Aortic annulus sizing in stenotic bicommissural non-raphe-type bicuspid aortic valves: reconstructing a three-dimensional structure using only two hinge points
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy is becoming an increasingly frequently encountered challenge in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Bicommissural non-raphe-type BAV (Sievers and Schmidtke Type 0) is composed morphologically of two aortic cusps with no raphe and is less common than the tricommissural or bicommissural raphe-type configurations. Precise annular sizing is a key step for successful TAVI in BAV. The challenge in bicommissural non-raphe-type BAV is that a three-dimensional structure has to be reconstructed using only two anatomical hinge points. For this reason, available software are limited when it comes to bicommissural non-raphe-type BAV. We propose that manual assessment of the aortic root in bicommissural non-raphe-type BAV using multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) software can be performed successfully by aligning the two available hinge points and measuring the smallest identifiable annular dimensions in the transverse plane (Fig. 1). We identified 12 patients with bicommissural non-raphe-type BAV undergoing TAVI between January 2013 and December 2017 in our high-volume institution. Our novel sizing strategy was employed prospectively in three patients—with good clinical outcomes—and evaluated retrospectively in the remainder (Table 1). No patient suffered a central major vascular complication or required new permanent pacemaker implantation. Device success occurred in all patients except one (post-procedural echocardiographic transvalvular gradient of 23 mmHg). In the retrospectively assessed cases, the novel annulus measure was concordant with the implanted THV size in 7 out of 9 procedures and, importantly, did not overestimate the annulus dimensions in any case. Furthermore, in two balloon-expandable THV cases the new measure may, in retrospect, have prompted consideration of a smaller implant size. To be noted, balloon sizing of the aortic annulus has additional value when selecting the valve size in BAV anatomy. Further prospective validation of this novel MDCT sizing technique is required.
KeywordsTranscatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI Aortic annulus sizing Bicuspid aortic valve Computed tomography
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
AHF is a proctor and medical consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. AMK is a proctor and medical consultant for and receives research support from Edwards Lifesciences. SB is a proctor and medical consultant for Medtronic. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Supplementary material 1 (MOV 28772 KB)
Supplementary material 2 (MOV 23224 KB)
- 13.Kochman J, Huczek Z, Scislo P, Dabrowski M, Chmielak Z, Szymanski P et al (2014) Comparison of one- and 12-month outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (results from a multicenter registry). Am J Cardiol 114(5):757–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bauer T, Linke A, Sievert H, Kahlert P, Hambrecht R, Nickenig G et al (2014) Comparison of the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (from the German TAVI Registry). Am J Cardiol 113(3):518–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Thyregod HG, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P et al (2015) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers NOTION randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(20):2184–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Ribeiro HB, Webb JG, Makkar RR, Cohen MG, Kapadia SR, Kodali S et al (2013) Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(17):1552–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Cerillo AG, Mariani M, Berti S, Glauber M (2012) Sizing the aortic annulus. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(2):245–256Google Scholar
- 44.Philip F, Faza NN, Schoenhagen P, Desai MY, Tuzcu EM, Svensson LG et al (2015) Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86(2):E88–E98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, Calhoon JH, Desai MY, Kaul S et al (2017) 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(10):1313–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Frangieh AH, Ott I, Michel J, Shivaraju A, Joner M, Mayr NP et al (2017) Standardized minimalistic transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the SAPIEN 3 device: stepwise description, feasibility and safety from a large consecutive single-center single- operator cohort. Struct Heart 1:000–000CrossRefGoogle Scholar