Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium
To assess the dietary share of ultra-processed foods (UPF) among Belgian children, adolescents and adults and associations with diet quality.
Data from the national Food Consumption Surveys 2004 (N = 3083; ≥ 15 years) and 2014–2015 (N = 3146; 3–64 years) were used. Two 24-h recalls (dietary records for children) were used for data collection. Foods consumed were classified by the level of processing using the NOVA classification. The usual proportion of daily energy intake from UPF was determined using SPADE (Statistical Program to assess dietary exposure).
In 2014/2015, 36.4% of foods consumed were ultra-processed, while 42.4% were unprocessed/minimally processed. The usual proportion of daily energy intake from UPF was 33.3% (95% CI 32.1–35.0%) for children, 29.2% (95% CI 27.7–30.3%) for adolescents and 29.6% (95% CI 28.5–30.7%) for adults. There were no differences in UPF consumption between 2004 and 2014/2015. The products contributing most to UPF consumption were processed meat (14.3%), cakes, pies, pastries (8.9%), sweet biscuits (7.7%) and soft drinks (6.7%). The UPF dietary share was significantly lower during consumption days when participants met the WHO salt intake recommendation (≤ 5 g/day) and when saturated fat was ≤ 10% of their total energy intake. The dietary share of unprocessed/minimally processed foods was significantly higher during consumption days when participants met the WHO salt and fruit/vegetable intake (≥ 400 g/day) recommendations and when saturated fat was ≤ 10% of their total energy intake.
The UPF dietary share is substantial and associated with lower diet quality. Internationally recommended policies to limit UPF accessibility and marketing need to be implemented to reduce UPF consumption.
KeywordsUltra-processed foods Diet quality Food consumption surveys Belgium
The authors want to thank the Ministry of Health to provide funding for the national food consumption surveys of 2004 and 2014/2015.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2018) Country Profile Belgium. http://www.healthdata.org/belgium. Accessed 10 Aug 2018
- 5.Vandevijvere S, De VS, Huybrechts I et al (2009) The gap between food-based dietary guidelines and usual food consumption in Belgium, 2004. Public Health Nutr 12:423–431Google Scholar
- 6.De Ridder K, Bel S, Brocatus L et al (2016) De consumptie van voedingsmiddelen en de inname van voedingsstoffen. In: Bel S, Tafforeau J (eds) Voedselconsumptiepeiling 2014–2015. Rapport 4. Wetenschappenlijk Instituut voor Volksgezondheid, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 9.Monteiro C, Cannon G, Levy RB et al (2016) NOVA. The star shines bright. World Nutr 7(1–3):28–38Google Scholar
- 16.Batal M, Johnson-Down L, Moubarac JC et al (2018) Quantifying associations of the dietary share of ultra-processed foods with overall diet quality in First Nations peoples in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario. Public Health Nutr 21:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bielemann RM, Motta JV, Minten GC, Horta BL, Gigante DP (2015) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and their impact on the diet of young adults. Revista de Saude Publica 49:28Google Scholar
- 28.Pan American Health Organization (2015) Ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: trends, impact on obesity, policy implications. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- 31.Mendonca RD, Lopes AC, Pimenta AM et al (2017) Ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of hypertension in a mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project. Am J Hypertens 30:358–366Google Scholar
- 38.FAO (2015) Guidelines on the collection of information on food processing through food consumption surveys. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- 39.Pan American Health Organization (2016) PAHO nutrient profile model. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- 44.Wetenschappenlijk Instituut voor Volksgezondheid (2016) Voedselconsumptiepeiling 2014–2015. Rapport 1: Voedingsgewoonten, antropometrie en voedingsbeleid. Wetenschappenlijk Instituut voor Volksgezondheid, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 46.Ministerio de Salud (2016) Guia alimentaria para la poblacion uruguaya. Para una alimentacion saludable, compartida y placentera. http://msp.gub.uy/sites/default/files/archivos_adjuntos/MS_guia_web.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
- 47.Fiolet T (2018) Quoi dans mon assiette: Objectifs du PNNS 2018–2022. https://quoidansmonassiette.fr/objectifs-pnns-2018-2022-pour-politique-nutritionnelle-et-sante-en-france/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
- 48.New York Times (2018) In sweeping war on obesity, Chile slays tony the tiger. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/07/health/obesity-chile-sugar-regulations.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018