Advertisement

European Journal of Nutrition

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 139–146 | Cite as

Active Hexose Correlated Compound (AHCC) promotes an intestinal immune response in BALB/c mice and in primary intestinal epithelial cell culture involving toll-like receptors TLR-2 and TLR-4

  • Jean-François Mallet
  • Émilie Graham
  • Barry W. Ritz
  • Kohei Homma
  • Chantal MatarEmail author
Original Contribution

Abstract

Purpose

Active Hexose Correlated Compound (AHCC®) is a cultured mushroom extract that is commercially available and promoted for immune support. Available data suggest that AHCC supplementation affects immune cell populations and immune outcomes, including natural killer cell response to infection. The mechanism by which AHCC exerts its effects is not well understood. The present work aimed to characterize the immunomodulatory activity of AHCC in the gut and to study the effects of AHCC on toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs).

Methods

BALB/c mice were fed AHCC by gavage. In vivo activities were assessed by immunohistochemistry and cytokine production. The effects of AHCC on ex vivo primary cell culture from IECs were examined after challenge with LPS or E. coli alone or in the presence of anti-TLR-2 and TLR-4 blocking antibodies.

Results

Feeding AHCC resulted in increased IgA+ cells in the intestine and increased sIgA, IL-10, and IFN-γ in the intestinal fluid. In IECs, contact with AHCC increased IL-6 production but not to the pro-inflammatory level of positive controls, LPS and E. coli. Blocking TLR-2 and TLR-4 reduced the induction of IL-6 by AHCC, suggesting that these innate receptors are involved in generating the immune response of IECs to AHCC.

Conclusions

AHCC may play a role in the orchestration of immune response and the maintenance of immune homeostasis in part by priming the TLR-2 and TLR-4 gate at the intestinal epithelium. Such a response is likely due to the recognition of non-pathogenic food-associated molecular patterns (FAMPs) such as those found associated with other mushroom or yeast-derived compounds.

