Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 175–188 | Cite as

Sepsis und Akutes Nierenversagen

Nephroprotektion und Einsatz von Nierenersatzverfahren
ÜBERSICHT

Zusammenfassung

Das akute Nierenversagen (ANV) ist eine häufige Komplikation der Sepsis, die den Verlauf entscheidend beeinflusst. Mehr als die Hälfte der Patienten mit septischem Schock weisen ein ANV auf und noch bei 20% aller Patienten mit moderater Sepsis, ist ein solches nachzuweisen. Septische Patienten mit ANV weisen eine signifikant höhere Letalität, als diejenigen Patienten mit ANV ohne Sepsis auf (70 vs. 45%). Während jahrelang das ANV als möglicherweise unvermeidbare Komplikation des septischen Multiorganversagens hingenommen und für die Prognose als nicht wegweisend eingeschätzt wurde, zeigen verschiedene Untersuchungen der letzten Jahre einen unabhängigen, fundamentalen Einfluss des ANV auf das Überleben der Patienten. Pathophysiologisch besteht eine enge Verzahnung zwischen den Mediatoren, die im Rahmen des Sepsissyndroms eine wesentliche Rolle spielen und lokalen, intrarenalen Prozessen. Interventionen zur Nephroprotektion und Prophylaxe eines ANV beruhen im Wesentlichen auf einer Beeinflussung der renalen Hämodynamik. Hierzu gehört vor allem eine Verbesserung der allgemeinen Nierenperfusion Nach ausreichender Volumenexpansion ist gerade beim septischen Patienten der Einsatz von Vasokonstriktoren erforderlich, welche durch die Steigerung des peripheren Widerstandes, trotz der potenziellen Nebenwirkungen an der Niere zu einem positiven Effekt führen. Wesentliche Substanz in diesem Zusammenhang ist das Noradrenalin. Selektive Therapieansätze, meist hervorragend pathophysiologisch begründet, welche die lokale Imbalanz zwischen Vasodilatation und Vasokonstriktion beeinflussen sollen, waren für die bisher untersuchten Substanzen, wie z. B. ANP oder Endothelin-Rezeptorantagonisten nicht erfolgreich. Eine Modulation intrarenaler Vorgänge gelingt möglicherweise mit N-Acetylcystein, während niedrig dosiertes Dopamin zur Prophylaxe des ANV heute obsolet ist. Schleifendiuretika können bei wenigen Patienten die Diurese beeinflussen, sind potenziell nephrotoxisch und haben keinen Einfluss auf das ANV. Für die extrakorporale Therapie des septischen ANV stehen die intermittierende Dialyse und kontinuierliche Therapieverfahren wie die CVVH zur Verfügung. Es gilt der allgemeine Konsensus, dass aufgrund der Schwere der Gesamterkrankung der Patienten diese eher mit einem kontinuierlichen Therapieverfahren behandelt werden sollten. Die Therapie dieser Patienten sollte frühzeitig erfolgen, um einen zusätzlich negativen Effekt des ANV auf andere Vitalfunktionen zu vermeiden. Bei Nutzung der CVVH ist ein Austauschvolumen von mindestens 35 ml/kg/h anzustreben. Ein Einsatz kontinuierlicher Nierenersatztherapie bei fehlendem ANV zur Elimination von Mediatoren, ist zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht zu empfehlen.

Schlüsselwörter

Akutes Nierenversagen Sepsis kontinuierliche Nierenersatztherapie Nephroprotektion 

Sepsis and acute renal failure: nephroprotection and continuous renal replacement therapy

Summary

Acute renal failure (ARF) is a frequent complication in patients with sepsis leading to a significant increase of mortality in these critically ill as compared with ARF patients without sepsis (70 vs 45%). In cases with septic shock more than half of the patients develop ARF. In previous years the development of ARF in multiple organ failure seemed to be fated and was not relevant for the prognosis of the patients. However, this could be by refuted by different studies. Therefore, the protection from ARF in early phases of sepsis seems to be promising. Interventions to protect the kidney against ARF can be roughly divided into two main strategies. The first is optimizing general renal perfusion by volume load and the application of vasopressors (e. g. norepinephrine) despite theoretical side effects of this substance on kidneys in healthy individuals. The second is the selective modulation, e. g. of intrarenal imbalance between vasoconstriction and vasodilatation and of other mechanisms involved in ARF, i. e. formation of free oxygen radicals, inflammation, tubular cast formation. Unfortunately, neither the application of ANP nor endothelin receptor antagonists were successful. A promising substance is N-acetylcysteine, proven to prevent contrast media associated nephropathy in some cases. Dopamine in “renal dosage” should be avoided. Furosemide produces diuresis in a few patients, is potentially nephrotoxic and has no influence on the outcome of ARF. Septic patient with ARF can be treated by intermittent hemodialysis and continuous forms of extracorporeal treatment, e. g. CVVH. Due to the severity of the disease, continuous forms of the treatment should be favored in very critically ill. Treatment should be started early, as it is necessary to avoid further damage to other vital functions due to the loss of exocrine renal function via fluid retention. CVVH should be performed with an exchange of at least 35 ml/kg/h and should be reserved for ARF patients as there is no scientific evidence of a non-renal indication for continuous forms of treatment.

Key words

Acute renal failure sepsis continuous renal replacement therapy nephroprotection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Abassi ZA, Hoffman A, Better OS (1998) Acute renal failure complicating muscle crush injury. Semin Nephrol 18:558–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allgren RL, Marbury TC, Rahman SN, Weisberg LS, Fenves AZ, Lafayette RA, Sweet RM, Genter FC, Kurnik BR, Conger JD, Sayegh MH (1997) Anaritide in acute tubular necrosis. Auriculin Anaritide Acute Renal Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med 336:828–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angstwurm MW, Schottdorf J, Schopohl J, Gaertner R (1999) Selenium replacement in patients with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome improves clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 27:1807–1813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baue AE (1975) Multiple, progressive, or sequential systems failure. A syndrome of the 1970s. Arch Surg 110:779–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellomo R, Chapman M, Finfer S, Hickling K, Myburgh J (2000) Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group. Lancet 356:2139–2143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellomo R, Tipping P, Boyce N (1993) Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration with dialysis removes cytokines from the circulation of septic patients. Crit Care Med 21:522–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beutler B, Krochin N, Milsark IW, Luedke C, Cerami A (1986) Control of cachectin (tumor necrosis factor) synthesis: mechanisms of endotoxin resistance. Science 232:977–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billiau A, Vandekerckhove F (1991) Cytokines and their interactions with other inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. Eur J Clin Invest 21:559–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouman CS, Oudemans-Van Straaten HM, Tijssen JG, Zandstra DF, Kesecioglu J (2002) Effects of early highvolume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 30:2205–2211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brezis M, Rosen S (1995) Hypoxia of the renal medulla-its implications for disease. N Engl J Med 332:647–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bullock ML, Umen AJ, Finkelstein M, Keane WF (1985) The assessment of risk factors in 462 patients with acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 5:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bywaters EG (1990) 50 years on: the crush syndrome. BMJ 301:1412–1415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cantarovich F, Rangoonwala B, Lorenz H, Verho M, Esnault VL (2004) High-Dose Flurosemide in Acute Renal Failure Study Group. High-dose furosemide for established ARF: a prospective, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Am J Kidney Dis 44:402–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chew SL, Lins RL, Daelemans R, De Broe ME (1993) Outcome in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:101–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark WR, Müller BA, Alaka KJ, Macias WL (1994) A comparison of metabolic control by continuous and intermittent therapies in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1413–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark WR, Müller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL (1997) Extracorporeal therapy requirements for patients with acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:804–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cole L, Bellomo R, Hart G, Journois D, Davenport P, Tipping P, Ronco C (2002) A phase II randomized controlled trial of continuous hemofiltration in sepsis. Crit Care Med 18:235–240Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cole L, Bellomo R, Journois D, Davenport P, Baldwin I, Tipping P (2001) High-volume hemofiltration in human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 27:978–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Conesa EL, Valero F, Nadal JC, Fenoy FJ, Lopez B, Arregui B, Salom MG (2001) N-acetyl-L-cysteine improves renal medullary hypoperfusion in acute renal failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281:730–737Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV et al (1996) The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of criticall ill patients. JAMA 276:889–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davenport A, Will EJ, Davidson AM (1993) Improved cardiovascular stability during continuous modes of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute hepatic and renal failure. Crit Care Med 21:328–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J, Gea-Banacloche J, Keh D, Marshall JC, Parker MM, Ramsay G, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, Levy MM (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–873PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Denton MD, Chertow GM, Brady HR (1995) „Renal-dose“ dopamine for the treatment of acute renal failure: scientific rationale, experimental studies and clinical trials. Kidney Int 49:4–14Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Druml W, Lax F, Grimm G, Schneeweiss B, Lenz K, Laggner AN (1994) Acute renal failure in the elderly 1975–1990. Clin Nephrol 41:342–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elahi MM, Yann Lim M, Josph RN, Dhannapuneni RR, Spyt TJ (2004) Early hemofiltration improves survival in post-cardiotomy patients with acute renal failure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:1027–1031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Erley CM, Duda SH, Rehfuss D, Scholtes B, Bock J, Muller C, Osswald H, Risler T (1999) Prevention of radiocontrast-media-induced nephropathy in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency by hydration in combination with the adenosine antagonist theophylline. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1146–1149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Faist E, Baue AE, Dittmer H, Heberer G (1983) Multiple organ failure in polytrauma patients. J Trauma 23:775–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fry DE, Pearlstein L, Fulton RL, Polk HC (1980) Multiple system organ failure. The role of uncontrolled infection. Arch Surg 115:136–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Getting LG, Reynolds HN, Scalea T (1999) Outcome in post-traumatic acute renal failure when continuous renal replacement therapy is applied early versus late. Intensive Care Med 25:805–813Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goris RJ, te Boekhorst TP, Nuytinck JK, Gimbrere JS (1985) Multiple-organ failure. Generalized autodestructive inflammation? Arch Surg 120:1109–1115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Griffiths RD, Jones C, Palmer TE (1997) Six-month outcome of critically ill patients given glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 13:295–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hack CE, Nuijens JH, Felt Bersma RJ, Schreuder WO, Eerenberg Belmer AJ, Paardekooper J, Bronsveld W, Thijs LG (1989) Elevated plasma levels of the anaphylatoxins C3a and C4a are associated with a fatal outcome in sepsis. Am J Med 86:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Halpenny M, Rushe C, Breen P, Cunningham AJ, Boucher-Hayes D, Shorten GD (2002) The effects of fenoldopam on renal function in patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:32–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EHS, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D (1994) Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 330:1712–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heering P, Morgera S, Schmitz FJ, Schmitz G, Willers R, Schultheiss HP, Strauer BE, Grabensee B (1997) Cytokine removal and cardiovascular hemodynamics in septic patients with continuous hemofiltration. Intensive Care Med 23:288–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heidland A, Schaefer RM, Heidbreder E, Horl WH (1988) Catabolic factors in renal failure: therapeutic approaches. Nephrol Dial Transplant 3:8–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Herbert MK, Ginzel S, Muhlschlegel S, Weis KH (1999) Concomitant treatment with urodilatin (ularitide) does not improve renal function in patients with acute renal failure after major abdominal surgery—a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr 111:141–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holt S, Goodier D, Marley R, Patch D, Burroughs A, Fernando B, Harry D, Moore K (1999) Improvement in renal function in hepatorenal syndrome with N-acetylcysteine. Lancet 353:294–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Honore PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, Lee PA, Dugernier T, Pirenne B, Hanique G, Matson JR (2000) Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med 28:3581–3587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huber W, Ilgmann K, Page M, Hennig M, Schweigart U, Jeschke B, Lutilsky L, Weiss W, Salmhofer H, Classen M (2002) Effect of theophylline on contrast material-nephropathy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: controlled, randomized, double-blinded study. Radiology 223:772–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huber W, Jeschke B, Page M, Weiss W, Salmhofer H, Schweigart U, Ilgmann K, Reichenberger J, Neu B, Classen M (2001) Reduced incidence of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in ICU patients under theophylline prophylaxis: a prospective comparison to series of patients at similar risk. Intensive Care Med 27:1200–1209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ix JH, McCulloch CE, Chertow GM (2004) Theophylline for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:2747–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jaimes EA, del Castillo D, Rutherford MS, Raij L (2001) Countervailing influence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitric oxide in endotoxemia. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1204–1210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joannidis M (2003) Pharmakologische Prävention des akuten Nierenversagens. Intensivmed 40:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kierdorf H (1991) Continuous versus intermittent treatment: Clinical results in acute renal failure. Contrib Nephrol 93:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kierdorf H (1994) Das akute Nierenversagen an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert. Nieren und Hochdruck 12:614–621Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kierdorf HP (2000) Aktuelle Aspekte der extrakorporalen Nierenersatzverfahren. Internist 41:1062–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kierdorf HP, Seeliger S (1997) Acute renal failure in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Kidney Blood Press Res 20:164–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kierdorf HP, Sieberth HG (1995) Continuous treatment modalities in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:2001–2008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kolff WJ (1947) New ways of treating uremia. Churchill Livingstone, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kramer P, Wigger W, Rieger J, Matthaei D, Scheler F (1977) Arteriovenous haemofiltration: A new and simple method for treatment of overhydrated patients resistant to diuretics. Klin Wochenschr 55:1121–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kshirsagar AV, Poole C, Mottl A, Shoham D, Franceschini N, Tudor G, Agrawal M, Denu-Ciocca C, Magnus Ohman E, Finn WF (2004) N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:761–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Landry DW, Oliver JA (2001) The pathogenesis of vasodilatatory shock. N Engl J Med 345:588–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lassnigg A, Donner E, Grubhofer G, Presterl E, Druml W, Hiesmayr M (2000) Lack of renoprotective effects of dopamine and furosemide during cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:97–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lauer A, Alvis R, Avram M (1988) Hemodynamic consequences of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Am J Kidney Dis 12:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lenz K, Hortnagl H, Druml W, Reither H, Schmid R, Schneeweiss B, Laggner A, Grimm G, Gerbes AL (1991) Ornipressin in the treatment of functional renal failure in decompensated liver cirrhosis. Effects on renal hemodynamics and atrial natriuretic factor. Gastroenterology 101:1060–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Leunissen KML, Hoorntje SJ, Fiers HA, Dekkers WT, Mulder AW (1986) Acetate versus bicarbonate haemodialysis in critically ill patients. Nephron 42:145–151Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI (1996) The effect of acute renal failure on mortality—a cohort analysis. JAMA 275:1489–1494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mehta RL (1996) Modalities of dialysis in acute renal failure. Seminars in Dialysis 9:469–475Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, Chertow GM (2002) Diuretics, mortality, and nonrecovery of renal function in acute renal failure. JAMA 288:2547–2553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    de Mendonca A, Vincent JL, Suter PM, Moreno R, Dearden NM, Antonelli M, Takala J, Sprung C, Cantraine F (2000) Acute renal failure in the ICU: risk factors and outcome evaluated by the SOFA score. Intensive Care Med 26:915–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, Holleman JH, Roush TS, Kowalchuk GJ, Bersin RM, Van Moore A, Simonton CA 3rd, Rittase RA, Norton HJ, Kennedy TP (2004) Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 19; 291:2328–2334Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Metnitz PGH, Krenn CG, Steltzer H, Lang T, Ploder J, Lenz K, Le Gall J-R, Druml W (2002) Effect of Acute Renal Failure Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy on Outcome in Critically Ill Patients. Crit Care Med 30:2051–2058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Morgera S, Rocktaschel J, Haase M, Lehmann C, von Heymann C, Ziemer S, Priem F, Hocher B, Gohl H (2003) Kox WJ, Buder HW, Neumayer HH. Intermittent high permeability hemofiltration in septic patients with acute renal failure. Intensive Care Med 29:1889–1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Paganini EP, O’Hara P, Nakamoto S (1984) Slow continuous ultrafiltration in haemodialysis resistant oliguric acute renal failure patients. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 30:173–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Paganini EP, Tapolyai M, Goormastic M, Halstenberg W, Kozlowski L, Leblanc M (1996) Establishing a dialysis therapy/Patients outcome link in ICU acute dialysis for patients with ARF. Am J Kid Dis 28:81–89Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Parsons FM, Hobson SM, Blagg CR et al (1961) Optimum time for dialysis in acute reversible renal failure. Lancet I:129–134Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Redl H, Schlag G (1992) Pathophysiologie des posttraumatischen Organversagens. Intensiv und Notfall 17:54–57Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T, Davis CS, Wenzel RP (1995) The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): a prospective study. JAMA 273:117–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Redl-Wenzl EM, Armbruster C, Edelmann G, Fischl E, Kolacny M, Wechsler-Fordos A, Sporn P (1993) The effects of norepinephrine on hemodynamics and renal function in severe septic shock states. Intensive Care Med 19:151–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rinaldo JE, Rogers RM (1986) Adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 315:578–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rivers E, Ngyuen B, Havstad S et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous venovenous hemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 355:26–30Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ronco C, Brendolan A, Dentini V, Ricci Z, Wratten ML, Bellomo R (2003) Coupled plasma filtration adsorption: rationale, technical development and early clinical experience. Blod Purif 21:409–416Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Schiffl H, Lang SM, König A, Strasser T, Haider MC, Held E (1994) Biocompatible membranes in acute renal failure: prospective case controlled study. Lancet 344:570–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Schrier WR, Wang W (2004) Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med 351:159–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Shilliday IR, Quinn KJ, Allison ME (1997) Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12:2592–2596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sieberth HG, Freiberg J, Heinze J, Kostock G, Quiring FR, Schäfer E (1975) Der Einfluss nichtrenaler Organfunktionsstörungen auf die Überlebenschancen beim akuten Nierenversagen. Intensivmed 12:195–199Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sieberth HG (1993) Pathophysiology of acute kidney failure. Klin Anasthesiol Intensivther 45:3–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sieberth HG, Kierdorf HP (1999) Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasable? Kidney Int 56:S79–S83Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sigler MH (1997) Transport characteristics of the slow therapies: Implications for achieving adequacy of dialysis in acute renal failure. Adv Ren Replace Ther 4:68–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Springer TA (1990) Adhesion receptoss of the immune system. Nature 346:425–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Solomon R, Werner C, Mann D, D’Elia J, Silva P (1994) Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide to prevent acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents. N Engl J Med 331:1416–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Stevens PE, Riley B, Davies SP, Gower PE, Brown EA, Kox W (1988) Continuous arteriovenous haemodialysis in critically ill patients. Lancet II:150–152Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Storck M, Hartl WH, Zimmerer E, Inthorn D (1991) Comparison of pump-driven and spontaneous continuous haemofiltration in postoperative acute renal failure. Lancet 337:452–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tepel M, van Der GM, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W (2000) Prevention of radiographiccontrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 343:180–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Teschan PE, Baxter CR, O’Brien TF et al (1960) Prophylactic hemodialysis in the treatment of acute renal failure. Ann Intern Med 53:992–1016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Thadhani R, Pascual M, Bonventre JV (1996) Acute renal failure [see comments]. N Engl J Med 334:1448–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    de Vries PMJM, Olthof CG, Solf A et al (1991) Fluid balance during hemodialysis and hemofiltration: The effect of dialysate sodium and a variable ultrafiltration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:257–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Yurt RW, Lowry SF (1990) Role of the macrophage and endogenous mediators in multiple organ failure. In: Deitch EA (ed) Multiple organ failure. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 60–71Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wang A, Holcslaw T, Bashore TM, Freed MI, Miller D, Rudnick MR, Szerlip H, Thames MD, Davidson CJ, Shusterman N, Schwab SJ (2000) Exacerbation of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity by endothelin receptor antagonism. Kidney Int 57:1675–1680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Zilow G, Sturm JA, Rother U, Kirschfink M (1990) Complement activation and the prognostic value of C3a in patients at risk of adult respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Exp Immunol 79:151–157PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten am Klinikum BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations