Effects of low-glycemic-index diets in pregnancy on maternal and newborn outcomes in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 1.1k Downloads
Maternal diet with a high glycemic index (GI) is associated with fetal overgrowth and higher infant body adiposity. Effects of low-GI diet on maternal and newborn outcomes have been assessed in both healthy pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus, but the results remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of low-GI diets on maternal and newborn outcomes.
PubMed, Clinical Trials, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized trials up to January 2016. Random- or fixed-effects models were used to calculate combined treatment effects.
A total of 11 trials involving 1985 women were eligible for analysis. This meta-analysis assessed 7 maternal and 11 newborn outcomes. Of these, gestational weight gain (GWG), fasting blood glucose (FBG), newborn birth weight, ponderal index (PI), proportion of macrosomia, and large for gestational age (LGA) were investigated in more than 8 trials. Compared with control diets, low-GI diets significantly reduced FBG (weight mean differences (WMD) = −0.18 mmol/L, 95 % CI: −0.33, −0.02), 2-h postprandial glucose level (WMD = −0.33 mmol/L, 95 % CI: −0.54, −0.12), and the proportion of LGA (RR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.31, 0.89). A lower GWG (WMD = −0.69 kg, 95 % CI: −1.74, 0.36) and birth weight (WMD = −0.10 kg, 95 % CI: −0.23, 0.03) were also observed without significant differences. Heterogeneity was observed in the GWG, FBG, and birth weight analyses. Low-GI diets did not affect other maternal and newborn outcomes. In subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the intervention effects of low GI on GWG and FBG varied.
Low-GI diets may have beneficial effects on maternal outcomes for those at risk of developing high glucose levels, without causing adverse effects on newborn outcomes. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the evidence of heterogeneity and limited number of studies.
KeywordsLow glycemic index Pregnancy outcomes Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Irma Silva-Zolezzi is employee of Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne. Gerard Vinyes Parés and Yi Wang are employees of Nestlé Research Center Beijing. The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Kaufmann RC, Mcbride P, Amankwah KS, Huffman DG (1992) The effect of minor degrees of glucose-intolerance on the incidence of neonatal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 80:97–101Google Scholar
- 5.Clapp JF (1998) Effect of dietary carbohydrate on the glucose and insulin response to mixed caloric intake and exercise in both nonpregnant and pregnant women. Diabetes Care 21:B107–B112Google Scholar
- 8.Markovic TP, Muirhead R, Overs S, Ross GP, Louie JCY, Kizirian N, Denyer G, Petocz P, Hyett J, Brand-Miller JC (2016) Randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a low-glycemic index diet on pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: the GI Baby 3 study. Diabetes Care 39:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ma WJ, Huang ZH, Huang BX, Qi BH, Zhang YJ, Xiao BX, Li YH, Chen L, Zhu HL (2015) Intensive low-glycaemic-load dietary intervention for the management of glycaemia and serum lipids among women with gestational diabetes: a randomized control trial. Public Health Nutr 18:1506–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Moses RG, Casey SA, Quinn EG, Cleary JM, Tapsell LC, Milosavljevic M, Petocz P, Brand-Miller JC (2014) Pregnancy and glycemic index outcomes study: effects of low glycemic index compared with conventional dietary advice on selected pregnancy outcomes(1–3). Am J Clin Nutr 99:517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Perichart-Perera O, Balas-Nakash M, Rodriguez-Cano A, Legorreta-Legorreta J, Parra-Covarrubias A, Vadillo-Ortega F (2012) Low glycemic index carbohydrates versus all types of carbohydrates for treating diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of glycemic control. Int J Endocrinol 2012:296017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. [Updated March 2011]. The Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
- 30.Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PM, Damm P, Dyer AR, de Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiller JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJN, Omori Y, Schmidt MI, Balaji V, Callaghan WM, Chen R, Conway D, Corcoy R, Coustan DR, Dabelea D, Fagen C, Feig DS, Ferrara A, Geil P, Hadden DR, Hillier TA, Hiramatsu Y, Houde G, Inturissi M, Jang HC, Jovanovic L, Kautsky-Willer A, Kirkman MS, Kjos SL, Landon MB, Lapolla A, Lowe J, Mathiesen HER, Mello G, Meltzer SJ, Moore TR, Nolan CJ, Ovesen P, Pettitt P, Reader DM, Rowan JA, Sacks DA, Schaefer-Graf U, Seshiah V, Simmons D, Sugiyama T, Trimble ER, Varma S, Yang HX, Yasuhi I, Pregnancy IAD (2010) International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33:676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Sung JF, Kogut EA, Lee HC, Mannan JL, Navabi K, Taslimi MM, El-Sayed YY (2015) Correlation of continuous glucose monitoring profiles with pregnancy outcomes in nondiabetic women. Am J Perinatol 32:461–467Google Scholar
- 37.Mourtakos SP, Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Antonogeorgos G, Alexi CD, Georgoulis M, Saade G, Sidossis LS (2016) Association between gestational weight gain and risk of obesity in preadolescence: a longitudinal study (1997–2007) of 5125 children in Greece. J Hum Nutr Diet. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12398 Google Scholar
- 39.Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Baur L (2007) Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD005105Google Scholar
- 44.Viguiliouk E, Kendall CW, Blanco Mejia S, Cozma AI, Ha V, Mirrahimi A, Jayalath VH, Augustin LS, Chiavaroli L, Leiter LA, de Souza RJ, Jenkins DJ, Sievenpiper JL (2014) Effect of tree nuts on glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled dietary trials. PLoS ONE 9:e103376CrossRefGoogle Scholar