Non-invasive quantification of right ventricular systolic function by echocardiography: a new semi-automated approach
- 327 Downloads
Right ventricular (RV) function determines long-term outcome in many cardiopulmonary diseases. However, the assessment of RV function is time-consuming and surrogate parameters derived from two-dimensional (2D) or Doppler echocardiography show poor consistency.
Forty consecutive patients were examined within 30 min after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with comprehensive echocardiography, including strain imaging and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. A new parameter, the RV automated systolic index (RV-ASI), was obtained from the apical four-chamber view using semi-automated border detection.
RV-ASI could be assessed by 2D echocardiography in 38 of 40 patients. RV ejection fraction assessed by MRI was 48 ± 9 %, while RV-ASI was 52 ± 11 % (r = 0.74, SEE = 6 %, p < 0.0001). Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were 7.5 and 8.9 %, respectively. An RV-ASI cut-off value of 52 % in this cohort was able to differentiate between normal and impaired RV function (AUC 0.92, sensitivity 87 %, specificity 93 %).
In this study, the RV-ASI showed to be an easy, rapid to assess and reliable tool for quantification of right ventricular function. Furthermore, this index can complement the assessment of right ventricular mechanics by 2D strain imaging for efficient and comprehensive non-invasive evaluation of right ventricular function.
KeywordsRight ventricular function Real-time three dimensional echocardiography Strain imaging Magnetic resonance imaging
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Grünig E, Weissmann S, Ehlken N, Fijalkowska A, Fischer C, Fourme T, Galié N, Ghofrani A, Harrison RE, Huez S, Humbert M, Janssen B, Kober J, Koehler R, Machado RD, Mereles D, Naeije R, Olschewski H, Provencher S, Reichenberger F, Retailleau K, Rocchi G, Simonneau G, Torbicki A, Trembath R, Seeger W (2009) Stress Doppler echocardiography in relatives of patients with idiopathic and familial pulmonary arterial hypertension: results of a multicenter European analysis of pulmonary artery pressure response to exercise and hypoxia. Circulation 119:1747–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Mereles D, Grünig E (2006) A stepwise and practical approach to Optimizing echocardiography in pulmonary hypertension. Adv Pulmonary Hypertens 5:30–33. http://www.phaonlineuniv.org/Journal/Vol5No3Autumn06/OptimizingEchocardiography. Accessed 23 March 2012Google Scholar
- 5.Voelkel NF, Quaife RA, Leinwand LA, Barst RJ, McGoon MD, Meldrum DR, Dupuis J, Long CS, Rubin LJ, Smart FW, Suzuki YJ, Gladwin M, Denholm EM, Gail DB (2006) Right ventricular function and failure: report of a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure. Circulation 114:1883–1891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American society of echocardiography endorsed by the european association of echocardiography, a registered branch of the european society of cardiology, and the canadian society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Borges AC, Knebel F, Eddicks S, Panda A, Schattke S, Witt C, Baumann G (2006) Right ventricular function assessed by two-dimensional strain and tissue Doppler echocardiography in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and effect of vasodilator therapy. Am J Cardiol 98:530–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tamborini G, Brusoni D, Torres Molina JE, Galli CA, Maltagliati A, Muratori M, Susini F, Colombo C, Maffessanti F, Pepi M (2008) Feasibility of a new generation three-dimensional echocardiography for right ventricular volumetric and functional measurements. Am J Cardiol 102:499–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sato T, Tsujino I, Ohira H, Oyama-Manabe N, Yamada A, Ito YM, Goto C, Watanabe T, Sakaue S, Nishimura M (2012) Validation study on the accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of right ventricular systolic function in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:280–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Leong DP, Grover S, Molaee P, Chakrabarty A, Shirazi M, Cheng YH, Penhall A, Perry R, Greville H, Joseph MX, Selvanayagam JB (2012) Nonvolumetric echocardiographic indices of right ventricular systolic function: validation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and relationship with functional capacity. Echocardiography 29:455–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Raymond RJ, Hinderliter AL, Willis PW, Ralph D, Caldwell EJ, Williams W, Ettinger NA, Hill NS, Summer WR, de Boisblanc B, Schwartz T, Koch G, Clayton LM, Jöbsis MM, Crow JW, Long W (2002) Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1214–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L, Bernheim A, Kessel-Schaefer A, Bremerich J, Zellweger M, Buser P, Handke M (2010) Dynamic assessment of right ventricular volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:116–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.van der Zwaan HB, Geleijnse ML, McGhie JS, Boersma E, Helbing WA, Meijboom FJ, Roos-Hesselink JW (2011) Right ventricular quantification in clinical practice: two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:656–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar