Variation in the effects of three different breakfast meals on subjective satiety and subsequent intake of energy at lunch and evening meal
- 1.3k Downloads
To determine the relative impact of three iso-caloric breakfast meals, of variable composition, on satiety, hunger and subsequent intake of energy.
In a three-way, crossover design, 30 healthy men (age of 21.7 ± 1.2 years; BMI, 23.1 ± 2.7 kg/m2) were randomised to one of three test breakfasts, on three separate occasions, separated by 1 week. The breakfasts consisted of eggs on toast, cereal (cornflakes) with milk and toast, or a croissant and orange juice. Subjective ratings of satiety, hunger, fullness and desire to eat were recorded at 30-min intervals by electronic visual analogue scales (VAS). Energy intake was assessed by weighed food intake at an ad libitum lunch and evening meal.
Participants showed increased satiety, less hunger and a lower desire to eat after the breakfast containing eggs relative to the cereal (p < 0.02), and croissant-based meals (p < 0.0001). The egg breakfast was also accompanied by a significantly lower intake of energy relative to the croissant- and cereal-based breakfasts at the buffet lunch and evening meal, respectively, 1,284 ± 464 (egg) versus 1,442 ± 426 kcal (croissant), p = 0.03, 1,407 ± 379 (cereal) at lunch and 1,899 ± 729 (egg) versus 2,214 ± 620 kcal (cereal), p = 0.02, 2,047 ± 712 (croissant) at evening meal. The breakfast meal with the greatest effect on satiety and subsequent intake of energy was distinct in having the highest protein and lowest carbohydrate content relative to the other two breakfasts.
These findings provide evidence to support the importance of food choice at breakfast as a means of increasing satiety in the morning and reducing energy intake at lunch.
KeywordsSatiety Dietary protein Breakfast Eggs
This work was supported by a small undergraduate student project grant from the University of Surrey. Foods for the breakfasts, lunches and evening meals were purchased with the support from the British Egg Industry Council.
Conflict of interest
Juliet Gray and Bruce Griffin have acted as scientific advisors to the British Egg Information Service. The study was originally conceived and conducted at the University of Surrey as an independent undergraduate research project. The authors did not receive any payment, or external input into the study design, interpretation of results or conclusions, or any financial support, other than that described above.
- 1.Kopelman PG (2000) Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404:635–643Google Scholar
- 2.Hill A, Blundell JE (1986) Macronutrients and satiety: the effects of a high-protein or high-carbohydrate meal on subjective motivation to eat and food preferences. Nutr Behav 3:133–144Google Scholar
- 3.de Graaf C, Hulshof T, Weststrate JA, Jas P (1992) Short-term effects of different amounts of protein, fats and carbohydrates on satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 55:33–38Google Scholar
- 4.Lang V, Bellisle F, Oppert J, Craplet C, Bornet FRJ, Slama G, Guy-Grand B (1998) Satiating effect of proteins in healthy subjects: a comparison of egg albumin, casein, gelatin, soy protein, pea protein, and wheat gluten. Am J Clin Nutr 67:1197–1204Google Scholar
- 5.Paddon-Jones D, Westman E, Mattes RD, Wolfe RR, Astrup A, Westerterp-Plantenga M (2008) Protein, weight management and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 87:1558S–1561SGoogle Scholar
- 7.Holt SH, Miller JC, Petocz P, Farmakalidis E (1995) A satiety index of common foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 49:675–690Google Scholar
- 9.Van der Wal JS, Marth JM, Khosla P, Jen KC, Dhurandhar NV (2005) Short term effect of eggs on satiety in overweight and obese subjects. J Am Coll Nutr 24:510–515Google Scholar
- 13.Stubbs RJ, Hughes DA, Johnstone AM, Rowley E, Reid C, Elia M, Stratton R, Delargy H, King JE, Blundell JE (2000) The use of visual analogue scales to assess motivation to eat in human subjects: a review of their reliability and validity with an evaluation of new hand-held computerized systems for temporal tracking of appetite ratings. Br J Nutr 84:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Atkinson KE (1989) An introduction to numerical analysis, 2nd ed, Wiley, New York, ISBN: 978-0-471-50023-0Google Scholar
- 17.McCance RA, Widdowson EM (2007) McCance and Widdowson’s the composition of foods, sixth summary edition. RSC publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 18.Department of Health (DoH) (2008) 41 Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom, Eighteenth Impression. TSO publishing, NorwichGoogle Scholar
- 19.Goldberg GR, Black AE (1998) Assessment of the validity of reported energy intakes—review and recent developments. Scand J Nutr 42:6–9Google Scholar
- 20.Goris AHC, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR (2000) Under-eating and under-recording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective under-reporting of fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 71:130–134Google Scholar
- 22.Veldhorst MA, Nieuwenhuizen AG, Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Westerterp KR, Engelen MP, Brummer RJ, Deutz NE, Westerterp-Plantenga MS (2009) Comparison of the effects of a high- and normal-casein breakfast on satiety, ‘satiety’ hormones, plasma amino acids and subsequent energy intake. Br J Nutr 101:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.de Graaf C, Hulshof T, Weststrate JA, Jas P (1992) Short-term effects of different amounts of protein, fats and carbohydrates on satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 55:33–38Google Scholar
- 24.Raben A, Agerholm-Larsen L, Flint A, Holst JJ, Astrup A (2003) Meals with similar energy densities but rich in protein, fat, carbohydrate, or alcohol have different effects on energy expenditure and substrate metabolism but not on appetite and energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 77:91–100Google Scholar
- 26.Anderson GH, Moore SE (2004) Dietary proteins in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans. J Nutr 134:974S–979SGoogle Scholar
- 31.Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report of the panel on dietary reference values of the committee on medical aspects of food policy (1991) Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond) 41:1–210Google Scholar
- 33.Livingstone BE, Robson PJ, Welch RW, Burns AA, Burrow MS, McCormack C (2000) Methodological issues in the assessment of satiety. Scand J Nutr 44:98–103Google Scholar