Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 283–290 | Cite as

Relationship of urinary incontinence and late-life disability: Implications for clinical work and research in geriatrics

  • Laura Coll-Planas
  • Michael D. Denkinger
  • Thorsten Nikolaus
REVIEW

Abstract

The role of urinary incontinence (UI) in the disablement process model has been mainly defined according to its impact on quality of life, global wellbeing, life satisfaction, institutionalization and death, which are global outcomes of disability. Recent research focused on the “active” role of UI in the main pathway of the disablement process model, i.e. actively involved in the causes of disability. The aim of this paper is to review the complex current scientific evidence on this second active role and to define the implications for further research and for clinical work in geriatrics. The relationship between UI and disability can be classified in the following five pathways:

1) UI as risk factor for functional decline and reduced physical activity through the increased risk of falls and fractures.

2) Functional decline and reduced physical activity as risk factors for the onset of UI.

3) Shared risk factors for UI and functional decline: white matter changes, stroke and other neurological conditions.

4) UI in a unifying conceptual framework: the multifactorial etiology of geriatric syndromes.

5) UI as an indicator of frailty.

Understanding these pathways could improve insight into clinical, pharmacological, environmental, behavioral and rehabilitative mechanisms to define measures for the prevention and treatment of the geriatric syndromes cascade. However, research on effective interventions on these overlapping areas is still quite rare. Additionally there is an urgent need to use the standardized terminology of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), established by the International Continence Society (ICS) to find a common language in disability research. To conclude, the relationship of UI and disability is evident in different pathways. Understanding these associations can have substantial implications for both clinical work and research in this area.

Key words

urinary incontinence late-life disability functional decline disablement process model 

Der Zusammenhang von Harninkontinenz und Behinderung im Alter: Bedeutung für die klinische Arbeit und geriatrische Forschung

Zusammenfassung

Die Rolle der Harninkontinenz wurde im Modell des „Disablement Process“ bislang hauptsächlich anhand globaler Endpunkte von Behinderung, wie Lebensqualität, allgemeinem Wohlbefinden, Lebenszufriedenheit, Institutionalisierung und Tod untersucht. Aktuelle Forschungsprojekte behandeln stattdessen die aktive Rolle der Harninkontinenz im Hauptpfad des „Disablement Process-Modells“, womit ihr eine direkte Rolle bei der Entstehung von funktioneller Einschränkung und Behinderung zugesprochen wird. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, einen Überblick über die komplexen Zusammenhänge dieser zweiten, „aktiven“ Rolle der Harninkontinenz zu geben und mögliche Auswirkungen für Forschung und klinisch geriatrische Arbeit aufzuzeigen. Der Zusammenhang zwischen Harninkontinenz und Beeinträchtigung kann anhand der folgenden 5 Pfade dargestellt werden:

1) Harninkontinenz als Risikofaktor für funktionellen Abbau und reduzierte körperliche Aktivität durch eine Erhöhung des Sturz- und Frakturrisikos.

2) Funktionsminderung im Alltag und reduzierte körperliche Aktivität als Risikofaktoren für den Beginn einer Harninkontinenz.

3) Gemeinsame Risikofaktoren für das Entstehen von Harninkontinenz und Funktionsminderung im Alltag: Marklagerveränderungen, Schlaganfall und andere neurologische Erkrankungen.

4) Harninkontinenz in einem vereinheitlichenden Rahmenkonzept: die multifaktorielle Ätiologie geriatrischer Syndrome.

5) Harninkontinenz als Gebrechlichkeits- Indikator.

Die Anwendung dieser Pfade könnte zu einem besseren Verständnis klinischer, pharmakologischer, rehabilitativer und verhaltenstherapeutischer Zusammenhänge führen, um Maßnahmen zur Prävention und Behandlung geriatrischer Syndrome zu definieren. Die Zahl von Forschungsprojekten zur weiteren Charakterisierung dieser sich überschneidenden Gebiete ist jedoch weiterhin sehr gering. Zudem besteht dringender Bedarf, die neue und standardisierte Terminologie von Symptomen des unteren Harntrakts (LUTS) der International Continence Society (ICS) zu verwenden, um in zukünftigen Forschungsprojekten mit dem Thema Behinderung im Alter eine gemeinsame Sprache zu finden.

Zusammenfassend kommt die Beziehung von Behinderung und Inkontinenz in verschiedenen Pfaden deutlich zum Ausdruck. Das Verständnis dieser Zusammenhänge kann bedeutende Auswirkungen für klinische Arbeit und geriatrische Forschung haben.

Schlüsselwörter

Harninkontinenz Behinderung im Alter funktioneller Abbau Modell des „Disablement Process“ 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown JS, Vittinghoff E, Wyman JF, Stone KL, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE et al (2000) Urinary incontinence: does it increase risk for falls and fractures? Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(7):721–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown WJ, Miller YD (2001) Too wet to exercise? Leaking urine as a barrier to physical activity in women. J Sci Med Sport 4(4):373–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danforth KN, Shah AD, Townsend MK, Lifford KL, Curhan GC, Resnick NM et al (2007) Physical activity and urinary incontinence among healthy, older women. Obstet Gynecol 109(3):721–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubeau CE, Simon SE, Morris JN (2006) The effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life in older nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(9):1325–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finkelstein MM (2002) Medical conditions, medications, and urinary incontinence. Analysis of a populationbased survey. Can Fam Physician 48:96–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fultz NH, Fisher GG, Jenkins KR (2004) Does urinary incontinence affect middle-aged and older women’s time use and activity patterns? Obstet Gynecol 104(6):1327–1334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirono N, Kitagaki H, Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Mori E (2000) Impact of white matter changes on clinical manifestation of Alzheimer‘s disease: A quantitative study. Stroke 31(9):2182–2188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holroyd-Leduc JM, Mehta KM, Covinsky KE (2004) Urinary incontinence and its association with death, nursing home admission, and functional decline. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(5):712–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang AJ, Brown JS, Thom DH, Fink HA, Yaffe K (2007) Urinary incontinence in older community-dwelling women: the role of cognitive and physical function decline. Obstet Gynecol 109(4):909–916PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA (2007) Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(5):780–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson RA, Vittinghoff E, Kanaya AM, Miles TP, Resnick HE, Kritchevsky SB et al (2004) Urinary incontinence in elderly women: findings from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):301–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenkins KR, Fultz NH (2005) Functional impairment as a risk factor for urinary incontinence among older Americans. Neurourol Urodyn 24(1):51–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson TM, Bernard SL, Kincade JE, DeFriese GH (2000) Urinary incontinence and risk of death among community- living elderly people: results from the National Survey on Self- Care and Aging. J Aging Health 12(1):25–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson TM, Kincade JE, Bernard SL, Busby-Whitehead J, Hertz-Picciotto I, DeFriese GH (1998) The association of urinary incontinence with poor self-rated health. J Am Geriatr Soc 46(6):693–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW (1963) Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of Adl: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kikuchi A, Niu K, Ikeda Y, Hozawa A, Nakagawa H, Guo H et al (2007) Association between physical activity and urinary incontinence in a community- based elderly population aged 70 years and over. Eur Urol 52(3):868–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuo HK, Lipsitz LA (2004) Cerebral white matter changes and geriatric syndromes: is there a link? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(8):818–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (2004) Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61–65Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miles TP, Palmer RF, Espino DV, Mouton CP, Lichtenstein MJ, Markides KS (2001) New-onset incontinence and markers of frailty: data from the Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(1):M19–M24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Rosenberg L, Schäfer W, Resnick NM (2007) Parameters of bladder function in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal continent women without detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn 26(3):356–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Schäfer W, Resnick NM (2006) The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(3):405–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schnelle JF, MacRae PG, Ouslander JG, Simmons SF, Nitta M (1995) Functional Incidental Training, mobility performance, and incontinence care with nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 43(12):1356–1362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Bula CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC (1999) Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 48(4):445–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Ustun TB (2002) Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 24(5):281–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thom DH, Haan MN, Van den Eeden SK (1997) Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age Ageing 26(5):367–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, Doucette JT (1995) Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence. Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA 273(17):1348–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van HP, Achterberg W, Ribbe M (2007) Urinary incontinence in disabled elderly women: a randomized clinical trial on the effect of training mobility and toileting skills to achieve independent toileting. Gerontology 53(4):205–210Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Verbrugge LM, Jette AM (1994) The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 38(1):1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whitman GT (2001) Patients with urinary incontinence and falls. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(3):336–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wolf SL, Riolo L, Ouslander JG (2000) Urge incontinence and the risk of falling in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(7):847–848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health ICF. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Spinger 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Coll-Planas
    • 1
  • Michael D. Denkinger
    • 2
  • Thorsten Nikolaus
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute on Aging of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) C/.BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Bethesda Geriatrische KlinikUlmGermany
  3. 3.Bethesda Geriatrische KlinikUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations