Clinical Research in Cardiology

, Volume 103, Issue 8, pp 665–673 | Cite as

Registry in Germany focusing on level-specific and evidence-based decision finding in the treatment of heart failure: REFLECT-HF

  • Ulrich Tebbe
  • Carsten Tschöpe
  • Jost Henner Wirtz
  • Jan Lokies
  • Eva Turgonyi
  • Peter Bramlage
  • Anke M. Strunz
  • Katharina Lins
  • Michael Böhm
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

In Germany, care for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) is provided by hospital-based cardiologists (HBC), office-based cardiologists (OBC) and general practitioners (GP). We aimed to compare patient characteristics, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic decisions.

Methods

Multi-centre, cross-sectional, observational survey at 48 physicians. Patients (n = 384) were required to have previously diagnosed HF and NYHA class ≥ II and/or a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50 %. A total of 384 patients were included at 5 HBCs, 26 OBCs and 18 GPs.

Results

A mean of 18.8 % of all patients at HBCs practices had heart failure, compared to a smaller proportion of 13.9 and 6.7 % at OBCs and GPs, respectively. Echo facility was available for all HBCs and OBCs, but for 16.7 % of GPs (p < 0.0001 for trend). Patients at HBCs had a higher NYHA class (65.6 % had class III/IV; p < 0.0001) compared to 36.8 % at OBCs and 39.3 % at GPs. Usage of three guideline-recommended pharmaceutical treatments was more than 80 %: diuretics (83.1 %), renin–angiotensin system blocking agents (91.4 %) and betablockers (90.1 %) with no differences between physician groups. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs, overall 47.7 %) were more frequently prescribed by OBCs (54.7 %; p = 0.0007 for trend) than HBCs (43.8 %) and GPs (31.0 %). Ivabradin was not frequently used (11.0 % at OBCs, 4.9 % at HBCs and 0 % at GPs; p = 0.0163 for trend). The proportion of patients with CRT (8.6 %), ICD (23.5 %) and CABG (23.1 %) was not statistically different between groups.

Conclusion

REFLECT-HF demonstrates that there are some differences in evidence-based treatment decisions between the three main health services (HBC, OBC and GP) providing care for patients with HF in Germany. Advocating adherence to guideline recommendations and earlier adoption of these evidence-based treatments across all levels of care might further improve patient care.

Keywords

Heart failure General practitioners Cardiologists Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists Echocardiography Elderly 

