A legume-based hypocaloric diet reduces proinflammatory status and improves metabolic features in overweight/obese subjects
The nutritional composition of the dietary intake could produce specific effects on metabolic variables and inflammatory marker concentrations. This study assessed the effects of two hypocaloric diets (legume-restricted- vs. legume-based diet) on metabolic and inflammatory changes, accompanying weight loss.
Thirty obese subjects (17 M/13F; BMI: 32.5 ± 4.5 kg/m2; 36 ± 8 years) were randomly assigned to one of the following hypocaloric treatments (8 weeks): Calorie-restricted legume-free diet (Control: C-diet) or calorie-restricted legume-based diet (L-diet), prescribing 4 weekly different cooked-servings (160–235 g) of lentils, chickpeas, peas or beans. Body composition, blood pressure (BP), blood biochemical and inflammatory marker concentrations as well as dietary intake were measured at baseline and after the nutritional intervention.
The L-diet achieved a greater body weight loss, when compared to the C-diet (−7.8 ± 2.9% vs. −5.3 ± 2.7%; p = 0.024). Total and LDL cholesterol levels and systolic BP were improved only when consuming the L-diet (p < 0.05). L-diet also resulted in a significant higher reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) and complement C3 (C3) concentrations (p < 0.05), compared to baseline and C-diet values. Interestingly, the reduction in the concentrations of CRP and C3 remained significantly higher to L-diet group, after adjusting by weight loss (p < 0.05). In addition, the reduction (%) in CRP concentrations was positively associated with decreases (%) in systolic BP and total cholesterol concentration specifically in the L-diet group, independent from weight loss (p < 0.05).
The consumption of legumes (4 servings/week) within a hypocaloric diet resulted in a specific reduction in proinflammatory markers, such as CRP and C3 and a clinically significant improvement of some metabolic features (lipid profile and BP) in overweight/ obese subjects, which were in some cases independent from weight loss.
KeywordsLegumes Hypocaloric diet Weight loss Inflammation C-reactive protein Complement C3
We wish to thank our physician (Blanca E. Martínez de Morentin), our nurse (Salomé Pérez) and our technicians (Ana Lorente and Verónica Ciaurriz), for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by Línea Especial about Nutrition, Obesity and Health (University of Navarra LE/97) and by Health Department of the Government of Navarra (22/2007). The Capes Foundation-Ministry of Education of Brazil also provided research grant to H. H. M. Hermsdorff (no 3756/05-0).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
- 3.Zulet MA, Puchau B, Navarro C, Marti A, Martínez JA (2007) Inflammatory biomarkers: the link between obesity and associated pathologies. Nutr Hosp 22:511–527Google Scholar
- 4.Hermsdorff HHM, Monteiro JB (2004) Visceral, subcutaneous or intramuscular fat: where is the problem? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 48:803–811Google Scholar
- 8.Hermsdorff HHM, Zulet MA, Bressan J, Martínez-González MA, Martínez JA (2009) Impact of caloric restriction and Mediterranean food-based diets on inflammation accompanying obesity and metabolic syndrome features. Obe Metab 5:69–77Google Scholar
- 9.Bazzano LA, Thompson AM, Tees MT, Nguyen CH, Winham DM (2009) Non-soy legume consumption lowers cholesterol levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.08.012
- 11.Zulet MA, Martínez JA (2001) Mediterranean diet: legumes and cholesterolemia. Rev Chil Nutr 28:312–320Google Scholar
- 13.Papanikolaou Y, Fulgoni VL 3rd (2008) Bean consumption is associated with greater nutrient intake, reduced systolic blood pressure, lower body weight, and a smaller waist circumference in adults: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2002. J Am Coll Nutr 27:569–576Google Scholar
- 19.WHO (2000) World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep 894:1–253Google Scholar
- 20.Aranceta J (2001) Spanish food patterns. Public Health Nutr 4:1399–1402Google Scholar
- 21.Dapcich V, Salvador-Castell G, Ribas-Barba L, Pérez-Rodrigo C, Aranceta J, Serra-Majem L (2004) Guía de la alimentación saludable. SENC. Sociedad Española de Nutrición Comunitaria, Madrid. [Guide for a health diet]Google Scholar
- 24.Pérez S, Parra MD, Martínez de Morentin B, Rodríguez MC, Martínez JA (2005) Evaluación de la variabilidad intraindividual de la medida de composición corporal mediante bioimpedancia en voluntarias sanas y su relación con el índice de masa corporal y el pliegue tricipital. Enferm Clin 15:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Gibson R (2005) Principles of nutritional assessment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18:499–502Google Scholar
- 30.Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM (2008) OpenEpi source epidemiology statistics for public health, version 2.3. www.OpenEpi.com, update 2008/20/05
- 38.Ma Y, Griffith JA, Chasan-Taber L et al (2006) Association between dietary fiber and serum C-reactive protein. Am J Clin Nutr 83:760–766Google Scholar
- 40.Bo S, Durazzo M, Guidi S et al (2006) Dietary magnesium and fiber intakes and inflammatory and metabolic indicators in middle-aged subjects from a population-based cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 84:1062–1069Google Scholar
- 41.Song Y, Li TY, van Dam RM, Manson JE, Hu FB (2007) Magnesium intake and plasma concentrations of markers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in women. Am J Clin Nutr 85:1068–1074Google Scholar