Drop-out from cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a randomized controlled trial of ST-elevation myocardial infarction does not cause selection bias on endpoints
- 108 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Background
The extent of selection bias due to drop-out in clinical trials of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) as surrogate endpoints is unknown. We sought to interrogate the characteristics and prognosis of patients who dropped out before acute CMR assessment compared to CMR-participants in a previously published double-blinded, placebo-controlled all-comer trial with CMR outcome as the primary endpoint.
Methods
Baseline characteristics and composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, heart failure and re-infarction after 30 days and 5 years of follow-up were assessed and compared between CMR-drop-outs and CMR-participants using the trial screening log and the Eastern Danish Heart Registry.
Results
The drop-out rate from acute CMR was 28% (n = 92). These patients had a significantly worse clinical risk profile upon admission as evaluated by the TIMI-risk score (3.7 (± 2.1) vs 4.0 (± 2.6), p = 0.043) and by left ventricular ejection fraction (43 (± 9) vs. 47 (± 10), p = 0.029). CMR drop-outs had a higher incidence of known hypertension (39% vs. 35%, p = 0.043), known diabetes (14% vs. 7%, p = 0.025), known cardiac disease (11% vs. 3%, p = 0.013) and known renal function disease (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). However, the 30-day and 5-years composite endpoint rate was not significantly higher among the CMR drop-out ((HR 1.43 (95%-CI 0.5; 3.97) (p = 0.5)) and (HR 1.31 (95%-CI 0.84; 2.05) (p = 0.24)).
Conclusion
CMR-drop-outs had a higher incidence of cardiovascular risk factors at baseline, a worse clinical risk profile upon admission. However, no significant difference was observed in the clinical endpoints between the groups.
Keywords
Leave Ventricular Ejection Fraction Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Charlson Comorbidity Index Exenatide Composite EndpointNotes
Compliance with ethical standards
Funding
All expenses for this study were paid by The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Eitel I, de WS, Wohrle J, Fuernau G, Lurz P, Pauschinger M et al (2014) Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(12): 1217–1226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Lonborg J, Vejlstrup N, Kelbaek H, Holmvang L, Jorgensen E, Helqvist S et al (2013) Final infarct size measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction predicts long-term clinical outcome: an observational study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(4):387–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kelbaek H, Terkelsen CJ, Helqvist S, Lassen JF, Clemmensen P, Klovgaard L et al (2008) Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(9):899–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kelbaek H, Engstrom T, Ahtarovski KA, Lonborg J, Vejlstrup N, Pedersen F et al (2013) Deferred stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study. EuroIntervention 8(10): 1126–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Erlinge D, Gotberg M, Lang I, Holzer M, Noc M, Clemmensen P et al (2014) Rapid endovascular catheter core cooling combined with cold saline as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The CHILL-MI trial: a randomized controlled study of the use of central venous catheter core cooling combined with cold saline as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(18): 1857–1865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Heusch G (2013) Cardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinic. Lancet 381(9861):166–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kim HW, Farzaneh-Far A, Kim RJ (2009) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(1):1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Perazzolo MM, Lima JA, Iliceto S (2011) MRI in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 32(3):284–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Desch S, Stiermaier T, de WS, Lurz P, Gutberlet M, Sandri M et al (2016) Thrombus aspiration in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late after symptom onset. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(2): 113–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ibanez B, Macaya C, Sanchez-Brunete V, Pizarro G, Fernandez-Friera L, Mateos A et al (2013) Effect of early metoprolol on infarct size in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) trial. Circulation 128(14): 1495–1503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.McCann GP, Khan JN, Greenwood JP, Nazir S, Dalby M, Curzen N et al (2015) Complete versus lesion-only primary PCI: the randomized cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(24): 2713–2724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Roolvink V, Ibanez B, Ottervanger JP, Pizarro G, van RN, Mateos A et al (2016) Early administration of intravenous Beta blockers in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction before primary PCI. J Am Coll CardiolGoogle Scholar
- 13.White SK, Frohlich GM, Sado DM, Maestrini V, Fontana M, Treibel TA et al (2015) Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8 (1 Pt B):178–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lonborg J, Vejlstrup N, Kelbaek H, Botker HE, Kim WY, Mathiasen AB et al (2012) Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33(12):1491–1499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hackel DB, Reimer KA, Ideker RE, Mikat EM, Hartwell TD, Parker CB et al (1984) Comparison of enzymatic and anatomic estimates of myocardial infarct size in man. Circulation 70(5):824–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Chia S, Senatore F, Raffel OC, Lee H, Wackers FJ, Jang IK (2008) Utility of cardiac biomarkers in predicting infarct size, left ventricular function, and clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(4):415–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, Cairns R, Murphy SA, de Lemos JA et al (2000) TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation 102(17): 2031–2037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Von KM, Wagner EH, Saunders K (1992) A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 45(2):197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, de Smet BJ, van den Heuvel AF et al (2008) Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 358(6): 557–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M et al (2013) Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369(17): 1587–1597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kelbaek H, Hofsten DE, Kober L, Helqvist S, Klovgaard L, Holmvang L et al (2016) Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10034): 2199–2206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Frenkel WJ, Jongerius EJ, Mandjes-van Uitert MJ, van Munster BC, De Rooij SE (2014) Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in acutely hospitalized elderly adults: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(2):342–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tu JV, Austin PC, Walld R, Roos L, Agras J, McDonald KM (2001) Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(4): 992–997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG et al (2009) Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 338:b2393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Pedersen F, Butrymovich V, Kelbaek H, Wachtell K, Helqvist S, Kastrup J et al (2014) Short- and long-term cause of death in patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(20): 2101–2108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar