Profile of European adults interested in internet-based personalised nutrition: the Food4Me study
- 880 Downloads
Personalised interventions may have greater potential for reducing the global burden of non-communicable diseases and for promoting better health and well-being across the lifespan than the conventional “one size fits all” approach. However, the characteristics of individuals interested in personalised nutrition (PN) are unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of European adults interested in taking part in an internet-based PN study.
Individuals from seven European countries (UK, Ireland, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Greece and Poland) were invited to participate in the study via the Food4Me website (http://www.food4me.org). Two screening questionnaires were used to collect data on socio-demographic, anthropometric and health-related characteristics as well as dietary intakes.
A total of 5662 individuals expressed an interest in the study (mean age 40 ± 12.7; range 15–87 years). Of these, 65 % were female and 97 % were Caucasian. Overall, 13 % were smokers and 47 % reported the presence of a clinically diagnosed disease. Furthermore, 47 % were overweight or obese and 35 % were sedentary during leisure time. Assessment of dietary intakes showed that 54 % of individuals reported consuming at least 5 portions of fruit and vegetables per day, 46 % consumed more than 3 servings of wholegrains and 37 % limited their salt intake to <5.75 g per day.
Our data indicate that individuals volunteering to participate in an internet-based PN study are broadly representative of the European adult population, most of whom had adequate nutrient intakes but could benefit from improved dietary choices and greater physical activity. Future use of internet-based PN approaches is thus relevant to a wide target audience.
KeywordsPersonalised nutrition European profile Tailored intervention Internet-based Randomised controlled trial
Food frequency questionnaire
Proof of principle
Randomised controlled trial
Study approval: The Food4Me study has been reviewed and approved by seven independent ethical research committees in each of the countries involved in the trial. Patient consent: All participants, both screened and randomised, have given consent to take part in this study. Funding statement: This work was supported by the European Commission under the Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology Theme of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development .
Conflict of interest
None of the authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.
- 1.Alwan A (2010) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240686458_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 28 Aug 2014
- 2.Nichols M, Townsend N, Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Scarborough P, Rayner M (2012) European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. http://www.escardio.org/about/Documents/EU-cardiovascular-disease-statistics-2012.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2014
- 4.Health and Social Care Information Centre NHS (2012) Health Survey for England—2011, Trend tables. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB09302. Accessed 20 Aug 2014
- 11.Eurostat (2010) Life Online. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/scoreboard_life_online.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2014
- 12.Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CM, Forster H, O’Donovan C, Woolhead C, Macready A, Fallaize R, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, Kolossa S, Hartwig K, Tsirigoti L, Lambrinou C, Moschonis G, Godlewska M, Surwiłło A, Grimaldi K, Bouwman J, Daly EJ, Akujobi V, O’Riordan R, Hoonhout J, Claassen A, Hoeller U, Gundersen T, Kaland S, Matthews JS, Manios Y, Traczyk I, Drevon C, Gibney E, Brennan L, Walsh M, Lovegrove J, Alfredo Martinez J, Saris WM, Daniel H, Gibney M, Mathers J (2015) Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 10(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12263-014-0450-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fallaize R, Forster H, Macready LA, Walsh CM, Mathers CJ, Brennan L, Gibney RE, Gibney JM, Lovegrove AJ (2014) Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the food4me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res 16(8):e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.World Health Organization (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 916). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/who_trs_916.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2014
- 16.World Health Organization (2013) Country profiles on nutrition, physical activity and obesity. http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/country-profiles-on-nutrition,-physical-activity-and-obesity-in-the-53-who-european-region-member-states.-methodology-and-summary-2013. Accessed 7 Oct 2014
- 19.World Health Organization (2014) The challenge of obesity—quick statistics. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/obesity/data-and-statistics. Accessed 28 June 2014
- 21.OECD (2012) Health at a glance: Europe 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/health/reports/docs/health_glance_2012_en.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2014
- 23.Physical activity and health in Europe: evidence for action (2006) http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/physical-activity/publications/2006/physical-activity-and-health-in-europe-evidence-for-action. Accessed 28 June 2014
- 24.European Fresh Produce Association (2012) A Review of the EU regime for the fruit and vegetables sector. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fruit-and-vegetables/policy/consultation/registered-organisations/freshfel_en.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2014
- 27.SACN (2014) Draft carbohydrates and health report. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/339771/Draft_SACN_Carbohydrates_and_Health_report_consultation.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
- 28.World Health Organisation (2014) WHO opens public consultation on draft sugars guideline. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2014/consultation-sugar-guideline/en/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
- 29.Bates B, Lennox A, Prentice A, Bates C, Page P, Nicholson SK, Swan G (2014) National diet and nutrition survey results from years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the rolling programme (2008/2009–2011/2012). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/310995/NDNS_Y1_to_4_UK_report.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2014
- 33.Institute of Medicine (2010) Strategies to reduce sodium intake in the United States. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Strategies-to-Reduce-Sodium-Intake-in-the-United-States.aspx. Accessed 5 Oct 2014
- 34.Celis-Morales C, Forster H, O'Donovan C, Woolhead C, Marsaux C, Fallaize R, Macready AL, Kolossa S, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, Tsirigoti L, Lambrinou CP, Godlewska M, Surwillo A, Gibney E, Brennan L, Walsh M, Drevon C, Manios Y, Traczyk I, Martinez JA, Lovegrove JA, Saris W, Daniel H, Gibney M, Mathers JC (2014) Validation of Web-based self-reported socio-demographic and anthropometric data collected in the Food4Me Study. Proc Nutr Soc 73(OCE2):E78Google Scholar