Health-promoting substances and heavy metal content in tomatoes grown with different farming techniques
- 680 Downloads
Organic farming is a production technique that imposes major restrictions on the use of fertilizers, pesticides, feed additives and veterinary drugs and for this reason consumers perceive organic foods to be healthier. The content of health-promoting molecules such as ascorbic acid, β-carotene, lycopene and salicylic acid are important aspects of the nutritional quality of organic foods.
To evaluate health promoting substances and the heavy metal content of tomato berries grown using conventional, integrated pest management (IPM) and organic farming techniques.
Moisture was determined by drying, crude protein by the Kjeldhal method, and ashes by incineration at 550°C. Ergosterol, ascorbic acid, β-carotene, lycopene and salicylic acid were determined by HPLC. The levels of heavy metals were measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
Compared to crops grown using conventional and IPM methods, organic tomatoes contained more salicylic acid but less vitamin C and lycopene. Organic tomatoes had higher Cd and Pb levels but a lower Cu content. Organic fruits had a slightly higher protein content than conventionally cultivated fruits, but the difference was minimal and consequently the nutritive significance was poor.
Farming techniques may have an impact on the quality of tomatoes. Their higher salicylate content supports the notion that organic foodstuffs are more wholesome. However, the lower lycopene and ascorbic acid levels of organic tomatoes are not to be regarded as positive. No residues of pesticides and ergosterol were detected.
Keywordsorganic farming lycopene tomato quality salycilic acid
This study was partially funded by Università Cattolica, Line D.1. Thanks are due to Prof. Salvatore Ciappellano for his helpful discussion of the results.
- 1.Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) (1991) Aliments des animaux: determination de la teneur en ergosterol, Paris, France, French Standard NF V 18-112Google Scholar
- 2.AOAC International (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. AOAC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Auclair L, Zee JA, Karam A, Rochat E (1995) Valeur nutritive qualité organoleptique et productivité des tomatoes de serre en function de leur mode de production: biologique-conventionel-hydroponique. Sci Aliments 15:511–528Google Scholar
- 6.Beigel R, Matetzky S, Fefer P, Dvir D, Hod H (2007) Aspirin-issues in daily practice: an update. Isr Med Assoc J 9:221–226Google Scholar
- 8.Caris-Veyrat C, Amiot MJ, Tyssandier V, Grasselly D, Buret M, Mikolajczak M, Guilland JC, Bouteloup-Demange C, Borel P (2004) Influence of organic versus conventional agricultural practice on the antioxidant microconstituent content of tomatoes and derived pureed; consequences on antioxidant plasma status in humans. J Agric Food Chem 52:6503–6509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Carnovale E (1999) La qualità nutrizionale dei prodotti dell’agricoltura biologica. Italus Hortus 6:41–44Google Scholar
- 13.Fjelkner-Modig S, Bengtsson H, Stegmark R, Nyström S (2000) The influence of organic and integrated production on nutritional sensory and agricultural aspects of vegetable raw materials for food production. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Plant Soil Sci 50:102–113Google Scholar
- 14.Food Standard Agency (2006) Survey of metals and other elements in offal and offal products. Food Survey Information Sheet no. 14/06, London, p 11Google Scholar
- 17.Hennekens CH (2002) Update on aspirin in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Manag Care 8(suppl):S691–S700Google Scholar
- 21.Kopp HJ, Paduch KD, Gierschner K (1989) Qualitätsuntersuchungen an Gemüse aus konventionellem und alternativem Anbau. In: Berichtsband XXIV. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Qualitätforschung, Vortragstagung, pp 102–125Google Scholar
- 22.Kucuk O, Srkar FH, Djuric Z, Sakr W, Pollak MN, Khachik F, Banerjee M, Bertram JS, Wood DP Jr (2002) Effects of lycopene supplementation in patients with localized prostate cancer. Exp Biol Med 227:881–885Google Scholar
- 23.Lucarini M, Carbonaro M, Nicoli S, Aguzzi A, Cappelloni M, Ruggeri S, Di Lullo G, Gambelli L, Carnovale E (1999) Endogenous markers for organic versus conventional plant products. In: Hagg M, Ahnenainen R, Evers AM, Tiilikkala K (eds) Agrifood quality II: Quality managements of fruits and vegetables. Special publication no. 229, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 306–310Google Scholar
- 25.Schwadorf K, Mueller HM (1989) Determination of ergosterol in cereals, mixed feed components and mixed feeds by liquid chromatography. J AOAC 72:457–462Google Scholar
- 27.Swain AR, Dutton SP, Truswell AS (1985) Salicylates in foods. J Am Diet Assoc 85:950–960Google Scholar
- 31.Worthington V (1998) Effect of agricultural methods on nutritional quality: a comparison of organic with conventional crops. Altern Ther Health Med 4:58–69Google Scholar