Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 372–378 | Cite as

Outdoor motivation moderates the effects of accessibility on mobility in old age

Originalien

Abstract

Background

Mobility plays a major role in healthy aging and social participation. This study explored whether accessibility problems in the housing environment are negatively associated with mobility in old age and whether this association is moderated by differences in an individual's preference for spending time outside the home (outdoor motivation).

Material and methods

This article reports the results of a research project on mobility in old age. The project included a survey study of 120 community-dwelling older adults between 59 and 92 years of age (mean = 71.7 years, SD = 7.3 years) living in the metropolitan region of Nuremberg, Germany. Objective assessments were conducted in the participants' housing environment to evaluate the magnitude of accessibility problems.

Results

Accessibility problems were negatively associated with mobility. Interaction analyses suggested a buffering effect of outdoor motivation on this association, i.e. participants who reported a preference for spending time outside the home had a higher mobility in the face of accessibility problems as compared with those who preferred staying at home.

Conclusion

Outdoor motivation may have protective effects for older adults when accessibility problems challenge mobility. These findings contribute to improving the understanding of how and under what circumstances older adults stay mobile and active in everyday life. Considering interindividual differences in outdoor motivation may binterventions and public health programs that are aimed at enhancing mobility and social participation in old age.

Keywords

Housing Enabler Motivation Ecology of aging Mobility limitations Architectural barriers 

Außerhäusliche Motivation moderiert die Auswirkungen von Zugänglichkeitsproblemen auf die Mobilität im hohen Alter

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Mobilität ist verbunden mit der Aufrechterhaltung von Gesundheit und sozialer Teilhabe im Alter. In dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, ob Zugänglichkeitsprobleme in der häuslichen Umgebung mit einer geringeren Mobilität im Alter verbunden sind. Weiterhin wird untersucht, inwiefern dieser Zusammenhang durch interindividuelle Unterschiede außerhäuslicher mobilitätsbezogener Motivation (outdoor motivation) moderiert wird.

Methodik

In diesem Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts zur Mobilität im Alter vorgestellt. Das Projekt umfasste eine postalische Fragebogenstudie mit 120 älteren Personen im Alter von 59 bis 92 Jahren (M = 71,7; SD = 7,3) in der Metropolregion Nürnberg. Weiterhin wurden objektive Erhebungen in der häuslichen Umgebung der Studienteilnehmer durchgeführt, um die Ausprägung individueller Zugänglichkeitsprobleme zu ermitteln.

Ergebnisse

Zugänglichkeitsprobleme waren mit einer geringeren Mobilität der Studienteilnehmer verbunden. Dieser Zusammenhang wurde durch die außerhäusliche mobilitätsbezogene Motivation moderiert. Personen mit einer Präferenz für außerhäusliche Mobilität berichteten unter der Bedingung von Zugänglichkeitsproblemen eine höhere Mobilität als Personen die innerhäuslich motiviert waren.

Diskussion

Außerhäusliche Motivation kann einen protektiven Effekt für die Aufrechterhaltung von Mobilität haben, wenn diese durch Zugänglichkeitsprobleme eingeschränkt ist. Die Befunde können zu einem besseren Verständnis der Bedingungen aktiven Alterns beitragen und haben Implikationen für Interventionen und Gesundheitsprogramme mit dem Ziel, Mobilität und soziale Teilhabe im Alter zu unterstützen.

Schlüsselwörter

Housing Enabler Motivation Ökologie des Alterns Mobilitätseinschränkungen Räumliche Barrieren 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF grant number 16SV5703).

We thank Jane Zagorski and Franziska Damm for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

Stefan T. Kamin, Anja Beyer and Frieder R. Lang state that there are no conflicts of interest.

All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B et al. (2004) Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing 33:287–292Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fänge A, Iwarsson S (2003) Accessibility and usability in housing: construct validity and implications for research and practice. Disabil Rehabil 25:1316–1325Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heyl V, Wahl H-W, Mollenkopf H (2005) Visual capacity, out-of-home activities and emotional well-being in old age: basic relations and contextual variation. Soc Indic Res 74:159–189Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iwarsson S, Slaug B (2010) The Housing Enabler. An instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Enabling Development, LundGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lang FR, Rohr MK, Williger B (2011) Modeling success in life-span psychology: the principles of selection, optimization, and compensation. In: Fingerman KL, Berg CA, Smith J, Antonucci TC (eds) Handbook of life-span development. Springer, New York, pp 57–85Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lawton MP (1998) Environment and aging: theory revisited. In: Scheidt RJ, Windley PG (eds) Environment and aging theory. A focus on housing. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Netuveli G, Wiggins RD, Hilden Z et al (2006) Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60:357–363Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Kaspar R (2005) Psychological aspects of outdoor mobility in later life. In: Mollenkopf H, Marcellini F, Ruoppila I et al (eds) Enhancing mobility in later life. IOS Press, Amsterdam, S 173–194Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Schilling O et al. (2007) Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. Gerontologist 47:96–107Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peel C, Baker PS, Roth DL et al (2005) Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB study of aging life-space assessment. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 85:1008–1019Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenberg DE, Huang DL, Simonovich SD, Belza B (2013) Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. Gerontologist 53:268–279Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosso AL, Auchincloss AH, Michael YL (2011) The urban built environment and mobility in older adults: a comprehensive review. J Aging Res 2011:1–10Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sijtsma K (2009) On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika 74:107–120Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stalvey BT, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Ball K (1999) The life space questionnaire: a measure of the extent of mobility of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 18:460–478Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toosizadeh N, Bunting M, Howe C, Mohler J, Sprinkle J, Najafi B (2014) Motorized mobility scooters: the use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults–a mini-review. Gerontology 60:357–365Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wahl H-W, Iwarsson S, Oswald F (2012) Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. Gerontologist 52:306–316Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wahl H-W, Lang FR (2006) Psychological aging: a contextual view. In: Conn PM (Hrsg) Handbook of models for human aging. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, S 881–895Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH (2010) Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist 50:443–450Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychogerontologyFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NürnbergNurembergGermany

Personalised recommendations