Comparative study of the oral absorption of microencapsulated ferric saccharate and ferrous sulfate in humans
- 403 Downloads
Our objective was to compare the absorption of microencapsulated ferric saccharate (MFS) and ferrous sulfate (FS) in a fortified milk product, using a crossover design.
Seventeen non-iron-deficient healthy adults from both sexes participated in the study. On each intervention day (days 1 and 8), after an overnight fast, the volunteers consumed one type of product (test or control) and blood sampling was carried out at different times. The interventions days were separated by 7-day washout periods. This study was double blinded, crossover and randomized for nature of the test meals. The primary outcomes of the study were total serum iron and transferrin saturation.
No significant differences could be observed in serum iron concentration during the 6-h postprandial study due to the type of milk product consumed, and there was neither an effect of time nor an interaction between the type of milk product and time. Transferrin saturation significantly increased after the intake of both products (P < 0.005), reaching a peak value between hours 2 and 4. No significant differences were detected between MFS and FS, indicating that iron absorption from MFS is equivalent to absorption from FS.
MFS is a new ingredient that allows the fortification of a wide range of food products, including heat-processed and non-acidic products with similar absorption to FS, designed to produce neither organoleptic changes nor off-color development during storage of fortified food.
KeywordsIron Deficiency Microencapsulated ferric saccharate Ferrous sulfate Fortified milk
The authors are grateful to the volunteers for their participation. The promoting company of this research is AB-Biotics S.A, Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain. The authors would like to express their gratitude to AB-Biotics for the confidence placed in their independent research group.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by an ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study.
- 2.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2010) DRAFT SACN 2010 report on iron and health. The Stationery Office, London. http://www.sacn.gov.uk/reports_position_statements/reports/sacn_iron_and_health_report.html. Accessed 20 January 2012
- 3.McClung JP, Karl JP, Cable SJ, Williams KW, Nindl BC, Young AJ, Lieberman HR (2009) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of iron supplementation in female soldiers during military training: effects on iron status, physical performance, and mood. Am J Clin Nutr 90(1):124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Brutsaert TD, Hernandez-Cordero S, Rivera J, Viola T, Hughes G, Haas JD (2003) Iron supplementation improves progressive fatigue resistance during dynamic knee extensor exercise in iron-depleted, nonanemic women. Am J Clin Nutr 77(2):441–448Google Scholar
- 5.Murray-Kolb LE, Beard JL (2007) Iron treatment normalizes cognitive functioning in young women. Am J Clin Nutr 85(3):778–787Google Scholar
- 6.Sachdey H, Gera T, Nestel P (2005) Effect of iron supplementation on mental and motor development in children: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Public Health Nutr 8(2):117–132Google Scholar
- 7.ACC/SCN (2000) Fourth report on the World nutrition situation, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pubs/books/4thrpt/highlights.pdf
- 8.Benoist B, de McLean E, Egll I, Cogswell M (2008) Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005: WHO global database on anaemia. WHO Press, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 10.WHO/FAO (2006) Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hurrell RF (2002) Fortification: overcoming technical and practical barriers. J Nutr 132(4suppl):806S–812SGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mora JO (2002) Iron supplementation: overcoming technical and practical barriers. J Nutr 132(4):853S–855SGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hyder SMZ, Persson LA, Chowdhury AMR, Ekström EC (2002) Do side-effects reduce compliance to iron supplementation? A study of daily- and weekly-dose regimens in pregnancy. J Health Popul Nutr 20(2):175–179Google Scholar
- 15.Hirve S, Bhave S, Bavdekar A, Naik S, Pandit A, Schauer C, Christofides A, Hyder Z, Zlotkin S (2007) Low dose “Sprinkles”—an innovative approach to treat iron deficiency anemia in infants and young children. Indian Pediatr 44:91–100Google Scholar
- 18.WO2010/040789 International patent application (2010) Iron source product in the form of capsules and process for their preparationGoogle Scholar
- 24.Aisen P, Leibman A, Zweier J (1978) Stoichiometric and site characteristics of the binding of iron to human transferrin. J Biol Chem 253(6):1930–1937Google Scholar
- 25.Conway RE, Geissler CA, Hider RC, Thompson RP, Powell JJ (2006) Serum iron curves can be used to estimate dietary iron bioavailability in humans. J Nutr 136(7):1910–1914Google Scholar
- 29.Mehansho H, Mellican RI, Hughes DL, Compton DB, Walter T (2003) Multiple micronutrient fortification technology development and evaluation: from lab to market. Food Nutr Bull 24:S111–S119Google Scholar
- 30.Mehansho H (2006) Iron fortification technology development: new approaches. J Nutr 136(4):1059–1063Google Scholar
- 32.Hurrell RF, Furniss DE, Burri J, Whittaker P, Lynch SR, Cook JD (1989) Iron fortification of infant cereals: a proposal for the use of ferrous fumarate or ferrous succinate. Am J Clin Nutr 49(6):1274–1282Google Scholar