European Journal of Nutrition

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 2029–2036 | Cite as

Evidence of a significant vitamin D deficiency among 9–13-year-old Polish children: results of a multicentre study

  • Danuta Chlebna-Sokół
  • Jerzy Konstantynowicz
  • Paweł Abramowicz
  • Beata Kulik-Rechberger
  • Marek Niedziela
  • Anna Obuchowicz
  • Katarzyna Ziora
  • Jolanta Karalus-Gach
  • Joanna Golec
  • Izabela Michałus
  • Elżbieta Karczmarewicz
  • Zenon Piotr HalabaEmail author
Open Access
Original Contribution



To evaluate the extent to which the population of Polish preadolescents is vitamin D deficient and to assess seasonal variations in vitamin D status.

Participants and methods

A total of 720 healthy children aged 9–13 years (409 girls, 311 boys) residing in 6 representative geographical locations in Poland were studied. A parental-assisted questionnaire provided data on nutritional habits, vitamin D supplements and sun exposure. Serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin was determined twice, after the winter in March and after the summer in October.


In March, vitamin D deficiency (25–50 nmol/L) was found in 64%, and severe deficiency (< 25 nmol/L) in 20.2% of children. In October, the deficiency and severe deficiency were still noticed in 25.9 and 0.1% of children, respectively. The mean serum concentration of 25-OHD was 52% higher in October (55.4 ± 14.0 nmol/L) than in March (36.4 ± 13.5 nmol/L), (p < 0.01). In children with 25-OHD < 50 nmol/L in March, their 25-OHD concentration increased by 64% through March to October (32.5 ± 8.2 vs. 53.2 ± 7.9 nmol/L, p < 0.01). An association was found between 25-OHD concentration and regular consumption of vitamin D supplements, cod-liver oil and fish.


The majority of preadolescent Polish boys and girls show vitamin D deficiency after the winter period, although a distinct amelioration over summertime is found in this age group. There is a need to implement effective prevention and intervention strategies in the management of vitamin D deficiency among schoolchildren in Poland, with the supplementation throughout the entire year.


Vitamin D deficiency 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentration Children Preadolescents Seasonality 


Over the last few decades, vitamin D status has been extensively evaluated in different populations worldwide, including various ethnic and age groups. A large body of evidence has been published regarding numerous health benefits attributable to vitamin D in adults, the elderly and paediatric populations [1, 2, 3]. Vitamin D deficiency in children has been linked to adverse effects such as growth failure and rickets. Adequate levels of vitamin D may also help reduce risk of autoimmune conditions, infection and type 2 diabetes [4]. It is well known that about 90% of vitamin D is produced in the skin by sunlight and only 10% comes from food [5]. However, skin synthesis is not always sufficient to provide the recommended dose in high-latitude regions such as Poland, which is situated between 49° and 54.5° North latitude; therefore, vitamin supplements are usually recommended between October and April, as an alternative for children through the season of limited skin synthesis of vitamin D [6]. Observational studies suggest that populations with a low serum 25-OHD concentration are at risk of chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, some types of cancer and osteoporosis, although the level of evidence supporting these associations differs between studied populations and published reports [7]. It is well known that vitamin D supply is extremely important for normal development and is crucial not only for the prevention of rickets, but also for appropriate musculoskeletal health during growth, achieving optimal peak bone mass and fracture prevention [8]. Several studies have shown that both adults and children worldwide demonstrate low 25-OHD levels resulting from an inappropriate vitamin D supply, including lifestyle factors, limited exposure to UVB and nutritional deficits [9, 10]. Therefore, a number of current practice guidelines underline the role of nutritional factors and focus on lifestyle characteristics associated with vitamin D deficiency. On the other hand, the differential data from published studies may challenge cutoffs for vitamin D sufficiency and criteria of adequate intakes, leading to a strategy based on a personalized approach, with respect to physiological characteristics, individual requirements and lifestyle [11].

