Reperfusion therapy and mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients: results from the Belgian STEMI registry
- 347 Downloads
Treatment strategies and outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been mainly studied in middle-aged patients. With increasing lifetime expectancy, the proportion of octogenarians will substantially increase. We aimed to evaluate whether the benefit of currently recommended reperfusion strategies is maintained in octogenarians.
Reperfusion therapy and in-hospital mortality were evaluated in 1,092 octogenarians and compared with 7,984 STEMI patients <80 years old based on data from the prospective Belgian STEMI registry.
The octogenarian STEMI group had more cardiovascular comorbidities, contained more female patients and presented more frequently with cardiac failure (Killip class >1, 40 vs. 20 %) compared with their younger counterparts (all p < 0.05). Although the rate of thrombolysis was similar (9.2 vs. 9.9 %) between both groups, a conservative approach was chosen more frequently (13.8 vs. 4.7 %), while PCI was performed less frequently (76.9 vs. 85.4 %) in octogenarians (p < 0.001). Moreover, ischemic time and door-to-needle/balloon time were longer for octogenarians. In-hospital mortality for octogenarians was 17.8 vs. 5.5 % in the younger group [adjusted OR 2.43(1.92–3.08)]. In haemodynamically stable octogenarians, PCI seemed to improve outcome compared with thrombolysis or conservative treatment (5.7 vs. 12.7 vs. 8.5 %, p = 0.09). In octogenarians with cardiac failure, in-hospital mortality was extremely high independent of the chosen reperfusion therapy (34.6 vs. 31.6 vs. 36.3 %, p = 0.88).
In-hospital mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients was high and related to a high prevalence of cardiac failure. Less PCI was performed in the octogenarian group compared with the younger patients, although mortality benefit of PCI was maintained in haemodynamically stable octogenarians.
KeywordsST-elevation myocardial infarction Elderly Reperfusion
The national ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Database is financially supported by a grant from the Ministry of Social Affairs of the Government of Belgium.
Conflict of interest
- 4.Alexander KP, Newby K, Armstrong PW et al (2007) Acute coronary care in the elderly, Part II ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 115:2570–2589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M et al (2011) Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies. Eur Heart J 32:51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Grines C (2005) SENIOR PAMI: a prospective randomised trial of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Presented at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 11.Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A et al (2000) TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation 102:2031–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Schwarz AK, Zahn R, Hochadel M et al (2011) Age-related differences in antithrombotic therapy, success rate and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the quality control registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Clin Res Cardiol 100:773–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fox CS, Muntner P, Chen AY et al (2010) Use of evidence-based therapies in short-term outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry. Circulation 121:357–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:2909–2945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr et al (2009) 2009 Focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report from the American college of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(23):2205–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Gibson CM, Pride YB, Frederick PD et al (2008) Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the national registry of myocardial infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 156:1035–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar