Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 511–521 | Cite as

Features of the Achilles tendon, paratenon, and enthesis in inflammatory rheumatic diseases

A clinical and ultrasonographic study
  • H. HarmanEmail author
  • E. Süleyman
Originalie
  • 239 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

We analyzed the ultrasonographic (US) features of the Achilles tendon (AT), paratenon (AP), and enthesis in patients with axial spondyloarthropathies (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compared these to healthy subjects. Relationships between these findings and clinical and functional parameters were identified.

Methods

The study included 40 axial SpA and 27 RA patients, as well as 30 healthy subjects. Clinical evaluation relied on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), AS Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL), Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), as well as on a visual analog scale (VAS) for entheseal pain and the Madrid Sonographic Enthesistis Index (MASEI). Separately, AT thickness, AP thickness, and echogenicity were examined bilaterally with US in 194 ankle regions.

Results

The fibrillar pattern of the AT was damaged in axial SpA patients compared to RA patients and healthy subjects (p < 0.001). The AT was thicker in axial SpA patients than in RA patients and healthy subjects (p < 0.05). The AP was thicker in axial SpA patients (p < 0.05). There were positive correlations of BASDAI and BASFI scores with the Achilles enthesitis total score (r = 0.523, p = 0.001 and r = 0.533, p = 0.001, respectively). In the multiple linear regression model, only age continued to show an effect on the Achilles enthesitis total scores in axial SpA patients (B = 0.091, β = 0.417, p = 0.011). The AT thickness was consistently positively correlated with height in axial SpA patients (B = 0.059, β = 0.482, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

The AT thickness was affected much more by the height of patients with axial SpA in comparison to RA patients and healthy subjects. Age was an independent factor for high Achilles enthesitis scores only in axial SpA.

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis Spondyloarthropathies Pain Ultrasonography 

Merkmale der Achillessehne, des Sehnengleitgewebes und des Sehnenansatzes bei entzündlichen rheumatischen Erkrankungen

Eine klinische und sonographische Studie

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Die Merkmale der Achillessehne („Achilles tendon“, AT), des Sehnengleitgewebes („Achilles paratenon“, AP) und der Sehnenansätze im Ultraschall (US) bei Patienten mit axialer Spondylarthropathie (SpA) und rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) wurden untersucht und mit gesunden Kontrollen verglichen. Dann wurden Zusammenhänge zwischen diesen Befunden und klinischen sowie funktionellen Parametern ermittelt.

Methoden

Die Studie umfasste 40 Patienten mit axialer SpA und 27 RA-Patienten sowie 30 gesunde Kontrollen. Die klinische Untersuchung basierte auf dem Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), AS Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL), Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) und dem Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) sowie auf einer Visuellen Analogskala (VAS) für Schmerzen der Sehnenansätze und dem Madrid Sonographic Enthesistis Index (MASEI). Darüber hinaus wurden AT-Dicke, AP-Dicke und Echogenität bilateral mit US im Bereich von 194 Sprunggelenken untersucht.

Ergebnisse

Das fibrilläre Muster der AT war bei Patienten mit axialer SpA im Vergleich zu RA-Patienten und gesunden Kontrollen gestört (p < 0,001). Die AT war bei Patienten mit axialer SpA dicker als bei RA-Patienten und gesunden Kontrollen (p < 0,05). Auch die AP war dicker bei axialer SpA (p < 0,05). Es bestanden positive Korrelationen des BASDAI- und BASFI-Scores mit dem Gesamtwert für Achilles-Enthesitis (r = 0,523; p = 0,001 bzw. r = 0,533; p = 0,001). Im Modell der multiplen linearen Regression wies nur das Alter kontinuierlich einen Einfluss auf den Gesamtwert für Achilles-Enthesitis bei Patienten mit axialer SpA auf (B = 0,091; β = 0,417; p = 0,011). Die AT-Dicke war durchgehend positiv mit der Körpergröße bei Patienten mit axialer SpA korreliert (B = 0,059; β = 0,482; p = 0,004).

Schlussfolgerung

Die AT-Dicke war im Vergleich zu RA-Patienten und gesunden Kontrollen deutlicher von der Körpergröße der Patienten mit axialer SpA beeinflusst. Alter war nur bei axialer SpA ein unabhängiger Faktor für hohe Achilles-Enthesitis-Scores.

Schlüsselwörter

Rheumatoide Arthritis Spondylarthropathien Schmerz Ultraschall 

Notes

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

H. Harman and E. Süleyman declare that they have no competing interests.

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the independent ethics committee of Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine. All patients signed informed consent to participate in the study, and for the collection and publication of the data.

References

  1. 1.
    Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64:375–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed IM, Lagopoulos M, McConnell P, Soames RW, Sefton GK (1998) Blood supply of the Achilles tendon. J Orthop Res 16(5):591–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Pastorino C, Bertolotto M, Silvestri E (1993) Analysis of echotexture of tendons with US. Radiology 186(3):839–843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aström M, Rausing A (1995) Chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A survey of surgical and histopathologic findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jul(316):151–164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leung JL, Griffith JF (2008) Sonography of chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a case-control study. J Clin Ultrasound 36(1):27–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stecco A, Busoni F, Stecco C et al (2015) Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the Achilles paratenon in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: an imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat 37(3):281–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suzuki T, Ishihara K (2011) Achilles paratendonitis as the initial manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 21(2):219–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiris A, Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E (2006) Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis  by  power Doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol 35(7):522–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta FM, Modesti M, Scarno A, Valesini G (2011) Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50(11):2080–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Expósito Molinero MR, de Miguel Mendieta E (2016) Discriminant validity study of Achilles enthesis ultrasound. Reumatol Clin 12(4):206–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R et al (2009) The development of Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):777–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neogi T, Aletaha D, Silman AJ et al (2010) The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum 62:2582–2591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2286–2291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doward LC, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA et al (2003) Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:20–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wells G, Becker JC, Teng J et al (2009) Validation of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria based on C‑reactive protein against disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and comparison with the DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):954–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen JD, Dougados M, Goupille P et al (2006) Health assessment questionnaire score is the best predictor of 5‑year quality of life in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 33:1936–1941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Miguel E, Cobo T, Muñoz-Fernández S et al (2009) Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 68:169–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koivunen-Niemelä T, Parkkola K (1995) Anatomy of the Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) with respect to tendon thickness measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 17(3):263–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turan A, Tufan A, Mercan R et al (2013) Real-time sonoelastography of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 42(8):1113–1118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rezvani A, Bodur H, Ataman S et al (2014) Correlations among enthesitis, clinical, radiographic and quality of life parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Mod Rheumatol 24(4):651–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sivas F, Mermerci Başkan B, Erkol Inal E, Akbulut Aktekin L, Barça N, Ozoran K, Bodur H (2009) The relationship between enthesitis indices and disease activity parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 28(3):259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M (2003) Assessment of peripheral enthesitis inthe spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with  power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 48(2):523–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Miguel E, Muñoz-Fernández S, Castillo C, Cobo-Ibáñez T, Martín-Mola E (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of enthesis ultrasound in the diagnosis of early spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 70(3):434–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Falcao S, Castillo-Gallego C, Peiteado D, Branco J, Martín Mola E, de Miguel E (2015) Can we use enthesis ultrasound as an outcome measure of disease activity in spondyloarthritis? A study at the Achilles level. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54(9):1557–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alcalde M, Acebes JC, Cruz M, González-Hombrado L, Herrero-Beaumont G, Sánchez-Pernaute O (2007) A sonographic enthesitic index of lower limbs is a valuable tool in the assessment ofankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 66(8):1015–1019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamdi W, Chelli-Bouaziz M, Ahmed MS, Ghannouchi MM, Kaffel D, Ladeb MF, Kchir MM (2011) Correlations among clinical, radiographic, and sonographic  scores  for enthesitis  in ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine 78(3):270–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Filippucci E et al (2010) Monitoring Achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-alpha antagonisttherapy: an  ultrasound study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49(3):578–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tan SC, Chan O (2008) Achilles and patellar tendinopathy: current understanding of pathophysiology and management. Disabil Rehabil 30:1608–1615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carmont MR, Highland AM, Rochester JR, Paling EM, Davies MB (2011) An anatomical study of the fascia cruris and paratatenon of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Surg 17:186–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harris CA, Peduto AJ (2006) Achilles tendon imaging. Australas Radiol 50:513–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR (2010) MRI of the Achilles tendon: a comprehensive review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and imaging of overuse tendinopathies. Acta Radiol 51:438–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perry M, Tillett E, Mitchell S, Maffulli N, Morrissey D (2012) The morphology  and symptom history of the Achilles tendons of figure skaters: an observational study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2(2):108–114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jhingan S, Perry M, O’Driscoll G et al (2011) Thicker Achilles tendons area risk factor to develop Achilles tendinopathy in elite professional soccer players. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 1(2):51–56PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stecco C, Cappellari A, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Morra A, Berizzi A, De Caro R (2014) The paratendineous tissues: an anatomical study of their role in the pathogenesis of tendinopathy. Surg Radiol Anat 36(6):561–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mienaltowski MJ, Adams SM, Birk DE (2014) Tendon proper- and peritenon-derived progenitor cells have  unique  tenogenic properties. Stem Cell Res Ther 5(4):86–88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine Department of Pysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, RheumatologySakarya UniversitySakaryaTurkey

Personalised recommendations