Advertisement

European Journal of Nutrition

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 379–389 | Cite as

Patterns of circulating fat-soluble vitamins and carotenoids and risk of frailty in four European cohorts of older adults

  • Sophie PilleronEmail author
  • Daniela Weber
  • Karine Pérès
  • Marco Colpo
  • David Gomez-Cabrero
  • Wolfgang Stuetz
  • Jean-François Dartigues
  • Luigi Ferrucci
  • Stefania Bandinelli
  • Francisco Jose Garcia-Garcia
  • Tilman Grune
  • Catherine FéartEmail author
  • On behalf of the FRAILOMIC initiative
Original Contribution

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the cross-sectional and prospective associations between patterns of serum fat-soluble micronutrients and frailty in four European cohorts of older adults 65 years of age and older.

Methods

Participants from the Three-City (Bordeaux, France), AMI (Gironde, France), TSHA (Toledo, Spain) and InCHIANTI (Tuscany, Italy) cohorts with available data on serum α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene, cryptoxanthin, lutein + zeaxanthin, retinol, α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D) were included. A principal component (PC) analysis was used to derive micronutrient patterns. Frailty was defined using Fried’s criteria. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for socio-demographic and health-related covariates were performed to assess the association between micronutrient patterns and prevalent frailty in 1324 participants, and the risk of frailty in 915 initially non-frail participants.

Results

Three different patterns were identified: the first pattern was characterized by higher serum carotenoids and α-tocopherol levels; the second was characterized by high loadings for serum vitamins A and E levels and low loadings for carotenes level; the third one had the highest loading for serum 25(OH)D and cryptoxanthin level and the lowest loading for vitamin A and E. A significant cross-sectional association was only observed between the seconnd PC and prevalent frailty (p = 0.02). Compared to the highest quartile, participants in the lowest quartile—i.e., high carotenes and low vitamins E and A levels—had higher odds of frailty (Odds ratio = 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.3–3.8). No association with the risk of frailty was observed.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that some specific micronutrient patterns are markers but not predictors of frailty in these European cohorts of older adults.

Keywords

Frailty Fat-soluble micronutrients Carotenoids Pattern Older adults Cohort 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported the FRAILOMIC Initiative (FP7-HEALTH-2012-Proposal No. 305483-2). The Three-City Study is conducted under a partnership agreement between the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Victor Segalen–Bordeaux2 University and the Sanofi-Synthélabo company. The Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale funded the preparation and beginning of the study. The 3C-Study is also sponsored by the Caisse Nationale Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés, Direction Générale de la Santé, Conseils Régionaux of Aquitaine and Bourgogne, Fondation de France, Ministry of Research-INSERM Program Cohortes et collections de données biologiques, the Fondation Plan Alzheimer (FCS 2009–2012), the Caisse Nationale pour la Solidarité et l’Autonomie (CNSA) and the “Programme Longévité et vieillissement”, COGICARE 07-LVIE 003 01. The AMI project was funded by AGRICA (CAMARCA, CRCCA, CCPMA PREVOYANCE, CPCEA, AGRI PREVOYANCE), la Mutualité Sociale Agricole (MSA) de Gironde, la Caisse Centrale de la Mutualité Sociale Agricole (CCMSA). The InCHIANTI study baseline (1998–2000) was supported as a “targeted project” (ICS110.1/RF97.71) by the Italian Ministry of Health and in part by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contracts: 263 MD 9164 and 263 MD 821336); the InCHIANTI Follow-up 1 (2001–2003) was funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contracts: N.1-AG-1-1 and N.1-AG-1-2111); the InCHIANTI Follow-ups 2 and 3 studies (2004–2010) were financed by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contract: N01-AG-5-0002);supported in part by the Intramural research program of the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland. The TSHA cohort was funded by grants PI07/90637, PI10/01532 and CB16/10/00456 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain), 03031-00 from the Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla la Mancha and PI2010/020 from FISCAM. Finally, the authors thank Drs Miranda M. Fidler and Citadel Cabasag for editing this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

CF received fees for conferences from Danone Research and Nutricia. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

394_2017_1602_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (73 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 72 KB)
394_2017_1602_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (204 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 203 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG et al (2015) Frailty assessment instruments: systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Res Rev 26:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féart C, Mann G et al (2013) Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goisser S, Guyonnet S, Volkert D (2016) The role of nutrition in frailty: an overview. J Frailty Aging 5:74–77Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonnefoy M, Berrut G, Lesourd B et al (2015) Frailty and nutrition: searching for evidence. J Nutr Health Aging 19:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rahi B, Colombet Z, Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand M et al (2016) Higher protein but not energy intake is associated with a lower prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling older adults in the french three-city cohort. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:672.e7–672.e672.e11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    García-Esquinas E, Rahi B, Peres K et al (2016) Consumption of fruits and vegetables and risk of frailty: a dose-reponse analysis of three prospective cohorts of community-dwelling older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 104:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong YY, Flicker L (2015) Hypovitaminosis D and frailty: epiphenomenon or causal? Maturitas 82:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Škrabáková Z, Gonzalez-Gross M et al (2016) Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Am J Clin Nutr 103:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michelon E, Blaum C, Semba RD et al (2006) Vitamin and carotenoid status in older women: associations with the frailty syndrome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ble A, Cherubini A, Volpato S et al (2006) Lower plasma vitamin E levels are associated with the frailty syndrome: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:278–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Semba RD, Bartali B, Zhou J et al (2006) Low serum micronutrient concentrations predict frailty among older women living in the community. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacobs DR, Gross MD, Tapsell LC (2009) Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 89:1543S–1548SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bohn T, Desmarchelier C, Dragsted LO et al (2017) Host-related factors explaining interindividual variability of carotenoid bioavailability and tissue concentrations in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res  https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600685 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erusalimsky JD, Grillari J, Grune T et al (2016) In search of “omics”-based biomarkers to predict risk of frailty and its consequences in older individuals: the FRAILOMIC initiative. Gerontology 62:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lippi G, Jansen-Duerr P, Viña J et al (2015) Laboratory biomarkers and frailty: presentation of the FRAILOMIC initiative. Clin Chem Lab Med 53:e253–e255Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pérès K, Matharan F, Allard M et al (2012) Health and aging in elderly farmers: the AMI cohort. BMC Public Health 12:558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia-Garcia FJ, Gutierrez Avila G, Alfaro-Acha A et al (2011) The prevalence of frailty syndrome in an older population from Spain. The Toledo Study for Healthy Aging. J Nutr Health Aging 15:852–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E et al (2000) Subsystems contributing to the decline in ability to walk: bridging the gap between epidemiology and geriatric practice in the InCHIANTI study. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1618–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    3C Study Group (2003) Vascular factors and risk of dementia: design of the Three-City Study and baseline characteristics of the study population. Neuroepidemiology 22:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosow I, Breslau N (1966) A Guttman health scale for the aged. J Gerontol 21:556–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alexander NB, Guire KE, Thelen DG et al (2000) Self-reported walking ability predicts functional mobility performance in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1408–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Avila-Funes JA, Helmer C, Amieva H et al (2008) Frailty among community-dwelling elderly people in France: the three-city study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1089–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rantanen T, Era P, Kauppinen M, Heikkinen E (1994) Maximal isometric muscle strength and socioeconomic status, health, and physical activity in 75-year-old persons. J Aging Phys Act 2:206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stuetz W, Weber D, Dollé MET, Jansen E et al (2016) Plasma carotenoids, tocopherols, and retinol in the age-stratified (35–74 years) general population: a Cross-Sectional Study in Six European Countries. Nutrients 8:E614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turpeinen U, Hohenthal U, Stenman U-H (2003) Determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum by HPLC and immunoassay. Clin Chem 49:1521–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tomkins A (2003) Assessing micronutrient status in the presence of inflammation. J Nutr 133:1649S–1655SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Bouillon R et al (2013) Vitamin D: do we get enough? A discussion between vitamin D experts in order to make a step towards the harmonisation of dietary reference intakes for vitamin D across Europe. Osteoporos Int 24:1567–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pearce SHS, Cheetham TD (2010) Diagnosis and management of vitamin D deficiency. BMJ 340:b5664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, Ávila-Funes JA, Amieva H, Meillon C et al (2016) Association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with the frailty syndrome in Mexican community-dwelling elderly. Aging Male 19:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Capuron L, Moranis A, Combe N et al (2009) Vitamin E status and quality of life in the elderly: influence of inflammatory processes. Br J Nutr 102:1390–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bartali B, Frongillo EA, Guralnik JM et al (2008) Serum micronutrient concentrations and decline in physical function among older persons. JAMA 299:308–315Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chan R, Leung J, Woo J (2015) Dietary patterns and risk of frailty in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older People in Hong Kong: a Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients 7:7070–7084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    León-Muñoz LM, García-Esquinas E, López-García E et al (2015) Major dietary patterns and risk of frailty in older adults: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med 13:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Avila-Funes JA, Amieva H, Barberger-Gateau P et al (2009) Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the phenotype of frailty for adverse health outcomes: the three-city study. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Pilleron
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniela Weber
    • 2
    • 3
  • Karine Pérès
    • 1
  • Marco Colpo
    • 4
  • David Gomez-Cabrero
    • 5
  • Wolfgang Stuetz
    • 6
  • Jean-François Dartigues
    • 1
  • Luigi Ferrucci
    • 7
  • Stefania Bandinelli
    • 8
  • Francisco Jose Garcia-Garcia
    • 9
  • Tilman Grune
    • 2
    • 3
    • 10
    • 11
  • Catherine Féart
    • 1
    Email author
  • On behalf of the FRAILOMIC initiative
  1. 1.Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research CenterUMR 1219, University BordeauxBordeauxFrance
  2. 2.Department of Molecular ToxicologyGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE)NuthetalGermany
  3. 3.NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-PotsdamNuthetalGermany
  4. 4.Department of StatisticsUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  5. 5.Unit of Computational MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  6. 6.Institute of Biological Chemistry and NutritionUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  7. 7.National Institute on AgingBaltimoreUSA
  8. 8.Geriatric Unit, Local Health Tuscany Center AgencyFlorenceItaly
  9. 9.Division of Geriatric MedicineHospital Virgen del Valle Complejo Hospitalario de ToledoToledoSpain
  10. 10.German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD)Munich-NeuherbergGermany
  11. 11.German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations