reality rather well. After arterial occlusion many pre-existent arterioles that are arranged more or less in parallel start to grow but finally only a few large ones emerge and the others are pruned away [129]. Increased FSS stimulated growth at first but ended when the competition had favored the large vessels offering less resistance and normal FSS [125].


6 The study of collateral vessel development, a personal history

The reason to study the role and development of coronary collateral vessels in the mid1960s was the urge to find a new role for the powerful coronary vasodilators that had been developed in the wake of the success of Dipyridamole [79], developed with the idea that vasoconstriction was the cause for angina pectoris. Nitroglycerine, because it relieved the pain of angina pectoris, was believed to relax spastic coronary arteries but was too short acting and hence longer acting vasodilators should improve the therapy of angina. However, the newly developed coronary angiography confirmed earlier pathological findings, in that coronary stenoses were structural and not functional barriers and there was hence no place for vasodilators. These, when applied in high doses, caused angina instead of preventing it, a property shared with high doses of nitroglycerine [162]. On the other hand it was widely accepted that FSS, caused by increased flow velocity, i.e., by vasodilatation, is the molding force for collateral vessels, at least in the vascular periphery [139]. Chronic coronary vasodilatation should therefore support collateral enlargement. When we started to study the influence of a long acting orally active coronary vasodilator, lidoflazine [127, 152], we noticed the paucity of functional data about the collateral circulation. Although the research by Fulton and Baroldi showed ample evidence of their existence in the normal and pathological human heart, nothing much was known about the mechanism of their structural enlargement. The prevailing view was that they enlarged by stretch because they appeared very thin walled [36, 45]. Also their ability to functionally replace the occluded artery and to what degree was unknown [52]. We could show, by in-vivo pulse-labeling with tritiated thymidine and uridine, that pre-existent coronary collaterals enlarge by active proliferation of endothelial cells which preceded that of SMCs after DNA and RNA synthesis [25, 102, 123]. The degree of adaptation by growth was impressive: in the canine heart (after gradual coronary occlusion) the collateral diameter increased up to 20-fold and the tissue mass increased up to 50-fold.

To test for functional capacity was more difficult: only pressure-derived indices were initially available. Peripheral coronary pressure measured in the distal stump of the occluded artery was a good estimate when divided by aortic pressure and when the measurement was carried out under maximal vasodilatation. The theoretical and experimental studies, that we carried out in the mid 1970s for the validation of the collateral flow index (CFI) [104, 105, 126, 132], are today used by clinicians in beating human hearts [104, 166]. A much more precise method to measure coronary and collateral flow was the then (1970) newly available tracer microsphere technique that we perfected using semi-conductor crystal detectors and a computer controlled automaton [163]. Our tracer studies showed that in spite of the tremendous growth of collateral vessels only one third of the maximal conductance was replaced [124]. This is sufficient for the resting state and mild activities but not for heavy physical exertion [65]. A wide margin for improvement exists therefore for therapy. Our studies were later confirmed by Epstein’s group, who arrived at exactly the same degree of adaptation [87].

Study of the histological structure and ultra structure revealed that both endothelial as well as SMCs went through a stage of dedifferentiation: SMCs lost their contractile phenotype and assumed a synthetic and proliferative phenotype, the latter also prevailing in endothelial cells. The most striking change was the migration of dedifferentiated SMCs toward the endothelium, apparently an attractor. This was enabled by the fragmentation of the internal elastic lamina.

By employing scanning and transmission electron microscopy in the study of collateral vessels at various stages of maturation [117] we noticed in 1975 that monocytes had attached to the formerly smooth but now “rocky” endothelial surface at early stages of the development [119] and had subsequently entered the sub-endothelial space. The adventitial space became invaded by bone marrow derived cells, mostly T-lymphocytes, and it became clear that the process of arteriogenesis exhibited an inflammatory scenario [11]. Treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs retarded the growth process showing that it was an essential element [118].

In the early 1980s the first angiogenic growth factors (GF) became known, notably PDGF [61] and FGF [13], the latter isolated first from brain tissue. Since my interest was focused on coronary collaterals our group tried to find a factor produced by the myocardium. Using a combination of chromatographic methods we finally purified a very potent mitogen for endothelial and SMCs from kilograms of bovine hearts. The amino acid sequence revealed that it was an already known factor, namely prostata growth factor, which was shortly thereafter identified as acidic Fibroblast Growth Factor, aFGF or FGF-1 [13, 112]. It was at first difficult to study the role of the FGFs-1 and -2. Because of the perfect evolutionary preservation of the genes it was not easy to produce an antibody and even the construction of a probe for in-situ hybridization had to take the detour via the chicken sequence. When finally an antibody became available we had FGF-1 adsorbed to porous micro-beads and, when injecting them into the porcine coronary circulation, we could indeed show by immuno-histochemistry the leaching of the factor from the bead, its take-up into cells, its transport into the nucleus and the subsequent mitosis [4]. However, mitosis was only observed in interstitial fibroblasts but not in smooth or cardiac muscle cells. And the frequency of mitosis paled in comparison with that of fibroblasts after myocardial necrosis.

In growing collateral vessels after ameroid-induced coronary occlusion we found FGF-1 in invading monocytes [120]. This renewed our interest in monocytes, especially since we found that porcine hearts challenged with micro-embolism (Mohri in [120]) to stimulate angiogenesis markedly up-regulated the chemo-attractant JE, later called MCP-1, (monocyte chemo-attractant protein1) [78, 157, 165].

The necessity to use smaller animals (new animal protection legislation) forced us to abandon the study of the coronary collateral circulation, first, because the ameroid technique of gradual coronary stenosis was not applicable in mouse or rat hearts (a recent report from Chilian’s group showed that this has become feasible in the rat heart [144]), and second, because pigs did not develop muscular collaterals [25]. We concentrated therefore on the peripheral circulation of the rabbit, rat and mouse, which reduced the complexity of the experiments because ischemic tissue loss played a relatively minor role even after acute occlusions with the exception of the white Balb C mouse with its poorly developed network of peripheral collateral vessels [62, 130, 151].

The role of monocytes was tested by infusion into the rabbit hindlimb of MCP-1 using osmotic minipumps and it indeed stimulated arteriogenesis markedly [77, 78]. The role of monocytes was further strengthened by experiments showing that the monocyte stimulant LPS, a Toll-like receptor ligand, markedly stimulated arteriogenesis [3] and over-expressed TNF-α [2, 68] but that reduction of blood monocyte count with 5′-fluoro-uracil inhibited arteriogenesis [2, 59]. Femoral ligature during the monocyte rebound from cytotoxic treatment stimulated it. Elimination of monocytes with nano-encapsulated bisphosphonates strongly inhibited arteriogenesis [107]. Over-transfusion with monocytes stimulated arteriogenesis [59, 63] but animals genetically lacking these cells (osteopetrotic mice and rats) were almost unable to develop collateral vessels [9]. Genetically targeted mice lacking the gene for MCP-1 [153] and mice lacking the gene for the MCP-1 receptor (CCR2) exhibited a severely limited ability to adapt to femoral artery occlusion [60]. These findings and our observation that monocytes produce paracrine growth factors may have been the basis for the recent clinical and experimental interest in adult bone marrow derived stem cells (which share markers with monocytes and EPCs) for the regeneration of arterial tissue. Murry in his Nature article supported this view [100].

The increase in FSS as it occurs as a consequence of increased collateral flow due to the steep pressure gradient across a stenosis or occlusion, tends to prevent the attachment of monocytes and so we studied the expression of adhesion molecules as a counterforce and we found ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 greatly increased on the endothelial surface and in the media of growing collaterals, more so in shunt stimulated collaterals [106, 128]. Injection of antibodies against ICAM and injection of the ICAM antigen reduced collateral development because the antigen binds to the circulating monocytes and the antibody blocks the docking site [69]. These experiments supported strongly again the important role of monocytes in arteriogenesis.

Van Weel and co-workers as well as Epstein and his group had recently shown that other leukocytes also contributed to arteriogenesis, mainly T-lymphocytes, NK-cells and CD4 and CD8 cells [137, 138, 151]. Endothelial progenitor cells were claimed to home toward growing vessels and change their phenotype into endothelial, smooth muscle and even to cardiac muscle cells [80, 140]. Bone marrow derived cells from EGFP chimaeras do indeed home toward growing collaterals but never incorporate into the vascular wall and do not change their phenotype but exhibit paracrine activity instead [172].

7 Phases of remodeling

Roughly 4 stages in the development of a pre-existent collateral arteriole into a mature small conductance artery can be identified. Following a critical stenosis or an acute occlusion a relatively silent phase of up to 2 days follows where nothing much happens in terms of blood flow increase. This is due to the fact that the cell cycle and events leading to it require about one day at which time point bone marrow derived cells attach to the endothelium and gather in the adventitial space. The hallmark of the first phase is the phenotypical change of endothelial and SMCs into synthetic and proliferative ones with increase of vascular permeability. The second phase is characterized by the controlled destruction of the collateral vessel by digestion of the extra-cellular scaffolding like internal elastic lamina and extra-cellular matrix simultaneously with a burst of mitotic activity of SMCs and endothelial cells where the ECs precede that of the SMCs by about one day. Phase 3 is the maturation phase characterized by orderly arrangement of the SMCs in circular layers, by establishment of cell-to-cell contacts and by synthesis of elastin and collagen to produce the new scaffold for the much larger vessel. Phase 4 is characterized by pruning of vessels that had initially participated in the remodeling but are eliminated by the competition for flow: those with the initial advantage of a slightly larger diameter reach maturation but many others close by overshooting intimal proliferation comparable to the closure of the stump of an occluded artery [129].

8 Structural restraints prevent full restitution of function?

The inability of exogenously applied angiogenic growth factors to fully restore the maximal conductance after arterial occlusion led us to tackle the thus far unanswered question: are collaterals actually able to fully replace the occluded artery? Can the limit of between 30% and 40% restoration of physiological conductance by collaterals be surpassed? Why does collateral growth stop prematurely? Is the tortuosity and increased length of collaterals an anatomical limit? In order to test that problem we designed an experiment where the pressure gradient along collaterals was further increased and maintained for a relatively long time. This was achieved by creating a side-to-side anastomosis between the distal stump of the occluded artery and the accompanying vein, creating an arterio-venous shunt where the collateral blood flow was largely shunted directly into the venous system, which increased markedly collateral flow and FSS. This procedure greatly stimulated arteriogenesis and functionally replaced the occluded artery already after one week and increased the maximal conductance at 4 weeks after occlusion by a factor of two [35, 106]. With this experiment we showed that the 30%–40% of spontaneous restoration of function was not caused by anatomical restraints but rather by the premature normalization of FSS, which falls with increases of the vessel radius by the 3rd power. Our studies show that therapeutic efforts are not doomed to fail because of anatomical restraints and a reference point is defined that could and should be reached by therapy. The reasons for premature stop of growth are twofold: shear stress falls not only because the vessel radius increases, as discussed but also because metabolic autoregulation limits blood flow to the actual need of the tissue.

9 Role of growth factors

Our findings that the FGF-1 protein is expressed in the heart [112], that application of FGF-1 to heart muscle stimulates mesenchymal cells to proliferate [4], that monocytes loaded with FGF-1 home-in on places where collateral vessels develop, that the FGFR-1 is expressed in SMCs of growing collaterals and in fibroblasts of the adventitia [30] and that transgenic myocardial over-expression increased arteriogenesis and arterial branching in the heart [38] were at first interpreted that FGF-1 is the growth factor of arteriogenesis [120]. Transgenic over-expression of FGF-2 in skeletal muscle under the control of the phosphoglycerate promoter resulted in complete restoration of blood flow after femoral artery occlusion, especially when combined with physical exercise [125]. Peripheral arteriogenesis following femoral artery occlusion could be inhibited by PAS (Polyanetholsulfonic acid), which blocks the action of FGF by complex formation, which impairs binding to the FGFR-1 [30]. FGF ligand availability did not change, therefore regulation of arteriogenesis seemed to proceed via receptor availability. In spite of all of these findings the FGF-hypothesis has a low probability because gene-targeting of FGF-1, of FGF-2 and the double knockout of FGF1 + 2 responded like wild-type mice to femoral artery occlusion [170]. Except for changes in tibia length the animals were normal and fertile. Since the FGF family is large the assumption was that other members had substituted in the gene-deleted animals. Adenoviral transfection of rabbit skeletal muscle with FGF-4 stimulated arteriogenesis but no evidence is available that collateral formation was stimulated in the FGF-1,-2 double knockouts by FGF-4. Although FGF-7 is strongly expressed in cultured porcine vascular SMCs, especially when stimulated with PDGF, no differential expression was found so far in developing collaterals. Mouse knockout studies of FGF-7 showed no impaired wound healing [54]. However, the triple knockout of FGF 5, 6 and 7 markedly inhibited the recovery of blood flow after femoral artery occlusion (Zimmermann et al. unpublished). In spite of the fact that external application of FGF-1, -2, FGF-4, and -5 stimulate arteriogenesis [48, 87, 150], from about 40%–50% of physiological maximal conductance, their internal role in collateral vessel development remains uncertain.

An enormous amount of research was generated by the discovery that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) played a crucial role in the embryonic genesis of the vascular system. No offspring issued from targeted deletion of the VEGF gene and not even heterozygote knockouts were viable [21, 39]. Numerous studies were published showing that application of VEGF either by protein or gene transfer could reduce hind limb ischemia after femoral artery occlusion in animals [7, 76, 164]. But in analogy with the pioneering work of Epstein with FGF, complete restoration of function of the occluded artery was not reached. Our recent studies showed that VEGF-A protein is indeed expressed on the endothelial surface of growing collaterals which explains the mitotic activity of the endothelium but not of the SMC proliferation at a distance from the endothelium, especially because VEGF is not a mitogen for SMCs. However, a combination of activated autologous EC and SMC by transduction with Angiopoietin-1 and VEGF retroviral vectors, respectively, produced arteriogenesis in a hind limb ischemia model in miniature pigs [50]. Recent studies by Terjung et al showed that the arteriogenesis of exercise can be inhibited by the VEGF antagonist ZD4190 [90]. Questions remain as to the mechanism of VEGF expression by shear stress, which appears unorthodox because VEGF is up regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor (hif), but also by changes in glucose concentration, in reaction to lowered oxygen tension [133], which is high in arterial endothelium. A plausible explanation for the interplay of factors might originate at shear stress activated eNOS which induces VEGF which in turn induces MCP-1 in SMCs which attracts monocytes which produce GFs and arteriogenesis can be blocked at each mentioned point. The action of growth factors, especially the FGFs and VEGF, but also of the pleiotrophic heparin binding growth factor Midkine are modulated by the syndecans (1–4), glycoproteins that act as co-receptors, especialy for G-protein-coupled receptors [27, 28].

An ideal candidate for an endothelial FSS-activated smooth muscle mitogen would be endothelin 1 [24]. Endothelin mRNA indeed reacts in our experiments to FSS in a quantitative way, i.e. moderate increase after simple femoral artery occlusion and marked increase following shunt induced maximal shear stress whereas in experiments of other groups it reacts mainly to changes in pressure [86]. However, endothelin is a strong antagonist of NO (and vice versa) [12, 158] but NO is essential for arteriogenesis. However, the observed increase of endothelin occurs late during the maturation phase of the collateral vessels where an antagonist of NO would be needed. Another NOS inhibitor is hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which is produced by MCP-1 activated monocytes [57]. However, HGF is not a known mitogen for SMCs but it is angiogenic and a mitogen and motogen for endothelial cells [16].

Uninhibited NO production could potentially further stimulate collateral vessel growth. A similar effect could potentially be induced by inhibition of enzymatic degradation of sGMP, the intracellular transmitter of NO. Indeed, sildenafil, a blocker of PDE-5, was reported to stimulate arteriogenesis [111, 134]. In our own experiments in an ischemic rabbit hind limb preparation and with oral administration of high doses of sildenafil the effect was marginal, probably caused by the unknown pharmacokinetics in that species.

10 Cell–cell interactions

As discussed above, the arteriogenic process is initiated by a sudden increase in shear stress. Shear stress is sensed and transduced from the extra-cellular space to the intracellular skeleton. Communication between ECs and SMCs as a transverse signalling across the vessel wall is required to initiate the proliferation process. All these steps rely on cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions.

Cellular effects of the extracellular matrix are primarily mediated by integrins. Among the many different isoforms αVβ3 integrin is involved in angiogenesis [41] as well as macrophage adhesion and migration [159]. αVβ3 integrin turned out to be selectively increased in the wall of growing collateral arteries during the first 3 days after occlusion [37]. The specific localization of αVβ3 integrin signals in the abluminal surface of the endothelium is consistent with observations, which were obtained in vitro [148]. However, increased expression under the influence of high flows shows integrin protein enwrapping all vascular cells, which could explain the problem of early signal transmission across the internal elastic lamina before that is destroyed by the action of elastase secreted by monocytes.

Nevertheless its main ligand vitronectin seemed not to be involved in arteriogenesis [37]. In contrast we found the integrin ligand fibronectin up-regulated in shunt-treated growing collaterals. Interactions between fibronectin and some syndecans can be modulated by components of the extracellular matrix proteins. Midkine, a heparin binding growth factor is a ligand of α4β1- and α6β1-integrins [99].

Notch (receptor) in the SMCs and Jagged or Delta (ligands) in the endothelium are membrane bound proteins, mediating signals between cells in contact. Fernandez and Broich already assumed a special relevance of the Jagged/Notch signalling in embryonic development of collateral arteries, as they have found consistent, time-dependent, and cell-type restricted regulation of Jagged and Notch protein expression during the growth of collateral arteries [37]. Limbourg et al. have shown that the ligand Dll1 regulates Notch signalling-dependent Ephrin-B2 expression and heterozygous Dll1 mice show impaired arteriogenesis. They could demonstrate that angiogenic GFs like VEGF and FGF-2 regulate Ephrin B2 expression via Dll1-dependent Notch activation [89]. Interaction between endothelial arterial expressed EphB2 (that we found up-regulated under high shear stress) and Eph B4 receptor, which is expressed by venous endothelial cells, regulates the integrity of the vessel wall, which has to be preserved throughout the remodelling process [84].

Electric currents or signalling molecules such as Ca2+ or IP3 between the ECs and SMCs could be explained via gap junctions located at the smooth muscle-endothelial interface called myoendothelial junctions (MEJ). Although the functional evidence argues strongly for the presence of these MEJ, ultrastructural evidence for their existence in coronary as well as in peripheral collateral vessels is lacking. At least their frequencies are too low to explain the signal transduction between endothelial cells (EC) and SMCs.

Connexins are proteins that form gap junctions. Cx37, Cx40, Cx43 and Cx45 have been identified in vascular cells, but the relative expression level differs with vessel size/ location and species. Even the flow pattern seems to have effects on connexin expression [33]. In the normal dog coronary system Cx37 and Cx40 were only expressed in ECs while during collateral growth SMCs, normally devoid of a junctional system, strongly express Cx37 [19].

An interesting idea is the evidence indicating that connexin proteins might also participate in cell-cell communication via direct, transcellular protein-protein interactions. The C-terminal portion of the connexins is associated with a variety of cytoskeletal proteins and, in conjunction with N-cadherin, is linked to a number of cell signalling cascades [160].

11 The NO paradox

The enormous increase of collateral vessel density and caliber and the drastic increase in function seen in the shunt model raised the question about the nature of the molecular pathways that had translated FSS into a growth signal. We studied gene expression in these rapidly growing vessels in the rat by genome-wide screening of transcripts using micro-arrays. Among the over 300 differentially expressed genes we found several of the known stress-responsive genes differentially expressed (klf2 [31, 40, 149], VEGFR/PECAM complex [149], TRPV4 calcium channels [141, 155]). We concentrated on the NOS isoforms because we had previously found that the NOS inhibitor L-NAME markedly inhibited the effects of increased FSS [35, 125]. And indeed we found the transcripts for eNOS, iNOS and nNOS significantly up-regulated both on the transcriptional as well as on the translational level. These findings posed riddles because NO is a powerful anti-mitogen [15, 70, 71]. The anti-proliferative actions of NO were even used to successfully battle restenosis, based on intimal SMC proliferation [1], after experimental angioplasty [22, 103]. The antimitotic actions of NO are dose dependent, at least in cells of the CNS that were treated with the synthetic NO donor detaNONOate: low doses of detaNONO are mitogenic but high doses are antimitotic [95]. These effects could be modulated by intracellular calcium concentrations. A similar pro-mitogenic effect was obtained with sodium nitroprusside in endothelial cells of the fetoplacental artery via the MAPKinases ERK-1,-2 [169].

Given the strong inhibitory actions of NOS antagonists it appeared logical to study mice with genetically targeted deletions of the NOS isoforms. However, surprisingly, we found that eNOS knockouts exhibited normal collateral vessel growth after femoral artery occlusion and showed delayed recovery only because of the prevailing intense vasoconstriction, which was easily neutralized by NO-donors [35, 71, 94, 125]. Only the additional inhibition of iNOS in eNOS ko mice inhibited arteriogenesis to a degree that led to auto-amputation (Schaper, submitted). L-NAME inhibits also iNOS, which explains our results with L-NAME in the shunt experiments. Irrespective of source, NO is an essential link in the pathways leading to arteriogenesis. It may originate also from the monocytes/macrophages in the peri-vascular space where they are activated in an autocrine way and stimulated to produce mitogens. These results also explain another spurious paradox, i.e., the non-involvement of Akt [35], necessary for the activation of eNOS [125] in our shunt studies.

It is of interest that for the experimental treatment of cancer both eNOS and iNOS must be inhibited to achieve an anti-angiogenic as well an anti-arteriogenic effect [22].

An important discussion point is the question of which comes first in the reaction to FSS: NO or VEGF-A? Both are known to be early responders and the arteriogenic actions of both can be stopped by inhibitors. But what induces what? From a physiological point of view NO must come first because the immediate effect of a step change in flow occurs within seconds and is NO-triggered vasodilatation [6, 109]. However, maximal phosphorylation at Ser 1177, a prerequisite for eNOS to become active, requires 5 min and Ser 116 de-phosphorylation requires 30 min, too long to explain the acute hemodynamic effects of NO but perhaps adequate for the transformation by growth [34]. It should also be noted that ischemic tissue is able to produce NO by a non-enzymatic route [92]. All these studies emphasize the essential role of NO and it appears feasible that soon an NO releasing chemical will be available for clinical testing to stimulate arteriogenesis. We have tested new direct and indirect NO donors and found them to be impressively arteriogenic.

The angiogenic and arteriogenic functions of NO were inferred on the basis of inhibitor studies prior to our results by Matsunaga [93] who also reported about the interaction between VEGF and NO. Even before that Guzman in 1997 reported the abrogation of structural dilatation of arteries in arterio-venous shunts by L-NAME. However, none of these authors provided explanations or hypotheses about the mechanisms of action of the anti-mitogen NO in a process that totally relies on smooth muscle mitosis. The role of NO in angiogenesis was discovered by Ziche already in 1994 [171] and recently the molecular pathway was described on the basis of targeted deletion of Rac-1 [116] a Rho-family member. With our studies in shunt-stimulated collateral growth we also described the involvement of the Rho-pathway in the expression of ABRA, an actin-binding protein strongly up-regulated in arteriogenesis. Arteriogenesis is also inhibited by the Rho antagonist Fasudil [35].

