Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from human faeces
- 1.6k Downloads
The possibility of using microbes to maintain health, and to prevent or treat disease is a topic as old as microbiology. The research of novel probiotic strains is important in order to satisfy the increasing request of the market and to obtain functional products in which the probiotic cultures are more active and with better probiotic characteristics than those already present on the market.
Aim of the study
In this study, the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Italian elderly human faeces was investigated.
The Lactobacillus strains were identified and examined for resistance to gastric acidity and bile toxicity, adhesion to HT-29 cells, antimicrobial activities, antibiotic susceptibility and plasmid profile. Survival of the strains through human intestine was examined in a 3 months human feeding trial.
Two strains, Lactobacillus rhamnosus IMC 501 and Lactobacillus paracasei IMC 502, tolerated well low pH and bile acids. In antimicrobial activity assays, both strains showed inhibitory properties towards selected potential harmful microorganisms, particularly against Candida albicans. The two selected strains expressed high in vitro adherence to HT-29 cells increasing this characteristic when they are used in combination and they were resistant to vamcomycin, colistin sulphate, gentamicin, oxolinic acid and kanamycin. Moreover, the two strains could be recovered from stools of volunteers after the feeding trials.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus IMC 501 and L. paracasei IMC 502 present favourable strain-specific properties for their utilisation as probiotics in functional foods and the high adhesion ability of the L. rhamnosus IMC 501 and L. paracasei IMC 502 used in combination, confirmed by both in vitro and in vivo study, indicate that the two bacterial strains could be used as health-promoting bacteria.
KeywordsLactobacillus rhamnosus Lactobacillus paracasei Probiotics Adhesion Probiotic combination Human study
- 1.Adlerberth I, Ahrne S, Johansson ML, Molin G, Hanson LA, Wold AE (1996) A mannose specific adherence mechanism in Lactobacillus plantarum conferring binding to the human colonic cell line HT-29. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2244–2251Google Scholar
- 3.Alander M, Satokari R, Korpela R, Saxelin M, Vilpponen-Salmela T, Mattila-Sandholm T, von Wright A (1999) Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after oral consumption. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:351–354Google Scholar
- 5.Anderson DG, McKay LL (1983) Simple and rapid method for isolating large plasmid DNA from lactic streptococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:549–552Google Scholar
- 8.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turk M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 45:493–496Google Scholar
- 9.Bernet-Carnard MF, Lievin V, Brassart D, Neeser JR, Servin AL, Hudault S (1997) The human L. acidophilus strain LA1 secretes a non bacteriocin anti-bacterial substance(s) active in vitro and in vivo. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2747–2753Google Scholar
- 11.Blum S, Reniero R (2000) Adhesion of selected Lactobacillus strains to enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells in vitro: a critical evaluation of reliability of in vitro adhesion assays. In: 4th work-shop, demonstration of nutritional functionality of probiotic foods. Rovaniemi, 25–28 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
- 12.Chan RC, Reid G, Irvin RT, Bruce AW, Costerton JR (1985) Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments. Infect Immun 47:84–89Google Scholar
- 15.Cummings JH, Antoine J-M, Azpiroz F, Bourdet-Sicard R, Brandtzaeg P, Calder PC, Gibson GR, Guarner F, Isolauri E, Pannemans D, Shortt C, Tuijtelaars S, Watzl B (2004) Passclaim—gut health and immunity. Eur J Nutr [Suppl 2] 43:II/118-II/173Google Scholar
- 16.Fang W, Shi M, Huang L, Wang Y (1996) Antagonism of lactic acid bacteria towards Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on agar plates and in milk. Vet Res 27:3–12Google Scholar
- 17.FAO/WHO (2001) Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation, CordobaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hudault S, Lievin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Servin A (1997) Antagonistic activity exerted in vitro and in vivo by Lactobacillus casei (strain GG) against Salmonella typhimurium C5 infection. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:13–518Google Scholar
- 24.Jacobsen CN, Rosenfeldt Nielsen V, Hayford AE, Møller PL, Michaelsen KF, Pærregaard A, Sandstrom B, Tvede M, Jakobsen M (1999) Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4949–4956Google Scholar
- 25.Kimura K, McCartney AL, McConnell MA, Tannock GW (1997) Analysis of fecal populations of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and investigation of the immunological responses of their human hosts to the predominant strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(9):3394–3398Google Scholar
- 27.Klein G, Hallmann C, Casas IA, Abad J, Louwers J, Reuter G (2000) Exclusion of vanA, vanB and vanC type glycopeptide resistance in strains of Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus rhamnosus used as probiotics by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization methods. J Appl Microbiol 89:815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ljung A, Wadström T (2006) Lactic acid bacteria as probiotic. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 7:73–90Google Scholar
- 29.McCartney AL, Wenzhi W, Tannock GW (1996) Molecular analysis of the composition of the bifidobacterial and lactobacillus microflora of humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(12):4608–4613Google Scholar
- 30.Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, Cresci A, Silvi S, Orpianesi C, Verdenelli MC, Clavel T, Koebnick C, Zunft HJ, Doré J, Blaut M (2006) Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(2):1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.NCCLS Standard (1997) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for anaerobic bacteria. Approved Standard-Fourth edition document, vol. 11, no. 17Google Scholar
- 33.Reid G, Bruce AW, McGroarty JA, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW (1990) Is there a role of lactobacilli in prevention of urogenital and intestinal infection? Clin Microbiol Rev 3:335–344Google Scholar
- 34.Rolfe RD (2000) The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. J Nutr 130:396S–402SGoogle Scholar
- 38.Silvi S, Verdenelli MC, Orpianesi C, Cresci A (2003) EU project Crownalife: functional foods, gut microflora and healthy ageing. Isolation and identification of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains from faecal samples of elderly subjects for a possible probiotic use in functional foods. J Food Engin 56:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res 18: 6531-65-35Google Scholar
- 43.Woodford N, Johnson AP, Morrison D, Speller DCE (1995) Current perspective on glycopeptide resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:585–615Google Scholar