There is a scarcity of data on vitamin D deficiency in Polish children and adolescents and all the existing studies have a cross-sectional design [12]. A recent study, conducted nationally on a large representative population (n = 5775), demonstrated evidently that the vast majority of young adults were vitamin D deficient [13]. According to an international survey, the proportion of Polish teenage population below the estimated average requirement for vitamin D was very high (92–100%), with mean intakes ranging from 3.2 µg/day in girls to 4.8 µg/day in boys [14]. In addition, a trend to decline in vitamin D intake was observed among 11–15-year-old Polish children over the period between 1988 and 2006, according to a large study encompassing 9747 randomly selected preadolescent boys and girls [15]. The reported dietary and supplemental intakes of vitamin D ranged between 1.9 and 3.3 µg/day in this survey, whereas official national guidelines of that time recommended at least 10 µg/day from October to March in general healthy population aged 2–18 years [16]. The updated practical guidelines, based on the subsequent Central European consensus, reinforced a more comprehensive strategy, and thus pointed out a need to enhance the recommended daily dose of vitamin D up to 15–25 µg for all prepubertal and adolescent population [17].

The objective of this study was to determine the serum 25-OHD level for preadolescent schoolchildren aged 9–13 years, to assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, and to evaluate the association between some lifestyle and environmental factors (nutrition, supplements, seasonal variations) and 25-OHD concentrations.

Participants and methods

Study population

This two-stage study (initial cross-sectional investigation in March and re-examination in October) was conducted nationally in 2011, and included 720 healthy Caucasian children (311 boys, 409 girls) aged 9.0–12.99 years, i.e., individuals attending grades 2–5 of public primary schools with similar physical education curricula. Children residing in six representative geographical locations in Poland were screened for inclusion criteria and enrolled to the survey. The study settings were both urban and rural areas of the following regions: Łódź (51.7°N), Poznań (52.4°N), Lublin (51.2°N), Szczecin (53.4°N), Białystok (53.1°N), the Upper-Silesian Conurbation (50.3°N). Recruitment was based on chronological age criteria, school proximity to research teams, and voluntary parental cooperation. The structured interview was conducted by a nurse with both the child and his/her parents. In all study sites, a pediatrician carried out routine physical examination and recorded medical signs and findings. Based on the initial medical check-up, participants were screened for conditions or medication known to affect bone tissue and/or skeletal health. Children with malabsorption, chronic gastrointestinal diseases, liver diseases, kidney diseases, endocrine disorders and diabetes, eating disorders, apparent metabolic disorders, connective tissue diseases, current or past glucocorticoid use, and therapies with anticoagulants, diuretics or anticonvulsants were excluded from the study.

Data collection

A parental-assisted questionnaire and a direct interview were used to evaluate dietary intakes of vitamin D supplements, fish-oil and multivitamin preparations, nutritional habits (reports on long-term use of restrictive/elimination diets, i.e., milk-free or gluten-free, vegan/vegetarian diets), level of physical/sport activity (number of hours per week at school, additional sports classes, number of hours of sedentary activity and the child’s leisure time activities). Nutritional intakes were assessed using a modified food frequency questionnaire, based on the last weekday record. Sunlight exposure was estimated according to the method published elsewhere [18]. The calculation method was based on a recall questionnaire evaluating daily time in sun for one typical sunny summer week (< 5, 5–30, > 30 min/day) and was expressed as the number of hours per week spent outdoors. Skin exposure was assessed using four choices: face and hands or face/hands and arms, or face/hands and legs, or bathing suit. A calculation of body surface area (skin area) effectively exposed to sunlight was carried out, and the use of UV sunscreens was analysed (supplementary material). Physical examination and anthropometric measurements were carried out using the same methodology, technical procedures and standardized equipment across the 6 centres. Weight and standing height were measured using conventional methods (electronic scale, Martin stadiometer), and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) was obtained from a standard formula. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the studied group. Blood samples were collected twice in each participating child, to determine serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD): I—in March (following the winter season), and II—in October (following the summertime). The sera were immediately frozen and stored at − 80 °C and transferred to the central certified laboratory (Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Medicine, Children’s Memorial Health Institute in Warsaw). A double test for 25-OHD concentration was performed with the electro-immuno-chemiluminescent method (ECLIA) using an ELECSYS 2010 analyzer. This method was previously used and validated for routine laboratory procedures, based on the international quality control system (DEQAS); intra-assay CV was less than 8%, whereas the inter-assay CV was less than 12% [19]. The 25-OHD serum concentration was expressed in nanomole per litre (nmol/L).

Table 1

Anthropometric characteristics of subjects studied


Age (years)

9.0–9.99 (n = 63)

10.0–10.99 (n = 259)

11.0–11.99 (n = 273)

12.0–12.99 (n = 125)









Weight (kg)

33.2 ± 6.0

34.3 ± 8,4

34.2 ± 5.9

36.8 ± 7.5

40.2 ± 8.4

39.6 ± 9.4

43.0 ± 12.8

44.7 ± 8.5

Height (cm)

137.5 ± 6.8

136.8 ± 8.6

139.6 ± 5.9

141.2 ± 6.7

146.7 ± 7.6

146.6 ± 6.9

150.6 ± 8.7

153.0 ± 6.2

BMI (kg/m2)

17.5 ± 2.4

18.1 ± 3.1

17.5 ± 2.5

18.4 ± 2.9

18.6 ± 2.7

18.3 ± 3.3

18.7 ± 4.4

19.0 ± 3.1

25-OHD (nmol/L)

 In March

36.7 ± 13.2

42.2 ± 15.5

40.9 ± 14.0

41.4 ± 18.5

37.4 ± 14.5

35.4 ± 12.5

34.4 ± 12.7

36.7 ± 13.7

 In October

59.2 ± 9.2

55.2 ± 11.7

58.4 ± 17.2

50.0 ± 10.7

54.9 ± 12.5

47.4 ± 11.2

55.7 ± 14.5

45.7 ± 7.5

p value March vs. October

 < 0.01


 < 0.000

 < 0.000

 < 0.000

 < 0.000

 < 0.004

 < 0.002

Mean values ± SD are shown

Data analysis

Adequate levels of 25-OHD were considered as those ranging from 50 to 200 nmol/L, deficiency was assigned to a level less than 50 nmol/L, based on the Practical Guidelines for the supplementation of vitamin D and the treatment of deficiency in Central Europe [17]. Prespecified thresholds were used to show varying degrees of 25-OHD deficiency (< 50, < 25 nmol/L), and severe deficiency was set at the level lower than 25 nmol/L.

All calculations were done using Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA). The data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. For comparison between the levels of 25-OHD in relation to seasonality and gender, the Mann–Whitney test was applied. In the case of dependent nominal variables for statistic significance assessment, the McNemar test and, for independent variables, the Pearson χ2 test was used. For small size samples, Yates’ correction or Fisher’s exact test were utilised. Significance was determined at p level < 0.05.


Vitamin D status

The serum concentration of 25-OHD below 50 nmol/L after winter (end of March) was found in 606 of all 720 children (84.2%). Among them, 461 (64%) had a concentration ranging between 25 and 50 nmol/L, whereas 145 individuals (20.2%) had less than 25 nmol/L. Adequate levels of 25-OHD were observed in only 114 children (15.8%) (Fig. 1). The region-specific analysis of 25-OHD status in March showed that the lowest proportions of vitamin D deficient and severely deficient children were found in central Poland (Łódź and Poznań), where 77 and 74% of the population, respectively, demonstrated 25-OHD concentrations below 50 nmol/L. In other regions, the deficiency was found in similar proportions and ranged from 88 to 95% of the studied children. After the summer (measurement in October), 25-OHD levels showed a significant improvement across the country. An increase of 25-OHD was observed regardless of the geographical region, particularly in those children who had previously demonstrated severely deficient levels (< 25 nmol/L). However, deficiency was still found in 26% of all studied children (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Proportion of children with adequate and inadequate vitamin D levels in relation to the season of the year

Predictors for vitamin D status and season-specific effect

No significant differences in serum 25-OHD concentration were observed between boys and girls, nor was this finding influenced by age. However, a significant season-specific effect on vitamin D status was found in nearly all studied children, i.e., a distinct increase in 25-OHD was observed from March to October, showing a relationship between summer and vitamin D supply (Table 1). The mean serum concentration of 25-OHD was 52% higher in October (55.4 ± 14.0 nmol/L) than in March (36.4 ± 13.5 nmol/L), (p < 0.01). In children with 25-OHD < 50 nmol/L in March, their 25-OHD concentration increased by 64% through March to October (32.5 ± 8.2 vs. 53.2 ± 7.9 nmol/L, p < 0.01). A scant proportion of participants reported appropriate seasonal supplementation with vitamin D in winter. Regular use of supplements containing vitamin D (400 IU/day) for an average of 3–4 months was reported by 42 (6%), multi-vitamins (100–200 IU of vitamin D per day) by 171 (23%), and fish-oil (200 IU of vitamin D per day) by 197 (27%) of the studied children. On the other hand, data also showed that a larger proportion of the children with adequate 25-OHD levels received vitamins in comparison with children who had deficient 25-OHD levels (Table 2). Analyses of the leisure time spent outdoors and the area of skin exposed to sunlight/UVB during summer revealed that children with adequate levels of 25-OHD in October reported a greater sun exposure and a higher number of hours spent outdoors in summer in comparison with vitamin D deficient and severely deficient children (Table 3). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that a larger proportion of children with sufficient serum 25-OHD in October spent their holidays in Mediterranean countries, compared to those with deficient levels (74 and 26%, respectively).

Table 2

Comparison of self-reported intakes of vitamin D from specific dietary sources in children with deficient and adequate levels of serum 25-OHD measured after winter

The source of vitamin D supplementation

Participants with the level of 25-OHD < 50 nmol/L

Participants with the level of 25-OHD ≥ 50 nmol/L

p value

Supplemented, n (%)

Not supplemented, n (%)

Supplemented, n (%)

Not supplemented, n (%)

Cod-liver oil

147 (27%)

399 (73%)

46 (46%)

54 (54%)

< 0.01


129 (23%)

422 (77%)

39 (39%)

62 (61%)

< 0.01

Vitamin D only products

31 (6%)

495 (94%)

11 (12%)

81 (88%)

< 0.03

p values are derived from χ2 test

Table 3

Comparison of outdoor activities and skin exposure to UVB in children with deficient and adequate levels of 25-OHD measured after summer

Time spent outdoor (h/week)

Children with the level of 25-OHD < 50 nmol/L, n (%)

Children with the level of 25-OHD ≥ 50 nmol/L, n (%)

The body surface area exposed to UVB (%)

Children with the level of 25-OHD < 50 nmol/L, n (%)

Children with the level of 25-OHD ≥ 50 nmol/L, n (%)

Less than 2

7 (52.9%)

6 (46.1%)

< 10

5 (50%)

5 (50%)


88 (40.7%)

128 (59.3%)


122 (37.9%)

200 (62.1%)


64 (26.8%)

175 (73.2%)

> 50

29 (23.4%)

95 (76.6%)

A significant improvement in vitamin D status found in the overall population at follow-up (re-examination in October) proved the beneficial effect of the time spent outdoors, i.e., exposure to sunlight. Skin synthesis of vitamin D was presumably most effective in the children with severe deficiency, as the majority of them demonstrated a proportional increase in concentration, reflecting a complete amelioration.


Our study included a representative sample of prepubertal children from different regions of Poland and clearly showed a deficiency of 25-OHD in this age group. We also extended our observation by demonstrating distinct seasonal variations in vitamin D status. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency after winter reached 84.2% in all regions of the country, with the highest rates found in children living in Szczecin and Białystok (Northern Poland), as well as in the Silesian and Lublin regions. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency after summer was 26% countrywide, with the highest rates in the regions of Łódź, Poznań and Szczecin.

Skin synthesis of vitamin D, mediated through exposure to UVB, was most evident in the children with severe deficiency, as in the majority of these children a significant improvement of the vitamin D status was observed. The considerable proportion of children with severe vitamin D deficiency (20.2% of all participants) was similar to those reported in other countries [20, 21]. Kim et al. in a recent study among healthy Korean adolescents (data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), demonstrated that 54.7% of teenagers had vitamin D deficiency, and as many as 13.4% had a severe deficiency [20]. The children studied by these investigators also had the lowest 25-OHD levels after winter and in early spring, thereby showing a similar pattern of seasonal variations. Another study of Asian adolescents also reported the largest deficiency rates, up to 89% of the population, observed in spring, with a distinct alleviation up to 63.9% after summer [21]. Consequently, these data indicate poor management and ineffective supplementation in the period when skin synthesis is absent due to geographical factors and latitude. Some other reports comprehensively explain the relationship between vitamin D status, latitude and sunlight exposure. The Brazilian investigators Santos et al. [22] did not observe variability in 25-OHD levels in summer and winter, presumably because the geographic latitude of the area in which they conducted their studies was below 35 degrees, so that dermal synthesis of vitamin D was possible throughout the whole year. Nevertheless, in as many as 54% of girls, vitamin D deficiency (25-OHD < 50 nmol/L) was observed because of the lack of supplementation, low vitamin D diet and overuse of sunscreens. Moreover, Pekkinen et al. found that 71% of Finnish children aged 7–11 years were vitamin D deficient (25-OHD < 50 nmol/L), even despite having met or exceeded the recommended daily intakes for vitamin D [23].

Our results may suggest suboptimal supply of vitamin D among Polish children, though the causality is difficult to demonstrate. Noticeably, according to the Polish official guidelines established in 2009, vitamin D deficiency is considered at the serum 25-OHD concentration below 50 nmol/L [24]. Although this criterion is consistent with the great majority of international recommendations on vitamin D, and several reports have considered a threshold value for adequate 25-OHD levels being 50 nmol/L, there are still controversies and country-specific differences regarding the definition of deficiency or appropriate requirements [11]. Thus, assuming that the level of 75 nmol/L is often believed to be desirable, a greater proportion would be classified as deficient at a higher cutoff.

In the present study, no significant differences in the 25-OHD levels between girls and boys were revealed, consistently with the recent observations by Karonova et al. [25], but contradictory to reports from South Korea [20], the United Kingdom [26] and Finland [23], which found lower 25-OHD levels in girls than in boys. In Canadian children aged from 2 to 16 years, a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in boys compared to girls was also reported [27]. According to this report, 69% of boys and 35% of girls aged 9–16 were vitamin D deficient, while in children aged 2–8 it reached 22 and 8%, respectively. Many investigators emphasize that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in childhood and adolescence increases with age [20, 28]. For example, Roth et al. [27] showed that 25-OHD concentrations decrease with age only in boys, whereas Willis et al. [29] found such an association also in girls. In our study, serum concentration of 25-OHD was not influenced by participants’ chronological age. This discrepancy may partly result from increased requirements for vitamin D due to the pubertal growth spurt and the rapid accrual of skeletal mass. On the other hand, teenage children, mainly girls, less frequently comply with dietary recommendations regarding nutritional vitamin D intake [30]. Furthermore, there may be a negative effect of reduced leisure time spent outdoors on the levels of 25-OHD during puberty and adolescence, because as children get older, their outdoor activity and solar UV dose are reduced. This has been reported by other investigators and seems to be typical for most European and also US populations during growth [31].

In our study, we attempted to assess the effects of sun exposure (hours per week and skin area exposed during summer) on serum concentration of 25-OHD. The re-examination in October indicated that children with adequate levels of 25-OHD reported higher UVB exposure and spent more time outdoors in summer, in comparison to children with vitamin D deficiency. This remains consistent with other observations, including McGillivray et al. [32] and Tangpricha et al. [33], who point out the low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency after summer, and highlight the beneficial effects of sun exposure on bone mineralisation. Similar results supporting our findings have been shown in studies evaluating the degree of sun exposure, not only using a questionnaire-based design, but also with the use of dosiometry [34]. Another study conducted in Spanish girls analysed the correlation between the rate of sun exposure in autumn and the wintertime vitamin D levels, demonstrating the beneficial effect of sunlight, in ensuring optimal vitamin D status (mean 25-OHD concentration was 100 nmol/L) [35]. The results of these studies still confirm the vital significance of sun exposure in achieving an adequate supply of vitamin D, and also indicate that supplementation with this vitamin is necessary in cases where effective skin biosynthesis is not possible. In our study, supplementation with vitamin D between October and March was reported by a small number of individuals, despite clear official national guidelines recommending a supply at the amount of 400 IU per day to all children aged 2–18 years [24]. In the literature, there are few studies assessing adherence with supplementation guidelines for the population during growth. Haran et al. conducted a survey among healthcare professionals regarding vitamin D supply to their own children; the supplementation level was found to be very low relative to the routine administration guidelines [36]. Similar observations indicating low rates of vitamin D supplement use were shown in British and Finnish reports [37, 38]. It should be emphasised that in our study, fish-oil and multivitamin preparations were the most commonly administered vitamin D-containing sources, whereas only a small proportion of children had received products containing only vitamin D. Although vitamin D-only products are presumably less frequently recommended by family physicians and paediatricians during growth, consumption of fish-oil and composite vitamins preparations may still have met the requirements. A similar view is also reflected in other studies [37]. Furthermore, there may be a suspicion that, despite receiving many recommendations from their physicians, parents appear non-compliant regarding this aspect of paediatric care. The benefit of fish-oil (cod-liver oil) may result from the fact that this nutritional supplement is widely promoted and accepted as a “healthy” product for children in Poland and, perhaps for this reason, the use of cod-liver oil in the autumn-winter-early spring season was more regular among our study participants. Furthermore, it is important to state that a significantly higher proportion of children whose parents reported supplementation with vitamin D in winter had an appropriate vitamin D status. This finding confirms the rationale for, and the efficacy of, prevention of the deficiency using regular supplementation. This remains in accordance with other observations, and proves that further promotion of vitamin D is needed in the critical period of prepuberty and puberty [39].

There were some limitations of our study that need to be mentioned. The socio-economic status has not been provided in this study. However, we did examine parental education, which was found to have no effect on vitamin D status in their children. Additionally, there are no essential differences, particularly regarding lifestyle, between rural and urban schoolchildren across the country nowadays. We did not analyse potential differences between the study locations. We are aware that the geographical context may be very important indeed, although Poland is not considered to be a large geographical area in terms of potential differences in latitude, exposure to the sun or, for instance, fish consumption.

In summary, prepubertal children in Poland demonstrate significant deficiency of vitamin D, particularly during winter, which remains consistent with most paediatric studies published elsewhere. We conclude that there is a positive effect of seasonal exposure to UVB on 25-OHD blood concentration, suggesting the efficacy of sunlight in correcting the deficits. A significant increase in vitamin D status after summer is likely to result from intensive skin synthesis associated with outdoor activity and habitual sun exposure. Thus, health professionals should actively encourage schoolchildren to modify their leisure time in summer. On the other hand, considering environmental factors (weather alterations, seasonal variations), supplementation with vitamin D is necessary in Polish children throughout the entire year, particularly when skin biosynthesis is limited.



The study was supported by the National Council of Scientific Research, Grant no. NN 407 27 37 39, and statutory resources no. 503/1-090-02/503-01.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standards

Children were considered eligible for the study when parental or the legal guardian’s written informed consent was obtained. The Bioethics Committee for Research Studies at the Medical University in Łódź approved the study (Certificate no. RNN/7/10/KE dated 12.01.2010).

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

394_2018_1756_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 KB)


  1. 1.
    Bikle D (2009) Nonclassic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 9:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baggerly CA, Cuomo RE, French CB, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Grant WB, Heaney RP, Holick MF, Hollis BW, McDonnell SL, Pittaway M, Seaton P, Wagner CL, Wunsch A (2015) Sunlight and vitamin D: necessary for public health. J Am Coll Nutr 34:359–365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR (2014) The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casey CF, Slawson DC, Neal LR (2010) Vitamin D supplementation in infants, children, and adolescents. Am Fam Physician 81:745–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357:266–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holick MF (2008) The vitamin D deficiency pandemic and consequences for nonskeletal health: mechanisms of action. Mol Asp Med 29:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jorde R, Grimnes G (2015) Vitamin D and health: the need for more randomized controlled trials. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 148:269–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA (1999) A 6-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J Bone Miner Res 14:1672–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daly RM, Gagnon C, Lu ZX, Magliano DJ, Dunstan DW, Sikaris KA et al (2012) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its determinants in Australian adults aged 25 years and older: a national, population-based study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 77:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pludowski P, Grant WB, Bhattoa HP, Bayer M, Povoroznyuk V, Rudenka E, Ramanau H et al (2014) Vitamin D status in Central Europe. Int J Endocrinol 2014:589587. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pludowski P, Holick MF, Grant WB, Konstantynowicz J, Mascarenhas MR, Haq A, Povoroznyuk V et al (2018) Vitamin D supplementation guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 175:125–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andersen R, Mølgaard C, Skovgaard LT, Brot C, Cashman KD, Chabros E, Charzewska J, Flynn A, Jakobsen J, Kärkkäinen M, Kiely M, Lamberg-Allardt C, Moreiras O, Natri AM, O’Brien M, Rogalska-Niedzwiedz M, Ovesen L (2005) Teenage girls and elderly women living in northern Europe have low winter vitamin D status. Eur J Clin Nutr 59:533–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Płudowski P, Ducki C, Konstantynowicz J, Jaworski M (2016) Vitamin D status in Poland. Pol Arch Med Wewn 126:530–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mensink GB, Fletcher R, Gurinovic M, Huybrechts I, Lafay L, Serra-Majem L, Szponar L et al (2013) Mapping low intake of micronutrients across Europe. Br J Nutr 110:755–773CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chwojnowska Z, Charzewska J, Wajszczyk B, Chabros E (2010) Trends in daily intake of calcium and vitamin D by adolescents. Probl Hig Epidemiol 91(4):544–548Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charzewska J, Chlebna-Sokół D, Chybicka A, Czech-Kowalska J, Dobrzańska A, Helwich E, Imiela JR et al (2010) Recommendations of prophylaxis of vitamin D deficiency in Poland (2009). Med Wieku Rozwoj 14:218–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Płudowski P, Karczmarewicz E, Bayer M, Carter G, Chlebna-Sokół D, Czech-Kowalska J, Dębski R et al (2013) Practical guidelines for the supplementation of vitamin D and the treatment of deficits in Central Europe—recommended vitamin D intakes in the general population and groups at risk of vitamin D deficiency. Endokrynol Pol 64:319–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanwell HEC, Vieth R, Cole DEC, Scillitani A, Modoni S, Frusciance V et al (2010) Sun exposure questionnaire predicts circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in Caucasian hospital workers in southern Italy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 121:334–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth JH, Schmidt-Gayk H, Weber H, Niederau C (2008) Accuracy and clinical implications of seven 25-hydroxyvitamin D methods compared with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry as a reference. Ann Clin Biochem 45:153–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim SH, Oh MK, Namgung R, Park MJ (2014) Prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in Korean adolescents: association with age, season and parental vitamin D status. Public Health Nutr 17:122–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee YA, Kim HY, Hong H, Kim JY, Kwon HJ, Shin CH, Yang SW (2014) Risk factors for low vitamin D status in Korean adolescents: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008–2009. Public Health Nutr 17:764–771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Santos BR, Mascarenhas LP, Satler F, Boguszewski MC, Spritzer PM (2012) Vitamin D deficiency in girls from South Brazil: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and association with vitamin D receptor gene variants. BMC Pediatrics 12:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pekkinen M, Viljakainen H, Saarnio E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Mäkitie O (2012) Vitamin D is a major determinant of bone mineral density at school age. PLoS One 7:e40090CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charzewska J, Chlebna-Sokół D, Chybicka A, Czech-Kowalska J, Dobrzańska A, Helwich E, Imiela JR et al (2010) Expert panel (prophylaxis of vitamin D deficiency-Polish recommendation 2009). Ginekol Pol 81(2):149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karonova T, Andreeva A, Nikitina I, Belyaeva O, Mokhova E, Galkina O, Vasilyeva E, Grineva E (2016) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the north-west region of Russia: a cross-sectional study. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 164:230–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Absoud M, Cummins C, Lim MJ, Wassmer E, Shaw N (2011) Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D insufficiency in children: a Great Britain population based study. PLoS One 6:e22179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roth DE, Martz P, Yeo R, Prosser C, Bell M, Jones AB (2005) Are national vitamin D guidelines sufficient to maintain adequate blood levels in children? Can J Public Health 96:443–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arabi A, Nabulsi M, Maalouf J, Choucair M, Khalifé H, Vieth R et al (2004) Bone mineral density by age, gender, pubertal stages, and socioeconomic status in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents. Bone 35:1169–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Willis CM, Laing EM, Hall DB, Hausman DB, Lewis RDA (2007) prospective analysis of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in white and black prepubertal females in the southeastern United States. Am J Clin Nutr 85:124–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valena J, González-Gross M, Huybrechts I, Breidenassel C, Ferrari M, Moruratidou T et al (2013) Factors associated with vitamin D deficiency in European adolescents: the HELENA study. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 59:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Godar DE, Pope SJ, Grant WB, Holick MF (2012) Solar UV doses of young Americans and vitamin D3 production. Environ Health Perspect 120:139–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McGillivray G, Skull SA, Davie G, Kofoed SE, Frydenberg A, Rice J et al (2007) High prevalence of asymptomatic vitamin D and iron deficiency in East African immigrant children and adolescents living in a temperate climate. Arch Dis Child 92:1088–1093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tangpricha V, Turner A, Spina C, Decastro S, Chen TC, Holick MF (2004) Tanning is associated with optimal vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration) and higher bone mineral density. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1645–1649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brodie AM, Lucas RM, Harrison SL, van der Mei IA, Armstrong B, Kricker A et al (2013) The AusD study: a population-based study of the determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration across a broad latitude rang. Am J Epidemiol 177:894–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramírez-Prada D, de la Torre MJ, Llórente-Cantarero FJ, Pérez-Navero JL, Gil-Campos M (2012) Evaluation of solar exposure, intake and physical activity in relation with vitamin D serum status in Spanish prepubertal girls. Nutr Hosp 27:1993–1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haran G, Rubin L, Shaoul R (2011) The compliance of medical staff for the routine administration of iron and vitamins in the first year of their child. Clin Nutr 30:54–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Metson D (2005) Should GPs be prescribing more vitamin D? Br J Gen Pract 55:966PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marjamaki L, Rasanen M, Uusitalo L, Ahonen S, Veijola R, Knip M et al (2004) Use of vitamin D and other dietary supplements by Finnish children at the age of 2 and 3 years. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 74:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Moy RJ, McGee E, Debelle GD, Mather I, Shaw NJ (2012) Successful public health action to reduce the incidence of symptomatic vitamin D deficiency. Arch Dis Child 97:952–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danuta Chlebna-Sokół
    • 1
  • Jerzy Konstantynowicz
    • 2
  • Paweł Abramowicz
    • 2
  • Beata Kulik-Rechberger
    • 3
  • Marek Niedziela
    • 4
  • Anna Obuchowicz
    • 5
  • Katarzyna Ziora
    • 6
  • Jolanta Karalus-Gach
    • 1
  • Joanna Golec
    • 1
  • Izabela Michałus
    • 1
  • Elżbieta Karczmarewicz
    • 7
  • Zenon Piotr Halaba
    • 8
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Propaedeutics and Metabolic Bone DiseasesMedical University of LodzŁódźPoland
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Immunology, and Metabolic Bone DiseasesMedical University of BialystokBiałystokPoland
  3. 3.Departament of Paediatric PropaedeuticsMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
  4. 4.Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and RheumatologyPoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznańPoland
  5. 5.Department of Paediatrics, School of Health Sciences in KatowiceMedical University of SilesiaBytomPoland
  6. 6.Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in ZabrzeMedical University of SilesiaZabrzePoland
  7. 7.Department of Biochemistry and Experimental MedicineThe Children’s Memorial Health Institute in WarsawWarsawPoland
  8. 8.Department of Medical SimulationUniversity of OpoleOpolePoland

Personalised recommendations