Replacement of glycaemic carbohydrates by inulin-type fructans from chicory (oligofructose, inulin) reduces the postprandial blood glucose and insulin response to foods: report of two double-blind, randomized, controlled trials

  • Helen Lightowler
  • Sangeetha Thondre
  • Anja Holz
  • Stephan Theis
Original Contribution

Abstract

Purpose

Inulin-type fructans are recognized as prebiotic dietary fibres and classified as non-digestible carbohydrates that do not contribute to glycaemia. The aim of the present studies was to investigate the glycaemic response (GR) and insulinaemic response (IR) to foods in which sucrose was partially replaced by inulin or oligofructose from chicory.

Methods

In a double-blind, randomized, controlled cross-over design, 40–42 healthy adults consumed a yogurt drink containing oligofructose or fruit jelly containing inulin and the respective full-sugar variants. Capillary blood glucose and insulin were measured in fasted participants and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after starting to drink/eat. For each test food, the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose and insulin was calculated and the GR and IR determined.

Results

Consumption of a yogurt drink with oligofructose which was 20% reduced in sugars significantly lowered the glycaemic response compared to the full-sugar reference (iAUC120min 31.9 and 37.3 mmol/L/min, respectively; p < 0.05). A fruit jelly made with inulin and containing 30% less sugars than the full-sugar variant likewise resulted in a significantly reduced blood glucose response (iAUC120min 53.7 and 63.7 mmol/L/min, respectively; p < 0.05). In both studies, the postprandial insulin response was lowered in parallel (p < 0.05). The reduction of postprandial glycaemia was positively correlated to the proportion of sugars replaced by inulin-type fructans (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the studies confirmed that substitution of glycaemic sugars by inulin or oligofructose from chicory may be an effective strategy to reduce the postprandial blood glucose response to foods.

Keywords

Glycaemia Insulin Dietary fibre Prebiotics Sugar replacement 

References

  1. 1.
    Blaak EE, Antoine JM, Benton D et al (2012) Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease. Obes Rev 13(10):923–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ludwig D (2002) The glycaemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287(18):2414–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavalot F, Petrelli A, Traversa M et al (2006) Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(3):813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rendell MS, Jovanovic L (2006) Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia. Metab Clin Exp 55(9):1263–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woerle HJ, Neumann C, Zschau S et al (2007) Impact of fasting and postprandial glycemia on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: importance of postprandial glycemia to achieve target HbA1c levels. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 77(2):280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roberfroid M, Slavin J (2000) Nondigestible oligosaccharides. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 40(6):461–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellegård L, Andersson H, Bosaeus I (1997) Inulin and oligofructose do not influence the absorption of cholesterol, or the excretion of cholesterol, Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, or bile acids but increases energy excretion in ileostomy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 51(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schaafsma G, Slavin L (2015) Significance of inulin fructans in the human diet. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safety 14(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franck A (2002) Technological functionality of inulin and oligofructose. Br J Nutr 87(Suppl 2):S287–S291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer D (2007) Dietary fibre: components and functions: inulin for product development of low GI products to support weight management. Wageningen Academic Publishers, RoosendaalGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grysman A, Carlson T, Wolever T (2008) Effects of sucromalt on postprandial responses in human subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 62(12):1364–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarini J, Wolever T (2010) The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduced free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 35(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    EFSA NDA Panel (2014) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to non-digestible carbohydrates and a reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 12(1):3513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Commission–Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/854 authorising certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health and amending Regulation (EU) No 432/2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO food products–determination of the glycaemic index (GI) and recommendation for food classification (26642:2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    EFSA NDA Panel (2012) Guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to appetite ratings, weight management, and blood glucose concentrations. EFSA J 10(3):2604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hätönen KA, Simila E, Virtamo JR et al (2006) Methodologic considerations in the measurement of glycemic index: glycemic response to rye bread, oatmeal porridge, and mashed potatoe. Am J Clin Nutr 84(5):1055–1061Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siahanidou T, Margeli A, Kappis A et al (2011) Circluating vasfatin levels in healthy preterm infants are independently associated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and dietary long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Metabolism 60(3):389–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atkinson F, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller J (2008) International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Diabetes Care 31(12):2281–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brynes AE, Edwards CM, Ghatei MA et al (2003) A randomised four-intervention crossover study investigating the effect of carbohydrates on daytime profiles of insulin, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids and triacylglycerols in middle-aged men. Br J Nutr 89(2):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Vuksan V et al (1992) Beneficial effect of a low glycaemic index diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 9(5):451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venn B, Green T (2007) Glycemic index and glycemic load: measurement issues and their effect on diet-disease relationships. Eur J Clin Nutr 61 (Suppl 1):S122–S131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aziz A, Dumais L, Barber J (2013) Health Canada’s evaluation of the use of glycemic index claims on food labels. Am J Clin Nutr 98(2):269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    European Commission–Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foodsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kellow N, Coughlan M, Reid C (2014) Metabolic benefits of dietary prebiotics in human subjects: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr 111(7):1147–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dehghan P, Pourghassem Gargari B, Asghari Jafar-abadi M (2014) Oligofructose-enriched inulin improves some inflammatory markers and metabolic endotoxemia in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Nutrition 30(4):418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dehghan P, Pourghassem Gargari B, Asghari Jafar-abadi M et al (2014) Inulin controls inflammation and metabolic endotoxemia in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Int J Food Sci Nutr 65(1):117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jones JM (2014) CODEX-aligned dietary fiber definitions help to bridge the ‘fiber gap’. Nutr J 13:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clemens R, Kranz S, Mobley AR et al (2012) Filling America’s fiber intake gap: summary of a roundtable to probe realistic solutions with a focus on grain-based foods. J Nutr 142(7):1390S–1401SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deehan EC, Walter J (2016) The fiber gap and the disappearing gut microbiome: implications for human nutrition. Trends Endocrinol Metab 27(5):239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Lightowler
    • 1
  • Sangeetha Thondre
    • 1
  • Anja Holz
    • 2
  • Stephan Theis
    • 2
  1. 1.Functional Food Centre, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.BENEO-InstituteObrigheim/PfalzGermany

Personalised recommendations