Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 128–134 | Cite as

Predicting fatigue in older breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

A head-to-head comparison of established assessments
  • Michael Dieter Denkinger
  • Melanie Hasch
  • Anna Gerstmayer
  • Rolf Kreienberg
  • Thorsten Nikolaus
  • Katharina Hancke
Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt

Abstract

Objectives

Because of substantial toxicities in older adults, chemotherapy is often omitted while the frequency of radiotherapy changes only minimally. In this study, we addressed the value of different assessments for predicting fatigue after radiotherapy in older breast cancer patients.

Patients and methods

We included 74 women with primary breast cancer over the age of 65 years treated with radiotherapy (26 % with additional chemotherapy). Assessments were conducted before adjuvant treatment and after radiotherapy. The assessments included the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), the EORTC Quality of Life assessment (EORTC-QLQ-C30), a cancer-specific comprehensive geriatric assessment (cancer-specific CGA), and the Fried frailty score. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess correlations with the FACIT-fatigue scale.

Results

Patients were on average 71 years old (range, 65–86 years). Most tumors (n=62) were classified as intermediate risk according to the St. Gallen consensus. The cancer-specific CGA was best associated with fatigue (p < 0.001, β estimate = 1.75), followed by the Fried frailty score (for the score of 1 versus reference of 2 and higher: p = 0.035, β estimate = − 5.74). There were no significant ceiling effects but there were substantial floor effects for the VES-13, KPS, and frailty score.

Conclusion

The cancer-specific CGA and the Fried frailty score (driven mainly by the item “exhaustion”) outperformed the other indices in predicting fatigue in a group of rather well-functioning older women with primary breast cancer.

Keywords

Geriatric oncology Geriatric assessment Breast cancer Fatigue Radiotherapy 

Kann man die Entwicklung einer Fatigue bei älteren Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom und Radiotherapie vorhersagen?

Ein direkter Vergleich etablierter Bewertungsverfahren

Zusammenfassung

Ziele

Ältere Krebspatienten bekommen seltener eine Chemotherapie, die Häufigkeit der Radiotherapie ändert sich dagegen kaum. In dieser Studie haben wir die Wertigkeit verschiedener Assessmentinstrumente bezüglich ihrer Vorhersagekapazität für Fatigue in einer Gruppe älterer Brustkrebspatientinnen untersucht.

Patienten und Methoden

Wir schlossen 74 Frauen mit primärem Mammakarzinom und älter als 65 Jahre ein, die mit Radiotherapie behandelt wurden. 26 % erhielten zusätzlich eine adjuvante Chemotherapie. Die Assessments wurden vor Beginn der adjuvanten Behandlung und nach der Radiotherapie durchgeführt. Die untersuchten Assessments waren der Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES), der Karnofsky Status (KPS), das EORTC Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC-QLQ-C30), ein Tumor-spezifisches Geriatrisches Assessment (Cancer-specific CGA nach A. Hurria) und der Frailty score (nach L. Fried).

Ergebnisse

Die Patientinnen waren im Mittel 71 Jahre alt (65–86 Jahre). Das Tumorstadium wurde zum größten Teil (n = 62) als intermediäres Risiko nach dem St. Gallen Konsensus eingestuft. Der Tumor-spezifische CGA war am besten mit Fatigue assoziiert (p< 0,001, β-Schätzer = 1,75), gefolgt von dem Fried Frailty Score (Für den Wert 1 gegenüber der Referenz von 2 und mehr Punkten: p = 0,035, β-Schätzer = − 5,74). Während keine signifikanten Deckeleffekte festgestellt werden konnten, gab es deutliche Bodeneffekte beim VES-13, dem KPS und dem Frailty Score.

Schlussfolgerung

In unserer Studie bei körperlich eher fitten, älteren Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom und nachfolgender Radiotherapie waren das Tumor-spezifische CGA nach A. Hurria und der Frailty Score nach L. Fried (vor allem bedingt durch den Punkt „Erschöpfung“) den anderen Indizes hinsichtlich ihrer Vorhersagekapazität für Fatigue überlegen.

Schlüsselwörter

Geriatrische Onkologie Geriatrisches Assessment Brustkrebs Fatigue Radiotherapie 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Michael Denkinger was supported by a geriatric research grant from the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany, which did not have any influence on the content. The authors would like to thank all patients that agreed to participate in this project with time-consuming interviews.

Prof. Thorsten Nikolaus, Chair for Geriatric Medicine at Ulm University and Director of the AGAPLESION Bethesda Hospital Ulm, passed away 26 September 2013. He will be warmly remembered and dearly missed by all.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

M.D. Denkinger, M. Hasch, A. Gerstmayer, R. Kreienberg, T. Nikolaus, and K. Hancke state that there are no conflicts of interest.

There are no financial disclosures to be declared. The foundation did not have any role in the analysis of data and decision to publish.

The study protocol was approved by the University of Ulm Medical School Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balducci L, Beghe C. (2000) The application of the principles of geriatrics to the management of the older person with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35(3):147–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, Chaves P et al (2006) Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women’s health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61(3):262–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cella D, Yount S, Sorensen M, Chartash E, Sengupta N, Grober J. (2005) Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 32(5):811–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crivellari D, Aapro M, Leonard R, von Minckwitz G, Brain E, Goldhirsch A et al (2007) Breast cancer in the elderly. J Clin Oncol 25(14):1882–1890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du XL, Osborne C, Goodwin JS (2002) Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for toxicity from chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(24):4636–4642CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fayers P, Bottomley A (2002) EORTC quality of life group and of the quality of life unit. Quality of life research within the EORTC–the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 38:125–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S, Provencal J, Weber B, Jacquin JP et al (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 16(11):1795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, Furberg CD, Gardin JM, Kronmal RA et al (1991) The cardiovascular health study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol 1(3):263–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ (2009) Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol 20(8):1319CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrmann E, Gerss J, Bierer S, Köpke T, Bolenz C, Hertle L et al (2009) Pre-treatment global quality of health predicts progression free survival in metastatic kidney cancer patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135(1):61–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurria A, Cirrincione CT, Muss HB, Kornblith AB, Barry W, Artz AS et al (2011) Implementing a geriatric assessment in cooperative group clinical cancer trials: CALGB 360401. J Clin Oncol 29(10):1290–1296CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, Zuckerman EL, Cohen HJ, Muss H et al (2005) Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment. Cancer 104(9):1998–2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hurria A, Lichtman SM, Gardes J, Li D, Limaye S, Patil S et al (2007) Identifying vulnerable older adults with cancer: integrating geriatric assessment into oncology practice. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(10):1604–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3457–3465CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hwang SS, Scott CB, Chang VT, Cogswell J, Srinivas S, Kasimis B (2004) Prediction of survival for advanced cancer patients by recursive partitioning analysis: role of Karnofsky performance status, quality of life, and symptom distress. Cancer Invest 22(5):678–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jemal A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2007) Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women. Breast Cancer Res 9(3):R28CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. MacLeod CM (ed): Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press. pp 191–205Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kellen E, Bulens P, Deckx L, Schouten H, Van Dijk M, Verdonck I et al (2010) Identifying an accurate pre-screening tool in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 75(3):243–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kramer J., Curran D, Piccart M, de Haes JCJ., Bruning P, Klijn J et al (2000) Identification and interpretation of clinical and quality of life prognostic factors for survival and response to treatment in first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 36(12):1498–1506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maione P, Perrone F, Gallo C, Manzione L, Piantedosi F, Barbera S et al (2005) Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter Italian lung cancer in the elderly study. J Clin Oncol 23(28):6865–6872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohile SG, Bylow K, Dale W, Dignam J, Martin K, Petrylak DP et al (2007) A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey-13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation. Cancer 109(4):802–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Molina-Garrido MJ, Guillen-Ponce C (2011) Comparison of two frailty screening tools in older women with early breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79(1):51–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montgomery GH, Kangas M, David D, Hallquist MN, Green S, Bovbjerg DH et al (2009) Fatigue during breast cancer radiotherapy: an initial randomized study of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis. Health Psychol 28(3):317–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moxley G (2010) Rheumatic disorders and functional disability with aromatase inhibitor therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 10(2):144–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    PACE participants, Audisio RA, Pope D, Ramesh H, Adams R, van Leeuwen B et al (2008) Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help: a SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 65(2):156–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pal SK, Katheria V, Hurria A (2010) Evaluating the older patient with cancer: understanding frailty and the geriatric assessment. CA Cancer J Clin 60(2):120–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pallis AG, Fortpied C, Wedding U, Van Nes MC, Penninckx B, Ring A et al (2010) EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient. Eur J Cancer 46:1502–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S (2005) Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 14(10):2197–2214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reidunsdatter RJ, Rannestad T, Frengen J, Frykholm G, Lundgren S (2011) Early effects of contemporary breast radiation on health-related quality of life—predictors of radiotherapy-related fatigue. Acta Oncol 50(8):1175–1182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Repetto L, Fratino L, Audisio RA, Venturino A, Gianni W, Vercelli M et al (2002) Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol 20(2):494–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rietman JS, Dijkstra PU, Debreczeni R, Geertzen JHB, Robinson DPH, De Vries J (2004) Impairments, disabilities and health related quality of life after treatment for breast cancer: a follow-up study 2.7 years after surgery. Disabil Rehabil 26(2):78–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ et al (2001) The vulnerable elders survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(12):1691–1699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2(3):187–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schmidt ME, Chang-Claude J, Vrieling A, Heinz J, Flesch-Janys D, Steindorf K (2012) Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: temporal courses and long-term pattern. J Cancer Surviv 6(1):11–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Siddiqui F, Pajak TF, Watkins-Bruner D, Konski AA, Coyne JC, Gwede CK et al (2008) Pretreatment quality of life predicts for locoregional control in head and neck cancer patients: a radiation therapy oncology group analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(2):353–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sjövall K, Strömbeck G, Löfgren A, Bendahl P-O, Gunnars B (2010) Adjuvant radiotherapy of women with breast cancer—information, support and side-effects. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(2):147–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Terret C, Albrand G, Moncenix G, Droz JP (2011) Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) or Physical Performance Test (PPT)? That is the question. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 77(2):142–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thalmann B, Spiegel R, Staehelin HB, Brubacher D, Ermini-Fünfschilling D, Blaesi S et al (2002) Dementia screening in general practice: optimised scoring for the clock drawing test. Brain Aging 2(2):36–43Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G (2009) A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer 115(19):4547–4553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Verger E, Salamero M, Conill C (1992) Can Karnofsky performance status be transformed to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scoring scale and vice versa? Eur J Cancer 28A(8–9):1328–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA (1999) The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 52(7):643–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Webster K, Cella D, Yost K (2003) The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:79CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Dieter Denkinger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Melanie Hasch
    • 3
  • Anna Gerstmayer
    • 3
  • Rolf Kreienberg
    • 3
  • Thorsten Nikolaus
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katharina Hancke
    • 3
  1. 1.AGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik UlmGeriatrie der Universität UlmUlmDeutschland
  2. 2.Geriatrisches Zentrum Ulm/Alb-DonauUlmDeutschland
  3. 3.Universitätsfrauenklinik UlmUlmDeutschland

Personalised recommendations