12 SMC dynamics separates arteriogenesis from angiogenesis

Most of the research in vascular remodeling had concentrated on the endothelium, which indeed plays a major role. However, the SMCs of the media are responsible for most of the remodeling process of the new artery. The marked changes from a contractile to a synthetic and proliferative phenotype, the digestion of the internal elastic lamina and the digestion of the extra-cellular matrix, which allows motility are much more profound compared to the mild morphological changes that characterize the endothelium [117, 122, 129]. Motility is also influenced by massive changes in the expression of integrins and the focal adhesion kinases [98]. The stresses that arterioles undergo, that normally do not exhibit contacts between endothelial- and SMCs because of the interposed internal elastic lamina, may have triggered the expression of connexin Cx37 in SMCs, which was formerly only weakly expressed in endothelium [18, 19]. The molecular changes in smooth muscle dominate also the genomic screens with the high expression of structural genes, in particular smooth muscle actin, its degree of polymerization and the numerous molecules that bind actin at various stages (abra, cofilin [106], tsmb4 [136], destrin [106]). All these changes point toward a potent mitogen for smooth muscle, the identity of which is not yet known. An interesting hypothesis is that the products of elastin cleavage, caused by monocyte-derived proteases, are mitogenic and that the loss of cell-to-cell contact itself triggers mitosis of SMCs. Our studies with heterozygote deletion of the elastin gene in mice showed accelerated arteriogenesis (Szymanski et al. unpublished). Elastin digestion is one of the prerequisites for positive remodeling.

We should keep in mind that situations exist where SMCs proliferate in the absence of GFs [91].

13 Pathways and gene transcription

The translation of the shear stress signal into a molecular pathway resulting in the activation of genes coding for proteins that enable arteriogenic remodeling is only incompletely understood. In-vitro results from stressed cultured endothelium are difficult to translate into an in-vivo situation where the shear forces are so much higher. Furthermore, stressed endothelium has to communicate with the underlying smooth muscle layer from which it is normally separated by the internal elastic lamina. None of the known endothelial stress-responsive proteins (klf2, Tzima-complex [149], ion channels, etc) explain the proliferation of the SMCs of the media but oxygen based radicals generated in response to mechanical stress may reach the SMCs and activate the transcription factor AP-1 which in turn induces MCP-1 etc., [32]. Activation of transcription factors by radicals would obviate the need for mitogens, which is in some contrast to the findings by our group that showed strong up-regulation of the MAPKinases ERK-1/ERK-2, which transmit mitogenic messages from cell membrane receptors to the nucleus [35, 125] (see Fig. 1). Among the transcription factors involved in arteriogenesis AP-1 [81] and the “early growth response gene”, egr-1 [29] play a prominent role because they are activated by the MAPKinases ERK-1,-2 and control the expression of GFs and adhesion molecules as well as chemokines for mononuclear cells [29]. Fittingly, egr-1 knockouts exhibited a significant delay in the blood flow recovery after femoral artery ligature [115]. We constructed an egr-1 reporter mouse by coupling of the egr-1 promoter to luciferase and studied the animals in a ccd black box in the hope to identify growing collaterals in a non-invasive way. But mainly skeletal stress points (jaws after feeding) lighted up after injection of Luminol partially confirming our hypothesis that mechanical stresses are inducers of egr-1.
Fig. 1

Network analysis of differentially expressed proteins (red symbols) involved in arteriogenesis. We performed a literature scan (Pathway Studio) in order to retrieve an extract of regulatory and interaction pathways. Different ligands and receptors act in concert leading to an activation of a variety of transcription factors and signalling pathways via the central players calcium and NO. Bold arrows indicate a fluid shear stress activated new pathway, which resulted from the molecular investigation of the shunt model. (FSS fluid shear stress, MCP-1 monocyte chemo-attractant protein, Dll1 delta-like1, JAG1 jagged1, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, FN1 fibronectin, Trpv4 transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 4, NOS1 neuronal nitric oxide synthase, NOS2A inducible nitric oxide synthase, NOS3 endothelial nitric oxide synthase, ITGA5: αVβ3 Integrin, EFNB2 Ephrin B2, NO nitric oxide, KLF2 Krueppel-like factor2, SRF serum response factor, EGR1 early growth response1, RHOA ras homolog gene family, member A, CFL1 cofilin1, Abra actin binding Rho activator, Dream DRE antagonist modulator, TMSB4X thymosinβ4, Dstn destrin)

NOS antagonists drastically abrogate ERK activity, which argues for an indirect influence of NO on a mitogen-releasing cell. Another pathway that seems to play a role is Rho signaling which appears to be tightly coupled with the changes of actin polymerization that is typical for arteriogenesis. A co-transcription factor that exhibits the highest up-regulation (over 40-fold) in growing peripheral collateral vessels in mouse, rat and rabbit is cardiac ankyrin repeat protein carp (ANKRD1) [10]. The function of carp [26, 173, 174] in the adult organism is unclear. During embryonic development it regulates the expression of GFs. Its up-regulation during adult arteriogenesis may signify a recapitulation of embryonic mechanisms. Carp was found to co-localize with α-actin in intimal SMCs in human atherosclerotic lesions and could be induced by activin, a member of the TGFβ family in experimental atherosclerosis [26]. Structural similarities suggest that carp belongs to the early response genes, which would partly explain its massive upregulation immediately following arterial occlusions [26]. Targeted deletion of the three isoforms of ANKRD1 showed no delay in blood flow recovery after femoral artery occlusion [58].

14 A brief excursion into the clinical situation

The clinical field of arteriogenesis is well covered by excellent reviews [82, 131, 135]. Today clinicians use techniques and insights gleaned from experimental work and collateral hemodynamics can now be studied in the beating hearts of fully conscious patients. The roles played by monocytes are fully recognized and are explored in studies making use either of the paracrine action of monocytes in adult stem cell applications, by chemokines that prolong the function of monocytes like GM-CSF or G-CSF [132] or by studying the gene expression of monocytes [23] with the question in mind why only relatively few patients are able to develop collaterals in spite of the fact that all human hearts possess the precursors of grown collateral arteries. Although these studies have produced interesting results it must be kept in mind that the development of collaterals needs time, which is not granted in a situation of acute thrombotic arterial occlusion. Those patients with a well-developed collateral circulation may have profited from a gradually developing stenosis via slow growth of mural thrombi and not necessarily from a fortuitous pattern of gene expression of monocytes.

In summary we have unraveled pathways essential for arteriogenesis that converge to remodel a preexistent arteriole into an artery. These pathways originate at the shear stressed endothelium which attracts bone marrow derived cells that produce GFs in response to NO and VEGF and lead to powerful remodeling mainly of the smooth muscle layer of the media resulting in a manifold increase of the arteriolar diameter able to deliver bulk flow to jeopardized tissue. The multitude of morphological, protein-biochemical and molecular changes seen in SMCs of developing collaterals are of considerable interest but they are only the consequences of the fundamental event that occurred with mitogenic stimulation which is still in need of unraveling.


  1. 1.
    Ahanchi SS, Tsihlis ND, Kibbe MR (2007) The role of nitric oxide in the pathophysiology of intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg 45:64–73Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arras M, Hoche A, Bohle R, Eckert P, Riedel W, Schaper J (1996) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in macrophages of heart, liver, kidney, and in the pituitary gland. Cell Tissue Res 285:39–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arras M, Ito WD, Scholz D, Winkler B, Schaper J, Schaper W (1998) Monocyte activation in angiogenesis and collateral growth in the rabbit hindlimb. J Clin Invest 101:40–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arras M, Mollnau H, Strasser R, Wenz R, Ito WD, Schaper J, Schaper W (1998) The delivery of angiogenic factors to the heart by microsphere therapy. Nat Biotechnol 16:159–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baroldi G, Scomazzoni G (1967) Coronary circulation in the normal and the pathological heart. Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bassenge E, Heusch G (1990) Endothelial and neuro-humoral control of coronary blood flow in health and disease. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 116:77–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baumgartner I, Isner JM (1998) Stimulation of peripheral angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Vasa 27:201–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ben Driss A, Benessiano J, Poitevin P, Levy BI, Michel JB (1997) Arterial expansive remodeling induced by high flow rates. Am J Physiol 272:H851–H858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergmann CE, Hoefer IE, Meder B, Roth H, van Royen N, Breit SM, Jost MM, Aharinejad S, Hartmann S, Buschmann IR (2006) Arteriogenesis depends on circulating monocytes and macrophage accumulation and is severely depressed in op/op mice. J Leukoc Biol 80:59–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boengler K, Pipp F, Fernandez B, Ziegelhoeffer T, Schaper W, Deindl E (2003) Arteriogenesis is associated with an induction of the cardiac ankyrin repeat protein (carp). Cardiovasc Res 59:573–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borgers M, Schaper J, Schaper W (1970) Acute vascular lesions in developing coronary collaterals. Virchows Arch A Pathol Pathol Anat 351:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bouallegue A, Daou GB, Srivastava AK (2007) Nitric oxide attenuates endothelin-1-induced activation of ERK1/2, PKB, and Pyk2 in vascular smooth muscle cells by a cGMP-dependent pathway. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293:H2072–H2079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burgess WH, Mehlman T, Marshak DR, Fraser BA, Maciag T (1986) Structural evidence that endothelial cell growth factor beta is the precursor of both endothelial cell growth factor alpha and acidic fibroblast growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:7216–7220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Busse R, Fleming I (1998) Pulsatile stretch and shear stress: physical stimuli determining the production of endothelium-derived relaxing factors. J Vasc Res 35:73–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Busse R, Fleming I (1998) Regulation of NO synthesis in endothelial cells. Kidney Blood Press Res 21:264–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bussolino F, Di Renzo MF, Ziche M, Bocchietto E, Olivero M, Naldini L, Gaudino G, Tamagnone L, Coffer A, Comoglio PM (1992) Hepatocyte growth factor is a potent angiogenic factor which stimulates endothelial cell motility and growth. J Cell Biol 119:629–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buus CL, Pourageaud F, Fazzi GE, Janssen G, Mulvany MJ, De Mey JG (2001) Smooth muscle cell changes during flow-related remodeling of rat mesenteric resistance arteries. Circ Res 89:180–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cai WJ, Kocsis E, Scholz D, Luo X, Schaper W, Schaper J (2004) Presence of Cx37 and lack of desmin in smooth muscle cells are early markers for arteriogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 262:17–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cai WJ, Koltai S, Kocsis E, Scholz D, Schaper W, Schaper J (2001) Connexin37, not Cx40 and Cx43, is induced in vascular smooth muscle cells during coronary arteriogenesis. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33:957–967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carmeliet P (2000) Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med 6:389–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carmeliet P, Ferreira V, Breier G, Pollefeyt S, Kieckens L, Gertsenstein M, Fahrig M, Vandenhoeck A, Harpal K, Eberhardt C, Declercq C, Pawling J, Moons L, Collen D, Risau W, Nagy A (1996) Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature 380:435–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen G, Quian HS, Liu P, Brooks A, Rubanyi G, Kauser K (2006) iNOS-derived NO substitutes for endothelial NO in tumor growth in the absence of eNOS expression. Nitric Oxide 4:16–20Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chittenden TW, Sherman JA, Xiong F, Hall AE, Lanahan AA, Taylor JM, Duan H, Pearlman JD, Moore JH, Schwartz SM, Simons M (2006) Transcriptional profiling in coronary artery disease: indications for novel markers of coronary collateralization. Circulation 114:1811–1820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dao HH, Bouvet C, Moreau S, Beaucage P, Lariviere R, Servant MJ, de Champlain J, Moreau P (2006) Endothelin is a dose-dependent trophic factor and a mitogen in small arteries in vivo. Cardiovasc Res 71:61–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Brabander M, Schaper W, Verheyen F (1973) Regenerative changes in the porcine heart after gradual and chronic coronary artery occlusion. Beitr Pathol 149:170–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Waard V, van Achterberg TA, Beauchamp NJ, Pannekoek H, de Vries CJ (2003) Cardiac ankyrin repeat protein (CARP) expression in human and murine atherosclerotic lesions: activin induces CARP in smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:64–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dedkov EI, Thomas MT, Sonka M, Yang F, Chittenden TW, Rhodes JM, Simons M, Ritman EL, Tomanek RJ (2007) Synectin/syndecan-4 regulate coronary arteriolar growth during development. Dev Dyn 236:2004–2010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deepa SS, Yamada S, Zako M, Goldberger O, Sugahara K (2004) Chondroitin sulfate chains on syndecan-1 and syndecan-4 from normal murine mammary gland epithelial cells are structurally and functionally distinct and cooperate with heparan sulfate chains to bind growth factors: a novel function to control binding of midkine, pleiotrophin, and basic fibroblast growth factor. J Biol Chem 279:37368–37376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deindl E (2007) Arteriogenesis: a focus on signal transduction cascades and transcription factors. Thromb Haemost 98:940–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deindl E, Hoefer IE, Fernandez B, Barancik M, Heil M, Strniskova M, Schaper W (2003) Involvement of the fibroblast growth factor system in adaptive and chemokine-induced arteriogenesis. Circ Res 92:561–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dekker RJ, van Soest S, Fontijn RD, Salamanca S, de Groot PG, VanBavel E, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ (2002) Prolonged fluid shear stress induces a distinct set of endothelial cell genes, most specifically lung Kruppel-like factor (KLF2). Blood 100:1689–1698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Demicheva E, Hecker M, Korff T (2008) Stretch-induced activation of the transcription factor activator protein-1 controls monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression during arteriogenesis. Circ Res (in press)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    DePaola N, Davies PF, Pritchard WF, Jr., Florez L, Harbeck N, Polacek DC (1999) Spatial and temporal regulation of gap junction connexin43 in vascular endothelial cells exposed to controlled disturbed flows in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3154–3159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dudzinski DM, Michel T (2007) Life history of eNOS: partners and pathways. Cardiovasc Res 75:247–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eitenmuller I, Volger O, Kluge A, Troidl K, Barancik M, Cai WJ, Heil M, Pipp F, Fischer S, Horrevoets AJ, Schmitz-Rixen T, Schaper W (2006) The range of adaptation by collateral vessels after femoral artery occlusion. Circ Res 99:656–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Elliot EC, Bloor CM, Jones EL, Mitchell WJ, Gregg DE (1971) Effect of controlled coronary occlusion on collateral circulation in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 220:857–861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fernandez B, Broich K (2004) Cell–cell and cell-matrix interactions. In: Schaper W, Schaper J (ed) Arteriogenesis. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fernandez B, Buehler A, Wolfram S, Kostin S, Espanion G, Franz WM, Niemann H, Doevendans PA, Schaper W, Zimmermann R (2000) Transgenic myocardial overexpression of fibroblast growth factor-1 increases coronary artery density and branching. Circ Res 87:207–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferrara N, Carver-Moore K, Chen H, Dowd M, Lu L, O’Shea KS, Powell-Braxton L, Hillan KJ, Moore MW (1996) Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature 380:439–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fledderus JO, van Thienen JV, Boon RA, Dekker RJ, Rohlena J, Volger OL, Bijnens AP, Daemen MJ, Kuiper J, van Berkel TJ, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ (2007) Prolonged shear stress and KLF2 suppress constitutive proinflammatory transcription through inhibition of ATF2. Blood 109:4249–4257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Friedlander M, Brooks PC, Shaffer RW, Kincaid CM, Varner JA, Cheresh DA (1995) Definition of two angiogenic pathways by distinct alpha v integrins. Science 270:1500–1502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fujita M, Tambara K (2004) Recent insights into human coronary collateral development. Heart 90:246–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fujita M, Yamanishi K, Araie E, Sasayama S, McKown DP, Franklin D (1994) Determinants of collateral development in a canine model with repeated coronary occlusion. Heart Vessels 9:292–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fulton W (1964) Anastomotic enlargement and ischemic myocardial damage. Br Heart J 26:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fulton W (1969) The morphology of coronary arterial anastomoses in health and disease and their influence on ischaemic myocardial damage. Acta Cardiol 12:38–67Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fulton WFM (1965) The coronary arteries. Charles C Thomas Springfield, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fulton WFM (1964) The time factor in the enlargement of anastomoses in coronary artery disease. Scot Med J 9:18–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Giordano FJ, Ping P, McKirnan MD, Nozaki S, DeMaria AN, Dillmann WH, Mathieu-Costello O, Hammond HK (1996) Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart. Nat Med 2:534–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Girard PR, Nerem RM (1995) Shear stress modulates endothelial cell morphology and F-actin organization through the regulation of focal adhesion-associated proteins. J Cell Physiol 163:179–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gluzman Z, Koren B, Preis M, Cohen T, Tsaba A, Cosset FL, Shofti R, Lewis BS, Virmani R, Flugelman MY (2007) Endothelial cells are activated by angiopoeitin-1 gene transfer and produce coordinated sprouting in vitro and arteriogenesis in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gray C, Packha, IM, Wurmser F, Eastley N, Hellewell P, Ingham P, Crossman D, Chico T (2007) Ischemia is not required for arteriogenesis in zebrafish embryos. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 10:2135–2141Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gregg DE (1974) The natural history of coronary collateral development. Circ Res 35:335–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Grimshaw MJ, Balkwill FR (2001) Inhibition of monocyte and macrophage chemotaxis by hypoxia and inflammation—a potential mechanism. Eur J Immunol 31:480–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guo L, Degenstein L, Fuchs E (1996) Keratinocyte growth factor is required for hair development but not for wound healing. Genes Dev 10:165–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guzman RJ, Abe K, Zarins CK (1997) Flow-induced arterial enlargement is inhibited by suppression of nitric oxide synthase activity in vivo. Surgery 122:273–279; discussion 279–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hacking WJ, VanBavel E, Spaan JA (1996) Shear stress is not sufficient to control growth of vascular networks: a model study. Am J Physiol 270:H364–H375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Haug C, Schmid-Kotsas A, Zorn U, Bachem MG, Schuett S, Gruenert A, Rozdzinski E (2000) Hepatocyte growth factor is upregulated by low-density lipoproteins and inhibits endothelin-1 release. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279:H2865–H2871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Heil M, Grimm S, Martin S, Zolk O, Schaper W, Zimmermann R (2007) Adenoviral transfer of the cardiac ankyrin repeat protein/ankyrin repeat proteindomain 1/CARP/ANKRD1) gene enhances arteriogenesis in an ischemic hindlimb model. Clin Res Cardiol (Abstract) 96(Suppl 1):P490Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Pipp F, Kostin S, Martin S, Clauss M, Schaper W (2002) Blood monocyte concentration is critical for enhancement of collateral artery growth. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H2411–H2419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Wagner S, Fernandez B, Helisch A, Martin S, Tribulova S, Kuziel WA, Bachmann G, Schaper W (2004) Collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis) after experimental arterial occlusion is impaired in mice lacking CC-chemokine receptor-2. Circ Res 94:671–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Heldin CH, Westermark B, Wasteson A (1981) Platelet-derived growth factor: isolation by a large-scale procedure and analysis of subunit composition. Biochem J 193:907–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Helisch A, Wagner S, Khan N, Drinane M, Wolfram S, Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Brandt U, Pearlman JD, Swartz HM, Schaper W (2006) Impact of mouse strain differences in innate hindlimb collateral vasculature. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26:520–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Herold J, Pipp F, Fernandez B, Xing Z, Heil M, Tillmanns H, Braun-Dullaeus RC (2004) Transplantation of monocytes: a novel strategy for in vivo augmentation of collateral vessel growth. Hum Gene Ther 15:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Herzog S, Sager H, Khmelevski E, Deylig A, Ito WD (2002) Collateral arteries grow from preexisting anastomoses in the rat hindlimb. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H2012–H2020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Heusch G, Guth BD, Seitelberger R, Ross J, Jr (1987) Attenuation of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in dogs with recruitment of coronary vasodilator reserve by nifedipine. Circulation 75:482–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Heusch G, Schulz R, Rahimtoola SH (2005) Myocardial hibernation: a delicate balance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H984–H999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hierck BP, Van der Heiden K, Alkemade FE, Van de Pas S, Van Thienen JV, Groenendijk BC, Bax WH, Van der Laarse A, Deruiter MC, Horrevoets AJ, Poelmann RE (2008) Primary cilia sensitize endothelial cells for fluid shear stress. Dev Dyn 237:725–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hoefer IE, van Royen N, Rectenwald JE, Bray EJ, Abouhamze Z, Moldawer LL, Voskuil M, Piek JJ, Buschmann IR, Ozaki CK (2002) Direct evidence for tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling in arteriogenesis. Circulation 105:1639–1641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hoefer IE, van Royen N, Rectenwald JE, Deindl E, Hua J, Jost M, Grundmann S, Voskuil M, Ozaki CK, Piek JJ, Buschmann IR (2004) Arteriogenesis proceeds via ICAM-1/mac-1- mediated mechanisms. Circ Res 94:1179–1185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Huang J, Lin SC, Nadershahi A, Watts SW, Sarkar R (2008) Role of redox signaling and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase activation in vascular smooth muscle cell growth inhibition by nitric oxide and peroxynitrite. J Vasc Surg 47:599–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ignarro LJ, Napoli C (2004) Novel features of nitric oxide, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 6:281–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ingber DE (2002) Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ Res 91:877–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ingber DE (2003) Tensegrity I: cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116:1157–1173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ingber DE (2003) Tensegrity II: how structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci 116:1397–1408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ingber DE (2008) Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 97:163–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Isner JM (2001) Still more debate over VEGF. Nat Med 7:639–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ito WD, Arras M, Scholz D, Winkler B, Htun P, Schaper W (1997) Angiogenesis but not collateral growth is associated with ischemia after femoral artery occlusion. Am J Physiol 273:H1255–H1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ito WD, Arras M, Winkler B, Scholz D, Schaper J, Schaper W (1997) Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 increases collateral and peripheral conductance after femoral artery occlusion. Circ Res 80:829–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kadatz R (1959) Pharmacological properties of a new coronary dilator substance 2, 6-bis(diethanolamino)-4, 8-dipiperidino-pyrimido[5,4-d]pyrimidine. Arzneimittelforschung 9:39–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T (2000) Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3422–3427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Karin M (1995) The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem 270:16483–16486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Koerselman J, van der Graaf Y, de Jaegere PP, Grobbee DE (2003) Coronary collaterals: an important and underexposed aspect of coronary artery disease. Circulation 107:2507–2511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Korff T, Aufgebauer K, Hecker M (2007) Cyclic stretch controls the expression of CD40 in endothelial cells by changing their transforming growth factor-beta1 response. Circulation 116:2288–2297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Korff T, Braun J, Pfaff D, Augustin HG, Hecker M (2008) Role of ephrinB2 expression in endothelial cells during arteriogenesis: impact on smooth muscle cell migration and monocyte recruitment. Blood 112:73–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Langille BL (1993) Remodeling of developing and mature arteries: endothelium, smooth muscle, and matrix. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 21(Suppl 1):S11–S17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lauth M, Berger MM, Cattaruzza M, Hecker M (2000) Elevated perfusion pressure upregulates endothelin-1 and endothelin B receptor expression in the rabbit carotid artery. Hypertension 35:648–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lazarous DF, Scheinowitz M, Shou M, Hodge E, Rajanayagam S, Hunsberger S, Robison WG, Jr., Stiber JA, Correa R, Epstein SE, et al (1995) Effects of chronic systemic administration of basic fibroblast growth factor on collateral development in the canine heart. Circulation 91:145–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lehoux S, Esposito B, Merval R, Tedgui A (2005) Differential regulation of vascular focal adhesion kinase by steady stretch and pulsatility. Circulation 111:643–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Limbourg A, Ploom M, Elligsen D, Sorensen I, Ziegelhoeffer T, Gossler A, Drexler H, Limbourg FP (2007) Notch ligand delta-like 1 is essential for postnatal arteriogenesis. Circ Res 100:363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lloyd PG, Prior BM, Li H, Yang HT, Terjung RL (2005) VEGF receptor antagonism blocks arteriogenesis, but only partially inhibits angiogenesis, in skeletal muscle of exercise-trained rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H759–H768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Majesky MW (2000) Novel genes for mitogen-independent smooth muscle replication. Circ Res 87:532–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Martin C, Schulz R, Post H, Boengler K, Kelm M, Kleinbongard P, Gres P, Skyschally A, Konietzka I, Heusch G (2007) Microdialysis-based analysis of interstitial NO in situ: NO synthase-independent NO formation during myocardial ischemia. Cardiovasc Res 74:46–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Matsunaga T, Warltier DC, Weihrauch DW, Moniz M, Tessmer J, Chilian WM (2000) Ischemia-induced coronary collateral growth is dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide. Circulation 102:3098–3103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Mees B, Wagner S, Ninci E, Tribulova S, Martin S, van Haperen R, Kostin S, Heil M, de Crom R, Schaper W (2007) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity is essential for vasodilation during blood flow recovery but not for arteriogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:1926–1933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Meini A, Garcia JB, Pessina GP, Aldinucci C, Frosini M, Palmi M (2006) Role of intracellular Ca2+ and calmodulin/MAP kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase signalling pathway in the mitogenic and antimitogenic effect of nitric oxide in glia- and neurone-derived cell lines. Eur J Neurosci 23:1690–1700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Miyagi M, Miwa Y, Takahashi-Yanaga F, Morimoto S, Sasaguri T (2005) Activator protein-1 mediates shear stress-induced prostaglandin d synthase gene expression in vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25:970–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Moll W (2003) Structure adaptation and blood flow control in the uterine arterial system after hemochorial placentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110(Suppl 1):S19–S27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Morla AO, Mogford JE (2000) Control of smooth muscle cell proliferation and phenotype by integrin signaling through focal adhesion kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 272:298–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Muramatsu H, Zou P, Suzuki H, Oda Y, Chen GY, Sakaguchi N, Sakuma S, Maeda N, Noda M, Takada Y, Muramatsu T (2004) alpha4beta1- and alpha6beta1-integrins are functional receptors for midkine, a heparin-binding growth factor. J Cell Sci 117:5405–5415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Murry CE (2007) Cardiac aid to the injured but not the elderly? Nat Med 13:901–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Nauli SM, Kawanabe Y, Kaminski JJ, Pearce WJ, Ingber DE, Zhou J (2008) Endothelial cilia are fluid shear sensors that regulate calcium signaling and nitric oxide production through polycystin-1. Circulation 117:1161–1171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Pasyk S, Schaper W, Schaper J, Pasyk K, Miskiewicz G, Steinseifer B (1982) DNA synthesis in coronary collaterals after coronary artery occlusion in conscious dog. Am J Physiol 242:H1031–H1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Pearce CG, Najjar SF, Kapadia MR, Murar J, Eng J, Lyle B, Aalami OO, Jiang Q, Hrabie JA, Saavedra JE, Keefer LK, Kibbe MR (2008) Beneficial effect of a short-acting NO donor for the prevention of neointimal hyperplasia. Free Radic Biol Med 44:73–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Piek JJ, van Liebergen RA, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Peters RJ, David GK (1997) Pharmacological modulation of the human collateral vascular resistance in acute and chronic coronary occlusion assessed by intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis in an angioplasty model. Circulation 96:106–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pijls N, van Son J, Kirkeeide R, De Bruyne R, Gould K (1993) Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 87:1354–1367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Pipp F, Boehm S, Cai WJ, Adili F, Ziegler B, Karanovic G, Ritter R, Balzer J, Scheler C, Schaper W, Schmitz-Rixen T (2004) Elevated fluid shear stress enhances postocclusive collateral artery growth and gene expression in the pig hind limb. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1664–1668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Pipp F, Heil M, Issbrucker K, Ziegelhoeffer T, Martin S, van den Heuvel J, Weich H, Fernandez B, Golomb G, Carmeliet P, Schaper W, Clauss M (2003) VEGFR-1-selective VEGF homologue PlGF is arteriogenic: evidence for a monocyte-mediated mechanism. Circ Res 92:378–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Poelmann RE, Van der Heiden K, Gittenberger-de Groot A, Hierck BP (2008) Deciphering the endothelial shear stress sensor. Circulation 117:1124–1126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Pohl U, Holtz J, Busse R, Bassenge E (1986) Crucial role of endothelium in the vasodilator response to increased flow in vivo. Hypertension 8:37–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Popp R, Fleming I, Busse R (1998) Pulsatile stretch in coronary arteries elicits release of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor: a modulator of arterial compliance. Circ Res 82:696–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Pyriochou A, Zhou Z, Koika V, Petrou C, Cordopatis P, Sessa WC, Papapetropoulos A (2007) The phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil stimulates angiogenesis through a protein kinase G/MAPK pathway. J Cell Physiol 211:197–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Quinkler W, Maasberg M, Bernotat-Danielowski S, Luthe N, Sharma HS, Schaper W (1989) Isolation of heparin-binding growth factors from bovine, porcine and canine hearts. Eur J Biochem 181:67–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Resnick N, Gimbrone MAJ (1995) Hemodynamic forces are complex regulators of endothelial gene expression. Faseb J 9:874–882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Resnick N, Yahav H, Shay-Salit A, Shushy M, Schubert S, Zilberman LC, Wofovitz E (2003) Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 81:177–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Sarateanu CS, Retuerto MA, Beckmann JT, McGregor L, Carbray J, Patejunas G, Nayak L, Milbrandt J, Rosengart TK (2006) An Egr-1 master switch for arteriogenesis: studies in Egr-1 homozygous negative and wild-type animals. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:138–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Sawada N, Salomone S, Kim HH, Kwiatkowski DJ, Liao JK (2008) Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and postnatal angiogenesis by Rac1. Circ Res 103:360–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Schaper J, Borgers M, Schaper W (1972) Ultrastructure of ischemia-induced changes in the precapillary anastomotic network of the heart. Am J Cardiol 29:851–859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Schaper J, Borgers M, Xhonneux R, Schaper W (1973) Cortisone influences developing collaterals. 1: a morphologic study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Pathol Anat 361:263–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Schaper J, Konig R, Franz D, Schaper W (1976) The endothelial surface of growing coronary collateral arteries: intimal margination and diapedesis of monocytes. A combined SEM and TEM study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 370:193–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Schaper W (1993) Collateral circulation, heart, brain, kidney, limbs. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Schaper W (1967) Tangential wall stress as a molding force in the development of collateral vessels in the canine heart. Experientia 23:595–596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Schaper W (1971) The collateral circulation of the heart. Elsevier North Holland Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Schaper W, DeBrabander M, Lewi P (1971) DNA-synthesis and mitoses in coronary collateral vessels of the dog. Circ Res 28:671–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Schaper W, Flameng W, Winkler B, Wuesten B, Türschmann W, Neugebauer G, Carl M, Pasyk S (1976) Quantification of collateral resistance in acute and chronic experimental coronary occlusion in the dog. Circ Res 39:371–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Schaper W, Schaper J (2004) Arteriogenesis. Kluwer Acadenic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Schaper W, Winkler B (1978) Determinants of peripheral coronary pressure in coronary occlusion. In: Maseri A, Lesch M, Klassen GA (eds) Primary and secondary angina pectoris. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 351–361Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Schaper WK, Xhoneux R, Jageneau AH, Janssen PA (1966) The cardiovascular pharmacology of lidoflazine, a long-acting coronary vasodilator. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 152:265–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Scholz D, Devaux B, Hirche A, Potzsch B, Kropp B, Schaper W, Schaper J (1996) Expression of adhesion molecules is specific and time-dependent in cytokine-stimulated endothelial cells in culture. Cell Tissue Res 284:415–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Scholz D, Ito W, Fleming I, Deindl E, Sauer A, Wiesnet M, Busse R, Schaper J, Schaper W (2000) Ultrastructure and molecular histology of rabbit hind-limb collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis). Virchows Arch 436:257–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Scholz D, Ziegelhoeffer T, Helisch A, Wagner S, Friedrich C, Podzuweit T, Schaper W (2002) Contribution of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis to postocclusive hindlimb perfusion in mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34:775–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Schultz A, Lavie L, Hochberg I, Beyar R, Stone T, Skorecki K, Lavie P, Roguin A, Levy AP (1999) Interindividual heterogeneity in the hypoxic regulation of VEGF: significance for the development of the coronary artery collateral circulation. Circulation 100:547–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Seiler C, Pohl T, Wustmann K, Hutter D, Nicolet PA, Windecker S, Eberli FR, Meier B (2001) Promotion of collateral growth by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Circulation 104:2012–2017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Semenza GL (1999) Regulation of mammalian O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:551–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Senthilkumar A, Smith RD, Khitha J, Arora N, Veerareddy S, Langston W, Chidlow JH Jr., Barlow SC, Teng X, Patel RP, Lefer DJ, Kevil CG (2007) Sildenafil promotes ischemia-induced angiogenesis through a PKG-dependent pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:1947–1954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Sherman JA, Hall A, Malenka DJ, De Muinck ED, Simons M (2006) Humoral and cellular factors responsible for coronary collateral formation. Am J Cardiol 98:1194–1197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Smart N, Risebro CA, Melville AA, Moses K, Schwartz RJ, Chien KR, Riley PR (2007) Thymosin beta4 induces adult epicardial progenitor mobilization and neovascularization. Nature 445:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Stabile E, Burnett MS, Watkins C, Kinnaird T, Bachis A, la Sala A, Miller JM, Shou M, Epstein SE, Fuchs S (2003) Impaired arteriogenic response to acute hindlimb ischemia in CD4-knockout mice. Circulation 108:205–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Stabile E, Kinnaird T, la Sala A, Hanson SK, Watkins C, Campia U, Shou M, Zbinden S, Fuchs S, Kornfeld H, Epstein SE, Burnett MS (2006) CD8+ T lymphocytes regulate the arteriogenic response to ischemia by infiltrating the site of collateral vessel development and recruiting CD4+ mononuclear cells through the expression of interleukin-16. Circulation 113:118–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Strandness DE Jr (1965) Peripheral arterial disease. Postgrad Med 38:409–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T (1999) Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med 5:434–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Taniguchi J, Tsuruoka S, Mizuno A, Sato J, Fujimura A, Suzuki M (2007) TRPV4 as a flow sensor in flow-dependent K+ secretion from the cortical collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292:F667–F673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Thoma R (1893) Untersuchungen über die Histogenese und Histomechanik des Gefäßsystems. F.Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Toyota E, Matsunaga T, Chilian WM (2004) Myocardial angiogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 264:35–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Toyota E, Warltier DC, Brock T, Ritman E, Kolz C, O’Malley P, Rocic P, Focardi M, Chilian WM (2005) Vascular endothelial growth factor is required for coronary collateral growth in the rat. Circulation 112:2108–2113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Tronc F, Wassef M, Esposito B, Henrion D, Glagov S, Tedgui A (1996) Role of NO in flow-induced remodeling of the rabbit common carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16:1256–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Tsao PS, Lewis NP, Alpert S, Cooke JP (1995) Exposure to shear stress alters endothelial adhesiveness: role of nitric oxide. Circulation 92:3513–3519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Tsao PS, Wang B, Buitrago R, Shyy JY, Cooke JP (1997) Nitric oxide regulates monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Circulation 96:934–940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Tzima E, del Pozo MA, Shattil SJ, Chien S, Schwartz MA (2001) Activation of integrins in endothelial cells by fluid shear stress mediates rho-dependent cytoskeletal alignment. Embo J 20:4639–4647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, Engelhardt B, Cao G, DeLisser H, Schwartz MA (2005) A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 437:426–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Unger EF (2001) Experimental evaluation of coronary collateral development. Cardiovasc Res 49:497–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    van Weel V, Toes RE, Seghers L, Deckers MM, de Vries MR, Eilers PH, Sipkens J, Schepers A, Eefting D, van Hinsbergh VW, van Bockel JH, Quax PH (2007) Natural killer cells and CD4+ T-cells modulate collateral artery development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:2310–2318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Verheyen A, Xhonneux R, Borgers M, Reneman RS (1976) Cell proliferation in developing coronary collaterals and the influence of Lidoflazine on this process. J Mol Cell Cardiol 8:53–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Voskuil M, Hoefer IE, van Royen N, Hua J, de Graaf S, Bode C, Buschmann IR, Piek JJ (2004) Abnormal monocyte recruitment and collateral artery formation in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 deficient mice. Vasc Med 9:287–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Voswinckel R, Ziegelhoeffer T, Heil M, Kostin S, Breier G, Mehling T, Haberberger R, Clauss M, Gaumann A, Schaper W, Seeger W (2003) Circulating vascular progenitor cells do not contribute to compensatory lung growth. Circ Res 93:372–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Vriens J, Watanabe H, Janssens A, Droogmans G, Voets T, Nilius B (2004) Cell swelling, heat, and chemical agonists use distinct pathways for the activation of the cation channel TRPV4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:396–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Wagner S, Helisch A, Ziegelhoeffer T, Bachmann G, Schaper W (2004) Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral vessels in a murine femoral artery ligation model. NMR Biomed 17:21–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Wang DL, Wung BS, Shyy YJ, Lin CF, Chao YJ, Usami S, Chien S (1995) Mechanical strain induces monocyte chemotactic protein-1 gene expression in endothelial cells: effects of mechanical strain on monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Circ Res 77:294–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Wedgwood S, Black SM (2005) Endothelin-1 decreases endothelial NOS expression and activity through ETA receptor-mediated generation of hydrogen peroxide. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 288:L480–L487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Weerasinghe D, McHugh KP, Ross FP, Brown EJ, Gisler RH, Imhof BA (1998) A role for the alphavbeta3 integrin in the transmigration of monocytes. J Cell Biol 142:595–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Wei CJ, Xu X, Lo CW (2004) Connexins and cell signaling in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:811–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Wezler K (1959) The flow law of blood circulation and its practical significance. Acta Neuroveg (Wien) 19:169–206Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Wilken DEC, Paolini HJ, Eickens E (1971) Evidence for intravenous dipyridamole producing a coronary steal effect in ischaemic myocardium. NZ Med J 1:8–14Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Winkler B (1979) The tracer microsphere method. In: Schaper W (ed) The pathophysiology of myocardial perfusion. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Witzenbichler B, Asahara T, Murohara T, Silver M, Spyridopoulos I, Magner M, Principe N, Kearney M, Hu JS, Isner JM (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) promotes angiogenesis in the setting of tissue ischemia. Am J Pathol 153:381–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Yoshimura T, Yuhki N, Moore SK, Appella E, Lerman MI, Leonard EJ (1989) Human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): full-length cDNA cloning, expression in mitogen-stimulated blood mononuclear leukocytes, and sequence similarity to mouse competence gene JE. FEBS Lett 244:487–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Zbinden R, Zbinden S, Meier P, Hutter D, Billinger M, Wahl A, Schmid JP, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C (2007) Coronary collateral flow in response to endurance exercise training. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14:250–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Zbinden R, Zbinden S, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C (2004) Direct demonstration of coronary collateral growth by physical endurance exercise in a healthy marathon runner. Heart 90:1350–1351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Zeiher AM, Fisslthaler B, Schray-Utz B, Busse R (1995) Nitric oxide modulates the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in cultured human endothelial cells. Circ Res 76:980–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Zheng J, Wen Y, Austin JL, Chen DB (2006) Exogenous nitric oxide stimulates cell proliferation via activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in ovine fetoplacental artery endothelial cells. Biol Reprod 74:375–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Zhou M, Sutliff RL, Paul RJ, Lorenz JN, Hoying JB, Haudenschild CC, Yin M, Coffin JD, Kong L, Kranias EG, Luo W, Boivin GP, Duffy JJ, Pawlowski SA, Doetschman T (1998) Fibroblast growth factor 2 control of vascular tone. Nat Med 4:201–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Ziche M, Morbidelli L, Masini E, Amerini S, Granger HJ, Maggi CA, Geppetti P, Ledda F (1994) Nitric oxide mediates angiogenesis in vivo and endothelial cell growth and migration in vitro promoted by substance P. J Clin Invest 94:2036–2044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Ziegelhoeffer T, Fernandez B, Kostin S, Heil M, Voswinckel R, Helisch A, Schaper W (2004) Bone marrow-derived cells do not incorporate into the adult growing vasculature. Circ Res 94:230–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Zolk O, Frohme M, Maurer A, Kluxen FW, Hentsch B, Zubakov D, Hoheisel JD, Zucker IH, Pepe S, Eschenhagen T (2002) Cardiac ankyrin repeat protein, a negative regulator of cardiac gene expression, is augmented in human heart failure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293:1377–1382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Zou Y, Evans S, Chen J, Kuo HC, Harvey RP, Chien KR (1997) CARP, a cardiac ankyrin repeat protein, is downstream in the Nkx2-5 homeobox gene pathway. Development 124:793–804PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Arteriogenesis ResearchMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung ResearchBad NauheimGermany

Personalised recommendations