Keywords

AHCC Toll-like receptor E. coli Infection Mushroom Innate FAMP 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Jairo Duarte for his help in the isolation of the intestinal epithelial cells. This work was made possible by a non-restrictive research grant from the manufacturer of AHCC, Amino Up Chemical Company, Sapporo, Japan.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kohei Homma is employed at Amino Up Chemical Co., Ltd. as a research scientist. Amino Up Chemical is the developer and manufacturer of the AHCC product used in this study. The author has not received personal financial gain from sales of the AHCC product. All findings and views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Amino Up Chemical. As the vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs for Atrium Innovations, Dr. Barry Ritz is involved in the commercialization of many natural products, including AHCC. Currently, two atrium companies, Douglas Laboratories and Pure Encapsulations, commercialize products that contain AHCC as an ingredient. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Ritz BW, Nogusa S, Ackerman EA, Gardner EM (2006) Supplementation with active hexose correlated compound increases the innate immune response of young mice to primary influenza infection. J Nutr 136(11):2868–2873Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ritz BW (2008) Supplementation with active hexose correlated compound increases survival following infectious challenge in mice. Nutr Rev 66(9):526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nogusa S, Gerbino J, Ritz BW (2009) Low-dose supplementation with active hexose correlated compound improves the immune response to acute influenza infection in C57BL/6 mice. Nutr Res. 29(2):139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daddaoua A, Martínez-Plata E, Ortega-González M, Ocón B, Aranda CJ, Zarzuelo A et al (2013) The nutritional supplement Active Hexose Correlated Compound (AHCC) has direct immunomodulatory actions on intestinal epithelial cells and macrophages involving TLR/MyD88 and NF-κB/MAPK activation. Food Chem 136(3–4):1288–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miura T, Kitadate K, Nishioka H, Wakame K (2010) Basic and clinical studies on active hexose correlated compound. In: Bagchi D, Lau FC, Ghosh DK (eds) Biotechnology in functional foods and nutraceuticals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Okuyama T, Yoshigai E, Ikeya Y, Nishizawa M (2013) Active Hexose Correlated Compound extends the lifespan and increases the thermotolerance of nematodes. Funct Foods Health Dis 3(6):166–182Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shah VB, Williams DL, Keshvara L (2009) β-Glucan attenuates TLR2- and TLR4-mediated cytokine production by microglia. Neurosci Lett 458(3):111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah VB, Huang Y, Keshwara R, Ozment-Skelton T, Williams DL, Keshvara L (2008) Beta-glucan activates microglia without inducing cytokine production in Dectin-1-dependent manner. J Immunol 180(5):2777–2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu W, Ma H, Miao J, Huang G, Tong M, Zou S (2013) β-Glucan modulates the lipopolysaccharide-induced innate immune response in rat mammary epithelial cells. Int Immunopharmacol 15(2):457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spierings ELH, Fujii H, Sun B, Walshe T (2007) A Phase I study of the safety of the nutritional supplement, active hexose correlated compound, AHCC, in healthy volunteers. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 53(6):536–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah SK, Walker PA, Moore-Olufemi SD, Sundaresan A, Kulkarni AD, Andrassy RJ (2011) An evidence-based review of a Lentinula edodes mushroom extract as complementary therapy in the surgical oncology patient. J Parenter Enter Nutr 35(4):449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kay E, Scotland RS, Whiteford JR (2014) Toll-like receptors: role in inflammation and therapeutic potential. BioFactors 40(3):284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O (2006) Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124(4):783–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tapping RI, Akashi S, Miyake K, Godowski PJ, Tobias PS (2000) Toll-like receptor 4, but not Toll-like receptor 2, is a signaling receptor for Escherichia and Salmonella lipopolysaccharides. J Immunol 165(10):5780–5787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gould D. (2010) Causes, prevention and treatment of Escherichia coli infections. Nurs Stand 7;24(31):50–56; quiz 58Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dho-Moulin M, Fairbrother JM (1999) Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Vet Res 30(2–3):299–316Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HLT (2004) Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sherman PM, Johnson-Henry KC, Yeung HP, Ngo PSC, Goulet J, Tompkins TA (2005) Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-Induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Infect Immun 73(8):5183–5188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abreu MT, Thomas LS, Arnold ET, Lukasek K, Michelsen KS, Arditi M (2003) TLR signaling at the intestinal epithelial interface. J Endotoxin Res 9(5):322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vinderola G, Matar C, Perdigón G (2005) Role of intestinal epithelial cells in immune effects mediated by Gram-positive probiotic bacteria: involvement of Toll-like receptors. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12(9):1075–1084Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Otte J-M, Cario E, Podolsky DK (2004) Mechanisms of cross hyporesponsiveness to Toll-like receptor bacterial ligands in intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 126(4):1054–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sainte-Marie G (1962) A paraffin embedding technique for studies employing immunofluorescence. J Histochem Cytochem 10(3):250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Slorach EM, Campbell FC, Dorin JR (1999) A mouse model of intestinal stem cell function and regeneration. J Cell Sci 112(18):3029–3038Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dogi CA, Galdeano CM, Perdigón G (2008) Gut immune stimulation by non pathogenic Gram(+) and Gram(−) bacteria. Comparison with a probiotic strain. Cytokine. 41(3):223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mantis NJ, Rol N, Corthésy B (2011) Secretory IgA’s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol 4(6):603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brandtzaeg P (2007) Induction of secretory immunity and memory at mucosal surfaces. Vaccine 25(30):5467–5484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aviles H, O’Donnell P, Orshal J, Fujii H, Sun B, Sonnenfeld G (2008) Active hexose correlated compound activates immune function to decrease bacterial load in a murine model of intramuscular infection. Am J Surg 195(4):537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wong EB, Mallet J-F, Duarte J, Matar C, Ritz BW (2014) Bovine colostrum enhances natural killer cell activity and immune response in a mouse model of influenza infection and mediates intestinal immunity through toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Nutr Res 34(4):318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Y, Ames N, Li S, Jones P, Khafipour E (2014) High molecular weight barley β-glucan supports bacterial populations beneficial for gut health. FASEB J 28(1 Supplement):647.45Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-François Mallet
    • 1
  • Émilie Graham
    • 2
  • Barry W. Ritz
    • 3
  • Kohei Homma
    • 4
  • Chantal Matar
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Nutrition Sciences Program, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Nutrition Sciences Department, College of Nursing and Health ProfessionsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Amino Up Chemical Company, Ltd.SapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations