Clinical Research in Cardiology

, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 61–67

ACE Inhibition in secondary prevention: are the results controversial?



Results from the HOPE and EUROPA trials showed that ACE inhibitors lower cardiovascular mortality of patients with atherosclerosis and preserved left ventricular function. However, despite apparently adequate study design, the recently conducted PEACE trial detected no benefit of an additional ACE inhibitor treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and no heart failure with respect to cardiovascular risk reduction. One of the main reasons for this discrepancy might be the lower cardiovascular baseline risk of the PEACE study population, which was more intensively treated with lipid lowering drugs and myocardial revascularization prior to enrollment than patients in HOPE or EUROPA. Another reason for the negative results of PEACE might be substance-specific differences between individual ACE inhibitors (trandolapril in PEACE, ramipril in HOPE, and perindopril in EUROPA) in their clinical efficacy to reduce cardiovascular end-points. The PEACE trial did not achieve the originally projected sample size and the addition of a soft end-point of revascularization has not been helpful. While the results from the PEACE trial suggest that low-risk patients with coronary artery disease and with preserved left ventricular function who receive intensive standard therapy including lipid lowering and coronary revascularization may not benefit from additional ACE inhibition therapy, this conclusion should be made with caution. A number of reasons, other than drug treatment efficacy, may explain the neutral results in the PEACE trial. Further studies are needed to try to resolve this issue. In the meantime, the overwhelming data still support the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease with preserved left ventricular function.

Key words

ACE inhibitors coronary artery disease secondary prevention HOPE EUROPA PEACE 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group (1987) Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med 316:1429–1435Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The SOLVD Investigators (1991) Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 325:293– 302Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The SOLVD Investigators (1992) Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med 327:685–691Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators (1993) Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 342: 821–828Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, and the OPTIMAAL Steering Committee, for the OPTIMAAL Study Group (2002) Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Lancet 360:752–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators (2000) Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 342:145–153Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fox KM. The EURopean trial on reduction of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease Investigators (2003) Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre rial (the EUROPA study). Lancet 362:782–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, Ferguson B, Fihn SD, Fraker TD, Gardin JM, O’Rourke RA, Pasternak RC, Williams SV (2003) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina – summary article. Circulation 107:149–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The PEACE Trial Investigators (2004) Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 351:2058–2068Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mancini GB, Henry GC, Macaya C et al (1996) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 94:258–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson RN, Smith BL (2003) Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 52:1–86Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yusuf S (2005) ACE inhibition in stable coronary artery disease [corresponence]. N Engl J Med 352:937– 939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilote L, Abrahamowicz M, Rodrigues E, Eisenberg MJ, Rahme E (2004) Mortality rates in elderly patients who take different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction: a class effect? Ann Intern Med 141:102–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown NJ, Vaughan DE (1998) Angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors. Circulation 97:1411–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lonn EM, Yusuf S, Dzavik V, Doris I, Yi Q, Smith S, Moore-Cox A, Bosch J, Riley WA, Teo KK, for the SECURE Investigators (2001) Effects of ramipril and vitamin E on atherosclerosis. The Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound changes in patients treated with Ramipril and vitamin E (SECURE). Circulation 103:919–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marre M, Lievre M, Chatellier G, Mann JFE, Passa P, Ménard J, on behalf of the DIABHYCAR Study Investigators (2004) Effects of low dose ramipril on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and raised excretion of urinary albumin: randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (the DIABHYCAR study). BMJ 328:495–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Carlsen JE, Bagger H, Eliasen P, Lyngborg K, Videbaek J, Cole DS, Auclert L, Pauly NC (1995) A clinical trial of the angiotensin- converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 333:1670– 1676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The ONTARGET/TRANSCEND Investigators (2004) Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of 2 large, simple, randomized trials evaluating telmisartan, ramipril, and their combination in high-risk patients: the ongoing telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril global endpoint trial/telmisartan randomized assessment study in ACE intolerant subjects with cardiovascular disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND) trials. Am Heart J 148:52–61 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik B. Friedrich
    • 1
  • Koon K. Teo
    • 2
  • Michael Böhm
    • 3
  1. 1.Klinik für Innere Medizin IIIUniversitätsklinikum des SaarlandesHomburg/SaarGermany
  2. 2.Population Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada L8N 3Z5
  3. 3.Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie Internistische IntensivmedizinUniversitätsklinikum des SaarlandesHomburg/SaarGermany

Personalised recommendations