References

  1. 1.
    Mehrhof F, Loffler M, Gelbrich G, Ozcelik C, Posch M, Hense HW, Keil U, Scheffold T et al (2010) A network against failing hearts—introducing the German “Competence Network Heart Failure”. Int J Cardiol 145:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braun V, Heintze C, Rufer V, Welke J, Stein T, Mehrhof F, Dini L (2011) Innovative strategy for implementing chronic heart failure guidelines among family physicians in different healthcare settings in Berlin. Eur J Heart Fail 13:93–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dini L, Heintze C, Welke J, Stein T, Rufer V, Braun V (2010) Are there any differences in guideline adherence to pharmacotherapy of heart failure between individual GP practices and Medical Care Centres (MCCs)? Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 104:113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumhakel M, Muller U, Bohm M (2009) Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail 11:299–303PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kasje WN, Denig P, De Graeff PA, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM (2004) Physicians’ views on joint treatment guidelines for primary and secondary care. Int J Qual Health Care 16:229–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutten FH, Grobbee DE, Hoes AW (2003) Differences between general practitioners and cardiologists in diagnosis and management of heart failure: a survey in every-day practice. Eur J Heart Fail 5:337–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mair FS, Crowley TS, Bundred PE (1996) Prevalence, aetiology and management of heart failure in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 46:77–79PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hood S, Taylor S, Roeves A, Crook AM, Tlusty P, Cohen J, Kaddoura S, Hemingway H (2000) Are there age and sex differences in the investigation and treatment of heart failure? A population-based study. Br J Gen Pract 50:559–563PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zugck C, Franke J, Gelbrich G, Frankenstein L, Scheffold T, Pankuweit S, Duengen HD, Regitz-Zagrosek V et al (2012) Implementation of pharmacotherapy guidelines in heart failure: experience from the German Competence Network Heart Failure. Clin Res Cardiol 101:263–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franke J, Zugck C, Wolter JS, Frankenstein L, Hochadel M, Ehlermann P, Winkler R, Nelles M et al (2012) A decade of developments in chronic heart failure treatment: a comparison of therapy and outcome in a secondary and tertiary hospital setting. Clin Res Cardiol 101:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 33:1787–1847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2009) National guideline chronic heart failure—Long version. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/herzinsuffizienz/pdf/nvl_hi_lang.pdf
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Ehlers APF, Götting S (2007) The accountability requirements of section 13550 of the cardiocomplex EBM. http://www.bnk.de/uploads/media/0703_262.pdf
  15. 15.
    Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (2013) Physician group EBM. http://www.kbv.de/8170.html
  16. 16.
    Schowalter M, Gelbrich G, Stork S, Langguth JP, Morbach C, Ertl G, Faller H, Angermann CE (2013) Generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: impact of depression. Clin Res Cardiol 102:269–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quittan M, Wiesinger GF, Crevenna R, Nuhr MJ, Posch M, Hulsmann M, Muller D, Pacher R et al (2001) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire for German-speaking patients. J Rehabil Med 33:182–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rutten FH, Grobbee DE, Hoes AW (2003) Diagnosis and management of heart failure: a questionnaire among general practitioners and cardiologists. Eur J Heart Fail 5:345–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mason J, Young P, Freemantle N, Hobbs R (2000) Safety and costs of initiating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for heart failure in primary care: analysis of individual patient data from studies of left ventricular dysfunction. BMJ 321:1113–1116PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clarke KW, Gray D, Hampton JR (1994) Evidence of inadequate investigation and treatment of patients with heart failure. Br Heart J 71:584–587PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Remes J, Miettinen H, Reunanen A, Pyorala K (1991) Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care. Eur Heart J 12:315–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cleland JG, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar JC, Dietz R, Eastaugh J, Follath F, Freemantle N, Gavazzi A et al (2002) Management of heart failure in primary care (the IMPROVEMENT of heart failure programme): an international survey. Lancet 360:1631–1639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jaarsma T, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Sturm H, Van Veldhuisen DJ (2005) Management of heart failure in The Netherlands. Eur J Heart Fail 7:371–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, van Veldhuisen DJ, Swedberg K, Shi H, Vincent J, Pocock SJ et al (2011) Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med 364:11–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franke J, Wolter JS, Meme L, Keppler J, Tschierschke R, Katus HA, Zugck C (2013) Optimization of pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure: is heart rate adequately addressed? Clin Res Cardiol 102:23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bohm M, Borer J, Ford I, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Komajda M, Lopez-Sendon J, Reil JC, Swedberg K et al (2013) Heart rate at baseline influences the effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure: analysis from the SHIFT study. Clin Res Cardiol 102:11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reil JC, Custodis F, Swedberg K, Komajda M, Borer JS, Ford I, Tavazzi L, Laufs U et al (2011) Heart rate reduction in cardiovascular disease and therapy. Clin Res Cardiol 100:11–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Houghton AR, Cowley AJ (1997) Why are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors underutilised in the treatment of heart failure by general practitioners? Int J Cardiol 59:7–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmed A, Centor RM, Weaver MT, Perry GJ (2005) A propensity score analysis of the impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on long-term survival of older adults with heart failure and perceived contraindications. Am Heart J 149:737–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ahmed A, Kiefe CI, Allman RM, Sims RV, DeLong JF (2002) Survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in older heart failure patients with perceived contraindications. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1659–1666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jost A, Rauch B, Hochadel M, Winkler R, Schneider S, Jacobs M, Kilkowski C, Kilkowski A et al (2005) Beta-blocker treatment of chronic systolic heart failure improves prognosis even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study. Eur Heart J 26:2689–2697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deedwania PC, Gottlieb S, Ghali JK, Waagstein F, Wikstrand JC, Group M-HS (2004) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of beta-adrenergic blockade with metoprolol CR/XL in elderly patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J 25:1300–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bosch M, Wensing M, Bakx JC, van der Weijden T, Hoes AW, Grol RP (2010) Current treatment of chronic heart failure in primary care; still room for improvement. J Eval Clin Pract 16:644–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schuchert A, Muto C, Maounis T, Frank R, Ella RO, Polauck A, Padeletti L, Mascot Study G (2013) One-year outcome after CRT implantation in NYHA class IV in comparison to NYHA class III patients. Clin Res Cardiol 102:505–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, Bittman R, Hurley S et al (2003) Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 348:1309–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J (1999) The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 341:709–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gysan DB, Albus C, Riedel R, Hossmann V, Vogt A, Latz V, Griebenow R (2012) CorBene: a new model for collaborative care of patients with congestive heart failure. Herz 37:56–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Tebbe
    • 1
  • Carsten Tschöpe
    • 2
  • Jost Henner Wirtz
    • 3
  • Jan Lokies
    • 4
  • Eva Turgonyi
    • 5
  • Peter Bramlage
    • 6
  • Anke M. Strunz
    • 7
  • Katharina Lins
    • 5
  • Michael Böhm
    • 8
  1. 1.Klinikum Lippe-Detmold, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Angiologie und IntensivmedizinDetmoldGermany
  2. 2.Medizinische Klinik II, Kardiologie und Pulmologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin FranklinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis DinslakenDinslakenGermany
  4. 4.Gemeinschaftspraxis Eickhoff LokiesBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Pfizer Ltd.TadworthUK
  6. 6.Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive MedizinMahlowGermany
  7. 7.Pfizer Pharma GmbHBerlinGermany
  8. 8.Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Innere Medizin IIIHomburg/SaarGermany

Personalised recommendations