Heart rate differentiates urgency and emergency in hypertensive crisis
To study the clinical significance of presenting blood pressure parameters and heart rate in patients with hypertensive crisis.
In patients admitted with hypertensive crisis between January 2011 and May 2011, demography, mode of presentation, co-morbidities, blood pressure readings, and heart rate at presentation were documented. Further clustering of hypertensive crisis into emergency or urgency was based on the presence or absence of target organ involvement. The relationship between blood pressure parameters, heart rate, and other variables was analyzed.
189 patients in sinus rhythm were enrolled in this pilot study. The rate of hypertensive urgency was 56 %, whereas the rate of hypertensive emergency was 44 %, respectively. Subjects with hypertensive emergency had a higher mean heart rate (93 ± 22.7 bpm) than those with urgency (81 ± 11.5 bpm) (P = 0.015). Women had higher heart rates (92 ± 18.5 bpm) than men (86 ± 17.6 bpm) (P = 0.014). Heart rates below 100 bpm had a specificity of 94 %, classifying patients as hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia had a powerful statistical association with hypertensive left ventricular failure (P < 0.0001). Other hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean blood pressure relates neither to urgency nor to emergency. Diabetic patients with HBA1c levels of more than 53 mmol/mol had a heart rate of more than 100 bpm (P = 0.015) during hypertensive crisis.
Normal heart rate is characteristic of hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia in this setting is an ominous sign and denotes hypertensive complications in particular left ventricular failure. Among diabetics, elevated heart rate is associated with poor glycemic control.
KeywordsHypertensive crisis Heart rate Tachycardia Hypertensive emergency Hypertensive urgency Left ventricular failure Glycated hemoglobin
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interests.
- 1.Dzau V, Braunwald E, Participants (1991) Resolved and unresolved issues in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease: a workshop consensus statement. Am Heart J 121:1244–1262Google Scholar
- 5.Custodis F, Gertz K, Balkaya M, Prinz V, Mathar I, Stamm C, Kronenberg G, Kazakov A, Freichel M, Böhm M, Endres M, Laufs U (2011) Heart rate contributes to the vascular effects of chronic mental stress: effects on endothelial function and ischemic brain injury in mice. Stroke 42(6):1742–1749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Palatini P, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Bulpitt CJ, Clement DL, Leeuw PW, Jaaskivi M, Leonetti G, Nachev C, O’Brien ET, Parati G, Rodicio JL, Roman E, Sarti C, Tuomilehto J, Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst- Eur) Trial Investigators (2002) Predictive value of clinic and ambulatory heart rate for mortality in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med 162:2313–2321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Robertson M, Ferrari R (2008) Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 372:817–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L, On behalf of the SHIFT Investigators (2010) Beneficial effects of ivabradine on outcomes in chronic heart failure. The systolic heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine trial (SHIFT). Lancet 376:875–885Google Scholar
- 19.Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Campbell WB, Haines DE, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Miller DD, Shaeffer CW Jr, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF (2003) ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias—executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society. Eur Heart J 24:1857–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Roccella EJ, The National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee (2003) Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 42:1206–1252Google Scholar
- 21.Rosei EA, Salvetti M, Farsang C (2011) Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Sci Newslett: Update Hypertens Manage 12(28):55–56Google Scholar
- 23.Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes—2009. Diabetes Care 32:S6–S12Google Scholar
- 24.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) (2002) Third Report of the National cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation 106:3143–3421Google Scholar
- 25.National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39(2 Suppl 1):S1–S266Google Scholar
- 26.Okin PM, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Hille DA, Dahlöf B, Edelman JM, Devereux RB (2010) All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in relation to changing heart rate during treatment of hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur Heart J 31:2271–2279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Fácila L, Morillas P, Quiles J, Soria F, Cordero A, Mazón P, Anguita M, Martín-Luengo C, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Bertomeu V, On behalf of the “The Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome” (PAMISCA) Investigators (2013) Prognostic significance of heart rate in hospitalized patients presenting with myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 4(1):15–19Google Scholar
- 30.Bruijns S, Guly H, Bouamra O, Lecky F, Wallis L (2012) Heart rate and systolic blood pressure in patients with minor to moderate, non-haemorrhagic injury versus normal controls. Emerg Med JGoogle Scholar
- 32.Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L, Danchin N, Gitt AK, Boersma E, Fioretti PM, Simoons ML, Battler A (2002) A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Eur Heart J 23:1190–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Alhabib KF, Sulaiman K, Al-Motarreb A, Almahmeed W, Asaad N, Amin H, Hersi A, Al-Saif S, AlNemer K, Al-Lawati J, Al-Sagheer NQ, AlBustani N, Al Suwaidi J, Gulf RACE-2 Investigators. Collaborators (2012) Baseline characteristics, management practices, and long-term outcomes of Middle Eastern patients in the second Gulf registry of acute coronary events (Gulf RACE-2). Ann Saudi Med 32(2):9–18Google Scholar