Abstract
Purpose
This study, conducted in participants of the NutriNet-Santé cohort, aims to identify dietary pesticide exposure profiles (derived from Non-negative Matrix Factorization) from conventional and organic foods among a large sample of general population French adults.
Methods
Organic and conventional dietary intakes were assessed using a self-administered semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Exposure to 25 commonly used pesticides was evaluated using food contamination data from Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Stuttgart accounting for farming system (organic or conventional). Dietary pesticide exposure profiles were identified using Non-Negative Matrix factorization (NMF), especially adapted for non-negative data with excess zeros. The NMF scores were introduced in a hierarchical clustering process.
Results
Overall, the identified clusters (N = 34,193) seemed to be exposed to the same compounds with gradual intensity. Cluster 1 displayed the lowest energy intake and estimated dietary pesticide exposure, high organic food (OF) consumption (23.3%) and a higher proportion of male participants than other groups. Clusters 2 and 5 presented intermediate energy intake, lower OF consumption and intermediate estimated pesticide exposure. Cluster 3 showed high conventional fruits and vegetable (FV) intake, high estimated pesticide exposure, and fewer smokers. Cluster 4 estimated pesticide exposure varied more across compounds than for other clusters, with highest estimated exposures for acetamiprid, azadirachtin, cypermethrin, pyrethrins, spinosad. OF proportion in the diet was the highest (31.5%).
Conclusion
Estimated dietary pesticide exposures appeared to vary across the clusters and to be related to OF proportion in the diet.
Trial registration
Clinical Trial Registry: NCT03335644.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADI:
-
Acceptable daily intake
- ANSES:
-
Agence Nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail
- ARfD:
-
Acute reference dose
- CNIL:
-
Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés
- CVUA:
-
Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt
- EAT:
-
Etude de l’Alimentation Totale
- EDI:
-
Estimated daily intake
- EFSA:
-
European food and safety authority
- EudraCT:
-
European Union drug regulating Authorities clinical trials
- FFQ:
-
Food frequency questionnaire
- IRB INSERM:
-
Institutional review board of the French institute for health and medical research
- MESA:
-
Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
- MUFA:
-
Mono unsaturated fatty acids
- NMF:
-
Non-negative matrix factorization
- PUFA:
-
Poly unsaturated fatty acids
- SFA:
-
Saturated fatty acids
References
Popp J, Pető K, Nagy J (2013) Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x
Eurostat—Tables, Graphs and Maps Interface (TGM) map. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/mapToolClosed.do?tab=map&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tai02&toolbox=types. Accessed 28 Jun 2019
L’utilisation des pesticides en France : état des lieux et perspectives de réduction. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/lutilisation-des-pesticides-en-france-etat-des-lieux-et-perspectives-de-reduction. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Collectif INSERM. Pesticides : Effets sur la santé, une expertise collective de l’Inserm. Salle Presse Inserm. 2013. https://presse.inserm.fr/pesticides-effets-sur-la-sante-une-expertise-collective-de-linserm/8463/
Garnett T (2013) Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions. Proc Nutr Soc 72:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665112002947
Lukowicz C, Ellero-Simatos S, Régnier M et al (2018) Metabolic effects of a chronic dietary exposure to a low-dose pesticide cocktail in mice: sexual dimorphism and role of the constitutive androstane receptor. Environ Health Perspect 126:067007. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2877
Mnif W, Hassine AIH, Bouaziz A et al (2011) Effect of endocrine disruptor pesticides: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:2265–2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8062265
Mostafalou S, Abdollahi M (2013) Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 268:157–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025
van der Marianne M, Maartje B, Hans K et al (2012) Is pesticide use related to Parkinson disease? Some clues to heterogeneity in study results. Environ Health Perspect 120:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103881
Ntzani EE, CMN G, Evangelou E, Tzoulaki I (2013) Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA Support Publ 10:497E. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2013.EN-497
Nougadère A, Sirot V, Kadar A et al (2012) Total diet study on pesticide residues in France: levels in food as consumed and chronic dietary risk to consumers. Environ Int 45:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.02.001
EU Pesticides database - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=activesubstance.selection&language=EN. Accessed 27 Sep 2019
Crépet A, Tressou J, Graillot V et al (2013) Identification of the main pesticide residue mixtures to which the French population is exposed. Environ Res 126:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.03.008
Traoré T, Béchaux C, Sirot V, Crépet A (2016) To which chemical mixtures is the French population exposed? Mixture identification from the second French Total Diet Study. Food Chem Toxicol 98:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.10.028
(2017) The 2015 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. In: Eur. Food Saf. Auth. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4791. Accessed 28 Jun 2019
Institut National de l’Origine et de la Qualité (INAO), Institut de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation Biologiques (ITAB) (2018). Guide des produits de protection des cultures utilisables en France en Agriculture Biologique. http://www.itab.asso.fr/divers/Guide_Intrants_Inao_Mai2018.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2019
Hercberg S, Castetbon K, Czernichow S et al (2010) The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-242
Touvier M, Méjean C, Kesse-Guyot E et al (2010) Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 25:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9
Touvier M, Kesse-Guyot E, Méjean C et al (2011) Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 105:1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510004617
Vergnaud A-C, Touvier M, Méjean C et al (2011) Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study. Int J Public Health 56:407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5
Kesse-Guyot E, Castetbon K, Touvier M et al (2010) Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire designed for French adults. Ann Nutr Metab 57:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321680
Baudry J, Méjean C, Allès B et al (2015) Contribution of Organic Food to the Diet in a Large Sample of French Adults (the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study). Nutrients 7:8615–8632. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7105417
Nutrinet-Santé E (2013) Table de Composition des Aliments de l’étude Nutrinet-Santé (Nutrinet-Santé Study Food Composition Database). Economica, Paris
Verger EO, Mariotti F, Holmes BA et al (2012) Evaluation of a diet quality index based on the probability of adequate nutrient intake (PANDiet) using national French and US dietary surveys. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042155
De Gavelle E, Huneau J-F, Mariotti F (2018) Patterns of protein food intake are associated with nutrient adequacy in the general french adult population. Nutrients 10:226. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020226
Martínez-González MA, Sánchez-Tainta A, Corella D et al (2014) A provegetarian food pattern and reduction in total mortality in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study. Am J Clin Nutr 100(Suppl 1):320S–S328. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.071431
UA-BW | CVUA Stuttgart (Startseite). https://www.cvuas.de/pub/default.asp?subid=1. Accessed 29 May 2019
European Food Safety Authority (2015) The 2015 European union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J 15:e04791. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4791
(2016) The 2014 European union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J 14:e04611. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4611
Baudry J, Pointereau P, Seconda L et al (2019) Improvement of diet sustainability with increased level of organic food in the diet: findings from the BioNutriNet cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 109:1173–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy361
Bognár A (2002) Tables on weight yield of food and retention factors of food constituents for the calculation of nutrient composition of cooked foods (dishes). BFE, Karlsruhe, Germany. http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/bognar_bfe-r-02-03.pdf
Bergström L (1994) Nutrient losses and gains in the preparation of foods. Rapport 32/94. Livsmedelsverket (National Food Administration), Uppsala. http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/Bergstroem_1994_32_Livsmedelsverket_nutrient_losses_and_gains.pdf
GEMS/Food-EURO (1995) Second workshop on reliable evaluation of low-levelcontamination of food. Report on a workshop in the frame of GEMS/Food-EURO.Kulmbach, Federal Republic of Germany, 26–27 March 1995
European Food Safety Authority (2010) Management of left-censored data in dietary exposure assessment of chemical substances: Management of left-censored data in dietary exposure assessment of chemical substances. EFSA J 8:1557
Institut Nationale de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). La macro SAS CALMAR. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2021902. Accessed 28 June 2019
Institut Nationale de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE) (2009) French national census data. [Internet]. https://www.insee.fr/fr/ppp/bases-dedonnees/recensement/populations-legales/default.asp?annee=2009. Accessed 28 June 2019
Seung D, Lee L (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 13:556–562
Zetlaoui M, Feinberg M, Verger P, Clémençon S (2011) Extraction of food consumption systems by nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) for the assessment of food choices. Biometrics 67:1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01588.x
Khattree R, Naik DN (2000) Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software, 1st edn. Wiley-SAS, Cary
Gaujoux R, Seoighe C (2010) A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinform 11:367. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-367
Willett W, Stampfer MJ (1986) Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 124:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366
Dolnicar S (2002) A review of unquestioned standards in using cluster analysis for data-driven market segmentation. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1286&context=commpapers. Accessed 20 June 2020
Béchaux C, Zetlaoui M, Tressou J et al (2013) Identification of pesticide mixtures and connection between combined exposure and diet. Food Chem Toxicol 59:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.006
Curl CL, Beresford SAA, Fenske RA et al (2015) Estimating pesticide exposure from dietary intake and organic food choices: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect 123:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408197
Barański M, Średnicka-Tober D, Volakakis N et al (2014) Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr 112:794–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514001366
Baudry J, Debrauwer L, Durand G et al (2018) Urinary pesticide concentrations in French adults with low and high organic food consumption: results from the general population-based NutriNet-Santé. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0062-9
Andreeva VA, Salanave B, Castetbon K et al (2015) Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health 69:893–898. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-205263
Boizot-Szantai C, Hamza O, Soler L-G (2017) Organic consumption and diet choice: an analysis based on food purchase data in France. Appetite 117:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.003
Agence Bio (2015) Baromètre de Consommation et de Perception des Produits Biologiques en France. https://www.agencebio.org/sites/default/files/upload/documents/4_Chiffres/BarometreConso/barometre_agence_bio_public.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2019
Valcke M, Bourgault M-H, Rochette L et al (2017) Human health risk assessment on the consumption of fruits and vegetables containing residual pesticides: a cancer and non-cancer risk/benefit perspective. Environ Int 108:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.023
Reiss R, Johnston J, Tucker K et al (2012) Estimation of cancer risks and benefits associated with a potential increased consumption of fruits and vegetables. Food Chem Toxicol 50:4421–4427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.055
Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S et al (2018) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide. Bordeaux mixture EFSA J 16:e05152. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5152
Yigit N, Velioglu YS (2019) Effects of processing and storage on pesticide residues in foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1702501
Acknowledgements
We especially thank Cédric Agaesse, Vristi Desan and Cynthia Perlin (dietitians); Thi Hong Van Duong, Younes Esseddik (IT manager), Paul Flanzy, Régis Gatibelza, Jagatjit Mohinder and Aladi Timera (computer scientists); Julien Allegre, Nathalie Arnault, Laurent Bourhis and Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, PhD (supervisor) (data-manager/statisticians) for their technical contribution to the NutriNet-Santé study and Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, PhD (operational manager). We also thank the CVUAS for the pesticide residue database and Noémie Soton for her contribution to the data management of the CVUAS database. We warmly thank all of the dedicated and conscientious volunteers involved in the NutriNet-Santé cohort.
Funding
The NutriNet-Santé study is supported by the following public institutions: French Ministry of Health (DGS), Santé Publique France, the National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts (CNAM) and the Sorbonne Paris Nord University. The BioNutriNet project was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) in the context of the 2013 Programme de Recherche Systèmes Alimentaires Durables (ANR-13-ALID-0001). Pauline Rebouillat is supported by a doctoral fellowship from Sorbonne Paris Nord University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EK-G, MT, and SH conducted the study. RV, DL, JB and EK-G conducted the research and implemented databases. PR performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically helped in the interpretation of results, revised the manuscript and provided relevant intellectual input. They all read and approved the final manuscript. EK-G supervised the study, had primary responsibility for the final content, she is the guarantor.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Detailed explanation for the non-negative matrix factorization procedure
Non-negative Matrix Factorization is a non-supervised data decomposition method, proposed by Lee to deal with non-negative data using non-negativity constraints.
This method is relevant for non-negative data with excess zeros and measurement error such as exposure to pesticides constrained by the detection limits of dosing techniques.
The purpose of NMF is to explain observed data through a limited number of components approximating the original data as accurately as possible.
The matrix representing the basis components and the matrix of mixture coefficients are constrained to have non-negative values, and no orthogonality or independence constraints are imposed on the basis components.
Let X be a matrix (n × p) containing only non-negative values and without a row or column containing only 0 and r a relatively small integer < n and < p.
The non-negative factorization of matrix X is the search for two matrices W (n × r) and H (r × p) containing only positive or zero values and whose product approaches X so that X ≈ WH.
The factorization is solved by searching for a local optimum of the optimization problem:
L is a loss function measuring approximation quality. Since the objective is usually to reduce the dimension of the original data, the factorization rank r is in practice often chosen such that r < min(n, p). This equation is solved by a multiplicative algorithm based on a gradient descent approach.
In this study of dietary pesticide profiles, W would be the total dietary exposure to the 25 selected pesticides (previously obtained after combining contamination values for each food and foods consumed by each participant) and H the number of individuals
K, the number of NMF Components.
(Adapted from Zetlaoui et al. 2011).
Appendix 2
Flowchart for the decomposition of ingredients and matching
Selected Ingredients included in the pesticides database:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebouillat, P., Vidal, R., Cravedi, JP. et al. Estimated dietary pesticide exposure from plant-based foods using NMF-derived profiles in a large sample of French adults. Eur J Nutr 60, 1475–1488 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02344-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02344-8